Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Micromechanics of The Elastic Behaviour of Granula
Micromechanics of The Elastic Behaviour of Granula
net/publication/226490132
CITATIONS READS
0 132
2 authors, including:
Leo Rothenburg
University of Waterloo
125 PUBLICATIONS 5,574 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Leo Rothenburg on 26 June 2014.
N.P. Kruyt
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Twente
L. Rothenburg
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Waterloo
Overview
• Micromechanics: stress, strain and work
• Discrete Element Simulations
• Variational principles
• Upper and lower bounds; uniform strain and stress
• Statistical theory
• Statistics from DEM simulations
• Conclusions
1
University of Twente
Micromechanics
pq q p
∆i = ui – ui
Contact geometry
Particle q
pq pq
ti li q
p + Xi
Xi
+ pq
ni
Stress
ni B
β ti
In boundary terms
= --- ∂ ( x i σ kj ) dS
1--- 1
σ ij = ò
S ij
σ dS
S ∂ xk ò
S S
1 1 β β
S ò
= --- n k x i σ kj dS = ---
S
β∈B
å Xi fj
B
In contact terms
β
Equilibrium conditions
pq
å fj + fj = 0
q
p pq β β
å å Xi fj + å Xi fj = 0
p q β∈B
β β c c
å fj xi = å fj li
β∈B c∈S
Micromechanical stress
1 c c
σ ij = --- å fj li
S
c∈S
Strain
In boundary terms
1--- ∂u i 1 1
α ij = ò
S ∂ xj ò ò
dS = --- u i n j ds = e jk --- u i t k ds
S S
S B B
1 dx k 1 du i 1 α α
ò
= e jk --- u i ds = – e jk ---
S ds S ds ò
x k ds = – e jk ---
S
α∈B
å ∆i Xk
B B
In contact terms
Compatibility conditions
rs rα
å ∆i + ∆i = 0
s
Network connecting
particle centres
rs r rα r
å å ∆i Xj + å ∆i Xj = 0
r s r
Polygon s
α α c c
å ∆i Xj = å ∆i gj
α∈B c∈S
rs
1 c c hi
α ij = --- å ∆i hj rs
gi
S
c∈S
Polygon r
c c
hj = – e jk g k
Work
1--- c c
å f i ∆ i = σ ij ε ij
S
c∈S
Geometry
1 c c
δ ij = --- å li hj
S
c∈S
Geometrical considerations
ln / 2
α/2
α
hn / 2
ln
Coordination number Γ = 3
0.95
Theory
Packing density
tan α
h
α = 2π --- = ----n-
0.9
------
Γ 2 ln
0.85
π
Packing density ≅ ----------------
0.8
Γ tan --π-
Experiments
Γ 0.75
4 5 6
Summary of micromechanics
pq rs
å fi å ∆i = 0
c c c
= 0 f i = S ij ∆ j
q s
1 c c 1 c c 1 c c
σ ij = --- å fi lj σ ij ε ij = --- å fi ∆i ε ij = --- å ∆i hj
S S S
c∈S c∈S c∈S
No particle rotation!
c c c c c
S ij = k n n i n j + k t t i t j
kn
c c
fn = kn ∆n
c c
ft = kt ∆t
kt
Extremum principles
Minimum potential energy principle
c c
f ∗ i , ∆∗ i compatible, no equilibrium
fi , ∆i
c c
compatible, equilibrium
1--- c c 1 c c
å f i ∆ i ≤ --- å f∗ i ∆∗ i
2 2
c∈S c∈S
c c
f ∗ i , ∆∗ i equilibrium, not compatible
fi , ∆i equilibrium, compatible
c c
1 c c 1
Then --- f∗ i ∆∗ i ≤ ---
c c
å å fi ∆i
2 2
c∈S c∈S
Network connecting
polygon centres
Network connecting
particle centres
c
Take ∆∗ i = ε ij l j : uniform strain
c
ε
Upper bound ε ij L ijkl ε kl ≤ ε ij L ijkl ε kl ≡ ε ij æè --- S ik l j l l ö ε kl
1 c c c
S å ø
c∈S
c
Take f∗ i = σ ij h j : uniform stress
c
σ
Lower bound σ ij M ijkl σ kl ≤ σ ij M ijkl σ kl ≡ σ ij æè --- S ik h j h l ö σ kl
1 – 1c c c
S å ø
c∈S
Orientational averaging
Uniform strain ∆ i = ε ij l j
Compression
∆n in shear ∆t in shear
Extension
Extension
θ θ
θ
Compression
Contact distribution
2π
1 M
ò E(θ)fj li(θ) dθ
c c
σ ij = --- å f j l i = ----- å E(θ g) ∆θ f j l i(θ g) = m S
S S
c∈S θg
0
Contact density
2π
Overall average á w(θ)ñ = m S ò E(θ)w(θ) dθ
0
1
Minimize potential energy á --- ∆ i S ij ∆ jñ
2
Subject to constraints ε ij = á ∆ i h jñ á f i ∆ iñ = σ ij ε ij
ε σ
Disorder χ ≡ á k n σ n2 + k t σ t2ñ = α ( 1 – α )ε ij ( L ijkl – L ijkl )ε kl
ε σ
L ijkl + L ijkl
L ijkl = ---------------------------
2
l n > 2R avg
6.5
Loose system
5.5
γ(R 1)
4.5
3.5
2.5
0.5 1 1.5 2
R2 R1 / Ravg
1.5
R1
R 2(R1) ⁄ R avg
No size preference
0.5
0.5 1 1.5 2
R1 / Ravg
Moduli
Simulations
K / kn G / kn
1 1
0.9 1
0.8 0.9
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.8
kt ⁄ kn
0.5 0.6
0.3 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.1 0.2
0 0
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Γ Γ
G / kn
0.5 0.5
Gσ
0.25 0.25
Theory
Gσ
0 0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
kt ⁄ kn kt ⁄ kn
Displacements
∆ i = ζε ij l j
K G
ζn ζn
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
kt ⁄ kn
kt ⁄ kn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Γ Γ
0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
G G G
ζt ( ζn + ζt ) ⁄ 2
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
kt ⁄ kn
kt ⁄ kn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Γ Γ
1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.875 0.9 0.925 0.95 0.975 1
0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.85 0.875 0.9 0.925 0.95 0.975
Compression
probability density
probability density
Gaussian Gaussian
distribution distribution
-3 0 3 -3 0 3
∆n – ∆n ∆t – ∆t
---------------------------
- --------------------------
-
StdDev(∆ n) StdDev(∆ t)
Shear
probability density
probability density
Gaussian Gaussian
distribution distribution
-3 0 3 -3 0 3
∆n – ∆n ∆t – ∆t
---------------------------
- --------------------------
-
StdDev(∆ n) StdDev(∆ t)
Energy ratios
1 1
E n = --- á k n ∆ n2ñ E n = --- á k t ∆ t2ñ
2 2
Et / En in compression Et / En in shear
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
kt ⁄ kn
kt ⁄ kn
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Γ Γ
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Conclusions
• two regimes: uniform strain and uniform stress
• upper and lower bound for moduli
• uniform strain assumption is only correct for dense
systems
• statistical theory gives average of uniform strain and
stress; appropriate for loose systems
• Gaussian probability functions for normal and tangen-
tial components of relative displacements
• no equipartition of energy
0.8 0.9
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.8
0.6 0.7
0.6 0.6
kt ⁄ kn
kt ⁄ kn
0.5 0.6
0.4 0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.2 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.2
0 0.1
0 0
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Γ Γ
cumulative probability
probability density
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
0 1 2 0 1 2
R / Ravg R / Ravg