Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Cosmopolitanism in Twenty First Century Fiction 1St Edition Kristian Shaw Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Cosmopolitanism in Twenty First Century Fiction 1St Edition Kristian Shaw Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/after-critique-twenty-first-
century-fiction-in-a-neoliberal-age-1st-edition-mitchum-huehls/
https://textbookfull.com/product/writing-animals-language-
suffering-and-animality-in-twenty-first-century-fiction-timothy-
c-baker/
https://textbookfull.com/product/televising-restoration-spain-
history-and-fiction-in-twenty-first-century-costume-dramas-david-
r-george/
https://textbookfull.com/product/collaborative-art-in-the-twenty-
first-century-1st-edition-sondra-bacharach/
Commonwealth History in the Twenty-First Century Saul
Dubow
https://textbookfull.com/product/commonwealth-history-in-the-
twenty-first-century-saul-dubow/
https://textbookfull.com/product/twenty-first-century-chicago-
preliminary-dick-simpson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/uproot-travels-in-twenty-first-
century-music-and-digital-culture-first-edition-clayton/
https://textbookfull.com/product/militant-aesthetics-art-
activism-in-the-twenty-first-century-first-edition-martin-lang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nomadland-surviving-america-in-
the-twenty-first-century-jessica-bruder/
Cosmopolitanism in Twenty-First
Century Fiction
Kristian Shaw
Cosmopolitanism
in Twenty-First
Century Fiction
Kristian Shaw
University of Lincoln
Lincoln, United Kingdom
Completing this book has been a wonderful experience, and that is largely
due to the people who have helped me along the way. First and foremost,
I want to thank my PhD supervisor Nick Bentley for all his intellectual
advice and guidance both throughout and following my doctorate. He has
taught me how to become a better writer and academic, and has provided
encouragement throughout all stages of my career thus far. Many thanks
also to Timothy Lustig for his intellectual breadth and enthusiasm,
improving and refining the structure of this project for the better.
I could not have asked for a more helpful or knowledgeable support
network.
The research in these pages was made possible through the generosity
of the Arts and Humanities Research Council. Their substantial funding
allowed me to dedicate countless hours to improving the quality and
depth of my doctoral research on which this book is based. I would also
like to thank the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Institute at
Keele University for supporting my project, providing internal funding
and introducing me to some wonderful colleagues. Anthony Mansfield in
particular provided much needed humour and insight during the doc-
toral process: I cannot imagine sharing an office with anyone else. It has
been a pleasure to teach and study in such a welcoming environment.
Kymberley Joy Warby offered constant encouragement and infinite kind-
ness – thank you.
Special thanks go to my commissioning editor at Palgrave, Ben Doyle,
for his advice and belief in this project, as well as his editorial assistants
Tomas René and Eva Hodgkin for their professionalism and guidance.
vii
viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 Introduction 1
6 Conclusion 179
Bibliography 193
Index 209
ix
NOTE ON THE TEXT
xi
ABSTRACT
xiii
xiv ABSTRACT
Introduction
We now have to be responsible for fellow citizens both of our country and
fellow citizens of the world.
Appiah 2009: 88
According to Peter Boxall, there has been ‘an ethical turn in the fiction
of the new century’ reflective of the ‘contemporary global condition’ (2013:
141). Undoubtedly, the twenty-first century has been marked by an inten-
sification in transnational mobility, globalisation and unprecedented tech-
nological change. This study of contemporary fiction will argue that the
concept of cosmopolitanism provides a direct response to ways of living in
relation to others and answers urgent fears surrounding cultural conver-
gence. As Bill Ashcroft notes, ‘cosmopolitanism is being reinvented as the
latest Grand-Theory-of-Global-Cultural-Diversity’ (2010: 77). The various
models of cosmopolitanism evident in the selected novels in this study are
particularly relevant in responding to the contemporary environment, and
inform our thinking about how we may confront the interconnectedness
and interdependence of global citizens and spaces. Literature is a late arrival
to the critical study of cosmopolitanism, and yet the term is uniquely suited
to literary analysis. Kwame Anthony Appiah recognises that the novel form
functions ‘as a testing ground for [ . . . ] cosmopolitanism, with its emphasis
on dialogue among differences’; the novel itself being ‘a message in a bottle
from some other position’ (2001: 207, 223). Literary studies as a discipline
often employs cosmopolitanism as a synonym for the terms globalisation
and transnationalism. Accurate definitions of the concept differ from these
two interrelated terms by emphasising an ethical dimension, operating at
the level of the individual. Indeed, cosmopolitanism is a highly malleable
and multidimensional concept, leaving its specificities open to interpreta-
tion. For this reason, there is much debate on how the term continues to
defy a simple definition. By clarifying the concept and its usage in literary
studies, it is possible to enhance its analytical value in reflecting the cultural
processes of globalised life. Although the concept has predominantly
remained the domain of philosophy and the social sciences, this study will
suggest the emergence of a growing cosmopolitan consciousness within
literature as a direct result of post-millennial cultural conflict and fragility –
indeed, global crises can be perceived as catalysts for a tentative and critical
cosmopolitanism. The following chapters build upon this approach to
demonstrate how British and American fiction is beginning to imagine
new configurations of cultural identity, community and socio-political
interdependence to respond to accelerated changes in world society.
Despite their diverse subject matter, the selected fictions in this study all
engage with contemporary concerns facing the globalised world, from the rise
in transnational mobilities, to radical technological change, to the threat of
ecological disaster. Chapter 2 examines the global fiction of David Mitchell.
Both Ghostwritten: A Novel in Nine Parts (1999) and Cloud Atlas (2004) are
a mixture of differing cultures, literary styles and genres that reflect the cultural
relationality and complex globality of the contemporary moment. Through a
detailed analysis of these novels, the chapter will argue that Mitchell acknowl-
edges a rise in the interrelation of global and local flows. Developing this idea,
the next two chapters will concentrate on how cosmopolitanism specifically
relates to local communities and landscapes. Chapter 3 concentrates on the
urban suburbs of London in Zadie Smith’s NW (2012). It will be argued that
Smith’s limited geographical focus on north-west London (an area in which
she was born and continues to reside) intimates that the social constructs of
the family and local community are more conducive to developing ethical
values and meaningful social relations. Chapter 4 provides a transatlantic
comparison to Smith’s fiction by exploring the urban cityscapes of New
York in Teju Cole’s Open City (2011). By paying attention to the non-elite
mobilities of African migrants, Cole’s text reveals a critical cosmopolitanism
that questions the very nature of cultural empathy. Chapter 5 shifts the focus
of the study by addressing the role of digital communicative technologies in
1 INTRODUCTION 3
WHAT IS COSMOPOLITANISM?
This first chapter will return to a more detailed statement on the chosen
authors and novels discussed in the main body of the study, but first it is
necessary to examine a number of key concepts. Specifically, this chapter
will scrutinise the ways in which the term cosmopolitanism has been under-
stood, both historically and in the contemporary period. Cosmopolitan
theory itself stretches back to the Greek Stoics and is visibly apparent in
Immanuel Kant’s Enlightenment philosophy. The Stoic’s classical concep-
tion of the term introduced the idea that individuals may exist as citizens of
the world, mediating between new and existing loyalties, and balancing
local allegiances with an abstract commitment to global others. Kant, on
the other hand, tried to combine the philosophical concept with demo-
cratic forms of governance; his work questioned the necessary institutional
specifics responsible for allowing world citizens to share a common global
occupancy. Earlier conceptions of cosmopolitanism possessed this purely
normative edge, resulting in the term evoking connotations of utopianism.
The post-millennial environment requires a more critical investigation into
usage of the term in order to confront the fragility and conflict of cosmo-
political threats, as well as emphasising how the ethical ideals of cultural
cooperation and empathy may possess a pragmatic function in addressing
global inequalities. In recent years, cosmopolitan theory has re-emerged
through the philosophical and sociological work of Martha Nussbaum,
among others. Nussbaum’s claim that ‘we should give our first allegiance
to the moral community made up by the humanity of all human beings’
demonstrates a turn away from localised forms of belonging and member-
ship, neglecting the more realisable and everyday forms of cultural engage-
ment (1996: 7). Nathan Glazer identifies that Nussbaum’s proposed
application of a universal form of cosmopolitanism, reconfigured from
Stoic philosophy, neglects the fact that the Stoics were citizens of ‘a near-
universal state and civilization’ with ‘uniformity in rights and obligations’,
4 COSMOPOLITANISM IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FICTION
asymmetries that govern global relations. Beck was also one of the first
theorists to recognise that a ‘cosmopolitan society means a cosmopolitan
society and its enemies’, acknowledging that there will always be those who
benefit less from globalising processes (2002a: 83 – emphasis added).
With this in mind, the concept does not necessarily involve ‘consensus’
but often ‘conflict’, as global communities ‘enter into mutually confirming
and correcting relations’ in an effort to mediate between diverse perspec-
tives and heterogeneous cultures (2006: 60). Contemporary fiction is
beginning to answer such reasoning, demonstrating how a networked
culture of global flows opens up spaces of cooperation as well as conflict,
as new potentialities for connectivity are tempered by a new awareness of
global risk. It is therefore necessary to examine how the authors discussed
in this study identify and tackle the present conditions of the emerging
twenty-first century, and also how the future will be shaped by the shared
consequences of cultural interdependence. Indeed, an increased awareness
of global others emerges as contemporary cosmopolitanism’s dominant
mode. Several of the fictions in this study, predominantly the works of
Mitchell, consequently imagine coordinated strategies of collaboration
that respond to the inherent common problems which cultural and cos-
mopolitical interconnection brings.
One of the key concerns in clarifying the usage of cosmopolitanism is
identifying the ethical ideals associated with the concept. Steven Vertovec
and Robin Cohen attempt to both pin down its meaning and acknowledge
its multiplicity, defining it as: ‘a socio-cultural condition’ arising as a result
of contemporary globalising processes; ‘a kind of philosophy or world-
view’ that acknowledges the common values existing between all humans
regardless of race or affiliation; a project aimed towards ‘building transna-
tional institutions’ that override the potency of the nation-state; a ‘political
project for recognizing multiple identities’ and the multiple allegiances a
citizen feels with regards to local, national and global concerns; ‘an attitu-
dinal or dispositional orientation’ that demonstrates an openness to cul-
tural experience and otherness; or simply ‘a mode of practice’ that
acknowledges and embraces the internal effects of globalisation on cultures
and communities (2002: 9). The following chapters will draw upon these
definitions, as well as those of other theorists, in attempting to identify the
various manifestations of the term operating in the selected fictions.
Crucially, while much research has predominantly focused on cosmopoli-
tanism as the purview of nation-states and governmental organisations, this
study shall suggest that the term is the purview of ethical agency.2 Literary
6 COSMOPOLITANISM IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FICTION
sector of society who possess the means to enjoy global mobility. Through a
sustained concentration on localised engagement and belonging, the fol-
lowing chapters will argue against Hannerz’s false dichotomy between so-
called ‘cosmopolitans’, whose affluence permits a freedom unhindered by
national borders or geographical distance, and ‘locals’, who remain
restricted by socioeconomic or cultural immobility (1990: 238).
Hannerz’s reasoning accounts for the mobile practices of Western elites,
but fails to address the day-to-day cultural practices of global others.
Instead, the fiction of Mitchell, Smith and Cole will demonstrate that
cultural convergence and deterritorialisation of territory can result in an
individual’s life becoming subject to global forces without even leaving their
locality. Mitchell and Smith in particular imagine ‘glocal’ spaces in which
the dynamic tension and creative interplay of global and local systems
complicate existing forms of belonging and questions of cultural identity,
demonstrating how cosmopolitanism can be integral to parochial cultural
encounters and can operate within localities.3
Moreover, cosmopolitanism should concern itself with non-elite citi-
zens and unprivileged positions, in order to prove its inherent value as a
pragmatic and applicable social concept. Tellingly, Hannerz’s positioning
of cosmopolitanism as an elite practice contradicts his statement that the
concept ‘is first of all an orientation’ that one can assume (1996: 103). His
proposed binary (of cosmopolitans and locals) fails to acknowledge both
the emergence of non-elite agencies arising from the progressive empow-
erment of immigrants and refugees, and, more importantly, the centrality
of ethical agency that makes cosmopolitanism so much more than a con-
dition of transnational mobility. Nor should we agree with Hannerz’s
reasoning that cosmopolitanism ‘has to do with a sense of the world as
one’ (2007: 83). He begins his seminal essay with the bold claim that ‘there
is now a world culture’, neglecting the very multiplicity and heterogeneity
of cultures that remain marginalised by Western hegemonic structures
(1990: 237). Such optimism perceives the world to already exist in a fully
globalised state, rather than in the process of coming to terms with pro-
gressive global interconnectedness. Cosmopolitanism is vital to such pro-
gressive interaction, involving the mediation between diverse lifeworlds
and cultures, while proposing that a potential cross-cultural dialogue may
be established that moves beyond hegemonic discourses. Accordingly,
David Held argues that only by adopting a cosmopolitan outlook may we
accommodate ourselves to ‘a more global era, marked by overlapping
communities of fate’ (57). Proposing a unified global culture merely
1 INTRODUCTION 9
universal and the particular, the similar and the dissimilar, the global and
the local are to be conceived, not as cultural polarities but as intercon-
nected and reciprocally interpenetrating principles’, which force indivi-
duals to acknowledge ‘the real, internal cosmopolitanization of their
lifeworlds and institutions’ (Beck 2006: 72–3, 2). Despite this, the
criticism remains that global theories of cultural interaction retain an
apparent disregard for world citizens who are unable to participate in the
global arena or for whom mobility is not an option. The works of Smith
and Cole address this limitation by revealing contemporary forms of
cosmopolitanism to be as intimately concerned with local contexts as
much as transnational mobilities, interrogating pragmatic forms of
engagement by non-elite citizens. Appropriately, Beck acknowledges
that cosmopolitanisation of territory reveals an awareness of ‘the
dynamics of global risks, of mobility and migration’ engendered by an
engagement with transnational concerns in localised settings (2008: 27).
