Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
Rakshit Ameta
Jayesh P. Bhatt
Suresh C. Ameta
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek
permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright
Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or
medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein.
In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety
of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors,
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of
products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods,
products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-824153-0
1. Introduction 1
Suresh C. Ameta
1.1 Introduction 1
1.1.1 Advantages 2
1.1.2 Disadvantages 3
1.2 Unique features of quantum dots 3
1.2.1 High surface-to-volume ratio 3
1.2.2 Surface plasmon resonance 3
1.2.3 Quantum confinement effect 4
1.3 Classification of quantum dots 4
1.3.1 Core-type quantum dots 4
1.3.2 Coreshell quantum dots 5
1.3.3 Alloyed quantum dots 5
1.4 Synthesis of quantum dots 8
1.4.1 Top-down approach 8
1.4.2 Bottom-up approach 9
1.4.3 Methods of synthesis 9
1.5 Applications of quantum dots 9
1.5.1 Solar cells 10
1.5.2 Sensors 11
1.5.3 Light emitting diodes 11
1.5.4 Photocatalysis 11
1.5.5 Hydrogen generation 12
1.5.6 Biomedicals 12
1.6 Conclusion 13
References 13
vii
viii Contents
2.1.2 Disadvantages 17
2.2 Metal-based quantum dots 17
2.2.1 Metal oxide quantum dots 17
2.2.2 Metal sulfide quantum dots 19
2.2.3 Others 21
2.3 Nonmetal-based quantum dots 21
2.3.1 Carbon-based quantum dots 21
2.3.2 Graphene-based quantum dots 26
2.4 Recent developments 28
2.5 Conclusion 29
References 29
Index 369
List of contributors
xiii
xiv List of contributors
Dr. Rakshit Ameta has a thoroughly first class career, securing first position
in his MSc. and was awarded a Gold Medal. He was also given the Fateh
Singh Award from Maharana Mewar Foundation, Udaipur for his meritorious
performance. After completion of his PhD, he served in Hindustan Zinc
Limited, Vedanta Group for 1 year. He has served in M.L. Sukhadia
University, Udaipur; University of Kota, Kota, PAHER University, Udaipur,
and presently is at J.R.N. Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University)
Udaipur. Under his supervision 12 PhD students have been awarded PhDs on
various aspects of Green Chemistry. He has around 140 research publications
to his credit in journals of national and international repute. He has a patent
to his credit as well. He is a reviewer of around 50 international journals. Dr.
Rakshit has successfully organized many National Conferences at University
of Kota, Kora; PAHER University, Udaipur; and J.R.N. Rajasthan
Vidyapeeth, Udaipur. He has delivered Invited lectures and chaired sessions
in 20 national conferences in different parts of the country. Dr. Rakshit has
served as a council member (201113 and 202022) and associate editor,
Physical Chemistry Section (201416), scientist-in-charge in the Industrial
and Applied Chemistry Section (20142016) of the Indian Chemical
Society, Kolkata, and executive council member (201214) and Zonal
Secretary (201618) of Indian Council of Chemists, Agra. He had been a
recipient of the Dr. U.C. Pant Memorial Award, Indian Chemical Society,
Kolkata. He has written six books published by Taylor & Francis, UK;
Academic Press, Elsevier; Apple Academic Press, and a number of chapters
in books by these publishers and also Nova Publishers; Trans-Tech
Publications, Springer, etc. His main research focus is on photochemistry,
green chemistry, microwave-assisted reactions, environmental chemistry,
wastewater treatment, nanochemistry, solar cells, bioactive & conducting
polymers.
