Rubric for the Video Interview assignment :

Needs Improvement
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) (2) Poor (1)

The student found The student found The student's

a highly relevant The student a somewhat The student's choice choice of
and suitable found a relevant relevant of interviewee was interviewee was
Finding the interviewee for interviewee for interviewee for not highly relevant to not relevant to the
interviewee the assignment. the assignment. the assignment. the assignment. assignment.

The student The student

conducted a conducted an The student
Rubrics_Assignment 1 - Vid…
comprehensive interview conducted an The student's The student's
interview covering all the interview interview did not interview did not
covering all the required covering some of adequately cover the cover the required
required discussion the required required discussion discussion points,
discussion points points with discussion points points, and the and the questions
Conducting with insightful appropriate with acceptable questions lacked were superficial
the questions and questions and questions and depth and and lacked
interview engagement. engagement. engagement. engagement. engagement.

The video quality

The video was The video was of was extremely
The video was of of good quality satisfactory The video quality poor, making it
professional with clear audio, quality with was poor, with issues difficult to
quality with video, and a acceptable audio, in audio, video, or comprehend the
excellent audio, moderately video, and a presentation style content due to
Video visual clarity, and engaging somewhat affecting the overall severe issues with
presentation engaging presentation engaging clarity and audio, video, or
quality presentation style. style. presentation style. engagement. presentation.

The student
submitted a The student The student's
The student public link that submitted a submission of the
Submission submitted a public was accessible public link that public link was The student failed
of the video link that was and functional, was somewhat problematic and had to submit a public
interview easily accessible with minor accessible but had significant link for the video
link and functional. issues. notable issues. accessibility issues. interview.

The student's The student's

report was The student's report was
comprehensive, report was incomplete,

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nFlZuSngZXJADkVFqUmWwNIVoKcYwfl7/mobilebasic 24/01/2024, 15 39
Page 1 of 2
:
 well-structured, mostly poorly structured,
and effectively comprehensive, and failed to
conveyed the key well-structured, The student's The student's report effectively convey
points from the and effectively report was was lacking in key points from
interview in about conveyed the somewhat comprehensiveness, the interview in
500 words. key points from comprehensive, structure, or effective about 500 words.
Report the interview in adequately conveyance of key
content and about 500 structured, and points from the
quality words. conveyed the key interview in about
points from the 500 words.
interview in about
500 words.

The student's The student's

overall The student's overall The student's
presentation and overall presentation and overall
submission were presentation and submission were presentation and
excellent, submission were satisfactory, with The student's overall submission were
demonstrating a good, minor areas for presentation and poor, indicating a
Overall high level of demonstrating improvement in submission were lack of
Presentation professionalism professionalism professionalism lacking in professionalism
and and attention to and attention to and attention to professionalism and and attention to
Submission detail. detail. detail. attention to detail. detail.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nFlZuSngZXJADkVFqUmWwNIVoKcYwfl7/mobilebasic 24/01/2024, 15 39
Page 2 of 2
: