Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: High temperature phase change material (PCM) is used as a thermal storage medium of a heat pipe
Received 27 May 2010 receiver in an advanced solar dynamic system. With both void cavity and phase change considered,
Accepted 15 October 2010 thermal performance of the heat pipe receiver was numerically analyzed under microgravity. The results
Available online 23 October 2010
indicate that the PCM contained in the integrated heat pipe performs the averaging function of heat
loads. Normal working of wick ensures the uniformity of the heat pipe, thus heat pipe receiver alleviates
Keywords:
thermal spot and thermal ratcheting. Void cavity influences the process of phase change. The thermal
Heat pipe receiver
resistance of void cavity is much higher than that of PCM canister wall. Void cavity prevents heat transfer.
Phase change
Void cavity
PCM melts slowly during sunlight periods and freezes slowly during eclipse periods with the effect of
void cavity. Void cavity reduces the utility and thermal storage ability of PCM. The temperature gradient
in the PCM zone is very significant because of void cavity. So the thermal stress of heat pipe receiver may
increase, and the lifetime may decrease. The research results can be used to guide the designing and
optimization of PCM canister for heat pipe receiver.
Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1359-4311/$ e see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.10.016
736 G. Xiaohong et al. / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 735e741
Table 1
Physical properties of phase change material.
of PCM are axisymetric to the heat pipe axis. The PCM canisters are that the melting point of LiF is higher than that of 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2,
stacked and brazed to the TSD section of heat pipes. The outer radius so the temperatures of heat pipe wall and PCM canister wall for LiF
of each heat pipe is equal to the inner radius of each PCM canister. are higher than that for 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2. Compared with LiF, the
The PCM canisters are not bonded to each other but are separated by thermal stress of wall material for 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2 maybe decrease
ceramic fiber spacers. The HSHX comprises individually sheathed and the working lifetime of wall material for 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2
heat pipes for heat exchange with the engine working fluid. maybe increase. Therefore, the eutectic mixture 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2 is
A heat pipe receiver is operated in the following manner. During selected as PCM for our research.
sunlight periods, the insolation in the receiver evaporates the heat
pipe fluid. Condensation of the heat pipe fluid occurs in the TSD 3.1. Physical model
portion, melting the PCM, as well as in the HSHX portion.
During eclipse periods, the receiver portion of the heat pipe is The heat transfer of PCM canister of the heat pipe receiver [9]
essentially in an adiabatic region though some condensation may includes
occur due to heat losses. The TSD region acts as a heat pipe evap-
orator, with condensation occurring in the HSHX. In any operating (1) heat conduction among solid, liquid in PCM zone and saturated
condition, the heat pipe fluid attains certain temperature and vapor in void cavity, heat conduction among PCM canister wall,
thermal conductance. Since the heat pipe is basically an isothermal fin and other enhanced heat additions,
device, the same heat pipe fluid temperature exists throughout the (2) radiation among the interfaces of void cavity with different
entire length of the heat pipe. The internal pressure is the fluid temperature, radiation among different PCM crystals, and
vapor pressure at an existing temperature. The heat pipe temper- (3) evaporation and condensation heat transfer between high and
ature and pressure vary with time throughout an orbit. low temperature interfaces in void cavity.
As shown in Fig. 2, a portion of the energy from the heat pipe
fluid is conducted into the PCM and stored as latent energy while The above process of heat transfer is transient. If all the above
the remaining energy is transported by the heat pipe to the last are considered, it is very difficult to solve the problem. To find easy
section of the receiver where a heat exchanger couples the heat solutions and simplify the calculations, some assumptions are
pipe to the engine. During a solar eclipse, pressure and temperature made as follows when the heat transfer model of the PCM canister
in the heat pipe drop, and energy starts to escape from the PCM via is built.
the heat pipe fluid, which transports it to the heat exchanger in the
last section of the receiver. (1) The temperature along heat pipe wall is uniform. All canisters
on a given heat pipe operate identically. A single canister is
3. Numerical simulation of the PCM canister of the heat pipe sufficient to model the entire TSD. This is due to the assumed
receiver symmetry in incident flux (all heat pipes operate identically)
and the uniformity in the heat pipe wall temperature in the
In general, the eutectic salt such as LiF and 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2 is TSD region. The model is simplified by the heat pipe wicking
selected as the PCM for heat pipe receiver. LiF is used as PCM for system, which, if operating properly, ensures an essentially
NASA designing of a heat pipe receiver [3]. 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2 is used uniform temperature around the circumference of the heat
as PCM on an experimental module in Japan [4]. Some physical pipe. Thus, only a two-dimensional canister model (axial and
properties of LiF and 80.5LiF-19.5CaF2 are shown in Table 1. It shows radial) is required [3].
(2) The initial void volume of PCM canister is fixed. Void cavity
distributes along the outer wall of PCM canister. During eclipse
periods, PCM in the TSD region freezes. PCM releases latent
heat to heat pipe. At the same time, PCM shrinks and void
cavity appears. Since the temperature of PCM close to canister
inner wall decreases more quickly than that of PCM close to
canister outer wall, PCM close to canister inner wall freezes
earlier. PCM in canister freezes gradually along the radial from
inner wall to outer wall. Void cavity appears near the outer wall
in canister [10].
(3) Heat convection of liquid PCM is ignored. Natural convection
disappears under microgravity. Marangoni convection caused
Fig. 2. The configuration of the unit heat pipe receiver. by surface tension exists. The order of magnitude for Marangoni
G. Xiaohong et al. / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 735e741 737
Fig. 5. The temperature fluctuation on heat pipe wall and PCM canister outer wall
Fig. 3. The physical model of PCM canister of the heat pipe receiver. during 0e20 orbital periods.
8
convection is smaller than that for natural convection. Mar- < Tm þ e=c; e 0
angoni convection appears only near the void cavity when PCM T ¼ T 0 < e < DHm (2)
melts during sunlight periods. Liquid PCM flows in a small scale. : m;
Tm þ ðe DHm Þ=c; e DHm
During eclipse periods, the temperature differences among
different liquid PCM interfaces decrease to about 1 K quickly. So PCM is solid (e 0). PCM is liquid (e DHm ). PCM is in phase
Marangoni convection driven by the temperature gradient on change (0 < e < DHm ), that is, PCM is mushy.
free surface disappears very quickly during eclipse periods.
Therefore, heat convection under microgravity can be ignored 3.2.2. Zone of void cavity
during both sunlight and eclipse periods. Since the axial temperature gradient is very small, the temper-
(4) The contact resistance between the PCM canister and heat pipe ature of void cavity is defined by radial steady heat transfer
wall is ignored. In fact, there is a gap between the PCM canister equation,
and heat pipe wall. The gap is very small and about 2e3 mm.
1 v vT
(5) The surfaces of all void cavities are the ones of gray bodies with r ¼ 0 (3)
diffusion reflection. r vr vr
Fig. 6. The temperature fluctuation on heat pipe wall and PCM canister outer wall in
Fig. 4. The grid meshes of the PCM canister of the heat pipe receiver. a steady period.
738 G. Xiaohong et al. / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 735e741
Fig. 9. The temperature field distribution of PCM canister at the end of sunlight with
void cavity.
3.5. Boundary conditions 4.1. Comparison and analysis of our numerical results and NASA
numerical results
vT
z ¼ 0; ¼ 0; (4) Fig. 5 shows the temperature fluctuation on heat pipe wall and
vr PCM canister outer wall during 0e20 orbital periods by our simu-
lation. Fig. 6 shows the temperature fluctuation on heat pipe wall
vT and PCM canister outer wall in one steady period by our simulation.
z ¼ l; ¼ 0; (5)
vr Fig. 7 shows a comparison between our numerical results and NASA
numerical results [3]. In the comparison, it can be seen that the
vT corresponding temperature differences between our simulation
r ¼ RCO ; ¼ 0; (6)
vz and NASA simulation on both heat pipe wall and PCM canister outer
wall are small. The temperature change trend of our numerical
vThw results agrees with that of NASA numerical ones. Therefore, our
r ¼ Rhw ; khw ¼ Q =A (7)
vz numerical results are credible. The model of the PCM canister of the
The boundary condition of heat pipe wall (canister inner wall) is heat pipe receiver built under microgravity in this paper is accurate
taken as periodic various heat flux. The user defined function (UDF) and reasonable. As it can be seen, when a heating cycle is stable, the
is used in simulation. The canister outer wall and side wall are temperature fluctuation both on heat pipe wall and in PCM canister
adiabatic with the outside. In the void cavity, thermal radiation is remains less than 16 K throughout a sunlight and eclipse cycle.
considered. These data indicate that the PCM contained in the integrated heat
Fig. 8. The temperature field distribution of PCM canister at the end of sunlight Fig. 10. The temperature field distribution of PCM canister at the end of eclipse
without void cavity. without void cavity.
G. Xiaohong et al. / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 735e741 739
Fig. 11. The temperature field distribution of PCM canister at the end of eclipse with
void cavity.
Fig. 12. The Melting ratio of the PCM in the canister without void cavity. Fig. 14. The liquid contour of PCM canister at the end of sunlight without void cavity.
740 G. Xiaohong et al. / Applied Thermal Engineering 31 (2011) 735e741
Fig. 17. The liquid contour of PCM canister at the end of eclipse with void cavity.
Fig. 15. The liquid contour of PCM canister at the end of sunlight with void cavity.
canister at the end of eclipse with void cavity. In the figures, it can
be seen that, PCM freezes totally without void cavity. PCM freezes
is very significant when void cavity exists. So the thermal stress of about 85% with void cavity. Void cavity prevents the heat transfer
heat pipe receiver may increase, and the lifetime may decrease. from the PCM zone to the canister wall during eclipse periods. PCM
Fig. 12 shows the melting ratio of the PCM in the canister during freezes slowly during eclipse periods with the effect of void cavity.
