Republic of the Philippines
SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES AGRI-BUSINESS AND MARINE AND
AQUATIC SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY
Malita, Davao Occidental, Philippines 8012
Institute of Teacher Education and Information Technology
Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education
Name of the Group: ______________
Rubrics for the Vegetable Canape
Taste:
-5: Exceptionally delicious, bursting with flavor.
-4: Very tasty, with well-balanced flavors.
-3: Good taste, but some flavors could be more
pronounced.
-2: Mediocre taste, lacks flavor.
-1: Unpalatable, unpleasant taste
Score:
Presentation:
-5: Visually stunning and good.
-4: Well-presented with attention and details.
-3: Neatly presented, but lacking of creativity.
-2: Average presentation, could be more visually
appealing.
-1: Poorly presented.
Score:
Texture:
-5: Perfectly cooked with a pleasing texture.
-4: Mostly good texture, but some areas could be
improved.
-3: Inconsistent texture, could use better
execution.
-2: Textural flaws and inconsistencies.
-1: Unpleasant texture, under/overcooked.
Score:
Execution:
-5: Skillfully prepared with excellent technique.
-4: Competently executed, with minor flaws.
3: Execution could be improved with better
attention to detail.
-2: Poor execution, noticeable mistakes.
-1: Major flaws in execution.
Score:
Overall Total:.
Rubrics for Group Presentation
Content:
- 5: Thorough, well-researched, and covers all
necessary Information.
- 4: Comprehensive, but could include more
detailed examples or explanations.
- 3: Adequate information, but lacks depth or
clarity in some areas.
- 2: Limited content, missing important details or
key points.
-1: Incomplete or irrelevant information.
Score:
Organization:
-5: Clear and logical structure, with a well-
developed introduction, body, and conclusion.
-4: Mostly organized, but some sections may lack
coherence or flow.
-3: Shows basic organization, but could benefit
from a more cohesive structure.
- 2: Disorganized, making it difficult to follow the
main ideas.
- 1: Lacks any organizational structure or
coherence.
Score:
Delivery:
-5: Engaging and confident presentation, with
clear and
concise speaking.
-4: Mostly effective delivery, but could improve in
terms of voice projection or body language.
-3: Adequate delivery, but may lack enthusiasm or
clarity at times.
-2: Inconsistent delivery with noticeable issues in
speaking or presentation skills
-1: Poor delivery, difficult to understand or
engage with the presentation.
Score:
Collaboration:
-5: Excellent teamwork and seamless
collaboration.
-4: Mostly effective collaboration with minor
communication or coordination issues.
- 3: Adequate collaboration, but could benefit
from better division of tasks or communication.
-2: Limited collaboration, with noticeable conflicts
or lack of coordination.
- 1: Lack of collaboration, with no evidence of
working together as a group.
Score:
Total:.
Overall Total:
Signature Over Printed name of the
Judge