Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VLSI Project Report C21C2
VLSI Project Report C21C2
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted By:
Section : C1C2
Year : 4th
Semester : 1st
Group Members :
Name ID
I. BACKGROUND
In contemporary times, the demand for high-
performance and high-speed devices necessitates
comparators capable of operating at swift speeds while Fig-2: Conventional Dynamic Comparator Design
minimizing power consumption. The design complexity of Circuit-2
such high-speed comparators escalates in scaled CMOS
technology, where scaling doesn't uniformly impact device
supply and threshold voltages. Dynamic comparators The second circuit represents an enhanced iteration of
emerge as an appealing solution for high-speed devices the conventional double tail comparator. This comparator
owing to their rapid operation and energy efficiency. consists of preamplifier and latch stages. Its swiftness is
Various dynamic comparator techniques are scrutinized in attributed to the direct connection of the comparator output
this case to address these challenges. to the latching nodes. However, it remains unsuitable for
low-power applications.
Comparison of parameters:
Comparison Table
Approach Single- Conventional XNOR- Proposed
stage Dynamic AND Gate Dynamic
Dynamic Controlled
Propagation 170.1E-9 19.64E-6 5.775E-9
Delay (s) 2.641E-6
Fig-4: Proposed Dynamic Avg Power 423.7E- 2.94E-6 150E-15 40.04E-9
Comparator Design Circuit-4 (W) 12
The fourth circuit leverages clock pulses and their Power 7.20E-17 5.88E-10 3.96E-19 2.31E-16
delayed signals to effectively diminish input-referred noise. Delay
Furthermore, it directly connects pre-amplifier outputs to the Cell Area 74.031 230.44 513.56 250.125
latching nodes, expediting their regeneration. As a result, (um2)
this circuit structure capitalizes on high speed without any No. of 11 14 10+34=44 12
accompanying increase in power consumption. Transistors
No. of DRC 0 0 0 0
Subsequent sections will comprehensively compare Errors
various parameters of these approaches to ascertain the No. of LVS 0 0 0 0
optimal and most cost-effective technique for a high-speed, Mismatches
energy-efficient comparator.
II. FUTURE ASPECTS
IV. RESULT (PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION)
The future outlook for dynamic comparators appears
promising, driven by advancements in semiconductor
technology and design methodologies. Several potential Circuit No. 1:
directions can be envisioned:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The completion of this work was made possible with the
invaluable guidance and support of the following faculty
members of the Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE)
department at Ahsanullah University of Science and
Technology (AUST):