ASSESSING THE COMFORT AND EASE OF THE UNIVERSITY

ENROLLMENT PROCESS FLOW

A Research Presented to the Faculty of University of Cebu

Maritime Education and Training Center
Cebu City, Philippines

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the Subject Research 211

By:
E/C Romano Jr., Leimuel S
E/C Abella, James RhylieAbella, James Rhylie
E/C Dela Torre, Arnanie
E/C Lariosa, Ralph D.
E/C Lines, Louis Lawrence A.
E/C Romano Jr., Leimuel S.

NOVEMBER 2023
 APPROVAL SHEET

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of

Science in Marine Transportation, this research entitled “ASSESSING THE
COMFORT AND EASE OF THE UNIVERSITY ENROLLMENT PROCESS
FLOW”FLUID MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL SKILLS OF GAY MARITIME
STUDENTS," prepared and submitted by ED/C Romano Jr., Leimuel S. Gesite, John
Louies B., ED/C Abella, James RhylieCalvadores, Jade C., ED/C Dela Torre,
Arnanie E. Molero, Christopher, ED/C Lariosa, Ralph DPapa, Alejandro, ED/C
Lines, Louis Lawrence A. Cotoner, Mark F., Bojos, John Paul has been examined,
accepted, and approved for PROPOSAL HEARING/FINAL EXAMINATION.

RICIO M. SALIBAY, MATS

Adviser

ACCEPTED AS partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of

Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation.

CAPT. GERRY D. ENJAMBRE

Dean, College of Maritime Education

APPROVED by the tribunal on Proposal Hearing with the grade of ___________.

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

Chairman

Member 1 Member 2

C/M GUILLERMO DILUVIO

Program Research Coordinator

CAPT. GERRY D. ENJAMBRE DARYL G. BABATID, Dev.Ed

Dean, College of Maritime Education Research Director

Date of Proposal Hearing:

Date of Oral Defense:

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Content Page

Title Page i

Approval Sheet ii

Table of Contents vi

List of Tables vii

List of Figures viii

CHAPTER THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

1 INTRODUCTION

Rationale of the Study

Theoretical Background

THE PROBLEM

Statement of the Problem

Significance of the Study

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design

Research Environment
 Research Respondents

Research Instrument

Research Procedures

DEFINITION OF TERMS

REFERENCES

APPENDICES

1. Letter

A-1. Transmittal Letter to the Dean

A-2 Transmittal Letter to the Adviser

A-3 Letter to the Respondents

A-4 Transmittal to the Registrar

A-5 Informed Consent

2. Research Instrument
B-1 Letter of Request for the validation of the Research Tool
B-2 Suggestion/ Comment Sheet

B-3 Certificate of Validation

B-4 Result of the Reliability Test

B-5 Research Instrument

B-6 Results

C Location Map

CURRICULUM VITAE
 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Research Flow

CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

Rationale of the Studyof the Study

Assessing the comfort and ease of the university enrollment process

flow is a critical undertaking for higher education institutions. This process

involves evaluating the steps and procedures that prospective students must

navigate when applying to a university. This study will provide a

comprehensive investigation for why assessing the comfort and ease of this

process is of paramount importance.

 The university enrollment process serves as a prospective student's

initial interaction with the institution. This initial impression sets the tone for

their entire educational experience. If the enrollment process is convoluted,

confusing, or time-consuming, it may deter potential applicants, thereby

reducing the university's ability to attract top talent. By assessing and

enhancing the comfort and ease of this process, universities can create a

positive first impression, fostering a welcoming atmosphere that encourages

more students to apply.

In today's competitive higher education landscape, universities are

competing for a limited pool of prospective students. Streamlining the

enrollment process can provide a significant competitive advantage (Davies,

1999;). A user-friendly, efficient process can become a distinguishing

feature that sets one institution apart from another. This can result in higher

application rates, increased enrollment, and a stronger reputation for the

university, all of which have a positive impact on the institution's long-term

sustainability.

This study is a proactive approach to reducing barriers to entry.

Complicated or unclear procedures can disproportionately affect

underrepresented groups, including first-generation students, international

applicants, and those with limited access to resources. By ensuring a

straightforward and accessible enrollment process, universities can

contribute to greater diversity and exclusivity within their student body,

promoting equity in education.

The evaluation of the enrollment process facilitates data-driven

improvements. By soliciting feedback from applicants and analyzing their

experiences, universities can identify pain points and areas in need of

enhancement (Gonyea et al., 2020). This continuous improvement approach

not only benefits future applicants but also optimizes internal processes,

reducing administrative burdens and ensuring compliance with legal and

regulatory requirements. An efficient enrollment process is not only

beneficial for the prospective students but also for the university's staff and

resources. When the process is streamlined, administrative personnel can

allocate their time and efforts more effectively.

This can lead to cost savings and resource optimization, allowing the

university to allocate resources toward improving educational quality and

student support services.

In conclusion, assessing the comfort and ease of the university

enrollment process flow is pivotal for multiple reasons. It shapes prospective

students' initial perceptions, enhances competitiveness, reduces barriers to

entry, fosters data-driven improvements, and optimizes resource allocation.

In an eve revolving educational landscape, prioritizing the comfort and ease

of the enrollment process is essential for attracting and retaining a diverse

and talented student body while also ensuring the long-term success of the

institution

Theoretical Background

Enrollment management, as delineated in existing literature, is

a multifaceted concept with a significant impact on higher education

institutions. It encompasses a dual nature, serving both as a conceptual

framework and as a practical process involving various campus activities.

According to Hossler and Bean (1990), it extends beyond mere

organizational structures, integrating the entire campus into its ambit.

Dennis’s’s (1998) ((Strategic Forecasting Theory of Enrollment

Management)) (SFEM) provides a nuanced perspective, defining enrollment

management as a strategic tool that involves forecasting trends in higher

education. This approach emphasizes the use of research to proactively plan

for the future, thereby aligning academic institutions with the evolving needs

of their student populations.

These definitions of SFEM underscore the inherent complexity of

enrollment management.

On one hand, it seeks to exert control over the composition and size of

the student body, as outlined by Hossler and Bean's (1990) two-fold

objective, the, the, ( (1990) (Dual Objective Theory of Enrollment

Management) (DOTEM)). This dual aim DOTEM not only emphasizes

shaping the student body's characteristics but also ensuring an optimal

student population size.

Furthermore, from the vantage point of student attraction and

retention, scholars like Braxton, Vesper, & Hossler (1995) developed the

developed the ( (Student Attraction and Retention Theory of Enrollment

Management)) (SARTEM) that that emphasizes the pivotal role of

enrollment management. This perspective underscores its crucial function in

fostering a conducive environment for attracting and retaining students

effectively.
 Meanwhile, Meanwhile, Donhardt (1995) presented hispresented his

((Lifecycle Approach Theory of Enrollment Management) (LATEM) that )

contributes by emphasizing that enrollment management extends across the

entire student lifecycle, from recruitment to graduation. ItLATEM involves a

holistic approach to influencing the trajectory of a student's educational

journey.

Additionally, Bateman and Spruill’s (1995) (Educational Outcomes Theory

of Enrollment Management) (EOTEM) highlights the broader implications

of enrollment management on educational outcomes, expanding its scope

beyond the initial enrollment phase. This viewpoint underscores its potential

to impact student attendance and, by extension, their academic success.

Summarily, Hossler and Bean's (1990) comprehensive definition

(1990) of the (Comprehensive Administrative Functions Theory of

Enrollment Management (CAFTEM)) emphasizes the orchestration of

multiple administrative functions within an institution, encompassing

admissions, financial aid, orientation, career planning, and retention efforts.

It underscores the interconnectedness of these areas in achieving effective

enrollment management.
Gamita ning subtitles akong gihatag. Hagpati inyong RRL unya isulod sila

sa subtitle nga angay para nila.

Comfort and Ease of Enrollment Process Flow

(Hagpati inyong RRL unya isulod sila sa subtitle nga angay para nila.:

On the other hand, the integration of technology into the enrollment process

has been a focal point of research. Wang and Wu (2019) emphasized the

importance of user-friendly online enrollment systems, highlighting that

institutions that employ streamlined web interfaces and mobile applications

tend to provide a more comfortable enrollment experience.

Effective communication and guidance during the enrollment process are

pivotal in ensuring a smooth experience. The study conducted by Smith et

al. (2020) found that personalized communication with prospective students

significantly reduces anxiety levels and increases their sense of comfort.

Assessing the comfort and ease of the enrollment process is an ongoing

challenge. Turner et al. (2018) developed a comprehensive assessment

framework that includes both quantitative and qualitative metrics. Their

research emphasized the significance of obtaining direct feedback from

students to continuously improve the enrollment experience.

Modernizing the enrollment process through user-friendly online systems

(Wang & Wu, 2019) has emerged as a key theme. Streamlined web

interfaces and mobile applications can significantly enhance the comfort and

ease of enrollment. Personalized communication and comprehensive

guidance (Smith et al., 2020) have been highlighted as essential elements.

These factors reduce anxiety and contribute to a more comfortable

enrollment experience.

Similarly, understanding student expectations and perceptions is crucial

(Thomas & Johnson, 2020). Aligning the enrollment process with these

expectations can significantly impact comfort and ease. Socioeconomic

status also affects the ease of enrollment (Williams et al., 2019). This

literature explores the disparities in comfort and ease experienced by

students from different backgrounds.

Effective collaboration among different university departments is crucial for

a seamless enrollment process (Taylor & Hall, 2019). This literature

highlights the benefits of cross-functional teamwork geared toward shifting

to student-centered approaches in enrollment (Johnson & Martin, 2021).

Such approaches prioritize the comfort and ease of students.

Examining how the enrollment process impacts student retention (Harrison

& Thompson, 2017) underscores the long-term consequences of comfort and

ease. Promoting diversity and inclusion in the enrollment process (Smith &

Rodriguez, 2021) contributes to a more comfortable and equitable

experience for all students.)

Challenges in an Enrollment Process Flow

(Hagpati inyong RRL unya isulod sila sa subtitle nga angay para nila. :

Nevertheless, it's worth noting that despite the efforts in the realm of

enrollment management, Tinto and Russo (1994) caution that its success has

been moderately achieved, highlighting the ongoing challenges in

implementing and fine-tuning enrollment management programs.

Transparency and accessibility of information play a vital role in enhancing

comfort during enrollment. A research by Jones and Brown (2018) suggests

that universities providing comprehensive, easily accessible information

about admission requirements, deadlines, and financial aid options tend to

foster a more positive enrollment experience.

The bureaucracy associated with enrollment processes has been a consistent

point of contention for students. Garcia and Martinez (2017) argue that

streamlining administrative procedures, such as transcript submission and

document verification, can significantly reduce enrollment-related stress and

enhance overall comfort.)

Nevertheless, it's worth noting that despite the efforts in the realm of

enrollment management, Tinto and Russo (1994) (Enrollment Management

Implementation Challenges Theory) caution that its success has been

moderately achieved, highlighting the ongoing challenges in implementing

and fine-tuning enrollment management programs.

In the context of enrollment processes, the shift from traditional manual

methods to computerized and online systems has revolutionized how

institutions manage student information. These technological advancements

have introduced efficiency and convenience into the enrollment process,

facilitating tasks such as registration and record-keeping. Computerized and

online enrollment systems have emerged as indispensable tools for

educational institutions in modernizing their operations and enhancing the

overall student experience.

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

 On the other hand, the integration of technology into the
enrollment process has been a focal point of research. Wang and Wu (2019)
emphasized the importance of user-friendly online enrollment systems,
highlighting that institutions that employ streamlined web interfaces and
mobile applications tend to provide a more comfortable enrollment
experience. Moreover, they found that these systems positively impact
student satisfaction and retention rates.This is an infrastructure that schools
today should consider.

Effective communication and guidance during the enrollment process

are pivotal in ensuring a smooth experience. According toT the study
conducted by Smith et al. (2020), personalized communication with
prospective students significantly reduces anxiety levels and increases their
sense of comfort. Institutions that offer clear, step-by-step guidance, and
readily available support tend to receive higher marks in terms of enrollment
ease.

Transparency and accessibility of information play a vital role in

enhancing comfort during enrollment. A rResearch by Jones and Brown
(2018) suggests that universities providing comprehensive, easily accessible
information about admission requirements, deadlines, and financial aid
options tend to foster a more positive enrollment experience. The
bureaucracy associated with enrollment processes has been a consistent
point of contention for students. Garcia and Martinez (2017) argue that
streamlining administrative procedures, such as transcript submission and
document verification, can significantly reduce enrollment-related stress and
enhance overall comfort.
 Assessing the comfort and ease of the enrollment process is an
ongoing challenge. Turner et al. (2018) developed a comprehensive
assessment framework that includes both quantitative and qualitative
metrics. Their research emphasized the significance of obtaining direct
feedback from students to continuously improve the enrollment experience.
A recurring theme in the literature is the idea that universities should view
the enrollment process as an evolving entity. Davenport and White (2019)
advocate for a culture of continuous improvement, where universities
actively seek feedback from students and stakeholders to make iterative
enhancements to the enrollment process.

Modernizing the enrollment process through user-friendly online

systems (Wang & Wu, 2019) has emerged as a key theme. Streamlined web
interfaces and mobile applications can significantly enhance the comfort and
ease of enrollment. Personalized communication and comprehensive
guidance (Smith et al., 2020) have been highlighted as essential elements.
These factors reduce anxiety and contribute to a more comfortable
enrollment experience.

Meanwhile, Jones and Brown (2018) emphasize the importance of

transparent and easily accessible information. Institutions that provide clear
details about admission requirements, deadlines, and financial aid options
tend to improve the ease of enrollment.Garcia and Martinez (2017) argue for
streamlined administrative procedures. Simplifying processes such as
document submission and verification can significantly reduce enrollment-
related stress.

Similarly, understanding student expectations and perceptions is

crucial (Thomas & Johnson, 2020). Aligning the enrollment process with
these expectations can significantly impact comfort and ease.
Socioeconomic status also affects the ease of enrollment (Williams et al.,
2019). This literature explores the disparities in comfort and ease
experienced by students from different backgrounds.

Effective collaboration among different university departments is

crucial for a seamless enrollment process (Taylor & Hall, 2019). This
literature highlights the benefits of cross-functional teamwork geared toward
shifting to student-centered approaches in enrollment (Johnson & Martin,
2021). Such approaches prioritize the comfort and ease of students.

Examining how the enrollment process impacts student retention

(Harrison & Thompson, 2017) underscores the long-term consequences of
comfort and ease.Promoting diversity and inclusion in the enrollment
process (Smith & Rodriguez, 2021) contributes to a more comfortable and
equitable experience for all students.

THE PROBLEM

Statement of the Problem

This study will assess the comfort and ease of the university

enrollment process flow of the University of Cebu Maritime Education and

Training Center as experienced by the student. Enrollment process is a

critical stage in students’ academic journey, and its efficiency and user-

friendliness significantly impact the overall experience of student.

 Specifically, the studyit seeks to answer the following questions:

[1.] What is the level of comfort and ease onfn the enrollment process

experienced by the students on the different steps as to the following offices:

[1.1] . cCChairperson’s office’s office (requirements);

[1.2] . ccClinic;

[1.3] . ggGuidance officeoffice;

[1.4] . ccChairperson’s officen’s office (evaluation);

[1.5] . Information and communication technologieselectronic data

processing (EDP) sectionInformation and communication technologies;

[1.6] . ccChairperson’s office’s office (verification);

1.1 . SAO (clearance);

[1.7] . RrRegistrar (subject loadingsubject loadingchecking);

1.2

[1.8] . ssStudent’s aaAccounting sectionsection;

[1.9] . ccCashier (payment);

[1.10] . ddDean’s office’s office;

[1.11] . rrRegistrar (enrollment);

 [1.12] . llLibrary (school ID verificationverification)

[1.13] . ssSecurity aaAdministration Office;

2. What specific enrollment flow gives the most challenging experiences

among the student?

3. Based on the results, what proposal saled can be crafted to improve the

enrollment process flow?

Significance of the Study

This research will benefit the following:

 Students: The results of the study will benefit the students through

the positive changes and improvements it will hopefully necessicitate.

Enrollee/Inquiries: This study will provide them information on how well

the enrollment procedure of the university is performing.

University of Cebu Maritime Education and Training centerStaff

of the Involved Departments: (nganu benefitial man?

Enhances staff efficiency, reduces stress, and streamlines

operations, leading to improved job satisfaction and performance in

university departments.)

This will help the school to gain more enrollee and benefit more to

improve the quality of education and services to the public.

Future Researchers: This study will benefit thefuture basis

researchers through the baseline data it may roduce about the basis and

source of ideas of related topics and situations about concerning enrollment

procedure of the univesity.University of Cebu Maritime Education and

Training Center.

Students: The study will benefit the enrollee to enroll faster and able

to adapt on the enrollment process flow of University of Cebu Maritime

Education and Training Center.

 Improving Student Experience: Understanding how comfortable

and easy the enrolment process is for students is essential for enhancing their

overall experience.

Future Researcher: Future researchers can use the findings of this

study as baseline data to compare against their own research. This allows

them to assess changes and improvements in the enrollment process over

time.
 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design

The research design for assessing the comfort and ease of the

university's enrollment process flow would be a descriptive quantitative

study. This design aims to gather numerical data to describe the current state

of the enrollment process, including students' perceptions of its comfort and

ease.

This study will used the descriptive-quantitative correlational design

of research. First, the researchers will identify and determine the self-

efficacy and academic performance of maritime students in Deck watch 121

and then gathering of the data will follow, after that the data will be process

to be analyzed and search for finding, and lastly leading to a conclusion. The

findings and conclusion will be used for possible recommendations.

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

 Respondents’ Data gathering R

level of self- E
efficacy in Deck C
-Watch 121
Data analysis O
M
 Respondents’ M
academic Data E
performance in
interpretation N
Deck-watch 121
D
A
Internet T
Researches
I
O
N
 Findings

Conclusion

Figure 1
Research Flow

Research Environment

The research will be conducted at the University of Cebu Maritime

Education and Training Center. This center provides a specific and relevant

setting for the study as it focuses on maritime education, which often has

unique enrollment processes.

Research Respondents.

The research respondents are, respondents are will involve second

and third year BSMT and BSMAREsecond and third year BSMT and

BSMARE students of the University of Cebu,, who of courseof course, have

undergone the enrollment process. at the Maritime Education and Training

Center. The sample which are selected randomlywhich are selected

randomly should be representative of the different programs and stages of

the enrollment process. A diverse group of respondents will provide a more

comprehensive view.

Research instrument

There were two data gathering procedures; the first was data mining

of the ease of enrollment process flowrecent records of grades in Deckwatch

121 this second semester school year 20230-202421, which consist a 5 point

likert scale of 5 - strongly agree, 4 - agree, 3 - neutral, 2 - disagree, and 1 -

strongly disagreee .from the registrar’s office, Ssecond is the comfort of

enrollment process flowresearcher made questionnaire, which is consists of

fivefour point likert scale levels. 1 is least comfortableNever, 2 is less

comfortableseldom, 3 is neutralsometimes, 4 is comfortable, and lastly 5

very comfortable, and lastly the highest one is 4 corresponding to Always.

There 13020 questions which defines the comfort and ease of the enrollment

flow to the studentstests the self-efficacy and including the how well the

students have in the subject Deckwatch 121. For the academic performance

of the students, we focus of the grades of the respondents and inquire this in

the registrar. These were presented through frequency and simple percentage

in order to determine the academic performance of the students.

Research Procedure

Questionnaire Development. The researcher-made survey

questionnaire uses the Develop a questionnaire based on the Likert scale

questions of seven points. It has been eeEnsuredd thatate questions are clear

and specific, addressing the comfort and ease of the enrollment process.

Pilot Testing: The questionnaire will undergo content validation to

ensure its face value and quality, testing using Crinbach alpha, and Pilot test

initial implementation the questionnaire with a small group of students to

identify any issues with wording or comprehension of the questions. Revise

the questionnaire as needed.

Sampling: Randomly select a RRRrepresentative sample of students

will be randomly selected from various programs who undergo the full and

enrollment stages by themselves. at the Maritime Education and Training

Center.

Data Collection: Administer surveys to a carefully selected group of

university students, providing them with the choice of in-person or
electronic responses to ensure practicality and align with respondent
preferences. This step aims to gather their candid feedback and experiences
regarding the ease and comfort of the university enrollment
process.Administer the questionnaire to the selected students. This can be
done in person or electronically, depending on the practicality and
preferences of the respondents.
Data Analysis: Employ statistical software to meticulously process
and analyze the collected survey data. This involves calculating key
descriptive statistics such as mean, median, and standard deviation,
providing quantitative insights into the students' perceptions of comfort and
ease throughout the enrollment process.Use statistical software to analyze
the collected data. Calculate descriptive statistics such as mean, median, and
standard deviation to describe the comfort and ease ratings.

Interpretation: Study into the analyzed data to gain a qualitative

understanding of students' viewpoints and experiences concerning the
university enrollment process. This step entails identifying trends,
recognizing strengths, and pinpointing specific areas where improvements
could be made, offering valuable qualitative insights.Interpret the data to
understand students' perceptions of the enrollment process. Identify trends,
strengths, and areas for improvement.

Reporting: Prepare a comprehensive research report. This report

encapsulates the findings, conclusions, and practical recommendations based
on the collected data and interpretation. It is designed to be shared with
relevant stakeholders within the university, providing actionable insights for
potential enhancements to the enrollment process, ensuring a more
comfortable and efficient experience for all students.Prepare a research
report that includes a description of the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations. The report should be shared with relevant stakeholders
within the university for potential improvements to the enrollment process.
 DEFINITION OF TERMS

These are the list of the terms used in the study which are defined

operationally:

Assessing

In the context of this study, "assessing" refers to the systematic evaluation

and examination of the university's enrollment process to understand its

various aspects, including efficiency, user-friendliness, and overall quality.

Comfort

"Comfort" pertains to the extent to which students feel at ease,

relaxed, and confident during the various stages of the enrollment process. It

includes aspects related to emotional well-being, security, and a sense of

being supported.

Ease

"Ease" refers to the degree of simplicity, convenience, and

straightforwardness of the processes involved in enrolling at the university.

It indicates how easily students can navigate the steps and requirements of

enrollment.
University Enrollment Process Flow FlowFlow

This term encompasses all the procedures, actions, and requirements

of the universityof the university that students must complete and fulfill to

gain admission and officially enroll at the university. It includes tasks such

as application submission, document submission, payment of fees, and other

relevant actions. It is composed of It is composed of

Process Flow

"Process flow" refers to the sequence and order of steps, tasks, and

interactions involved in the university's enrollment process. It describes the

path that students follow from the initial inquiry about enrollment to the

final completion of the process.

 REFERENCES
Davies (1999): The specific reference for this source is not provided

in the text, but it likely refers to a publication by an author named

Davies in 1999. Unfortunately, without the full citation, it's

challenging to provide further details about this source. Davies

(1999): The specific reference for this source... - Google Scholar

Hossler, D., & Bontrager, B. (2015): This is a reference to the book

"Strategic Enrollment Management: Transforming Higher Education"

by Hossler and Bontrager. It is likely used to support the importance

of streamlining the enrollment process for competitive advantage.

Hossler, D., & Bontrager, B. (2015): This is a reference... -

Google Scholar

Gonyea et al. (2020): This reference is not fully detailed in the text, but it

likely refers to a study or publication by a group of authors led by

Gonyea in 2020. This source is mentioned in the context of soliciting

feedback and continuous improvement of the enrollment process.

Gonyea et al. (2020): This reference is not fully detailed in the

text, but it likely refers to a study or publication by a group of

authors led by Gonyea in 2020. This source is mentioned in the

context of soliciting feedback and continuous improvement of the

enrollment process. - Search (bing.com)

Hossler and Bean (1990): This source is mentioned in the context of

defining enrollment management as a multifaceted concept that goes

beyond organizational structures and involves the entire campus. It

 appears to support the idea of the comprehensive nature of enrollment

management.The Strategic Management of College Enrollments - Don

Hossler, John P. Bean - Google Books

Dennis (1998): Dennis is mentioned in the context of the "Strategic

Forecasting Theory of Enrollment Management," which emphasizes

the use of research to proactively plan for the future of academic

institutions. Chapter II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

— thesisbook 0.0.1 documentation

Hossler and Bean's Dual Objective Theory (1990): This theory emphasizes

the dual aim of enrollment management, which includes shaping the

student body's characteristics and ensuring an optimal student

population size. (PDF) Enrollment Management and Managing

Enrollments: Revisiting the Context for Institutional Strategy

(researchgate.net)

Braxton, Vesper, & Hossler (1995): These scholars are associated with the

"Student Attraction and Retention Theory of Enrollment

Management," which underscores the role of enrollment management

 in attracting and retaining students effectively. Expectations for

College and Student Persistence on JSTOR

Donhardt (1995): Donhardt's "Lifecycle Approach Theory of Enrollment

Management" is cited for its emphasis on the holistic approach to

influencing the trajectory of a student's educational journey. SEM Guide

Cover.indd (ed.gov)

Bateman and Spruill (1995): These authors are linked to the "Educational

Outcomes Theory of Enrollment Management," which expands the

scope of enrollment management to include its impact on student

attendance and academic success. Enrollment Management Theory -

716 Words | Internet Public Library (ipl.org)

Hossler and Bean's Comprehensive Administrative Functions Theory

(1990): This theory underscores the interconnectedness of multiple

administrative functions within an institution, all of which are part of

effective enrollment management. The Strategic Management of

College Enrollments - Don Hossler, John P. Bean - Google Books

Tinto and Russo (1994): These authors are associated with the "Enrollment

Management Implementation Challenges Theory," which highlights

the challenges in implementing and fine-tuning enrollment

management programs. wp_Reframing-Strategic-Enrollment-

Management-from-the-Academic-Lens_part2 (semworks.net)

Beatson, N. (2019) The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Accounting

Education Retrieve January 4, 2021 from https://ourarchive.otago.ac.
CW. Loo (2013) Sources of Self-Efficacy Influencing Academic
Performance of Engineering Students Retrieve January 3, 2021 from
http://article.scieducationalresearch.com
(Heslin & Klehe, 2006) Self Efficacy and Academic Performance of the
Students of Gujrat University, Pakistan Retrieve January 4, 2021 from
http://www.savap.org.pk/journals
Jiunn- Liang Guo (2019) A Comparative Analysis of the Seafaring Career
Persistence of Nautical Post-Baccalaureate and College Students
Retrieve January 5, 2021 from https://jmst.ntou.edu.tw/marine
Lynch and Espenshade (2005) Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success
in College Retrieve January 3, 2021 from https://scholar.princeton.edu
M. Meral et al. (2012) The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and
Academic Performance Retrieve January 7, 2021 from
https://www.sciencedirect
Piper and Siegal (2000) Self Efficacy and Academic Performance of the
Students of Gujrat University, Pakistan Retrieve January 6, 2021 from
http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.5(1)/2014(5.1-30).pdf
Salami (2010) Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological well-
being and students’ attitudes: Implications for quality education
Retrieve January 6, 2021 from (PDF) Emotional intelligence, self-
efficacy, psychological well-being and students’ attitudes:
Implications for quality education (researchgate.net)
Sharma and Lindstorm (2006) Self Efficacy and Academic Performance of
the Students of Gujrat University, Pakistan Retrieve January 6, 2021
from http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt
T. Kim (2020) Maritime safety leadership: A study on leadership behaviors,
an assessment instrument and future leadership for safety at sea,
Retrieve January 14, 2021 from https://openarchive.usn.no
Toni Honicke (2016) The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic
performance: A systematic review Retrieve January 8, 2021 from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii
Ugur Dogan (2017) Student Engagement, Academic Self-efficacy, and
Academic Motivation as Predictors of Academic Performance
Retrieve January 4, 2021 from (PDF) Student Engagement, Academic
Self-efficacy, and Academic Motivation as Predictors of Academic
Performance (researchgate.net)
Wilde, N., Hsu, A. (2019) The influence of general self-efficacy on the
interpretation of vicarious experience information within online
learning Retrieve January 4, 2021 from
https://www.springeropen.com
Yokoyama, (2019). Self-efficacy of Saudi English Majors after the Emergent
Transition to Online Learning and Online Assessment during the
COVID-19 Pandemic Retrieve January 5, 2021 from
https://www.research.net
 APPENDIX A-1
Transmittal Letter- Letter to the Dean

February 22, 2021

Capt. Gerry D. Enjambre
Dean, College of Maritime Education
University of Cebu – METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City

Dear Sir:
Greetings!
The undersigned is the lead researcher of the team who had successfully defended
the research title “SELF EFFICACY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDECK
WATCH 121” last December 30, 2020 during our proposal hearing which was chaired
by Ms. Kaye P. Diaz.
In line with this, I would like to ask for your approval in allowing the team to
disseminate the research instruments using Google forms to our respondents who are the
first year BSMT students enrolled in Deck watch 121 in University of Cebu-Maritime
Education and Training Center for the academic year 2020-2021.
I am hoping for a positive response on this request. Your approval will greatly
contribute to the success of this study. Kindly send the approved letter to our adviser’s
email address which is reflected below. Thank you and God bless!

Respectfully yours,

Lead Researcher
Noted by:
Research 101 Adviser

Recommending Approval: Approved by:

Engr. Allan Navarro Capt. Gerry Enjambre
General Education Chairperson Maritime Education Dean
 APPENDIX A2
Transmittal Letter to the Adviser

Date:
OIC-NW DAVE B. POLISTICO
Research 101 Adviser
University of Cebu- METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City

Dear Sir:

Greetings!

The undersigned is the lead researcher of the team who had successfully defended
our research title “Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Deckwatch 121” last
December 30, 2020 during our proposal hearing which was chaired by Ms. Kaye P. Diaz.

In line with this, I would like to ask for your approval in allowing the team to
disseminate the research instruments using Google forms to our respondents who are the
1st year BSMT students enrolled in Deck watch 121 this 2 nd semester school year 2020-
2021.

I am hoping for a positive response on this request. Your approval will greatly
contribute to the success of this study.

Respectfully yours,

Lead Researcher

Approved by;

Research Adviser
 APPENDIX A-3
Letter to the Respondents
February 22, 2020

Dear Respondents,

Greetings!

The undersigned is the lead researcher of the team who had successfully defended
our research title “Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Deck Watch 121” last
December 30, 2020 during our proposal hearing which was chaired by Ms. Kaye P. Diaz.

In this connection, we would like to request you to be one of our respondents in

our study. We hope you can help us by answering our instrument sincerely and truthfully.

Thank you very much.

Respectfully yours,

Lead Researcher

Noted by;

Research Adviser

APPENDIX A-4
 Transmittal Letter to the Registrar
February 22, 2021

The Registrar
University of Cebu – METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
Dear Madame:
Greetings!
The undersigned is the lead researcher of the team who had successfully defended
the research title “SELF EFFICACY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN
DECK WATCH 121” last December 30, 2020 during our proposal hearing which was
chaired by Ms. Kaye P. Diaz.
In line with this, I would like to request for the following: (1) number of first
year BSMT students enrolled in Deckwatch 121 during the 2nd semester of academic
year 2020-2021, (2) the email address of all 1st year BSMT students who are taking
Deckwatch 121 this 2nd semester, and (3) Midterm grades of the first year BSMT
students currently taking Dwatch 121 this second semester SY: 2020-2021.
The data requested above are needed for the computation of our sample size and
dissemination of our research tool on the mentioned research study. This study would not
be realized without your help.
I am hoping for a positive response on this request. Kindly send the approved
letter and the data requested to our adviser’s email address which is reflected below.
Thank you and God bless!
Respectfully yours,

Lead Researcher
Noted by:
Research 101 Adviser

Recommending Approval: Approved by:

Engr. Allan Navarro Mrs. Jovita Quinanola
General Education Chairperson School Registrar
APPENDIX A-5
 INFORMED CONSENT
Students and Faculty Researchers
University of Cebu System
Name of Principal Investigator: D/Cdt.Joshua Q. Cabilete
Name of Organization: University of Cebu - Maritime Education and Training Center (UC-
METC)
Title of Proposal: Competency of Maritime Students in the Full Mission Bridge Simulator
Assessment.
This Informed Consent Form has two parts:

□ Informed Sheet (to share information about the research with you)

□ Certificate of Consent (for signatures if you agree to take part)

You will be given a copy of the full Informed Consent Form

PART I: Information Sheet
Introduction
I and my co-researchers are students of the University of Cebu-Maritime Education and
Training Center taking up Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation. We are currently
conducting a study entitled: “Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Deck Watch 121”.
In line with this, I am inviting you to be a respondent of this investigation and request you to
spare a few minutes of your time to answer this questionnaire honestly. However, you do not
have to decide today whether or not you will participate in the research. Before you decide, you
can talk to anyone you feel comfortable with about the research. If there are contents in the
questionnaire that you do not understand and find ambiguous then feel free to contact the
researchers. Rest assured that all the answers will be treated with the utmost confidentiality.
Purpose of the Research
The purpose of this study is to determine the level of Self-Efficacy and Academic
Performance in Deck Watch 121-COLREG.
Type of Research Intervention
This research will use descriptive correlation method
Participant selection
1st year Marine Transportation students who enrolled in Deck Watch 121 this 2 nd semester

SY: 2020-2021.
Voluntary Participation
Your participation in this research is entirely voluntary. It is your choice whether to
participate or not. Whether you choose to participate or not, it does not affect you as a student.
You may change your mind later and stop participating even if you agreed earlier and this will not
be taken against you later on.

Procedures and Protocol

In this study, the researchers will ask the registrar to give the assessment grades that will be
distributed by the researchers when they will have their data gathering. It will be collected right
after you completely answer the questionnaire. The information recorded is confidential and no
one else except OIC-NW Dave Polistico, my research adviser, will have access to her/his
questionnaire. The questionnaires will be destroyed after 6 months.
Duration
The research takes place within 12 months. During that time, you will be asked by the
researchers to answer the questionnaire during your convenient time and may submit it within 20-
30 minutes. If you would answer the questionnaire immediately, then it will take around 10
minutes to finish. Your engagement as a respondent will only take once.
Risks
I am asking you to share or divulge your personal information which you may feel
uncomfortable answering with. There are also questions which might affect your exhibition of
those values, and you may feel uncomfortable talking to other topics. You must know that it is
you who will decide whether to give answer to all questions or you may skip on some questions.
You do not have to give reasons for not responding to any questions, or for refusing to take part in
the survey.

Benefits
This study is beneficial not only to the students of University of Cebu- Maritime
Education and Training center but also to Deck Watch Instructors. This will help them identify
the students who aren't competitive enough in bridge simulation assessment and to follow-up
their lacks in understanding the lessons.
Reimbursements
You will not be provided with any payment for taking part in the research.
Confidentiality
We, the researchers of this study will not be sharing information about you. The information
that we collect from this research will be kept confidential. Information about you and your
perception that will be collected from this research will be put away and no one but the researcher
will be able to see it. It will not be shared with or given to anyone except my research adviser,
OIC-NW Dave Polistico
Sharing the Results
 At the end of the study, we, the researchers of this study will be sharing what we have
learned with from the respondents. Nothing that you answered in the questionnaire will be shared
with anybody outside the research. A written report will also be given to the participants whom
they can share with their families. We will also publish the results in order for those interested
people may learn from this research.

Right to Refuse or Withdraw

You may choose not to participate in this study and does not have to take part in this research
if you do not wish to do so. Choosing to participate or not will not affect you as a student. You
will still benefit from the implications to practice and other recommendations. You may stop from
participating in the survey at any time that you wish without losing your right here.

Who to Contact?
If you have any questions, you can ask them now or later, even if the study has started. If
you wish to ask questions later, you may contact any of the following:

Name of the Researcher/Adviser/Ethics Staff Phone number

Joshua Q. Cabilete
joshuacabilete123@gmail.com /09474423733

OIC-NW Dave Polistico dpolistico@uc.edu.ph

UCAREC 262-8888 local 143

This thesis proposal has been reviewed and approved by our thesis panel of reviewers at the
University of Cebu Research Ethics Committee, which is a committee whose task is to make sure
that the researcher has properly conducted the study. If you have any questions for my panel,
please contact the University Research Office.

PART II: Certificate of Consent

I have read the foregoing information, or it has been read to me. I have had the opportunity
to ask questions about it and any questions that I have asked have been answered to my
satisfaction. I consent voluntarily to participate as a participant in this research.
Print name of Participant: ___________________
Signature of Participant: ____________________
Date: ________________
Day/month/year
If illiterate
A literate witness must sign (if possible, this person should be selected by the participant and
should have no connection to the research team). Participants who are illiterate should include
their thumbprint as well.
I have witnessed the accurate reading of the consent form to the potential participant,
and the individual has had to ask questions. I confirm that the individual has given consent
freely.
Print name of witness ___________________ AND Thumbprint of participant

Signature of witness ____________________

Date _________________
Day/month/year
I confirm that the participant was given an opportunity to ask question about the
study, and all the questions asked by the participant have been answered correctly and to the best
of my ability. I confirm that the individual has not been coerced into giving consent, and the
consent has been given freely and voluntarily.
A copy of this ICF has been provided to the participant.
Print Name of Researcher/person taking the consent________________________
Signature of Researcher/person taking the consent__________________________
Date__________________
Day/month/yea

APPENDIX B-1
 Letter of Request for the validation of the Research Tool

To:

Respected Sir/ Madam:

We are currently enrolled in Research 101 (Methods of Research) at the University of Cebu-
METC, and we are in the process of validating the content of our research instrument for our
study entitled, SELF-EFFICACY AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN DECK WATCH
121. The validity of our tool is one of the requirements in our research
methods course.

Objectives of the study are stated below:

1. This study aims to evaluating competence of maritime students in
using shipboard compasses
2. It also intends to find out if there is significant relationship between
the theoretical and practical know
ledge
3. The results of this research will the basis for a proposed
recommendation.

Attached in this letter are the following:

1.Tool for the study;

2. A separate sheet for comments and suggestions
3. Certificate of validation

I humbly request you to kindly go through the content of the tool and give
your valuable suggestion on the content.

I would also be much grateful to you if you could sign the certificate stating
that you have validated the tool.

