Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hasan A. Fallahgoul
Sergio M. Focardi
Frank J. Fabozzi
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier
125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom
525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, United States
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2017 Hasan A. Fallahgoul, Sergio M. Focardi, Frank J. Fabozzi.
Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek
permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright
Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by
the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or
medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein.
In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the
safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors,
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of
products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods,
products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-804248-9
SMF
To the memory of my parents
FJF
To my family
About the Authors
Hasan A. Fallahgoul is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Swiss Finance
Institute @ EPFL, in the team lead by Professor Loriano Mancini. Prior to this
position, he was a postdoctoral researcher at the European Center for Advanced
Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), Université Libre de Bruxelles,
Belgium. His research interests are in financial econometrics, quantitative finance,
Lévy processes, and fractional calculus; specializing in heavy-tailed distributions
and their applications to finance. Dr. Fallahgoul has published several papers in
scientific journals including Quantitative Finance, Applied Mathematics Letters,
and Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice. He holds a PhD and MSc in
applied mathematics from the K. N. Toosi University of Technology.
List oJ illustrations xi
Part I Theory
2 Ft'actional Calculus 12
21 Different definitions for fractional derivatives 12
2.1.1 Riemann-Liouville Fractiona.l Derivative 13
2.1.2 Caputo Fractional Derivative 15
2."1.3 G ri.inwal d- Letnikov Fractional Derivative 16
2.1.4 Fractional derivative based 011 the Pourier transform 17
2.2 Computation with i\fatlab 18
Key points of the chapter 20
Part II Applications 57
Index 103
Illustrations
In this monograph we discuss how fractional calculus and fractional processes are
used in financial modeling, finance theory, and economics. We begin by giving
an overview of fractional calculus and fractional processes, responding upfront to
two important questions:
1. What is the fractional paradigm for both calculus and stochastic processes?
2. Why is the fractional paradigm important in science in general and in finance
and economics in particular?
Fractional calculus is a generalization of ordinary calculus. Calculus proved
to be a key tool for modern science because it allows the writing of differential
equations that link variables and their rates of change. Differential equations
ushered in modern theoretical quantitative science. A key reason for the success
of differential equations in science is that the description of physical phenomena
simplifies locally. For example, to understand how temperature propagates in a
rod when we apply a source of heat to one of its extremities. While the actual
description of the propagation of temperature can be rather complex in function
of the source of heat, locally, the heat equation is quite easy: at any point on the
rod, the time derivative of the temperature is proportional to the second space
2
derivative: ∂T
∂t
= k ∂∂xT2 . This is the key for the success of differential equations in
science: phenomena simplify locally and one can write a simple, yet extremely
powerful, general law.
However, not all problems are local. Many problems in physics, engineering,
and economics are of a global nature. Consider, for example, variational problems,
where the objective is to optimize a functional, that is, to find an optimum in
a space of functions. Though variational problems are not local, it has been a
major mathematical success to translate variational problems into integral or
differential equations. Still the formalism of fractional calculus is a very useful
tool for solving variational problems.
A widely cited example is Abel’s integral equation, which solves the problem
of the tautochrone. A tautochrone is a curve on a vertical plane such that the
time that it takes a point freely sliding on the curve under the sole influence of
gravity to reach the lowest point is a constant independent of its starting point.
Abel’s integral equations can be solved with a fractional derivative.
The problem of the tautochrone is essentially a variational problem. A pro-
found link has been established in several recent papers between the calculus of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804248-9.50001-2, 3
Copyright © 2017 Hasan A. Fallahgoul, Sergio M. Focardi, Frank J. Fabozzi.
Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.
4 Fractional calculus and fractional processes: an overview
variations and fractional calculus, (see, Gorenflo et al. (2001) and Mainardi et al.
(2000).). The calculus of variations is one of the main mathematical tools used
in science and engineering. Classical dynamics, for example, can be formulated
in variational terms as the problem of maximizing Hamiltonian functionals. Con-
trol theory is based on variational principles. Fractional calculus is very useful in
formulating and solving variational problems. It is the non local characteristic of
fractional calculus that makes it interesting (in science and engineering).
Fractional calculus is also useful in computing probability distribution func-
tions with fat tails, widely used in financial risk management. As we will see in
Chapters 4 and 5, the solutions of some fractional partial differential equations
represent fat-tailed, stable distributions. These distributions cannot be described
with closed formulas. Numerical approximations are needed. Fractional calculus
provides useful tools for computing numerically fat-tailed stable distributions.
Solving fractional partial differential equations proved to be an important tool
in pricing financial contracts such as options. But classical Black-Scholes equa-
tions (see Black and Scholes (1973)) fail in many practical applications of option
pricing. As we will see in Chapter 6, fractional differential equations provide
better approximations to option pricing.
The fractional paradigm applies not only to calculus but also to stochastic
processes, used in many applications in finance and economics such as modeling
volatility and interest rates and modeling high frequency data. The key features
of fractional processes that make them interesting to these disciplines include the
following:
1. Long-range memory
2. Path-dependence, non Markovian properties
3. Self-similarity
4. Fractal paths
5. Anomalous diffusion behavior.
The definition and properties of fractional processes look very different from
those of fractional calculus; actually, fractional processes such as fractional Brow-
nian motions are defined in terms of long-range dependence, that is, persistent
autocorrelation. The fractional nature of these processes appears in some pa-
rameters that characterize autocorrelations, namely the so called Hurst-exponent
H, which might assume fractional values as opposed to integer values. And an-
other important feature of fractional processes, self-similarity, is also represented
d
through a fractional exponent H in the relationship{Xct } = {cH Xt }.
Anomalous diffusions are defined in terms of the growth rate of the diffusion
process. The variance of an anomalous diffusion grows as tα , that is, var (Xt ) ∝ tα ,
where α is a fractional exponent as opposed to the α = 1 integer exponent of
normal diffusions. Anomalous diffusions can be represented through fractional
Brownian motions or through continuous-time random walks.
What is the relationship between fractional calculus and the properties (persis-
tent correlations, self-similarity, and growth of variance) of fractional processes
1.1 Fractional calculus 5
x y1 yn−1 x
1
Z Z Z Z
−n n−1
D f≡ ··· f (yn ) dyn dyn−1 · · · dy1 = (x − t) f (t) dt
a a a (n − 1)! a
that we mentioned above. Using the Gamma function, the Cauchy formula can
be generalized to the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral:
Z x
−α 1 α−1
D f≡ (x − t) f (t) dt. (1.2)
Γ (α) a
This formula is well-defined in ordinary calculus under rather general conditions
that will be discussed in the chapters to follow. Therefore, it can be used to
generalize the notion of integral of order n, where n is an integer, to that of
integral of order α > 0 where α is a real number.
The next step is to define the derivative of order α > 0. In essence, the process
1.2 Fractional processes 7
is the following. nWe know how to define D−α f for any real α
number and we know
how to define ddxnf for any integer number. To define ddxαf for any real number
α > 0, we find the largest integer m such that m − 1 < α < m and we define the
(left) fractional derivative of order α in two steps. First we perform a fractional
integration of order m − α, which is a positive number. Then we take the m-th
order derivative. This is called the left-hand fractional derivative given by
dα f dm
= (J α f ) (1.3)
dxα dxm
Many other definitions of fractional derivatives have been proposed. Most defi-
nitions are based on the Riemann-Liouville integral; other definitions extend the
notion of the difference quotient. In this monograph we will discuss several of these
definitions. Using fractional derivatives, we can extend the notion of differential
equations to fractional differential equations and fractional integral equations.
Let’s now ask: What is the geometrical or physical interpretation of fractional
calculus? What is the difference between classical calculus and fractional calculus?
Why is fractional calculus important? Besides the purely mathematical interest,
what is the practical interest of fractional calculus?
The question of the geometrical or physical interpretation of fractional calculus
has been discussed for some 300 years without reaching a conclusion. Classical
integral and derivatives have well-known and clear geometrical interpretations in
terms of tangent lines, tangent planes, and areas. Physical interpretations are
also clear in terms of speed and acceleration. However, there is no consensus
on the interpretation of fractional integrals and derivatives. The interpretation
of fractional derivatives and integrals was recognized as one of the unresolved
problems at the first International Conference on Fractional Calculus held in
1974 in New Haven, Connecticut.
Subsequent attempts to provide an interpretation have been made. For exam-
ple, Podlubny (1998) proposed the “fence interpretation” for stochastic integrals.
The possibility of links between fractional calculus and fractals has also been
proposed. However, the problem has remained basically unresolved. Despite this,
some of the main features and advantages of fractional calculus are well-known, in
particular the properties of non locality and the representation of (long) memory
processes.
Suppose now that the distribution of the jump size is independent from the dis-
tribution of waiting times: ϕ (ξ, τ ) = λ (ξ) ψ (τ ). Under this assumption, equation
(1.9) becomes:
1 − ψ̃ (s) 1
p̃ (k, s) =
s 1 − λ̃ (k) ψ̃ (s)
where λ̃ (k) is the Fourier transform of λ (ξ).
α
Let’s now make the further assumption that λ̃ (k) = exp (− |k| ) , 0 < α ≤
2 and that under these assumptions, λ̃ (k) is the characteristic function of an
alpha–stable distribution of index alpha. Scalas et al. (2000) demonstrate that
the following fractional partial differential equation holds:
∂ β p (x, t) ∂ α p (x, t) t−β
= α + δ (x) , t > 0
∂t β ∂ |x| Γ (1 − β)
Continuous-time random walks are non Markovian, long-range memory processes
which can be described by the fractional equivalent of the Fokker-Planck equation.
Continuous-time random walks do not have continuous paths as paths make
jumps. However, the mean squared displacement, that is the variance of the
process, does not grow linearly with time. Continuous time random walks have
therefore been proposed as a model of anomalous diffusion.
In the following chapters we will discuss in mathematical detail the properties
of fractional calculus and fractional processes and their applications in finance
and economics.
2
Fractional Calculus
Since the early 1960s, there have been a good number of papers related to heavy
tail distributions. These papers support the view that the heavy tail property is
a stylized fact about financial time series. Stable distributions have infinite vari-
ance, a property which is not found in empirical samples where empirical variance
does not grow with the size of the sample. As an example of the application of
fractional calculus, by extending diffusion equations to fractional order, a con-
nection between stable and tempered stable distribution with fractional calculus
can be made.
Because there are different methods for extending ordinary calculus to frac-
tional calculus, in this chapter we discuss the concepts and properties of the
most well-known definitions of fractional calculus and those that will be used in
this monograph.
This chapter is organized as follows. Some important definitions for fractional
calculus are discussed in Section 2.1. More specifically, details of the Riemann-
Liouville fractional derivative, Caputo fractional derivative, Grünwald-Letnikov
fractional derivative, and fractional derivative based on the Fourier transform are
discussed. Some examples for implementation of fractional derivatives in Matlab
are given in Section 2.2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804248-9.50002-4, 12
Copyright © 2017 Hasan A. Fallahgoul, Sergio M. Focardi, Frank J. Fabozzi.
Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.
2.1 Different definitions for fractional derivatives 13
and
dn
f (n) (x) = f (x),
dxn
where f(n) (x) and f (n) (x) are respectively an n-fold integral and a derivative of
order n. There are different approaches for presenting the functions f(n) (x) and
f (n) (x) in terms of f (x) and n, each approach leading to a definition for the
fractional derivative.2
Given our objective in this monograph, we limit our discussion to the Riemann-
Liouville, Caputo, Grünwald-Letnikov, and fractional integrals and derivatives
based on the Fourier transform.3 Bear in mind that there is a link between these
definitions.4
Let I = [a, b] be a finite interval on the real axis R. The left-side and right-side
fractional integrals RL Iaα+ f and RL Ibα− f of order α ∈ C are defined by
Z x
1 f (t)dt
(RL Iaα+ f )(x) = , (x > a; Re(α) > 0) (2.2)
Γ(α) a (x − t)1−α
and
b
1 f (t)dt
Z
(RL Ibα− f )(x) = , (x < a; Re(α) > 0) (2.3)
Γ(α) x (t − x)1−α
where Γ(x) and Re(α) show the gamma function and imaginary part of α, re-
spectively. By setting n ∈ N in equations (2.2) and (2.3), we obtain
Z x
1
(RL Iaα+ f )(x) = (x − t)n−1 f (t)dt, (n ∈ N) (2.4)
(n − 1)! a
and
b
1
Z
(RL Ibα− f )(x) = (t − x)n−1 f (t)dt, (n ∈ N) (2.5)
(n − 1)! x
It should be stressed that equations (2.4) and (2.5) are equal to equation (2.1).
