Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HIRBOD VARASTEH
Civil Engineering, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom
BAHAMIN BAZOOYAR
Low-Carbon Energy Systems, Cranfield University, Bedford, United Kingdom
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements
with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website:
www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be
noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding,
changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information,
methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their
own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury
and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of
any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-818868-2
vii
viii Contents
Index........................................................................................................... 239
Preface
xiii
xiv Preface
CO2 in the flue gases to bring it close to the level of CO2 con-
centration in the exhaust of the solid fuel combustion to feed a
solvent-based postcombustion capture unit.
This book presents Carbon Capture Technologies for Gas-
Turbine-Based Power Plants and explores current progress in
oxyfuel combustion capture as one of the most capable tech-
nologies for carbon capture in power plants. The three major
carbon capture technologies (precombustion, postcombustion,
and oxyfuel combustion) and the membrane technology are
explained in this book, and the pros and cons of each technol-
ogy are compared with the oxyfuel combustion capture. This
book investigates over 20 different oxycombustion turbine (oxy-
turbine) power cycles, identifying the main parameters with
regard to their operation, process, and performance simula-
tions, and energy and exergy analysis. The natural gas com-
bined cycle (NGCC) power plant with postcombustion capture
is used as the base-case scenario. One of the challenges of the
oxyfuel combustion technology is the need to generate pure
oxygen on site. Therefore, the oxygen production and air sepa-
ration units (ASU) and CO2 compression and purification units
(CPU) are explained in this book. The procedure for the design
and the operational characteristics of a radial NOx-less oxyfuel
gas turbine combustor are presented and the combustor CFD
simulation and performance analysis of the heat exchanger net-
work and turbomachinery are conducted. The book provides
technoeconomic analysis, technology readiness level (TRL),
sensitivity and risk analysis, levellised cost of energy (LCOE),
and the stages of development for oxycombustion turbine
power plants. This book can be used to generate a road map for
the development of future gas turbine-based power plants with
full carbon capture capabilities using the experiences of the
recently demonstrated cycles. The content of this book can sup-
port students, researchers, engineers, policymakers, and energy
industry managers to plan the development and deployment of
the future zero carbon and NOx free gas-fired power plants to
help achieve the net zero targets in the energy industry.
Acknowledgment
xv
This page intentionally left blank
An introduction to gas turbine
1
systems
1.1 Introduction
Greenhouse gases (GHG) are the main reason for the increase
in the global mean temperature and climate change. Carbon
dioxide (CO2) from the combustion of fossil fuels is the principal
GHG, and power plants and the energy sector are the main
sources of CO2 emissions. With 73.2% of carbon emission from
the energy sector, including industry, transport, building and
agriculture, this sector is considered as the main contributor to
the global warming (Ourworldindata, 2020). The carbon budget
is the cumulative amount of carbon dioxide emissions permitted
over a period of time to keep the temperature rise within a cer-
tain temperature threshold. The carbon budget for the 2 C global
temperature increase scenario has an upper limit on the cumula-
tive CO2 that is in the range of 8001400 GTCO2, and the carbon
budget for 1.5 C scenario is in the range of 200800 GtCO2
(IEAGHG, 2019).
The avoidance and reduction of carbon dioxide emission from
the energy sector is the main strategy to mitigate climate change.
Gas turbine systems are widely used to generate electrical power
and to balance the power demand and response to grid fluctua-
tions. Fig. 1.1 shows the electricity generation in the UK for 28 days
from 18 August 2021 to 14 September 2021. In one year period
(from September 2020 to the end of August 2021) in the UK, over
40% of electricity was generated from gas combustion, mainly in
gas turbine power plants and there was an overall combined emis-
sion of 236 gCO2/kWh in this 12 months in the UK (Fig. 1.2).
The increasing concern for climate change has led to global
efforts to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. It
appears that by far the most significant contribution to the green-
house effect stems from emissions of carbon dioxide. A large part
of the CO2 emission is produced by combusting fossil fuels in
conventional power plants and industrial processes (United State
Environmental Protection Agency, 2018). Nonetheless, Global
Figure 1.1 Power generation in the UK for 28 days from 18 August 2021 to 14 September 2021 (MyGridGB, 2021).
Please see the online version to view the colour image of the figure.
Figure 1.2 Sources of electricity generation in the UK from September 2020 to the end of August 2021 (MyGridGB, 2021).
demand for fossil fuels are increasing. For instant natural gas (NG)
demand is forecasted to increase by 2.5% a year for the next 10
years (IEAGHG, 2020).