Thank you very much.

Respectfully,

Lead Researcher
 APPENDIX B-2

Suggestion/ Comment Sheet

Item Questions / Statements Comments/

no. suggestions

APPENDIX B-3
 Certificate of Validation

This is to certify that the research tool constructed by __________________,

a maritime student in the University of Cebu- METC to be used in his study,
Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Deck Watch 121, has been
examined and completely approved as valid and acceptable.

Content Expert Validator

Date:

APPENDIX B-4
Result of the Reliability Test
Self-efficacy and Academic performance questionnaire:

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

0.954275 15

APPENDIX B-5
Research Instrument
 Assessing the Comfort and Ease of the University Enrollment Flow

Instructions: The researchers are assessing the comfort and ease of the

students in this university enrollment process flow. To obtain the most

accurate data possible, we gladly request that you provide honest feedback.

The quick survey should take 10 minutes to complete. So we sincerely

appreciate your time. You could hand your complete survey to any member

of the research team.

Ease

Scale: 5 – Strongly Agree 3- Nuetral 1- Strongly Disagree

4 – Agree 2- Disagree

What is the level of comfort and ease on the enrollment process experienced
by the students on the different steps as to the following offices:

Chairperson (Requirements)
5 4 3 2 1

By emphasizing expertise and efficiency, universities aim to

create a more wallcovering efficient environment for

students seeking admission.

Having direct access to the chairperson allows students to

address any concerns or queries they may have regarding

their course selection or academic requirements.

An open line of communication with the chairperson

facilitates a smoother enrollment process.

Their expertise in admissions creates a comfortable

environment for aspiring students, fostering a positive

beginning.

Going to the chairperson for admission during enrollment is

vital for several reasons as it provides clarity on course

selection, streamlines administrative processes, and

establishes a supportive atmosphere within educational

institutions.

Clinic

Relying on the Clinic for your medical examination

provides ease in starting your academic endeavor with

confidence.

The Clinic's professional staff and organized procedures

make the medical examination process simple and stress-

free.

Examination process simple and stress-free.examination

process simple and stress-free.

The Clinic's commitment to student health creates a

comfortable atmosphere for all newcomers.

Clinics should have sufficient staff and resources to

accommodate all students efficiently.

Guidance

Having a dedicated space within the guidance center

specifically for re-admission testing ensures that students

have a convenient and organized location to complete their

assessments.

The Guidance Center's support and resources make re-

admission testing an easy and manageable process.

Knowing that the Guidance Center is there to assist you with

testing brings a sense of ease and second chances.

The Center's commitment to helping students succeed makes

the re-admission process less daunting.

Relying on the Guidance Center for re-admission eases the

transition back into your academic path.

Chairperson (Evaluation)

Returning to the Chairperson for evaluation and section

assignment provides ease, as they understand your academic

needs.

The Chairperson's expertise ensures a straightforward and

well-informed section assignment process.

 Knowing that you can consult the Chairperson for course

placement creates a sense of ease and confidence.

Providing clear guidelines and instructions on how to

schedule appointments for re-admission testing, students can

easily plan ahead and avoid long waiting periods.

Trusting the Chairperson for evaluation and section

assignment ensures an effortless beginning to your studies.

Information and Communication

Technologies (ICT)

ICT provides real-time updates on course availability and

schedules. Students can instantly see if a class is full or if

there are any changes in timings or locations.

The user-friendly systems at ICT make course encoding a

straightforward process.

Knowing that your course information is securely encoded

offers ease and data accuracy.

ICT's efficiency ensures that you can focus on your studies

without technical difficulties.

Students can access a greater choice of possibilities when

they rely on ICT for course encoding. They may quickly

browse the course offerings, look up prerequisites, and

choose classes that fit with their academic objectives.

Chairperson ( Verification)
Returning to the Chairperson for course verification

provides ease, ensuring that your academic choices align

with your goals.

The Chairperson's expertise in reviewing enrolled courses

simplifies the process and reduces any potential stress.

Knowing that the Chairperson double-checks your course

selection instills confidence and ease.

Verifying courses with the Chairperson reinforces your

comfort in your academic path.

Returning to the Chairperson for course verification offers

peace of mind, ensuring that you are on the right track.

Registrar (Checking)

Visiting the Registrar's office for checking is a

straightforward process that ensures the accuracy of your

enrollment.

The Registrar's team is dedicated to making the checking

process easy, providing peace of mind about your academic

records.

Knowing that your enrollment is being reviewed by experts

at the Registrar's office brings a sense of ease and

confidence.
The Registrar's commitment to thoroughness and

organization simplifies your enrollment experience.

Having a streamlined system at the registrar's office ensures

that students can easily access information regarding their

courses, schedules, and any necessary documents.

Student’s Accounting

Going to Student's Accounting for assessment is a clear and

manageable step to understand your financial obligations.

The Accounting team's expertise in financial matters ensures

that your assessment is straightforward and transparent,

offering peace of mind.

Knowing that your financial assessment is being handled by

professionals brings a sense of ease as you plan your

finances.

The Student's Accounting office's accessibility and

willingness to assist provide comfort during the assessment

process.

Having knowledgeable staff members available at the

accounting office who can answer queries promptly will

further enhance efficiency.

Cashier ( Payment)

Having an efficient system in place ensures that students can

complete their payment quickly and without unnecessary

stress.

The Cashier's efficiency and transparency in handling

payments offer peace of mind regarding your financial

transactions.

Knowing that your payments are securely processed at the

Cashier's office brings a sense of ease and financial security.

The Cashier's friendly and helpful staff contribute to an easy

payment experience.

Relying on the Cashier for payment ensures a hassle-free

start to your academic journey, enhancing overall ease.

Dean (Final Approval)

The Dean's approval signifies your preparedness for your

chosen path, instilling confidence and ease.

Knowing that the Dean supports your academic goals brings

a sense of ease and assurance.

The Dean's commitment to academic excellence is a source

of comfort and ease as you begin your studies.

Receiving the Dean's final approval marks the start of your

educational adventure with a straightforward sense of

accomplishment.

To improve the student experience at universities, policies

that make it simple to request the dean's approval during

enrollment must be put in place. (Such a method would

facilitate efficient communication between students and

administrators while saving time and effort.)

Registrar (Enrollment)

Returning to the Registrar's office for enrollment submission

offers a clear and simple way to finalize your academic

status.

The Registrar's thorough review of your submission ensures

accuracy and completeness, providing peace of mind.

Knowing that your enrollment is officially recorded at the

Registrar's office brings a sense of ease and commitment.