The left-side and right-side fractional derivatives RL Daα+ f and RL Dbα− f of order
α ∈ C are defined by
n
RL α d RL n−α
( Da+ f )(x) = Ia+ f (x)
dx
n Z x
1 d f (t)dt
= , (n = [Re(α)] = 1; x > a)
Γ(n − α) dx a (x − t)
α−n+1
and
d n RL n−α
RL
( Dbα− f )(x) = − Ib− f (x)
dx
d n b
Z
1 f (t)dt
= − , (n = [Re(α)] + 1; x < b)
Γ(n − α) dx x (t − x)
α−n+1
RL d RL 1− pq
( Daα+ c)(x) = Ia+ c (x)
dx
Z x
1 d cdt
= p p , (n = [Re(α)] + 1 = 1; x > a)
Γ(1 − q ) dx a (x − t) q
p
!
c d (x − a)1− q
= ,
Γ(1 − pq ) dx 1 − pq
p
c(x − a)− q
= .
Γ(1 − pq )
Therefore, one important conclusion is that the RL fractional derivative of a
constant number is not zero. This property in fractional calculus is in contrast
to the property in ordinary calculus where the derivative of a constant function
is always zero.
and
" n−1
#!
C
X f (k) (b)
Dbα− f RL
Dbα− (b − t)k
(x) = f (t) − (x),
k=0
k!
respectively.
Both the RL and C fractional derivatives are very common in applied areas.
However, in working with differential equations, the C fractional derivative is
more flexible. The reason for this attribute for the C financial derivative is related
to the initial conditions for solving differential equations: it is not necessary for
the initial conditions to be fractional.7
x
1 dt
Z
C
Daα+ f
(x) = , (n = [Re(α)] = 1; x > a)
Γ(1 − α) a (x − t)α
p
!
1 d (x − a)1− q
= ,
Γ(1 − pq ) dx 1 − pq
p
(x − a)− q
= .
Γ(1 − pq )
where !
α α(α − 1) · · · (α − k + 1)
= .
k n!
The left-side and right-side GL fractional derivatives are defined if h > 0 and
h < 0, respectively. That is, the left-side and right-side GL fractional derivative
of order α on finite interval I = [a, b] is defined by
α
∆h,a+ f (x)
GL α
Da+ f (x) = lim + ,
h−→0 hα
and
∆αh,b− f (x)
GL
Dbα− f (x) = lim−
,
h−→0 hα
respectively, where
[Xh ]
x−a !
α
∆αh,a+ f (x) = (−1)k
f (x − kh), (x ∈ R; h, α > 0),
k=0
k
and
[Xh ]
b−x !
α k α
∆h,b− f (x) = (−1) f (x + kh), (x ∈ R; h, α > 0).
k=0
k
where F−1 is the inverse of the Fourier transform. Representing the fractional
derivative using Fourier transform by equations (2.7) and (2.8) emphasizes the
fact that equation (2.9), in general, for fractional derivatives does not hold; that
is,
dn n d
n
= (−1) . (2.9)
dxn dxn
Remark This definition is an extension of the RL fractional derivative for an
infinite interval (−∞, ∞).
By changing the order of the derivative and function, we will get another plot.
Figure 2.4 shows the RL derivatives for cos(x) + sin(x).
By replacing the command cumsum(f ) rather than diff(f ) in the above codes,
one can obtain the RL fractional integral.
By comparing Figures 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4, one can see that the difference between
20 Fractional Calculus
a function and its derivative can be substantial while in fractional calculus case
this may not be true.
Now, we compute the GL fractional derivative and integral.15 The output for
the following code is presented in Figure 2.5.
Figure
√ 2.4 The RL fractional derivatives for the cos(x) + sin(x) of order
2 ∗ (0.1 : 3 : 25)
a= .
17
22 Fractional Calculus
REFERENCES.
[1] Pliny: lxxxiii., 11, N.c.v.
[2] Stockhusen: De Litharg. Fumo, etc. Goslar, 1656.
[3] Tronchin: De Colica Pictonum. 1758.
