Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Toy
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/internal-medicine-5th-edition-eugene-toy/
FIFTH EDITION
CASE FILES®
Internal Medicine
Eugene C. Toy, MD Mark T. Warner, MD
Assistant Dean for Educational Programs Assistant Professor
Director of Doctoring Courses Division of Critical Care Medicine
Director of Scholarly Concentrations in Department of Internal Medicine
Women’s H ealth McGovern Medical School at T e University
Professor and Vice Chair of Medical Education of exas
Department of O bstetrics and Gynecology H ealth Science Center at H ouston (U H ealth)
McGovern Medical School at T e University H ouston, exas
of exas
H ealth Science Center at H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
New York Chicago San Francisco Athens London Madrid Mexico City
Milan N ew Delhi Singapore Sydney oronto
Copyright © 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States
Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means,
or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
ISBN: 978-0-07-184336-2
MHID: 0-07-184336-1.
The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-0-07-184335-5,
MHID: 0-07-184335-3.
All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occur-
rence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the bene t of the trademark owner,
with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been
printed with initial caps.
McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promo-
tions or for use in corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us page at
www.mhprofessional.com.
Notice
Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes
in treatment and drug therapy are required. The authors and the publisher of this work have checked with sources
believed to be reliable in their efforts to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the
standard accepted at the time of publication. However, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in
medical sciences, neither the editors nor the publisher nor any other party who has been involved in the prepara-
tion or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or
complete, and they disclaim all responsibility for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from use of
the information contained in this work. Readers are encouraged to con rm the information contained herein with
other sources. For example and in particular, readers are advised to check the product information sheet included
in the package of each drug they plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this work is
accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications for admin-
istration. This recommendation is of particular importance in connection with new or infrequently used drugs.
TERMS OF USE
This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use
of this work is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store
and retrieve one copy of the work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify,
create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any
part of it without McGraw-Hill Education’s prior consent. You may use the work for your own noncommercial
and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to use the work may be terminated if
you fail to comply with these terms.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO
GUARANTEES OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF
OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMATION THAT
CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK VIA HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY
DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill
Education and its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work will meet your
requirements or that its operation will be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its
licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error or omission, regardless of cause, in the
work or for any damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no responsibility for the content of any
information accessed through the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education and/or its licen-
sors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the
use of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been advised of the possibility of such damages. This
limitation of liability shall apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such claim or cause arises in contract,
tort or otherwise.
DEDICATION
o our coach Victor, and our ather-son teammates Bob & Jackson,
Steve & Weston, Ron & Wesley, and Dan & Joel. At the inspirational JH Ranch
Father-Son Retreat, all o us, including my loving son Andy, arrived as strangers,
but in 6 days, we le t as li elong riends.
– EC
o my parents who instilled an early love o learning and o the written word,
and who continue to serve as role models or li e.
o my beauti ul wi e Elsa and children Sarah and Sean,
or their patience and understanding, as precious amily time was
devoted to the completion o “the book.”
o all my teachers, particularly Drs. Carlos Pestaña, Robert Nolan,
Herbert Fred, and Cheves Smythe, who make the complex understandable,
and who have dedicated their lives to the education o physicians,
and served as role models o healers.
o the medical students and residents at the
McGovern Medical School at T e University o exas
Health Science Center at Houston (U Health) whose enthusiasm, curiosity,
and pursuit o excellent and compassionate care provide
a constant source o stimulation, joy, and pride.
o all readers o this book everywhere in the hopes that it might help them
to grow in wisdom and understanding,
and to provide better care or their patients
who look to them or com ort and relie o suf ering.
And to the Creator o all things, W ho is the source o all knowledge
and healing power, may this book serve as an instrument o His will.
–J P
o my beloved wi e, Dean-na, and my lovely daughter, Kayley,
orever gratitude or your undying love and support in this journey.
You two have provided me the necessary margin and energy
to complete this task and urthered my ability
to continue on in the pursuit o Medicine.
–M W
This page intentionally left blank
CONTENTS
Contributors / vii
Pre ace / ix
Acknowledgments / xi
Introduction / xiii
Listing o Cases / xv
Section I
How to Approach Clinical Problems ...................................................................1
Part 1. Approach to the Patient ................................................................................................. 3
Part 2. Approach to Clinical Problem Solving ....................................................................10
Part 3. Approach to Reading ....................................................................................................13
Section II
Cases...................................................................................................................19
Wellness (Cases 1-2)................................................................................................................21
Cardiovascular (Cases 3-13) .................................................................................................37
Pulmonary (Cases 14-19) ................................................................................................... 137
Gastrointestinal (Cases 20-23) ......................................................................................... 189
Hepatic, Gall Bladder, Biliary (Cases 24-27) ................................................................. 223
Renal, Genitourinary (Cases 28-30) ................................................................................ 259
Musculoskeletal (Cases 31-35)......................................................................................... 287
Neurological (Cases 36-39)................................................................................................ 331
Critical Care (Cases 40-41) ................................................................................................. 365
Immunological, Infectious (Cases 42-46) ..................................................................... 381
Endocrine/Hormonal (Cases 47-53)............................................................................... 425
Hematological (Cases 54-58)............................................................................................ 489
Alcohol Abuse/ Toxicology (Case 59-60) ...................................................................... 531
Section III
Review Questions ...................................................................................................................... 549
Index / 563
This page intentionally left blank
CONTRIBUTORS
Javier Barreda-Garcia, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Divisions of Critical Care, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas H ealth Science Center at
H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
Tuberculosis (Pulmonary), Cavitary Lung Lesions
Sujith Cherian, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Divisions of Critical Care, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas H ealth Science Center at
H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
Pleural Ef usion, Parapneumonic Ef usions
Rosa M. Estrada-Y-Martin, MD, MSc, CMQ, FCCP
Associate Professor of Medicine
Divisions of Critical Care, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas H ealth Science Center at
H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
HIV and Pneumocystis Pneumonia
Reeba Mathew, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Divisions of Critical Care, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas H ealth Science Center at
H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
Chronic Cough/ Asthma
Sandeep Sahay, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Divisions of Critical Care, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine
H ouston, exas
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Mary Alice Sallman, MS4
Medical Student, Class of 2017
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas
H ealth Science Center at H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
Review Questions and Answers
vii
viii CONTRIBUTORS
Lilit Sargsyan, MD
Clinical Fellow, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas H ealth Science Center at
H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Allison L. Toy
Registered N urse
Baylor Scott & W hite H illcrest Medical Center
Waco, exas
Manuscript Reviewer
Erik Vakil, MD
Clinical Fellow, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
McGovern Medical School at the University of exas H ealth Science Center at
H ouston (U H ealth)
H ouston, exas
Hemoptysis, Lung Cancer
PREFACE
I have been deeply amazed and grateful to see how the Case Files® books have
been so well received, and have helped students to learn more effectively. In the
12 short years since Case Files®: Internal Medicine was first printed, the series has
now multiplied to span most of the clinical and the basic science disciplines, and
has been translated into over a dozen foreign languages. Numerous students have
sent encouraging remarks, suggestions, and recommendations. Four completely
new cases have been written. he cases have been reorganized into organ systems
for better ability to integrate knowledge. Case correlation references are also used
in this edition. his fifth edition has been a collaborative work with my wonder-
ful coauthors and contributors, and with the suggestions from five generations of
students. ruly, the enthusiastic encouragement from students throughout not just
the United States but worldwide provides me the inspiration and energy to con-
tinue to write. It is thus with humility that I offer my sincere thanks to students
everywhere … for without students, how can a teacher teach?
Eugene C. oy
ix
This page intentionally left blank
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
he curriculum that evolved into the ideas for this series was inspired by Philbert
Yau and Chuck Rosipal, two talented and forthright students, who have since grad-
uated from medical school. It has been a tremendous joy to work with my excellent
coauthors, Dr. John Patlan, who exemplifies the qualities of the ideal physician—
caring, empathetic, and avid teacher, and who is intellectually unparalleled, and
Dr. Mark Warner who has a magnificent grasp of the breadth of medicine and also
is an accomplished and passionate educator. Dr. Warner would like to acknowledge
Drs. Javier Barreda-Garcia, Rosa Estrada-Y-Martin and Reeba Mathew, wonder-
ful colleagues and contributors, Drs. Erik Vakil and Lilit Sargsyan, colleagues and
fellows that continue to teach him and Drs. Sandeep Sahay and Sujith Cherian,
wonderful students who have now, themselves, become teachers.
I am greatly indebted to Catherine Johnson, whose exuberance, experience, and
vision helped to shape this series. I appreciate McGraw-H ill’s believing in the con-
cept of teaching through clinical cases. I am also grateful to Catherine Saggese for
her excellent production expertise, and Cindy Yoo for her wonderful and meticu-
lous role as development editor. I cherish the ever-organized and precise project
manager, Raghavi Khullar. It has been a privilege and honor to work with one of
the brightest medical students I have encountered, Alice Sallman, who directed the
review questions and answers, and gave input on the explanations for all the com-
prehension questions. Most of all, I appreciate my ever-loving wife erri, and our
four wonderful children, Andy and his wife Anna, Michael, Allison, and Christina,
for their patience and understanding.
Eugene C. oy
xi
This page intentionally left blank
INTRODUCTION
xiii
xiv INTRODUCTION
PART II
Approach to the Disease Process: It consists of two distinct parts:
a. Definitions: Terminology pertinent to the disease process.
b. Clinical Approach: A discussion of the approach to the clinical problem in general,
including tables, figures, and algorithms.
PART III
Comprehension Questions: Each case contains several multiple-choice questions, which
reinforce the material, or which introduce new and related concepts. Questions about
material not found in the text will have explanations in the answers.
PART IV
Clinical Pearls: Several clinically important points are reiterated as a summation of the
text. This allows for easy review, such as before an examination.
LISTING OF CASES
1 H ealth Maintenance 22
2 H ypercholesterolemia 30
3 Myocardial Infarction, Acute 38
4 Congestive H eart Failure due to Critical Aortic Stenosis 52
5 Aortic Dissection, Marfan Syndrome 60
6 H ypertension, Outpatient 68
7 H ypertensive Encephalopathy/ Pheochromocytoma 80
8 Atrial Fibrillation, Mitral Stenosis 88
9 Syncope— H eart Block 98
10 Acute Pericarditis Caused by
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 107
11 Pericardial Effusion/ amponade Caused by Malignancy 114
12 Endocarditis ( ricuspid)/ Septic Pulmonary Emboli 122
13 Limb Ischemia (Peripheral Vascular Disease) 130
14 Pulmonary Embolism 138
15 Chronic O bstructive Pulmonary Disease 146
16 Chronic Cough/ Asthma 156
17 Pleural Effusion, Parapneumonic 167
18 H emoptysis, Lung Cancer 174
19 Community-Acquired Pneumonia 182
20 Peptic Ulcer Disease 190
21 Ulcerative Colitis 198
22 Acute Sigmoid Diverticulitis 206
23 Chronic Diarrhea 214
24 Cirrhosis, Probable H epatitis C– Related 224
25 Pancreatitis, Gallstones 234
26 Acute Viral H epatitis, Possible Acetaminophen
H epatotoxicity 242
27 Painless Jaundice, Pancreatic Cancer 252
28 Acute Glomerulonephritis, Poststreptococcal Infection 260
29 N ephrotic Syndrome, Diabetic N ephropathy 270
30 Acute Kidney Injury 278
31 Osteoarthritis 288
32 Low Back Pain 296
33 Acute Monoarticular Arthritis—Gout 304
xv
xvi LISTING OF CASES
How to Approach
Clinical Problems
CLINICAL PEARL
» The history is the single most important tool in obtaining a diagnosis. All
physical findings and laboratory and imaging studies are first obtained
and then interpreted in the light of the pertinent history.
HISTORY
1. Basic information: Age, gender, and ethnicity must be recorded because some
conditions are more common at certain ages; for instance, pain on defecation
and rectal bleeding in a 20-year-old may indicate inflammatory bowel disease,
whereas the same symptoms in a 60-year-old would more likely suggest colon
cancer.
2. Chief complaint: W hat is it that brought the patient into the hospital or clinic?
Is it a scheduled appointment, or an unexpected symptom? The patient’s own
words should be used if possible, such as, “I feel like a ton of bricks are on my
chest.” The chief complaint, or real reason for seeking medical attention, may
not be the first subject the patient talks about (in fact, it may be the last thing),
particularly if the subject is embarrassing, such as a sexually transmitted disease,
or highly emotional, such as depression. It is often useful to clarify exactly what
the patient’s concern is, for example, they may fear their headaches represent
an underlying brain tumor.
3. History of present illness: This is the most crucial part of the entire database.
The questions one asks are guided by the differential diagnosis one begins to
consider the moment the patient identifies the chief complaint, as well as the
clinician’s knowledge of typical disease patterns and their natural history. The
duration and character of the primary complaint, associated symptoms, and
exacerbating/ relieving factors should be recorded. Sometimes, the history
will be convoluted and lengthy, with multiple diagnostic or therapeutic inter-
ventions at different locations. For patients with chronic illnesses, obtaining
prior medical records is invaluable. For example, when extensive evaluation of
a complicated medical problem has been done elsewhere, it is usually better to
4 CASE FILES: INTERNAL MEDICINE
first obtain those results than to repeat a “million-dollar workup.” When reviewing
prior records, it is often useful to review the primary data (eg, biopsy reports,
echocardiograms, serologic evaluations) rather than to rely upon a diagnostic
label applied by someone else, which then gets replicated in medical records and
by repetition, acquires the aura of truth, when it may not be fully supported by
data. Some patients will be poor historians because of dementia, confusion,
or language barriers; recognition of these situations and querying of family
members is useful. When little or no history is available to guide a focused
investigation, more extensive objective studies are often necessary to exclude
potentially -serious diagnoses.
4. Past history:
a. Illness: Any illnesses such as hypertension, hepatitis, diabetes mellitus,
cancer, heart disease, pulmonary disease, and thyroid disease should be elic-
ited. If an existing or prior diagnosis is not obvious, it is useful to ask exactly
how it was diagnosed; that is, what investigations were performed. Dura-
tion, severity, and therapies should be included.
b. Hospitalization: Any hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits
should be listed with the reason(s) for admission, the intervention, and the
location of the hospital.
c. Blood transfusion: Transfusions with any blood products should be listed,
including any adverse reactions.
d. Surgeries: The year and type of surgery should be elucidated and any
complications documented. The type of incision and any untoward effects
of the anesthesia or the surgery should be noted.
5. Allergies: Reactions to medications should be recorded, including severity and
temporal relationship to the medication. An adverse effect (such as nausea)
should be differentiated from a true allergic reaction.
6. Medications: Current and previous medications should be listed, including
dosage, route, frequency, and duration of use. Prescription, over-the-counter,
and herbal medications are all relevant. Patients often forget their complete
medication list; thus, asking each patient to bring in all their medications—
both prescribed and nonprescribed—allows for a complete inventory.
7. Family history: Many conditions are inherited, or are predisposed in family
members. The age and health of siblings, parents, grandparents, and others can
provide diagnostic clues. For instance, an individual with first-degree family
members with early onset coronary heart disease is at risk for cardiovascular
disease.