Dr. Jayesh P. Bhatt received his MSc. from RSTM Nagpur University in
2011. He was awarded his PhD in the year 2019 from PAHER University,
Udaipur. Since 2019 he has been working as an assistant professor in the
Department of Chemistry, PAHER University, Udaipur. He has done
research in the field of nanomaterials, particularly quantum dots, wastewater
treatment, etc. Dr. Jayesh has published 11 research articles in journals of
xv
xvi About the editors
Prof. Suresh C. Ameta obtained his master’s degree from the University of
Udaipur and was awarded a gold medal in 1970. He obtained his PhD degree
from Vikram University in 1980. He has served as professor and head,
Department of Chemistry, North Gujarat University Patan (1994) and M.L.
Sukhadia University, Udaipur (200205) and head, Department of Polymer
Science (200508). He also served as dean, P.G. Studies for a period of 4
years (200408) in M.L. Sukhadia University, Udaipur and dean, Faculty of
Science, PAHER University (201118). Now, he is serving as professor of
eminence (distinguished professor), Faculty of Science, PAHER University,
Udaipur. Prof. Ameta has around 50 years of experience of teaching and
research. He has successfully guided 108 students through their PhDs. Prof.
Ameta has occupied the prestigious position of President, Indian Chemical
Society, Kolkata (200001) and is now a lifelong advisor. He was awarded
a number of prizes during his career, including the National prize twice for
writing chemistry books in Hindi, Prof. M.N. Desai Award, Prof. W.U.
Malik Award, Scientist of the Year Award, National Teacher Award, Prof.
G.V. Bakore Award, and above all, Life Time Achievement Awards from
the Indian Chemical Society (2011), Kolkata, Indian Council of Chemists,
Agra (2015) and Association of Chemistry Teachers, Mumbai (2018). Dr.
Ameta has more than 400 research papers and 36 books to his credit. He has
contributed chapters in books published by Trans-Tech, Switzerland; Nova
Science; Taylor & Francis; Elsevier; Springer; and Apple Academic Press.
He has 12 books to his credit, including Green Chemistry, Microwave
Assisted Organic Synthesis, Solar Energy Conversion and Storage, Group
Theory, Photocatalysis, Storage, Advanced Oxidation Processes for Waste
Water Treatment, Sonochemistry, etc. The Indian Chemical Society, Kolkata
published a special issue of the Journal of Indian Chemical Society on his
60th birthday in 2008 and also instituted a National Prize in his honor as the
Prof. Suresh C. Ameta Award to be given to a Senior Scientist of the country
from 2003 onwards.
Preface
xvii
This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 1
Introduction
Suresh C. Ameta
Department of Chemistry, PAHER University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
1.1 Introduction
The materials in the nanorange (1100 nm) are termed as nanomaterials.
There are some nanostructured materials with size in the 210 nm range,
such nanomaterials are called quantum dots. The name quantum dot was
given because it is a tiny speck of matter (210 nm), which is very small,
just like a single point or dot. In other words, it is considered zero-
dimensional. The particles inside the quantum dot that carry electricity (elec-
trons and holes) are trapped (constrained) and have well-defined energy
levels, following the laws of quantum theory just like individual atoms.
There are a few dozen to hundreds or a few thousand atoms. Although these
quantum dots are nanocrystals, they behave more like individual atoms;
therefore, they have been nicknamed artificial atoms also.
Quantum dots have quantized energy levels. On excitation an electron in
the quantum dot jumps to a higher energy level. When this excited electron
returns to a lower level, the quantum dot emits a photon of light with the
same energy as was originally absorbed. The color of the emitted light
depends on the energy levels and it varies from one quantum dot to another.
The energy levels of quantum dots are governed by their size and not the sub-
stance from which it was made. The quantum dots and their application have
been excellently reviewed by different researchers (e.g., Jamieson et al., 2007;
Jacak et al., 2013; Michler, 2003; Wu et al., 2019; Molaei, 2019; Divsar,
2020; Nair et al., 2020; Abd Rani et al., 2020; Vyas et al., 2021).
A small quantum dot has a longer bandgap, and hence it requires more
energy to excite its electron. As the frequency of emitted light is proportional
to the energy, smaller quantum dots emit radiation of higher energy or fre-
quency, that is, shorter wavelengths, while larger quantum dots have closely
spaced energy levels and emit photons of lower energy or frequency, that is,
longer wavelengths. It means that as the size of quantum dots increases, the
quantum dot will emit photons with lower energy or frequency and higher
wavelength and vice versa. This is presented in Fig. 1.1.
When the size of the quantum dot is greater (diameter 56 nm), then it
will emit radiation of larger wavelengths with orange or red colors. On the
other hand, if the size of quantum dot is smaller (diameter 23 nm), then it
will emit radiation of shorter wavelengths with blue and green colors. But
the actual color depends on the exact size and composition of the quantum
dots. Accordingly, a change in color can be observed as the particle size of
quantum dots varies. This is clearly visible in Fig. 1.2.
1.1.1 Advantages
These are some advantages of quantum dots and these are:
G High quantum yield
G High photostability
G Symmetric and narrow peak of emission
FIGURE 1.1 Relationship between size of quantum dots, energy or frequency of emitted light,
and wavelength of radiation.
G Longer lifetime
G Possibility to control emission by changing the size and structure of
quantum dots
G Brightness
G Resistance to photobleaching as compared to organic fluorophores
G Required small amount of energy for excitation (blue or UV radiation)
1.1.2 Disadvantages
Apart from the advantages, there are some disadvantages of quantum dots
such as:
G High toxicity, when used in vivo
G Decline of fluorescence exponentially
G Blinking of quantum dots makes them invisible sometimes
G Quantum yield deterioration
G Extended lifetime may create a problem when rapid degradation is
required
FIGURE 1.4 Coreshell type quantum dots with various arrangements of coreshell.
6 Quantum Dots
FIGURE 1.5 Coreshell typeI: (A) normal, and (B) reversed quantum dots.
FIGURE 1.6 Energy diagram of coreshell typeI: (A) normal and (B) reversed quantum
dots.
FIGURE 1.7 Coreshell typeII quantum dots. (A) Both the bands (conduction and valence)
of shell are higher than core and (B) Both the bands of shell are lower than the core.
FIGURE 1.9 (A) Specific element (Te- or Se-) rich alloyed quantum dots, and (B) homoge-
neous alloyed quantum dots.
8 Quantum Dots
G Cancer therapy
G Chemical and biosensors
G Microscopy
G Lasers
G Inkjet printing
G Spin coating
G Photosplitting of water to generate hydrogen
G Light-emitting diodes
G Wastewater treatment using photocatalysts
G Photothermal and photodynamic therapy
G Targeted drug delivery,
This list is not complete and many more new applications will emerge in
years to come. Some major applications of quantum dots are depicted in
Fig. 1.12.
The second of these cases was a young girl about seventeen years
old who had never menstruated. She had had epileptic or hystero-
epileptic seizures for several years. An operation was performed in
which the ovaries and Fallopian tubes were removed. Twelve days
after the operation, from which she made a good recovery, she had
four convulsive seizures. She had several attacks subsequently, and
then for a considerable period was exempt. She had, however, acute
inflammatory rheumatism, with endocarditis and valvular trouble.
About seven months after the operation she had several severe
convulsions with loss of consciousness, and died about a year after
the operation, having had many severe seizures during the last few
weeks of her life.
The patient was a girl aged two and a half years, who had recently
recovered from an attack of diphtheritic conjunctivitis. During the
period of her convalescence the attending nurse called attention to
the unusual position assumed by the child while sleeping—viz. a
lateral decubitus, the head raised a short distance from the pillow,
and the forearm slightly elevated and stretched out from the body,
the muscles at the same time exhibiting marked tremulousness. A
series of trials readily demonstrated that the child when awake could
be placed in any position compatible with her muscular power, and
that she could thus remain until released. She was placed, for
instance, in the sitting posture, the arm brought at right angles to the
body, the forearm at right angles to the arm, and the hand at right
angles to the forearm, both legs raised from the bed, and the head
bent backward. This position, a most uncomfortable and difficult one
to preserve, would be maintained until the little subject dropped from
sheer exhaustion. Flexion and extension of each separate finger
were easily produced, and the fingers remained until replaced in the
positions in which they had been fixed. At the beginning the child's
mind was sluggish, although she asked for food and made known
her various wants. How far she appreciated surrounding objects
could not be accurately ascertained, inasmuch as the previous
disease of her eyes had left her with a central corneal macula on
each side, rendering her almost sightless in one eye and with but
indifferent object-perception in the other. Voluntary motion was
preserved, and she sat up, turned, and moved whenever she
pleased, but most often when at rest at this stage maintained
somewhat of the position before described which during sleep first
attracted attention to this condition.
As the nutrition of the child improved, it was found that the curious
positions could be produced by word of command as well as by
manipulation. In short, within six weeks after the first manifestations
of this disorder, as a usual thing the little patient ate, slept, and
played as a normal child should do, but could at any time be thrown
into this cataleptoid state. Her one dominant idea apparently was to
maintain the position in which she had been placed. She was often
turned into some constrained posture, and all attendants absented
themselves from the room and left her to her own devices; but no
attempt on her part was made to in any way change her attitude. If at
dinner-time a bowl of broth was placed before the patient, she would
begin to eat with great relish, but if the spoon was taken away and
her hands raised over her head, they would so remain, the child
making no effort to return to her meal, although the bowl stood
before her and all watchers again retired from the room. This
experiment was suggested by H. C. Wood, who examined the child
with me. To show how completely her consciousness was occupied
with one idea of maintaining any position in which she had been
placed, the following additional experiments may be quoted: If she
was put into a sitting position, as in the act of supplication, with her
hands folded and arms extended, and then given a sudden push
sufficient to overthrow her equilibrium, the arms would be quickly
and intuitively thrown out to protect her from the impending fall, but,
the fall accomplished, they would as quickly be returned to their
former position. If a heated silver spoon was gradually brought in
contact with her extended hand, an expression of pain would pass
the child's face, perhaps a cry escape her, and the injured member
be rapidly withdrawn, but again almost immediately returned to its
original place. It seemed as if the idea of fixity in a certain position
which occupied the child's mind was suddenly disturbed by another
outside impression, but, being dominant, it quickly drove away the
intruder and the former state was restored. At this time the
phenomena noted were somewhat in accord with those induced by
the mesmeric process, inasmuch as the consciousness seemed
largely given up to the one impression operating at that time—i.e. the
maintenance of certain fixed positions. Unlike this condition,
however, the readiness to receive new impressions, and the
complete abeyance of those senses not operating was wanting, for,
as seen above, the new impression only for a moment disturbed the
child's one idea, to which she quickly returned; nor was there any
true absence of sensibility, as was evidenced by the result from
touching her with a heated spoon.
As time wore on, a new phase of this condition became evident. The
induced manifestations seemed to act the part of some amusement
to the child, and the complete absence of volition which had been an
early characteristic phenomenon was not now so marked a feature.
Thus, if, after the experimenter had for a time moulded and twisted
the child into various shapes, he would suddenly leave the room, the
little subject would cry lustily, as a child does when suddenly
deprived of its playthings, although, curiously enough, no matter how
hard she cried, she would not release herself from the last position in
which she had been left. Often during any series of observations that
were being made it was noted that a faintly-amused look played
about her lips, which speedily gave way to a fit of crying when the
performance stopped. The hand which, when formerly placed in any
position, remained a perfectly motionless and passive object, was
now seen slightly to change its place, move the fingers, or the like—
an observation first made by A. K. Meigs while examining the
patient. The house-physician, Nathan P. Grimm, took great care and
interest in observing the case.