[4] John Hunter: Observations of Diseases of the Army in Jamaica.
London, 1788.
[5] Meillère, G.: Le Saturnisme. Paris, 1903.
[6] Bisserie: Bull. Soc. Pharmacol. May, 1900.
[7] Houston: Local Government Board Annual Report, 1901-02,
supplement, vol. ii.
CHAPTER II
ÆTIOLOGY
Lead poisoning of industrial origin rarely occurs in the acute form.
Practically all cases coming under the notice of either appointed surgeons,
certifying surgeons, or even in the wards of general hospitals, are of the
subacute or chronic type. There is no reason to suppose that lead
compounds are used more frequently by the workers in lead industries as
abortifacients than by other persons.
The compounds of lead which are responsible for poisoning in industrial
processes are for the most part the hydrated carbonate, or white lead, and
the oxides of lead, whilst a comparatively small number of cases owe their
origin to compounds, such as chromates and chlorides.
The poisonous nature of any lead compound from an industrial point of
view is proportional to (1) the size of the ultimate particles of the substance
manufactured, and therefore the ease with which such particles are capable
of dissemination in the air; and (2) the solubility of the particles in the normal
fluids of the body, such as the saliva, pharyngeal and tracheal and bronchial
mucus, etc., and the fluids of the stomach and intestine. An instance of the
variation in size of the particles of lead compounds used industrially is the
difference between ground lead silicate (fritted lead) used in the potteries,
and the size of the particles of ordinary white or “raw” lead. By micrometric
measurements one of us [K. W. G.[1]] found the average size of the particles
of fritt to be ten times that of the white lead particles. Further, direct
experiment made with equal masses of the two compounds in such a manner
that the rate of settling of the dust arising could be directly compared in a
beam of parallel light showed presence of dust in the white lead chamber
fifteen minutes after the fritt chamber was entirely clear. It is found as a matter
of practice that where dust is especially created, and where it is difficult to
remove such dust by exhaust fans, the greatest incidence of lead poisoning
occurs. The association of dusty processes and incidence of lead poisoning is
discussed in relation to the various trades in Chapters XV. to XVII. Fume and
vapour given off from the molten metal or compounds, such as chlorides
(tinning), are only a special case of dust.
The channels through which lead or its compounds may gain entrance to
the animal body are theoretically three in number:
1. Respiratory tract.
2. Gastro-intestinal.
3. Cutaneous.
For many years most authorities have held that industrial poisoning by
means of compounds of lead takes place directly through the alimentary
canal, and that the poison is conveyed to the mouth mainly by unwashed
hands, by food contaminated with lead dust, and by lead dust suspended in
the air becoming deposited upon the mucous membrane of the mouth and
pharynx, and then swallowed. As evidence that lead dust is swallowed, the
classical symptom of colic in lead poisoning has been adduced, on the
supposition, in the absence of any experimental proof, that the lead
swallowed acted as an irritant on the gastro-intestinal canal, thus causing
colic, and, on absorption from the canal, setting up other general symptoms.
Much of the early treatment of lead poisoning is based upon this assumption,
and the administration of sulphuric acid lemonade and the exhibition of
sulphate of magnesia and other similar compounds as treatment is further
evidence of the view that the poisoning was considered primarily intestinal.
One of the chief objections to this view, apart from the experimental
evidence, is that in those trades where metallic lead is handled, particularly
lead rolling, very few hygienic precautions have ever been taken in regard to
washing before meals, smoking, etc. Although in these trades the hands
become coated with a lead compound (oleate), and the workers frequently
eat their food with unwashed hands, thus affording every opportunity for the
ingestion of lead, the incidence of poisoning is by no means as high or so
pronounced in these occupations as in those giving rise to lead dust, such as
the white lead industry, where special precautions are taken, and where the
incidence of poisoning is always related to the dust breathed.
Respiratory Tract.—In a report on the incidence of lead poisoning in the
manufacture of paints and colours, one of us [T. M. L.[2]] in 1902 laid stress on
the marked incidence of poisoning in the specially dusty lead processes.