For example, Cole’s fiction reveals the ways by which parochial settings
operate as microcosmic analogies for the global relations of the wider
world. Crucially, however, borderlessness is no longer a necessary
requirement for cross-cultural interaction, with many of the tensions
and concerns raised as a direct result of nation-state allegiances or local
ties. Rather, this study follows Robbins in perceiving cosmopolitanism to
involve an inscription of ‘(re)attachment, multiple attachment, or attach-
ment at a distance’ (1998b: 3). What the fictions discussed in this study
share is an embrace of wider connectivities, operating alongside existing
bonds, in formulating a sense of global belonging, and demonstrate the
emergence of a critical cosmopolitan outlook that specifically interro-
gates assumptions regarding ethnic heritage or racial grouping.
As Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri suggest, globalisation ‘is not one
thing, and the multiple processes that we recognize as globalization are
not unified or univocal’ (2000: xv). This study will therefore attempt to
address the context-specific manifestations of globalising processes in the
disparate fictions, questioning whether these forces foster a more cosmo-
politan outlook – concerning a greater understanding and empathy for the
lives of cultural others, coupled with an acknowledgement of the necessity
for cross-border interdependencies – or create resistance towards wider
allegiances and cultural attachments. Similarly, while this study will follow
Werbner in acknowledging that globalisation can be perceived as the
‘(mainly Western) spread of ideas and practices’, and cosmopolitanism
involves an inherent ‘complicity with Western hegemony’, it will be
12 COSMOPOLITANISM IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FICTION
presence of transnational communities does not suggest that ethical ideals are
practised or promoted; it is merely a state of cultural movement. Similarly,
exposure to otherness and diversity through mobility is not an inevitable
precursor to ethical engagement. There is instead a valid argument that
transnational mobility merely results in the emergence of superficial cultural
engagement, based on Western aesthetic spectatorship. We can term such
actions ‘faux-cosmopolitanism’, to be grouped with the growth in tourism
and business travel, merely expressing ‘a kind of ersatz benevolence’ by
‘superimposing a wider, allegedly global culture on more local cultural
practices’ (van Hooft 2009: 11). Cosmopolitanism is also often conflated
with mere multiculturalism, yet Annemarie Bodaar correctly differentiates
the terms by suggesting that multiculturalism denotes rigid ‘adherence to the
culture of the group’ whereas cosmopolitanism concerns the formation of
‘loose and multiple’ socio-cultural ties that exceed the fixed boundaries
associated with ethnicity alone (2006: 171). While multiculturalism implies
a form of homogeneity at the group level, cosmopolitanism explores hetero-
geneous forms of belonging that arise through acts of individual ethical
agency. Further, it will be argued that cosmopolitan outlooks are not the
result of an allegiance to one territorial space, nor are they necessarily based
on the idea of nomadism, because such a view neglects the relevance and
impact of belonging and place and suggests a privileged view from nowhere
in particular. The issues, then, are not whether individuals are increasingly
transnationally mobile, but whether such mobility is a catalyst in the forma-
tion of new connectivities and ethical subjectivities towards others, and the
position the novels implicitly (or explicitly) take on this issue.