0e28 orbital periods without void cavity. Fig. 13 shows the melting PCM can’t release latent heat totally because of void cavity.
ratio of the PCM in the canister during 0e12 orbital periods with
void cavity. In the figures, it can be seen that, the melting ratio of 5. Conclusions
the PCM in the canister reaches 88% without void cavity and 84%
with void cavity. So the utility of PCM decreases with the effect of With both phase change and void cavity considered, thermal
void cavity. performance of the PCM canister of the heat pipe receiver is analyzed.
Fig. 14 shows the liquid contour of PCM canister at the end of The numerical results are compared with NASA numerical results.
sunlight without void cavity. Fig. 15 shows the liquid contour of
PCM canister at the end of sunlight with void cavity. In the figures, (1) In the comparison, it can be seen that the corresponding
it can be seen that, the minimum liquid contour of PCM canister at temperature differences between our simulation and NASA
the end of sunlight is 77% without void cavity and 68% with void simulation on both heat pipe wall and PCM canister outer wall
cavity. So PCM melts slowly with the effect of void cavity. Void are small. The temperature change trend of our numerical
cavity prevents the heat transfer from the canister wall to the PCM results agrees with that of NASA numerical ones. Therefore, our
zone during sunlight periods. The thermal performance of heat numerical results are credible. The model of the PCM canister
pipe receiver may decrease when void cavity exists. The thermal of the heat pipe receiver built under microgravity in this paper
storage ability of PCM canister may decrease because of void cavity. is accurate and reasonable.
Fig. 16 shows the liquid contour of PCM canister at the end of (2) When heating cycle is stable, the temperature fluctuation both
eclipse without void cavity. Fig. 17 shows the liquid contour of PCM on heat pipe wall and in PCM canister remains less than 16 K
throughout a sunlight and eclipse cycle. These data indicate
that the PCM contained in the integrated heat pipe performs an
averaging function of heat loadings. Normal working of wick
ensures the uniformity of heat pipe, thus heat pipe receiver
alleviates thermal spot and thermal ratcheting.
(3) Void cavity reduces the utility and thermal storage ability of
PCM. PCM melts slowly during sunlight periods and freezes
slowly during eclipse periods with the effect of void cavity.
PCM can’t release latent heat totally because of void cavity.
(4) Void cavity influences the process of phase change. The thermal
resistance of void cavity is much higher than that of PCM
canister wall. Void cavity prevents heat transfer during sunlight
and eclipse periods. The temperature gradient of PCM zone is
very significant because of void cavity. So the thermal stress of
heat pipe receiver may increase, and the lifetime may decrease.
References
[2] G. Bal, G. Mccormick, An investigation of thermal stress in a heat pipe receiver [11] Y. Zhao, Tutorial of Fluent. National Defense University of Science and Tech-
using finite element analysis, Journal of Engineering Technology 14 (1997) 20e26. nology, Changsha, 2003.
[3] H.J. Strumpf, M.G. Coombs, Advanced Heat Receiver Conceptual Design Study
NASA-88e25977. Lewis Research Center, Ohio, 1988.
[4] H. Takeshi, N. Hitoshi, F.J. Tsutomu, Experimental study on sterling engine Nomenclature
generator and solar receiver system for future space application, American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2000) 2842. z: axial length (m)
[5] M. Fujiwara, T. Sano, K. Suzuki, Thermal analysis and fundamental tests on r: radial length (m)
heat pipe receiver for solar dynamic space power system, Journal of Solar t: time (s)
Energy Engineering 112 (1990) 177e182. P: pressure (Pa)
[6] H.J. Strumpf, On-orbit Performance Prediction of the Heat Receiver for the T: temperature (K)
U.S./Russia Solar Dynamic Power Flight Experiment. IEEE conference, 1996. k: thermal conductivity (W/(m$K))
[7] A. Dennis, 2 kWe Solar Dynamic Ground Test Demonstration Project NASA- c: specific heat capacity (J/(kg K))
CR-198423, Arizona (1997). 6H: latent heat of phase change (J/kg)
[8] H.J. Strumpf, Solar Dynamic Power System Development for Space Station e: specific enthalpy (J/kg)
Freedom NASA-RP-1310. Lewis Research Center, Ohio, 1993.
[9] D. Keyong, Y. Xiugan, Two-dimensional transient heat transfer analysis of Greek letters
a phase change material container, Journal of Solar Energy 19 (1998) 41e47. r: density (kg/m3)
[10] T.W. Keslake, M.B. Ibrahim, Two-dimensional model of space station freedom
thermal energy storage canister, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 114 Subscripts
(1992) 114e121. m: melting point