Following on that report special attention was given to the removal of dust by
means of exhaust ventilation. With the introduction of precautionary
measures, the incidence of poisoning underwent a marked decrease, this
decrease being most definite in those industries where efficient exhaust
ventilation could be maintained (see p. 47). Experience shows that cases of
poisoning in any given trade or manufacturing process are always referable to
the operations which cause the greatest amount of dust, and where,
therefore, the opportunity of inhaling lead dust is greatest.
The investigations of Duckering[3], referred to on p. 203, show the amount
of dust present in the air in certain dangerous processes. His results clinch
the deductions made from general observation, that dusty processes are
those especially related to incidence of industrial poisoning. Ætiologically,
therefore, the relationship of dust-contaminated air and poisoning is
undeniable, and in not a few instances on record persons residing at a
distance from a lead factory have developed poisoning, although not
employed in any occupation involving contact with lead, aerial infection
through dust remaining the only explanation. The actual channel through
which the lead dust suspended in the air gains entrance to the body is,
therefore, of especial importance; one of two channels is open—gastro-
intestinal and respiratory.
The investigations of one of us (K. W. G.) on the experimental production of
lead poisoning in animals has shown conclusively that the dust inhaled was
far more dangerous, and produced symptoms far earlier than did the direct
ingestion of a very much larger quantity of the same compound by way of the
mouth and gastro-intestinal canal. There is no doubt whatever that the chief
agent in causing lead poisoning is dust or fume suspended in the air. That a
certain amount finds its way into the stomach direct is not denied, but from
experimental evidence we consider the lung rather than the stomach to be
the chief channel through which absorption takes place (see p. 81).
The following table gives a specific instance of the incidence of lead
poisoning in a white lead factory, and demonstrates clearly the ætiological
importance of dust. The increase in reported cases, as well as in symptoms
of lead absorption not sufficiently severe to prevent the individual from
following his usual occupation, was associated with the rebuilding of a portion
of the factory in which the packing of dry white lead had been carried on for a
large number of years. The alterations necessitated the removal of several
floors, all of which were thoroughly impregnated with lead dust. Before the
alterations were undertaken it was recognized that considerable danger
would arise; stringent precautions were therefore taken, and the hands
engaged in the alterations kept under special observation. Notwithstanding
this there was an increase in the number of reported cases, which were all
mild cases of colic; all recovered, and were able to return to their work in a
short time.
Table I.—Lead Poisoning in a White Lead Factory.
The figures refer to the weekly examination of the whole of the men. For example, if a man
was returned as suffering from anæmia on three occasions, he appears as three cases in
Column 7.
Year Total Total Cases Cases Cases of Cases of Cases of Blue Line
Number Cases of in Dusty in Other Suspen- Anæmia Tremor
of Poisoning Processes Processes sion
Exami-
nations
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1905 5,464 9 8 1 20 78[B] 249[B] 311[B]
1906 [A] 5,096 18 16 2 9 256 215 532
1907 4,303 4 3 1 6 62 81 38
1908 3,965 4 3 1 5 40 25 11
[A] Structural alterations in progress, including cutting up “lead floor,” saturated with
white lead dust.
[B] These numbers for the half-year only, the inspection being taken over in June,
1905.
In the second digestion, in which the analysis of the contents showed the
patient to be suffering from the condition known as “hyperhydrochloridia,” the
results were—
Lead sulphate 0·046 per cent.
White lead 0·042 „
Litharge 0·340 „
A very large number of experiments have also been performed for the
purpose of determining the solubility of raw lead glaze, and white lead, in
artificial digestions, the digestions having been made up in such a way that
they resembled as far as possible in every particular the ordinary stomach
contents. The type of digestion used was as follows:
Dry breadcrumbs 140 grammes.
Hydrochloric acid 5 c.c.
Lactic acid 0·1 c.c.
Acetic acid 0·1 c.c.
Pepsin 1·2 grammes.
Milk 1,200 c.c.
Digestions were performed with this mixture, and in every case the digest
was divided into two portions; each portion was retained at body temperature,
with agitation for a couple of hours, and at the end of that time one portion
was submitted to analysis. The second portion was neutralized, sodium
carbonate and pancreatic ferment added, and digestion carried on for another
two and a half hours at body temperature. At the end of this time the
pancreatic digest was examined.