The gas turbine power generation is more flexible in respond-
ing to electrical demand (Bazooyar and Darabkhani, 2020).
However, conventional gas turbines burn fossil fuels and release a
An introduction to gas turbine systems 3
the first turbojet gas turbine engine in 1930 with enough network
power and high-speed jet for aircraft propulsion.
The heavy gas turbines have been developed to produce
electrical power by combined cycle gas turbine with a bottom
cycle of the steam turbine (CCGT) (Horlock and Bathie, 2004).
Gas turbine material technologies have been developed during
the last 20 years. The cooling method of the blade and new
coating materials let the turbines work at higher temperature,
such as the NetPower cycle and CES cycle; in recent years, the
development of composer pressure ratio support has increased
turbine efficiency up to 60%.
Gas turbines convert the chemical energy of the fuel into
either mechanical energy or kinetic energy. There are two types
of gas turbines: (1) power generation gas turbines that convert
the chemical energy of the fuel to shaft power to produce elec-
tricity and (2) gas turbines for aircraft which produce thrust for
propulsion (Schobeiri and Meinhard, 2018).
The main concept of gas turbine thermodynamics is receiv-
ing fuel energy at a high temperature at the combustor (C) to
produce work at the gas turbine (A) and release the remaining
energy to heat sink with the low temperature at the condenser
(D), as shown in Fig. 1.3.
The power plants need to produce a network with minimum
fuel consumption. However, the capital cost and operational
cost need to be balanced to produce electricity with a lower
cost (cost/kW h21) (Horlock and Bathie, 2004). In recent years,
new gas turbine technologies have been developed to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. To this end, the combustor section
Table 1.1 Comparison of an industrial gas turbine with an aeroderivative gas turbine.
Table 1.2 Comparison of gas turbines based on the number of shafts (Forsthoffer, 2011).
Figure 1.9 Triple-shaft open cycle gas turbine with intercooler (Ying et al., 2016).
Figure 1.10 Single-shaft closed cycle gas turbine with intercooler and recuperator (Soares, 2015).
“Strategy,” says Jomini, speaking of the art of war on land, “is the art
of making war upon the map, and comprehends the whole theater of
warlike operations. Grand tactics is the art of posting troops upon
the battlefield, according to the accidents of the ground; of bringing
them into action; and the art of fighting upon the ground in
contradistinction to planning upon a map. Its operations may extend
over a field of ten or twelve miles in extent. Strategy decides where to
act. Grand tactics decides the manner of execution and the
employment of troops,” when, by the combinations of strategy, they
have been assembled at the point of action.
... Between Strategy and Grand Tactics comes logically Logistics.
Strategy decides where to act; Logistics is the act of moving armies; it
brings the troops to the point of action and controls questions of
supply; Grand Tactics decides the methods of giving battle.
5. Fundamental Principles[21]
The situation here used in illustration is taken from the Thirty Years’
War, 1618–1648, in which the French House of Bourbon opposed the
House of Austria, the latter controlling Spain, Austria, and parts of
Germany. France lay between Spain and Austria; but if Spain
commanded the sea, her forces could reach the field of conflict in
central Europe either by way of Belgium or by way of the Duchy of
Milan in northern Italy, both of which were under her rule.
[The upper course of the Danube between Ulm and Ratisbon is
also employed to illustrate central position, dominating the great
European theater of war north of the Alps and east of the Rhine.—
Editor.]
The situation of France relatively to her two opponents of this
period—Spain and Austria—illustrates three elements of strategy, of
frequent mention, which it is well here to name and to define, as well
as to illustrate by the instance before you.
1. There is central position, illustrated by France; her national
power and control interposing by land between her enemies. Yet not
by land only, provided the coast supports an adequate navy; for, if
that be the case, the French fleet also interposes between Spanish
and Italian ports. The Danube is similarly an instance of central
position.
2. Interior lines. The characteristic of interior lines is that of the
central position prolonged in one or more directions, thus favoring
sustained interposition between separate bodies of an enemy; with
the consequent power to concentrate against either, while holding
the other in check with a force possibly distinctly inferior. An interior
line may be conceived as the extension of a central position, or as a
series of central positions connected with one another, as a
geometrical line is a continuous series of geometrical points. The
expression “Interior Lines” conveys the meaning that from a central
position one can assemble more rapidly on either of two opposite
fronts than the enemy can, and therefore can utilize force more
effectively. Particular examples of maritime interior lines are found
in the route by Suez as compared with that by the Cape of Good
Hope, and in Panama contrasted with Magellan. The Kiel Canal
similarly affords an interior line between the Baltic and North Sea, as
against the natural channels passing round Denmark, or between the
Danish Islands,—the Sound and the two Belts.[22] These instances of
“Interior” will recall one of your boyhood’s geometrical theorems,
demonstrating that, from a point interior to a triangle, lines drawn to
two angles are shorter than the corresponding sides of the triangle
itself. Briefly, interior lines are lines shorter in time than those the
enemy can use. France, for instance, in the case before us, could
march twenty thousand men to the Rhine, or to the Pyrenees, or
could send necessary supplies to either, sooner than Spain could
send the same number to the Rhine, or Austria to the Pyrenees,
granting even that the sea were open to their ships.
