Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PA L G R AV E S T U D I E S I N S U S TA I N A B L E B U S I N E S S
Series Editors
Paul Shrivastava
Pennsylvania State University
University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
László Zsolnai
Corvinus University Budapest
Budapest, Hungary
Sustainability in Business is increasingly becoming the forefront issue for
researchers, practitioners and companies the world over. Engaging with this
immense challenge, Future Earth is a major international research platform
from a range of disciplines, with a common goal to support and achieve
global sustainability. This series will define a clear space for the work of
Future Earth Finance and Economics Knowledge-Action Network. Pub-
lishing key research with a holistic and trans-disciplinary approach, it intends
to help reinvent business and economic models for the Anthropocene,
geared towards engendering sustainability and creating ecologically con-
scious organizations.
Designing a
Sustainable Financial
System
Development Goals and Socio-Ecological
Responsibility
Editors
Thomas Walker Stéfanie D. Kibsey
David O’Brien Centre for Sustainable David O’Brien Centre for Sustainable
Enterprise Enterprise
Concordia University, John Molson Concordia University, John Molson
School of Business School of Business
Montreal, Québec Montreal, Québec
Canada Canada
Rohan Crichton
David O’Brien Centre for Sustainable
Enterprise
Concordia University, John Molson
School of Business
Montreal, Québec
Canada
We would like to thank the support received by the David O’Brien Centre
for Sustainable Enterprise at Concordia University in the preparation of this
edited book, in particular our research assistants Annabelle Boucher,
Stephanie Lee, Minh-Thy Nguyen, Katrina Frances, and Andrea Kim. In
addition, we would like to express our gratitude to Cary Krosinsky for his
helpful advice throughout the process.
v
CONTENTS
1 Introduction 1
Thomas Walker, Stéfanie D. Kibsey, and Rohan Crichton
vii
viii CONTENTS
Index 423
LIST OF FIGURES
xi
xii LIST OF FIGURES
xiii
xiv LIST OF TABLES
Introduction
Our current financial system is a legacy from a time when our understanding
of socio-ecological systems, natural resource management, and environ-
mental degradation was limited. Historically, utmost importance was placed
upon economic growth and development, with little consideration for the
integrity of the environment, sustainability, or the well-being of future
generations.
In recent years—especially following the Paris Climate Agreement
(COP21)—we have witnessed new ways of thinking and doing business
emerge and gain traction among academics, practitioners, and policymakers.
In the minds of many, the financial system is no longer a closed, isolated
system; it has evolved into a larger socio-ecological system where finance,
social well-being, and planetary health are highly interlinked. In fact, our
world cannot move toward sustainability, address climate change, reverse
environmental degradation, and improve human well-being without aligning
the financial system with sustainable development goals.
Chapter 3
Social and Environmental Responsibility in the Banking Industry: A Focus on
Commercial Business
By Beatriz Fernandez Olit, Marta de la Cuesta Gonzalez, and Francisco
Pablo Holgado
This chapter carries out a review of the social and environmental responsibility
of banks and suggests a different approach to defining and measuring it based
on the diversity of banks’ models and their activities. Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) within the banking industry should include several
intra-sectoral approaches, adapted to better manage the higher risks of uni-
versal banks or to adequately disclose the positive impact of smaller banks on
their communities. The chapter argues that the trend of current homogeni-
zation of the banking industry is going to be unfavorable in terms of future
4 T. WALKER ET AL.
Chapter 4
Seeking Greener Pastures: Exploring the Impact for Investors of ESG Integra-
tion in the Infrastructure Asset Class
By Roy R. Sengupta, Tessa Hebb, and Hakan Mustafa
This chapter looks at one of the most crucial aspects of sustainable devel-
opment across the world, which is infrastructure. Infrastructure factors into
the design and liveability of all communities in the world and will make a
major difference in both developmental and environmental goals in the long
term. Estimates have shown that it will require over $30 trillion of additional
infrastructure investment globally if we are to meet the Sustainable Devel-
opment Goals by 2030. Governments acting alone do not have sufficient
financial resources required to meet these needs. In order to get the finan-
cial system working in a sustainable way for communities, we must find a
way to leverage the resources of private capital for sustainable infrastructure.
This part of the book seeks to explore ways in which such private capital can
be leveraged for infrastructure, which has positive Environmental, Social,
and Governance (ESG) impacts.
INTRODUCTION 5
This chapter considers the role in which economic theory plays in sus-
tainable infrastructure investment, including the relevance of concepts such
as information asymmetry, as well as the issues which sustainable infrastruc-
ture investment could help to solve, and some of the obstacles and trends in
the field of sustainable infrastructure investment. The key argument of this
chapter is that sustainable infrastructure (defined as infrastructure which
scores well on Environmental, Social, and Governance factors over its
lifecycle) is able to provide competitive returns for investors; returns that,
over the long term, match or even exceed the returns of non-sustainable
infrastructure. Overall, the chapter identifies both barriers to increased
uptake of sustainable infrastructure investment, but also a general feeling
of cautious optimism regarding the future of such investment, as evidenced
in both the literature and the interviews.
Chapter 5
Pricing Carbon: Integrating Promise, Practice and Lessons Learned from the
Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)
By Paula DiPerna
Carbon pricing is an essential pillar in the architecture of any new sustain-
able financial system to help address climate change because it makes
otherwise invisible costs visible. But moving from theory to practice has
proven elusive. To help accelerate progress, this chapter presents lessons
learned from the Chicago Climate Change (CCX), which operated from
2003–2010 and pioneered carbon pricing worldwide using the cap-and-
trade mechanism, including spearheading a landmark joint that created the
first carbon market pilot program in China, the Tianjin Climate Exchange
(TCX). CCX, which began trading in 2003, was the world’s first and only
carbon market that covered all six greenhouse gases and had international
links.
Fueled by passion, imagination, and bold investors, including a leading
US philanthropy, CCX went from a hunch and an instinct to an expansive
practical working system that covered many major companies in the United
States. In fact, through CCX, the United States had more emissions capped
and subject to a rules-based reduction schedule than any other nation in the
world at the time even though the United States had no national regulatory
structure to require greenhouse gas reductions. The chapter describes how
CCX, voluntary but legally binding, coaxed and cajoled companies into
action, building up an extensive network of early adopters who believed that
6 T. WALKER ET AL.
Chapter 7
Sustainability Stress Testing the Financial System: Challenges and Approaches
By Dieter Gramlich
This chapter looks at how sustainability stress test (SST) models in finance
assess the resilience of financial institutions and markets against adverse
conditions in the surrounding ecological and social system. Depending on
the outcome from these models, individual institutions may work proac-
tively to avoid potential failures and include their clients in preventive
actions. Supervisors of the financial system may intervene to ex-ante miti-
gate the most critical factors and reduce the exposure of the overall system.
SST approaches thus indirectly contribute to the design of a sustainable
financial system.
In addition to the conventional risk factors from financial and real
markets, SST models include adverse conditions from the socio-ecological
environment and their interaction with the financial system. Up to now, the
effects from climate change on the financial system are mainly considered.
Further factors connected to the scarcity of resources and social imbalances
must be incorporated. It is argued that SST models particularly have to
account for the complex and mostly indirect connectivity between the
financial and the surrounding socio-ecological system. A further challenge
is to comply with the non-linear, dynamic, and simultaneous interaction
between the systems in a forward-looking way.
The inclusion of stress factors from the ecological and social system will
overlay conventional and purely economic structures of risk and risk con-
nectivity. New patterns of common exposures and turning points will
emerge. Due to the structural and behavioral complexity of the overall
economic, ecological, and social system, SST models are not simply exten-
sions of existing stress test models. Rather, they have to be conceived as a
new conceptual approach of stress modeling.
Chapter 8
Responsible Investment Requires a Proxy Voting System Responsive to Retail
Investors
By Ian Robertson
This chapter looks at how a sustainable financial system supports and pro-
motes responsible investment. Institutional investors have largely been able
to work within the labyrinthine proxy voting system to practice responsible
investment (RI) and express their views to companies on environmental,
8 T. WALKER ET AL.
social, and governance (ESG) issues. Though gaps and imperfections in the
system are evident, remedies are routinely considered by regulators and
institutional participants. For retail investors, however, the gaps continue
to widen; though they are increasingly interested in RI, their proxy voting
rates have declined considerably, regardless of whether they invest through
a discount brokerage, full-service brokerage, or use the services of a discre-
tionary portfolio manager.
Responsible investment has evolved from its values-based origins
(e.g. avoiding tobacco companies). It now includes more broadly represen-
tative portfolios that integrate ESG factors into the analysis of investments
and into the subsequent voting of proxies. Integrating ESG factors into
research can uncover hidden risks, while the ESG-themed voting of proxies
nudges companies to more responsible behavior (and according to recent
studies, lower risk and better returns). Before the mid-1970s, retail investors
who own shares directly overwhelmingly voted their proxies, but just as the
centrality of proxy voting to responsible investment was rising, retail voting
rates were declining precipitously.
The chapter traces the origin of property rights, the corporation, and
the ownership rights of shareholders. It situates historic ownership rights
within the social contract between government and citizen and traces the
centuries-long ebb and flow of regulated and liberal market capitalism. The
chapter concludes by noting that the decline in retail investor proxy voting
coincides with the current era of (neo)-liberal capitalism and that
re-engagement of this broad base of investors may both improve compa-
nies’ ESG performance and help usher in a new era of responsible capitalism.
A central recommendation is that stockbrokers, whose investment recom-
mendations are currently held to a duty of “suitability”, be considered
“fiduciaries” and that this higher standard be applied expansively to include
the responsible voting of proxies to reflect clients’ interests.
Chapter 9
The Creation of Social Impact Credits: Funding for Social Profit
Organizations
By Marcel Minutolo, John Stakeley, and Chloe Mills
Designing a sustainable financial system that facilitates development and
socio-ecological responsibility is no small task. Aligning competing stake-
holder requirements is challenging given the complexity of the global
financial system disparate interests. This chapter builds on the concept of
INTRODUCTION 9
Chapter 10
Crowdfunding Sustainable Enterprises as a Form of Collective Action
By Helen Toxopeus and Karen Maas
Crowdfunding is perceived as a particularly promising source of finance for
sustainable initiatives (Calic and Mosakowski 2016; Lehner 2013; Lehner
and Nicholls 2014). By undertaking an institutional, rule-based analysis of
crowdfunding, this chapter introduces three key mechanisms that may create
collective action among crowdfunders, thereby increasing availability of funds
for sustainable enterprises. Firstly, the use of social networks can increase
collective action, especially in the crucial early stages of a crowdfunding
campaign. Existing (strong and weak) ties can decrease fears of moral hazard
and increase trust about expected participation of other funders. Further-
more, smaller group sizes can enhance the feeling that an individual contri-
bution really matters and can also lead to reputational concerns for not
participating. Second, crowdfunding allows for heterogeneous contribution
and payoff rules, ranging from debt/equity to rewards to impact and com-
binations of these. This creates new niche funding markets where the payoff is
tailored to a specific crowd and also enables an enterprise to engage its value
10 T. WALKER ET AL.
Chapter 11
Palm Oil: Mitigating Material Financial Risks via Sustainability
By Gabriel Thoumi
This chapter looks at the environmental impact of the palm oil business.
Palm oil is an inexpensive and highly versatile oil derived from the fruit of
the oil palm tree. It is found in half of all consumer goods on the shelves
today in Western grocery stores. Due to its high yields and many uses, palm
oil is the most actively traded oil crop in the world. With annual sales of $50
billion, palm oil is big business. Indonesia and Malaysia have expanded their
plantations and tripled production over the past 15 years, and today account
for 85 percent of global production.
Palm oil has been identified as a driver of both tropical deforestation and
climate change. Material financial risks often accompany the environmental
impacts and human rights abuses associated with palm oil expansion. In
2015, fires associated with palm oil expansion in Indonesia destroyed over
2 million hectares of tropical forest and may be responsible for 100,000
deaths throughout SE Asia.
Capital markets in SE Asia and globally are raising capital to expand palm
oil expansion. Currently, there are over 7000 institutional investor equity
positions invested in publicly traded companies in the agriculture sector in
Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. Many regional and global banks are
also providing loans to support palm oil expansion in the region while debt
markets likewise expand capital to support palm oil expansion.
These investors and banks are facing material financial risks associated
with their financing activities supporting SE Asian palm oil expansion.
Likewise, the numerous publicly traded companies and private companies
in the palm oil supply chain in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore also are
facing material financial risks associated with their palm oil expansion.
INTRODUCTION 11
Chapter 13
Mobilizing Early-Stage Investments for an Innovation-Led Sustainability
Transition
By Friedemann H. J. Polzin, Ulrika Stavl€
ot, and Mark W. J. L. Sanders
This chapter looks more at the financial system as consisting of a multitude of
actors that cover a variety of risk/return profiles and therefore finance different
companies’ projects and infrastructure, which makes it more stable and thus
more resilient to shocks. It so happens, such a diverse and resilient financial
system also allows for innovation in green tech sectors to be financed, con-
tributing directly to a sustainability transition in the real economy. Hence,
mobilizing private early-stage equity capital is important to achieve a more
12 T. WALKER ET AL.
Chapter 14
Financial Sector Sustainability Regulations and Voluntary Codes of Con-
duct: Do They Help to Create a More Sustainable Financial System?
By Olaf Weber
This chapter discusses the role of voluntary sustainability codes of conduct
and sustainability regulation in helping to create a more sustainable financial
system. Voluntary codes of conduct that are analyzed are UNEPFI,
UNPRI, the Equator Principles, GABV, and IRIS. Furthermore, financial
sector sustainability regulations, such as the Chinese Green Credit Policy,
the Nigerian Sustainable Banking Principles, and the Environmental Risk
Management Guidelines for Banks and Financial Institutions in Bangladesh
will be discussed. Additionally, newer developments, such as the FSB Task
Force on Climate Related Disclosures and climate risk related reporting
regulations for institutional investors will be presented. Most of the
described voluntary codes of conduct and regulations focus on financial
risks for the industry connected with environmental and social risks. Hence,
both voluntary codes of conduct and regulations can help to create a more
sustainable financial system, particularly if they work in tandem. However,
in order to address sustainability issues, these mechanisms should focus not
only on financial sector risks, but on decreasing negative impacts of the
financial sector on sustainable development and on increasing positive
contributions to sustainable development. Enforcement is also a common
issue. While voluntary codes of conduct usually do not have any
INTRODUCTION 13
Chapter 15
Why Self-Commitment Is Not Enough: On a Regulated Minimum Standard
for Ecologically and Socially Responsible Financial Products and Services
By Andreas Oehler, Matthias Horn, and Stefan Wendt
A crucial requirement to supporting the distribution of ecologically and
socially responsible financial products within a sustainable financial system is
high-quality information for consumers about the achievable financial prod-
ucts. This chapter points out that an ambiguous understanding of what
ecological and social responsibility actually means is one of the main obstacles
for consumers to engage in ecologically and socially responsible financial
products. Without a clear definition of specific ecological and social criteria
that must be fulfilled in order to categorize financial products and services as
being responsible, and without information about the performance impact,
individuals are unable to determine if ecologically and socially responsible
investments fit their personal needs. To tackle this problem, it is proposed
that a regulated minimum standard of ecological and social responsibility
should be implemented both on a global and on a local level. This minimum
standard must apply to the entire value chain to avoid greenwashing and must
go beyond existing legal requirements for firms, financial service providers,
and consumer information. The proposed minimum standard is based on
knock-out criteria measured as fulfilled/not fulfilled while avoiding scoring or
rating approaches and tolerance thresholds. The minimum standards’ under-
lying principles and functioning as well as other key features of the financial
products and services have to be presented in a transparent and comprehen-
sible way that also allows for comparison between different products or
services. Information about key characteristics must be clear and verifiable
and should address the products’ and services’ fit to personal consumer needs.
A sustainable financial system would benefit from the introduction of the
proposed minimum standard because it allows consumers to understand and
compare financial products and services, and it provides a level playing field
for intermediaries and strengthens competition.
PART I
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The recent crisis has induced some critical reconsideration for the role of
“mainstream finance” (Kramer and Porter 2011; Rappaport and Bogle
2011; Shiller 2013; Zingales 2015). Many academics and practitioners
suggest that the crash was the result of bad or poorly applied theories
(Zingales 2015), even useless or harmful (Scherer and Marti 2011), and a
systemic failure of the economics profession (Colander et al. 2009). In the
most recent years, a growing number of scholars have been put the need to
diversify finance approaches under a magnifying glass by overcoming the
limitations related to the crucial (and mechanistic) assumptions of the
classical finance view and by recovering the newest view able to create
shared value (Kramer and Porter 2011). However, some authors have
highlighted that financial systems would have to reappropriate the funda-
mental and basic useful functions for a good society (Shiller 2013), sustain-
able development and social justice (Weber and Feltmate 2016).
The main criticism of the “traditional” financial theory is that the finan-
cial models and frameworks fail to explain the real financial world. About
this, several questions on how finance should be reconsidered in its onto-
logical, epistemological and methodological assumptions are posed
(Lagoarde-Segot 2015, 2016a; Schinckus 2015; Lagoarde-Segot and
Paranque 2017). The debate on these contentious issues highlights the
major key gaps in traditional finance, which uses a positivism approach
and quantitative models, resulting in theories and models in which ethical
considerations are irrelevant, with the consequence of having a remarkable
separation between facts and values.
For this reason, a number of scholars have argued that the assumptions of
theoretical constructs are largely unable to understand several real-world
phenomena (Lagoarde-Segot 2015). Currently, new approaches are emerg-
ing by questioning the foundations of the traditional view. However, it is
only after the recent crisis that we are witnessing a growing academic
movement that is formally opposed to the neoclassical financial approach
(Lagoarde-Segot 2016a) by underlining that the turmoil can be considered
a symbol for the failure of the mainstream (Blommestein 2009, p. 70) and
by forcing the reconsideration of academic finance (Lagoarde-Segot
2016b). The crisis undoubtedly leads to evidence that concepts such as
irresponsibility, morally dubious behavior and financial misconduct have
had a disruptive impact on the financial and economic systems. Therefore,
the crisis emphasizes a preexisting trend, and it becomes an opportunity to
promote the possibility of substantive change in the discipline of finance
(Gendron and Smith-Lacroix 2015).
Regardless of the theoretical debate, it is important to note that in recent
years, the financial systems provided experience in developing innovative
financial forms and models, which emphasizes concepts such as community
and values. In several countries, including the USA, the UK, Australia and
Europe, innovative forms of funding are being developed, in which people,
in addition to considering risk and return characteristics, take into account
concepts of sustainability, solidarity and social impact. The most prominent
examples are crowdfunding (in particular, civic, equity and lending),
microcredit and social impact investing models, which will be discussed
below.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
devant euls. Et conmenchièrent li archier, qui estoient entré en ces
estages, à traire fortement à ceuls qui se tenoient as deffenses; et
traioient si roit et si ouniement que à painnes ne se osoit nuls
amoustrer, se il n’estoit trop fort paveschiés. Entre ces deus
bierefrois qui estoient arestés devant les murs, avoit deus cens
compagnons à tout hauiaus et grans pils de fier pour effondrer le
mur; et jà en avoient des pières assés ostées et rompues, car li
archier qui estoient hault ens ès estages, les deffendoient de ject et
de tret. Fº 101.
P. 81, l. 26: cent.—Mss. A 20 à 22: deux cens. Fº 177 vº.
P. 82, l. 7: haviaus.—Mss. A 15 à 17, 20 à 22: hoiaux, hoyaux.
Fº 123.—Mss. A 23 à 29: houyaulx. Fº 139.
P. 82, l. 8: voir Sup. var. (n. d. t.)