Thirty-five digestions were performed. When 1 gramme of white lead was
used—that is, 0·01 per cent., containing 0·75 per cent. of lead oxide—the
quantity of lead found as lead oxide in the acid digest varied from 2 to 3 per
cent., whilst the amount found in the pancreatic digest varied from 4 to 6·5
per cent. of the added salt. On increasing the amount to 12 grammes—that
is, 1 per cent.—the quantity returned in the digest only increased from 1·5 to
2 per cent. In other words, in the addition of larger quantities of material the
ratio of solubility did not rise in proportion to the quantity added. Where a
direct pancreatic digestion was performed without the preliminary digest of
the gastric contents, the amount of lead present in the digest was only about
0·2 per cent. of the quantity added; indeed, it was very much smaller than the
amount dissolved out after preliminary acid digestion—that is, if the normal
sequence of digestion is followed, the solubility progresses after the gastric
digest has been neutralized and pancreatic ferment has been added,
whereas very slow action indeed occurs as the result of action of the
pancreatic digest alone. Some experiments described by Thomason[12],
although carried out without special regard to the physiological question of
the progressive nature of digestion, distinctly confirm the point raised. Thus,
in a digest of gastric juice, milk, and bread, 5·0 per cent. of lead was
dissolved, whereas when pancreatic juice alone was used only 0·4 per cent.
was found to be dissolved, a remarkable confirmation of the point under
discussion.
The difficulty of estimating lead present in these gastric digestions is a very
real one, as, owing to the precipitation of lead by various fluids of an
albuminoid nature, it is difficult to determine the amount of lead present in a
given quantity of digest; moreover, in making such a digest, much of the
material may become entangled among the clot of the milk in a purely
mechanical fashion, and, in attempting to separate the fluid from the other
portion of the digest, filtration no doubt removes any lead which has been
rendered soluble first of all, and reprecipitated as an albuminate. An
albuminate of lead may be formed with great ease in the following way: A 5
per cent. solution of albumin in normal saline is taken, 0·02 per cent. of
hydrochloric acid is added, and 10 per cent. solution of lead chloride added
as long as a precipitate is formed. The precipitate is then filtered off, and
washed in a dialyser with acidulated water until no further trace of lead is
found in the washings. A portion of this substance taken up in distilled water
forms a solution of an opalescent nature, which readily passes through the
filter and gives the reaction of protein with Millon’s reagent, and the lead
reaction by means of caustic potash and sulphuretted hydrogen, but very
large quantities of mineral acid are required to produce any colour with
hydrogen sulphide. Lead which gains access to the stomach, either dissolved
in water or swallowed as fine dust, becomes in all probability converted first
into a soluble substance, chloride, acetate, or lactate, which compound is
then precipitated either by the mucin present in the stomach, or by the protein
constituents of the food, or by the partially digested food (peptonate of lead
may be formed in the same way as the albuminate described above). In this
form, or as an albuminate or other organic compound, it passes the pylorus,
and becomes reprecipitated and redigested through the action of the
pancreatic juice. A consideration of the action of artificial gastric juices and
the properly combined experiments of gastric and pancreatic digestions
suggest that the form in which lead becomes absorbed is not a chloride, but
an organic compound first formed and gradually decomposed during the
normal process of digestion, and absorbed in this manner from the intestine
along with the ordinary constituents of food. Dixon Mann[13] has shown that
about two-thirds of the lead administered by the mouth is discharged in the
fæces, and that the remaining one-third is also slowly but only partially
eliminated. This point is of very considerable importance in relation to
industrial poisoning of presumably gastro-intestinal origin, and consideration
of the experiments quoted suggests that the digestion of albuminate or
peptonate may to some extent be the basis which determines the excretion of
so much of the lead via the fæces. This alteration of solubility has no doubt a
bearing on the immunity exhibited by many animals when fed with lead, and
probably explains the fact that many of the experimental animals fed with lead
over long periods exhibited no symptoms of poisoning (see p. 85), whereas
control animals, given a far smaller quantity of lead by other means and
through the lung, rapidly developed symptoms of poisoning. A diversity of
opinion exists as to the effect of pepsin upon the solubility of lead. Oliver[14]
considers that the pepsin has a retarding influence on the solubility of lead in
the gastric juice, and Thomason’s experiments also support this view,
although it is difficult to see why the action of pepsin alone should be of such
extreme importance. There is also the complicating fact that other added
substances in the food may mask any direct pepsin factor that may be
present. Albumose and peptone rather than pepsin are to be regarded as the
more important substance physiologically in their reaction with lead, and it is
interesting to note that Schicksal[15] found that by exposing lead in the form of
white lead in a 1 per mille solution of hydrochloric acid in the presence of
peptone produced a greater solvent effect on white lead than did the diluted
acid alone, and the same effect was also seen on metallic lead.