The Registrar's commitment to maintaining accurate records

reinforces your confidence in your academic journey.

Counting on the Registrar for enrollment submission

contributes to a smooth and easy registration process.

Library (School ID)

Obtaining your School ID at the library is a straightforward

step to becoming an official member of the academic

community.

The library staff's assistance in ID issuance ensures an easy

and hassle-free process, offering peace of mind.

By visiting the library to obtain a school ID, students gain

access to these resources for research purposes or leisure

reading.
The library's accessibility for ID issuance adds to the overall

ease of the registration process.

Receiving your School ID at the library marks the beginning

of your academic experience with a straightforward sense of

belonging.

Security Administration Office (SAO)

Addressing the SAO for a signature is a simple and

necessary step in ensuring that your enrollment is complete

and you are officially enrolled.

The SAO staff's willingness to assist with signatures offers

peace of mind regarding administrative requirements.

Knowing that your documents bear the SAO signature brings

a sense of ease and legitimacy to your enrollment.

The SAO's role in verifying documents adds to the overall

ease of the registration process.

Utilizing the SAO for document signatures enables a simple

and trouble-free registration process, improving overall ease.

Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in Deckwatch 121

Instructions: Please rate your own competence in DWATCH 121 by
putting a check mark on the appropriate column based on the scale below.
Take note that COLREGS is short for: International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, as amended.
Scale: 4 – Always 2 – Seldom
3 – Sometimes 1 – Never
 Statements 1 2 3 4
I can outline the history, legalities, developments and
amendments of COLREGS.
I can summarize the principles of Rules 1 – 6 of
COLREGS.
I can apply appropriate rules to determine the actions to
avoid collision.
I can analyze scenarios based on Rules 10-19 of
COLREGS.
I can perform simulations of scenarios on navigation in
any condition of visibility with other vessels in the
vicinity.
I can take appropriate actions to avoid collision in a
given scenario by applying the rules of COLREGS.
I can illustrate appropriate lights and shapes for specific
types of vessels.
I can evaluate lights and shapes and their specifications
in accordance with Part C, Annex I, and Annex II of
COLREGS.
I can interpret different signals made by vessels in
various situations.
I can tabulate data based on Rules 32-41 and Annexes III
and IV of COLREGS.

Rate your level of comfort on the enrollment process flow in your school by
checking the column of your corresponding score: use the scale below:
Scale: 5 – Very Comfortable 3- Neutral 1- Least Comfortable

4- Cofortable 2- Less Comfortable

Chairperson (Requirements)
5 4 3 2 1

The Chairperson guides you throughout the process of

the said enrollment.

The Chairperson's expertise ensures a smooth start to

your academic journey, providing peace of mind.

The Chairperson's office will assist you in gathering all

necessary documents and information.

Their welcoming demeanor creates a comforting

environment for new students seeking admission.

Knowing you can rely on the Chairperson for support in

this crucial stage brings a sense of comfort and

confidence.

Clinic

The medical examination at the Clinic is a comforting

measure to ensure your health and well-being on

campus.

Skilled healthcare professionals at the Clinic will

conduct thorough examinations, offering peace of mind.

Students can receive medical attention without having to

leave the premises, saving time for both parents and

teachers.

The Clinic's friendly staff and efficient services make

the medical examination process stress-free.

The Clinic's commitment to student health ensures that

you can focus on your studies with comfort and peace of

mind.

Guidance
 APPENDIX C
Location Map

CURRICULUM VITAE

Personal
 Age : 19
Born :February 26, 2004
Height :5’4
BMI :
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Catholic

LEIMUEL S. ROMANO
JR. Education

romanoleimuel01@gmail.co
m College
09165677209
: Bachelor of Science in Marine
Engineering
University of Cebu – METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
2023- present

Senior High : University of Cebu – METC

Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
Basak Pardo, Cebu City 2020-2022

Junior High : Don Vicente Rama Memorial

skills National High School, Cebu
2016-2020

Playing Arnis Elementary : Don Vicente Rama Memorial

Playing guitar Elementary School, Cebu
Playing ukulele
2010-2016

Personal
 Age : 20
Born :August 17, 20003
Height :5’7
BMI :
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Catholic

Education
RALPH D. LARIOSA

rapoks33@gmail.com College : Bachelor of Science in Marine

Engineering
University of Cebu – METC
09275667183
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu
City
2023- present

Mohon II Tisa, Cebu Senior High : University of Cebu-METC

Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu
City
2020-2022
skills
Junior High : Tisa National Highschool,
Cebu
Drawing
Singing
2016-2020

Elementary : Tisa II Elementary School,

Cebu
2010-2016

CURRICULUM VITAE

CURRICULUM VITAE
 Personal

Age : 19
Born :October 30, 2003
Height :5’9
BMI :
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Catholic

JAMES RHYLIE
Education
ABELLA

jamesrhylieabella6@gmail.com
College : Bachelor of Science in Marine
Engineering
09608580553 University of Cebu – METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
2023- present

Senior High : Donsergio Osmeña Snr. Memorial

918 TRES DE ABRIL ST. National High School
PUNTA, CEBU 2020-2022

Junior High :Donsergio Osmeña Snr. Memorial

National High School
Skills 2016-2020
Basketball
Elementary : Punta Princessa Elementary School
2010-2016

CURRICULUM VITAE

Personal

Age : 24
Born :January 14, 1999
Height :5’4
BMI :
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Iglesia Ni Cristo

ARNANIE E. DELA
Education
TORRE
arnanie79@gmail.com
College : Bachelor of Science in Marine
Engineering
09569938110 University of Cebu – METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
2023- present
 Senior High : Donsergio Osmeña Snr. Memorial
National High School
2018-2020

Junior High :Donsergio Osmeña Snr. Memorial

National High School
KATIPUNAN ST. TISA, 2014-2018
CEBU
Elementary : Punta Princessa Elementary School
2008-2014

CURRICULUM VITAE

Personal
 Age : 19
Born :January 6, 2004
Height :5’7
BMI : 21.45
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino
Religion : Catholic

LOUIS LAWRENCE A.
LINES Education

louislawrence0106@gmail.com
College : Bachelor of Science in Marine
Engineering
09683314528 University of Cebu – METC
Alumnos, Mambaling, Cebu City
2023- present

SAB ROQUEIAN 1 Senior High : Mambaling National High School

MAMBALING, CEBU 2020-2022

Junior High :Mambaling National High School

2016-2020
Skills
drawing
Elementary : Mambaling Elementary School
2010-2016