3. The position of France relatively to Germany and Spain
illustrates also the question of communications. “Communications”
is a general term, designating the lines of movement by which a
military body, army or fleet, is kept in living connection with the
national power. This being the leading characteristic of
communications, they may be considered essentially lines of
defensive action; while interior lines are rather offensive in
character, enabling the belligerent favored by them to attack in force
one part of the hostile line sooner than the enemy can reinforce it,
because the assailant is nearer than the friend. As a concrete
instance, the disastrous attempt already mentioned, of Spain in 1639
to send reinforcements by the Channel, followed the route from
Corunna to the Straits of Dover. It did so because at that particular
moment the successes of France had given her control of part of the
valley of the Rhine, closing it to the Spaniards from Milan; while the
more eastern route through Germany was barred by the Swedes, who
in the Thirty Years’ War were allies of France. The Channel therefore
at that moment remained the only road open from Spain to the
Netherlands, between which it became the line of communications.
Granting the attempt had been successful, the line followed is
exterior; for, assuming equal rapidity of movement, ten thousand
men starting from central France should reach the field sooner.
The central position of France, therefore, gave both defensive and
offensive advantage. In consequence of the position she had interior
lines, shorter lines, by which to attack, and also her communications
to either front lay behind the front, were covered by the army at the
front; in other words, had good defense, besides being shorter than
those by which the enemy on one front could send help to the other
front. Further, by virtue of her position, the French ports on the
Atlantic and Channel flanked the Spanish sea communications.
At the present moment, Germany and Austria-Hungary, as
members of the Triple Alliance, have the same advantage of central
and concentrated position against the Triple Entente, Russia, France,
and Great Britain.
Transfer now your attention back to the Danube when the scene of
war is in that region; as it was in 1796, and also frequently was
during the period of which we are now speaking.... You have seen
before, that, if there be war between Austria and France, as there so
often was, the one who held the Danube had a central position in the
region. Holding means possession by military power, which power
can be used to the full against the North or against the South—
offensive power—far more easily than the South and North can
combine against him; because he is nearer to each than either is to
the other. (See map.) Should North wish to send a big reinforcement
to South, it cannot march across the part of the Danube held, but
must march around it above or below; exactly as, in 1640,
reinforcements from Spain to the Rhine had, so to say, to march
around France. In such a march, on land, the reinforcement making
it is necessarily in a long column, because roads do not allow a great
many men to walk abreast. The road followed designates in fact the
alignment of the reinforcement from day to day; and because its
advance continually turns the side to the enemy, around whom it is
moving, the enemy’s position is said to flank the movement,
constituting a recognized danger. It makes no difference whether the
line of march is straight or curved; it is extension upon it that
constitutes the danger, because the line itself, being thin, is
everywhere weak, liable to an attack in force upon a relatively small
part of its whole. Communications are exposed, and the enemy has
the interior line....
This is an illustration of the force of Napoleon’s saying, that “War
is a business of positions.” All this discussion turns on position; the
ordinary, semi-permanent, positions of Center, North, and South; or
the succession of positions occupied by the detachment on that line
of communications along which it moves. This illustrates the
importance of positions in a single instance, but is by no means
exhaustive of that importance. Fully to comprehend, it is necessary
to study military and naval history; bearing steadily in mind
Napoleon’s saying, and the definitions of central position, interior
lines, and communications.
Take, for example, an instance so recent as to have been
contemporary with men not yet old,—the Turkish position at Plevna
in 1877. This stopped the Russian advance on Constantinople for
almost five months. Why? Because, if they had gone on, Plevna
would have been close to their line of communications, and in a
central position relatively to their forces at the front and those in the
rear, or behind the Danube. It was also so near, that, if the enemy
advanced far, the garrison of Plevna could reach the only bridge
across the Danube, at Sistova, and might destroy it, before help could
come; that is, Plevna possessed an interior line towards a point of the
utmost importance. Under these circumstances, Plevna alone