Table II.—Schicksal’s Table.
Amount
dissolved
returned
as
Metallic
Solution. Substance. Time. Lead.
(a) 1·0 per cent. peptone 100 White lead, 10 3 days at 37°
- 0·1471 grm.
0·1 per cent. HCl c.c. grms. C.
REFERENCES.
[1] Goadby, K. W.: A Note on Experimental Lead Poisoning. Journal of Hygiene, vol.
ix., No. 1, April, 1909.
[2] Legge, T. M.: Report on the Manufacture of Paints and Colours containing Lead
(Cd. 2466). 1905.
[3] Duckering, G. E.: Journal of Hygiene, vol. viii., No. 4, September.
[4] Meillère, G.: Le Saturnisme, chap. iv. Paris, 1903.
[5] Armit, H. W.: Journal of Hygiene, vol. viii., No. 5, November, 1908.
[6] Tanquerel des Planches: Traité des Maladies de Plomb, ou Saturnines. Paris,
1839.
[7] Stanski: Loc. cit.
[8] Gautier: Intoxication Saturnine, etc. Académie de Médecine, viii., November,
1883.
[9] Thresh, J. C.: The Lancet, p. 1033, October 7, 1905.
[10] Ibid., January 5, 1909.
[11] Thomason: Report of the Departmental Committee on Lead Manufacture:
Earthenware, China, vol. ii., appendices, p. 61. 1910.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Dixon Mann: Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, p. 495. 1908.
[14] Oliver, Sir T.: Lead Poisoning (Goulstonian lectures). 1891.
[15] Schicksal: Die Bekämpfung der Bleigefahr in der Industrie, p. 38. 1908.
[16] Steinberg: International Congress of Industrial Hygiene. Brussels, 1910.
[17] Cloetta: Dixon Mann’s Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, p. 463.
[18] Little: The Lancet, March 3, 1906.
[19] Canuet, T.: Thèse, Paris, 1825, No. 202. Essai sur le Plomb.
[20] Drouet: Thèse, Paris, 1875. Recherches Experimentales sur le Rôle de
l’Absorption Cutanée dans la Paralysie Saturnine.
[21] Manouvrier, A.: Thèse, Paris, 1873, No. 471. Intoxication par Absorption
Cutanée.
CHAPTER III
SUSCEPTIBILITY AND IMMUNITY
A large number of poisonous substances, among which lead may
be included, are not equally poisonous in the same dose for all
persons. It is customary to speak of those persons who show a
diminished resistance, or whose tissues show little power of resisting
the poisonous effects of such substances, as susceptible. On the
other hand, it is possible, but not scientifically correct, to speak of
immunity to such poisonous substances. Persons, particularly, who
resist lead poisoning to a greater degree than their fellows are better
spoken of as tolerant of the poisonous effects than as being partially
immune.
The degree of resistance exhibited by any given population
towards the poisonous influence of lead shows considerable
variation. Thus, in a community using a water-supply contaminated
with lead, only a small proportion of the persons drinking the water
becomes poisoned. There are, of course, other factors than that of
individual idiosyncrasy which may determine the effect of the poison,
as, for example, the drawing of the water first thing in the morning
which has been standing in a particular pipe. But even if all
disturbing factors are eliminated in water-borne lead poisoning,
differing degrees of susceptibility are always to be observed among
the persons using the water.
Lead does not differ, therefore, from any other drugs to which
persons show marked idiosyncrasies. Thus, very small doses of
arsenic may produce symptoms of colic in susceptible persons; a
limited number of individuals are highly susceptible to some drugs,
such as cannabis indica, while others are able to ingest large doses
without exhibiting any sign of poisoning; and it is well known that
even in susceptible persons the quantity of a particular drug which
first produces symptoms of poisoning may be gradually increased, if
the dosage be continued over long periods in quantities insufficient