Another key distinguishing feature of contemporary cosmopolitan theory
is the rapid acceleration of digital communicative technologies. The speed
and immediacy with which digital technology now links the wider world
forges dialogues and connectivities that have no precedent. Such technolo-
gies reformulate global relations and lead to the construction of new virtual
communities that are founded on non-corporeal connections and override
geographical or cultural divides. Gavin Kendall, Ian Woodward and Zlatko
Skrbiš support this claim, arguing that contemporary forms of cosmopolitan-
ism differ from classical models because technology ‘enables a vital dimension
of the cosmopolitan experience – to move beyond the cosmopolitan imagi-
nation to enable active, direct engagement with other cultures’ (2005: 1).
Proponents of digital communication regard the internet as the means of
promoting cultural understanding and awareness of otherness, forging con-
nections between global citizens who will never meet face-to-face. Through
1 INTRODUCTION 15
an analysis of Eggers and Kunzru’s work, however, it will be argued that the
globalising flows of digital connectivity simultaneously function as a new
form of cultural imperialism, strengthening rather than reducing the global
inequalities of twenty-first century life.
CHAPTER SUMMARIES
To prevent this study simply becoming a sociological review of emergent
cultural processes, the following chapters provide a close reading of
selected fictions which actively engage with, and assume widely diverse
stances to, the concerns of cosmopolitanism (making the structure of this
study a cosmopolitan enterprise in itself). After all, literature is suited to
exploring the values and ideals of cosmopolitan thought. As Nussbaum
argues, ‘[n]arratives, especially novels [ . . . ] speak to the reader as a human
being, not simply as a member of some local culture; and works of literature
frequently cross cultural boundaries far more easily than works of religion
and philosophy’ (1990: 391). The various forms of cosmopolitanism
explored in the chosen novels reveal the multidimensionality of the con-
cept, reactive and sensitive to geographical and cultural idiosyncrasies.
Despite this, the following chapters do not exist in isolation, but interrelate
with one another, fostering a unity in diversity and allowing a clear
18 COSMOPOLITANISM IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY FICTION
Series I. Nemocera.—In this section the habit occurs in no less than five
families, viz.:
Blepharoceridae. Curupira; in the female only; larva aquatic.
Culicidae. Culex, Mosquitoes; in the female only; other genera, with one or
two exceptions, do not suck blood; larvae aquatic.
Chironomidae. Ceratopogon, Midge; in the female only; exceptional even
in the genus, though the habit is said to exist in one or two less
known, allied genera; larval habits not certain; often aquatic; in C.
bipunctatus the larva lives under moist bark.
Psychodidae. Phlebotomus: in the female only (?); quite exceptional in the
family; larva aquatic or in liquid filth.
Simuliidae. Simulium, sand-flies; general in the family (?), which, however,
is a very small one; larva aquatic, food probably mixed vegetable and
animal microscopic organisms.
Series II. Brachycera. Tabanidae. Gad-flies: apparently general in the
females of this family; the habits of the exotic forms but little known; in
the larval state, scarcely at all known; some are aquatic.
Series IV. Cyclorrhapha Schizophora: Stomoxys, Haematobia; both sexes
(?); larvae in dung. [The Tse-tse flies, Glossina, are placed in this family,
though their mode of parturition is that of the next section].
Series V. Pupipara. The habit of blood-sucking is probably common to all the
group and to both sexes. The flies, with one exception, frequent
Vertebrates; in many cases living entirely on their bodies, and
apparently imbibing much blood; the larvae are nourished inside the
flies, not on the imbibed blood, but on a milky secretion from the mother.
Sub-Order Aphaniptera. Fleas. The habit of blood-sucking is common to all
the members and to both sexes. The larvae live on dried animal matter.
Thirty years or more ago the Russian naturalist, Wagner, made the
very remarkable discovery that the larva of a Cecidomyiid produces
young; and it has since been found by Meinert and others that this
kind of paedogenesis occurs in several species of the genera
Miastor and Oligarces. The details are briefly as follows:—A female
fly lays a few, very large, eggs, out of each of which comes a larva,
that does not go on to the perfect state, but produces in its interior
young larvae that, after consuming the interior of the body of the
parent larva, escape by making a hole in the skin, and thereafter
subsist externally in a natural manner. This larval reproduction may
be continued for several generations, through autumn, winter, and
spring till the following summer, when a generation of the larvae
goes on to pupation and the mature, sexually perfect fly appears.
Much discussion has taken place as to the mode of origination of the
larvae; Carus and others thought they were produced from the
rudimental, or immature ovaries of the parent larva. Meinert, who
has made a special study of the subject,[370] finds, however, that this
is not the case; in the reproducing larva of the autumn there is no
ovary at all; in the reproducing larvae of the spring-time rudimentary
ovaries or testes, as the case may be, exist; the young are not,
however, produced from these, but from germs in close connection
with the fat-body. In the larvae that go on to metamorphosis the
ovaries continue their natural development. It would thus appear that
the fat-body has, like the leaf of a Begonia, under certain
circumstances, the power, usually limited to the ovaries, of producing
complete and perfect individuals.
The habits of many of the larvae are very peculiar, owing to their
spinning or exuding a mucus, that reminds one of snail-slime; they
are frequently gregarious, and some of them have likewise, as we
shall subsequently mention, migratory habits. Perris has described
the very curious manner in which Sciophila unimaculata forms its
slimy tracks;[371] it stretches its head to one side, fixes the tip of a
drop of the viscous matter from its mouth to the surface of the
substance over which it is to progress, bends its head under itself so
as to affix the matter to the lower face of its own body; then stretches
its head to the other side and repeats the operation, thus forming a
track on which it glides, or perhaps, as the mucus completely
envelops its body, we should rather call it a tunnel through which the
maggot slips along. According to the description of Hudson[372] the
so-called New Zealand Glow-worm is the larva of Boletophila
luminosa; it forms webs in dark ravines, along which it glides, giving
a considerable amount of light from the peculiarly formed terminal
segment of the body. This larva is figured as consisting of about
twenty segments. The pupa is provided with a very long, curiously-
branched dorsal structure: the fly issuing from the pupa is strongly
luminous, though no use can be discovered for the property either in
it or in the larva. The larva of the Australian Ceroplatus mastersi is
also luminous. Another very exceptional larva is that of Epicypta
scatophora; it is of short, thick form, like Cecidomyiid larvae, and has
a very remarkable structure of the dorsal parts of the body; by
means of this its excrement, which is of a peculiar nature, is spread
out and forms a case for enveloping and sheltering the larva.
Ultimately the larval case is converted into a cocoon for pupation.
This larva is so different from that of other Mycetophilidae, that Perris
was at first unable to believe that the fly he reared really came from
this unusually formed larva. The larva of Mycetobia pallipes (Fig.
221) offers a still more remarkable phenomenon, inasmuch as it is
amphipneustic instead of peripneustic (that is to say, it has a pair of
stigmata at the termination of the body and a pair on the first thoracic
segment instead of the lateral series of pairs we have described as
normal in Mycetophilidae). This larva lives in company with the
amphipneustic larva of Rhyphus, a fly of quite another family, and
the Mycetobia larva so closely resembles that of the Rhyphus, that it
is difficult to distinguish the two. This anomalous larva gives rise, like
the exceptional larva of Epicypta, to an ordinary Mycetophilid fly.[373]
But the most remarkable of all the Mycetophilid larvae are those of
certain species of Sciara, that migrate in columns, called by the
Germans, Heerwurm. The larva of Sciara militaris lives under layers
of decomposing leaves in forests, and under certain circumstances,
migrates, sometimes perhaps in search of a fresh supply of food,
though in some cases it is said this cannot be the reason. Millions of
the larvae accumulate and form themselves by the aid of their
viscous mucus into great strings or ribbons, and then glide along like
serpents: these aggregates are said to be sometimes forty to a
hundred feet long, five or six inches wide, and an inch in depth. It is
said that if the two ends of one of these processions be brought into
contact, they become joined, and the monstrous ring may writhe for
many hours before it can again disengage itself and assume a
columnar form. These processional maggots are met with in
Northern Europe and the United States, and there is now an
extensive literature about them.[374] Though they sometimes consist
of almost incredible numbers of individuals, yet it appears that in the
Carpathian mountains the assemblages are usually much smaller,
being from four to twenty inches long. A species of Sciara is the
"Yellow-fever fly" of the Southern United States. It appears that it has
several times appeared in unusual numbers and in unwonted
localities at the same time as the dreaded disease, with which it is
popularly supposed to have some connection.
There are more than 1000 species of these flies known, and many
genera. They form three sub-families, which are by some considered
distinct families, viz.: Ptychopterinae, Limnobiinae or Tipulidae
Brevipalpi, Tipulinae or Tipulidae Longipalpi.