AQUATIC SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY Malita, Davao Occidental, Philippines 8012
Institute of Teacher Education and Information Technology
Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education
Name of the Group: ______________
Rubrics for Group Presentation
Content: Rubrics for the Egg Vepocapi salad - 5: Thorough, well-researched, and covers all Taste: necessary Information. -5: Exceptionally delicious, bursting with flavor. - 4: Comprehensive, but could include more -4: Very tasty, with well-balanced flavors. detailed examples or explanations. -3: Good taste, but some flavors could be more - 3: Adequate information, but lacks depth or pronounced. clarity in some areas. -2: Mediocre taste, lacks flavor. - 2: Limited content, missing important details or -1: Unpalatable, unpleasant taste key points. Score: -1: Incomplete or irrelevant information. Presentation: Score: -5: Visually stunning and good. Organization: -4: Well-presented with attention and details. -5: Clear and logical structure, with a well- -3: Neatly presented, but lacking of creativity. developed introduction, body, and conclusion. -2: Average presentation, could be more visually -4: Mostly organized, but some sections may lack appealing. coherence or flow. -1: Poorly presented. -3: Shows basic organization, but could benefit Score: from a more cohesive structure. Texture: - 2: Disorganized, making it difficult to follow the -5: Perfectly cooked with a pleasing texture. main ideas. -4: Mostly good texture, but some areas could be - 1: Lacks any organizational structure or improved. coherence. -3: Inconsistent texture, could use better Score: execution. Delivery: -2: Textural flaws and inconsistencies. -5: Engaging and confident presentation, with -1: Unpleasant texture, under/overcooked. clear and Score: concise speaking. Execution: -4: Mostly effective delivery, but could improve in -5: Skillfully prepared with excellent technique. terms of voice projection or body language. -4: Competently executed, with minor flaws. -3: Adequate delivery, but may lack enthusiasm or 3: Execution could be improved with better clarity at times. attention to detail. -2: Inconsistent delivery with noticeable issues in -2: Poor execution, noticeable mistakes. speaking or presentation skills -1: Major flaws in execution. -1: Poor delivery, difficult to understand or Score: engage with the presentation. Overall Total:. Score: Collaboration: -5: Excellent teamwork and seamless collaboration. -4: Mostly effective collaboration with minor communication or coordination issues. - 3: Adequate collaboration, but could benefit from better division of tasks or communication. -2: Limited collaboration, with noticeable conflicts or lack of coordination. - 1: Lack of collaboration, with no evidence of working together as a group. Score: Total:. Overall Total: