You are on page 1of 3

Process Name - Bending Application

Version: Initial Release Issue Date: July 4, 2010


Auditor: Date: Score
Supplier: Location: 0%
Duns: Part Name: RED

A. Section A Title AUDIT WORKSHEET


EVIDENCE/ G
QUESTION: DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR Answer Y OBSERVATIONS
REQUIRED R

Enter required evidence NR NR ###


1 Does Supplier steel hardness check when material income description Hardness must in Spec.
Are the steel surface clean(have no dirty,grain,scratch)? Incoming material check guidance NR NR ###
2
Is the bending tool surface clean and take maintenance Verification check in Process Control Plans and Work Instructions
each shift?
NR NR ###
3
Are the bending machine clips robust? Check the movement clip which hold part position when bending. NR NR ###
4
Does the supplier put the part in right position? How to Verify the position datum of the bend machine / the lock
make sure the position, How to hold the position? mechanism/error proofing device.
NR NR ###
5
Do supplier have the oil bending machine parameter?(based One chart mark out the raw material hardness and the oil pressure a
on oil bending machine) judgment relationship
NR NR ###
6
How can supplier make sure the section change before and If the bending tool is robust and good maintained ?If the supplier
after bending is in spec have section check each batch?
NR NR ###
7

If supplier have some assistant equipment/attachment to keep the


How could supplier make sure parts is continually bended whole parts bended smoothly?( Youli stick? Snake bone)How about NR NR ###
the attachment changeover frequency and maintenance?
8
Are the operators using gloves that do not leave fibers or Identified in Operator Work Instructions
lint on the part surface?
NR NR ###
9
10 Are operators using due care while handling parts? Standardized work instructions for protecting material. NR NR ###
Is the supplier allowing sufficient time to keep the pressure Bending cycle time check, no time adjust without engineer
on the parts when bending? authorization.
NR NR ###
11
If a manual operation exists, are the proper checks robust? Error proofing, defect data. NR NR ###
12
Is the Control Plan, PFMEA, and Work Instructions updated Approved Boundary Samples
with good boundary samples?
NR NR ###
13

Are the check aid match the GD&T or have been modified according
to the real assembly status? How about the parts status without NR NR ###
locked on the check fixture? Can the check fixture grasp the
14 How about the checking aid status? deviation of the bending curve degree?
Are the check fixture maintained /calibrated regularlly?No NR NR ###
15 How about the checking aid Maintenance status? attachment lost of the check aid, no rust, right calibrated
16 How about the checking aid use status Are the check fixture used according to the WI? NR NR ###
Total

SCORE

Rating:
Green ≥ 90% / Yellow 70-89% / Red ≤ 69%

Sections Percent of compliance Results score


A. Section A Title 0% RED ###

If any of the single sections is rated RED, overal audit result is RED with 0% score

Summary score 0% RED Pts Element Scoring


Requirements not met, needs immediate correction
0 SQE to assure actions are in place prior to leaving the facility,
including CS1/2 implementation if necessary
Requirements not met, process acceptable with additional controls in
1 place

2 Requirements met, process has improvement potential

3 Requirements fully met, best practice process in place

NA Not Applicable (does not impact audit score)

Supplier Representative Name with Signature


GM Representative Name with Signature NR Not Rated (impacts audit score)

Audit form 746188963.xlsx Version 1.0


GM Confidential 3 Issue Date: July 4, 2010
Supplier Start Date: SQE
Location Rev. Date: SQE Phone:
Duns Grad Date: Manager:
Commodity Program: Group:
Prepared by: Creativity Team:

G Green - Task Completed on Time


Y Yellow - Task May Be Late
R Red - Task is Late
W White - Task Re-Timed, No Status
B Blue - Task Status is Incorrect / Not Updated
On Track (Bold Box/No Color)
STATUS
Most
Oldest Recent

AUDIT DATE TARGET ACTUAL LAST


ITEM Priority ACTION ITEM ACTION LEADER 1 2 3 4 5 6 COUNTER MEASURES
SECTION OPENED CLOSE DATE CLOSE DATE UPDATE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Action Form 746188963.xlsx Version 1.0


GM Confidential 3 Issue Date: July 4, 2010
Audit form developed by:
Name Department Region Phone Mail
Frank Luo Dept

Changes Log:
Date Version Description
7/4/2010 Initial Release Initial audit release

Change Log 746188963.xlsx Version 1.0


GM Confidential 3 Issue Date: July 4, 2010

You might also like