8. Social history: This is one of the most important parts of the history in that
the patient’s functional status at home, social and economic circumstances, and
goals and aspirations for the future are often the critical determinant in what
the best way to manage a patient’s medical problem is. Living arrangements,
economic situations, and religious affiliations may provide important clues for
puzzling diagnostic cases, or suggest the acceptability of various diagnostic
SECTION I: HOW TO APPROACH CLINICAL PROBLEMS 5
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
The physical examination begins as one is taking the history, by observing the
patient and beginning to consider a differential diagnosis. When performing the
physical examination, one focuses on body systems suggested by the differential
diagnosis, and performs tests or maneuvers with specific questions in mind; for
example, does the patient with jaundice have ascites? W hen the physical examina-
tion is performed with potential diagnoses and expected physical findings in mind
(“one sees what one looks for”), the utility of the examination in adding to diag-
nostic yield is greatly increased, as opposed to an unfocused “head-to-toe” physical.
1. General appearance: A great deal of information is gathered by observation, as
one notes the patient’s body habitus, state of grooming, nutritional status, level
of anxiety (or perhaps inappropriate indifference), degree of pain or comfort,
mental status, speech patterns, and use of language. This forms your impres-
sion of “who this patient is.”
2. Vital signs: Vital signs like temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory
rate, height, and weight are often placed here. Blood pressure can sometimes
be different in the two arms; initially, it should be measured in both arms.
In patients with suspected hypovolemia, pulse and blood pressure should be
taken in lying and standing positions to look for orthostatic hypotension. It is
quite useful to take the vital signs oneself, rather than relying upon numbers
gathered by ancillary personnel using automated equipment, because impor-
tant decisions regarding patient care are often made using the vital signs as an
important determining factor.
3. Head and neck examination: Facial or periorbital edema and pupillary responses
should be noted. Funduscopic examination provides a way to visualize the
effects of diseases such as diabetes on the microvasculature; papilledema can
signify increased intracranial pressure. Estimation of jugular venous pressure
is very useful to estimate volume status. The thyroid should be palpated for
a goiter or nodule, and carotid arteries auscultated for bruits. Cervical (com-
mon) and supraclavicular (pathologic) nodes should be palpated.
4. Breast examination: Inspect for symmetry and for, skin or nipple retraction
with the patient’s hands on her hips (to accentuate the pectoral muscles) and
also with arms raised. With the patient sitting and supine, the breasts should
then be palpated systematically to assess for masses. The nipple should be
assessed for discharge, and the axillary and supraclavicular regions should be
examined for adenopathy.
6 CASE FILES: INTERNAL MEDICINE
CLINICAL PEARL
» Ultrasonography is helpful in evaluating the biliary tree, looking for
ureteral obstruction, and evaluating vascular structures, but has limited
utility in obese patients.
99
95
1
90
2
80
70 50
5
60 20
50 10 10
40 5
2 %
30 20
% 1
20 30
40
10 50
60
5
70
80
2
90
1
95
99
P os tte s t Like lihood ra tio: P re te s t
proba bility S e ns itivity proba bility
1 S pe cificity
Figure I–1. Nomogram illustrating the relationship between pretest probability, posttest probability,
and likelihood ratio. (Reproduced with permission from Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper KL, et al. Harrison’s
Principles of Internal Medicine. 16th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2005:10.)
10 CASE FILES: INTERNAL MEDICINE
patient has a pretest probability of CAD of 50%, then the test result of 2 mm of
ST-segment depression raises the posttest probability to 90%.
If one knows the sensitivity and specificity of the test used, one can calculate
the likelihood ratio of the positive test as sensitivity/ (1 – specificity). Posttest prob-
ability is calculated by multiplying the positive likelihood ratio by the pretest prob-
ability, or plotting the probabilities using a nomogram (see Figure I– 1).
Thus, knowing something about the characteristics of the test you are employ-
ing, and how to apply them to the patient at hand is essential in reaching a correct
diagnosis and to avoid falling into the common trap of “positive test = disease” and
“negative test = no disease.” Stated another way, tests do not make diagnoses; doctors
do, considering test results quantitatively in the context of their clinical assessment.
CLINICAL PEARL
» If test result is positive,
Posttest Probability = Pretest Probability × Likelihood Ratio
Likelihood Ratio = Sensitivity/(1 – Specificity)