Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THIRUTHURAIPOONDI TALUK
A Project submitted to
Submitted by
K. PRIYADHARSHINI
Register No. P22 272006
UNDER THE GUIDENCE OF
Mrs. S. SUJATHA, M.SC., M.Phil., (Ph.D.).,
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
SENGAMALA THAYAAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST WOMEN’S COLLEGE
(AUTONOMOUS),
(Accredited by NAAC)(An ISO 9001:2015 certified Institution)
SUNDARAKKATTAI, MANNARGUDI-614 016
TAMIL NADU, INDIA.
APRIL-2024
Mrs. S. SUJATHA, M.SC., M.Phil., (Ph.D.).,
Head of the Department,
Department of Chemistry,
STET Women’s College (Autonomous),
Sundarakkottai, Mannargudi - 614 016.
“Arise Awake and Stop Not
Till the Goal is Reached”
_________________________________________________________ __________
Date:
CERTIFICATE
Submitted for the End Semester Examination held at Sengamala Thayaar Education
Trust Women’s College (Autonomous), Mannargudi on ……………..
1. 2.
Miss. K.PRIYADHARSHINI,
Reg. No: P22 272006,
II – M.Sc., Chemistry,
STET Women’s College (Autonomous)
“Arise Awake and Stop Not Sundarakkottai, Mannargudi- 614016.
Till the Goal is Reached”
_______________________________________________________________________
DECLARATION
Date:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
“God is great” First I thank God for showering his blessing on me, so that I could up
this project work confidently.
I express my privilege and deep sense of gratitude to my project advisor and also my
guide Mrs. S. SUJATHA, M.SC., M.Phil., (Ph.D.)., Head, Department of Chemistry,
S.T.E.T. Women’s College, Mannargudi.
My sincere thanks to all the STAFF MEMBERS AND LAB ASSISTANTS of the
Department of Chemistry, Mannargudi, for their encouragement to do this project.
(K. PRIYADHARSHINI)
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
To determine the bore water quality from the different water sources. The
sample of the bore water were collected from different places and checked how the
characteristics differ from place to place. Using the samples, compared with standard
specification.
the ground water due to so many reasons. So people use such polluted water, it causes many
health problems and therefore people must be calculated to remove impurities from water and
the problem arising due to water pollution. Hence the present work “Physico chemical
assessment of bore water in Thiruthuraipoondi Taluk” with the help of the some physical and
chemical characteristics.
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION 1
V CONCLUSION 41
VI REFERENCES 43
INTRODUCTION
AIM AND SCOPE
EXPERIMENTAL
METHODS
ABBREVIATION
SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
INTRODUCTION
Water is the basic need for survival of all living beings. It also supports the profitable growth
of the country in terms of agricultural and artificial developments. Only 1% of water is fit to
use out of the 71% that is available on Earth. Remaining 70% of water is being defiled with
organic and inorganic matters, chemicals and other pollutants by colorful natural and mortal
conditioning.
Water is necessary for life, but its vacuity at a sustainable quality and volume is threatened
by numerous factors, of which climate plays a commanding part. Significant variation of the
mean state of the climate or of its variability lasting for decades or longer, is appertained to as
climate change. Atmospheric carbon dioxide situations have continuously increased since the
1950s. Information on the original or indigenous impacts climate change on hydrological
processes and water resources is geting more important.
Water resource operation plans decreasingly need to incorporate the goods of global climate
change in order to directly predict future supplies. In recent times, numerous experimenters
have used empirical downfall runoff model to study impacts of climatic change on hydrology.
Kinds in these parameters determine the quantum of water that reaches the face, evaporates or
transpires back to atmosphere, infiltrates into the ground water system.
Water is the vital liquid for mortal subsistence and is used as a resource in colorful product
processes. Still, the declination of the terrain is being reflected in the water resources of the
earth.
The effect of global warming and climate change bear multi – correctional exploration,
especially when considering hydrology and global water resources.
The quality of ground water is the attendant of all the processes and response that act on the
water from the moment is condensed in the atmosphere to the time it is discharged by a well
or spring and varies from place to place and with depth of the water table.
1
SOURCE OF WATER
Surface water
Source of surface water can include any above ground collection of water such as rivers,
lakes, ponds, and oceans. Surface water accounts f or 80% of the human use.
Ground water
Ground water can exist in the soil itself, or between rocks and other materials. Most
communities obtain their water from underground aquifers, or rock formation capable of
holding large amounts of fresh water. Only 3% of the water on earth is considered freshwater
with more 30% of that small amount being found as ground water.
Ocean water
Although ocean water makes up nearly 97% of water on earth, it is hot variable sources
of potable water unless salt and other impurities are removed. The most promising method is
through rivers osmosis. This process forces saltwater through filters with microscopic forces
that removes salt and other microbes.
Atmospheric water
Rain water and water formed by show are grouped under atmospheric water. As the rain
and snow falls appear, they wash they dusty, soot and other suspended particles to the earth.
Frozen water
The Himalayas, which are often called “The Roof of the world”, contain some the most
extensive and rough high-altitude areas on earth as well as greatest area of glacier and
permafrost outside of the poles.
Stored Water
Water which is present in ponds, reservoirs, lakes or oceans for a considerable period is
called stored water. The microbe population increase greatly in similar water.
Properties of water
Water Resources
Total global water contend is roughly 1,4 billion cubic kilo measures. Out of which only
3% water is fresh and suitable for mortal use. This 3% - 77.2% permanently firmed. -24.4% -
Ground water and soil admixture. 0.35% -are contained in lakes and watlands. -0.01% in rivers
and streams.
The department of drinking water supply shows of the 1.42 million rural habitations the
country, 1.27 million are completely converted 0.13 million are incompleted converted and
15.917 are not converted.
The presence of reduntant arsenic in ground water has been reported from west Bengal.
It is also reported that around 0.2 million people in west Bengal have arsenic afflitiated skin
incarnation.
In India include varying iron situations in ground water especially in north eastern India.
Heavy metals similar as chromium, lead, nickel, hand pump attached, defluorination and iron
removal plants have failed due to in applicable technology.
Water becomes a health hazard on numerous accounts; Inadequacy of clean water and
impurity of available water due to poor installations and defiled discharged from mortal
habitations and diligence.
3
EX: diarrhoea diseases, infections, hepatitis.
Physicochemical analysis
Chlorine residual
The disinfection of drinking-water inventiories constitutes an important barrier
against waterborne conditions..
Although colorful detergents chlorine one form or another is the principal disinfecting agent
employed in small communities in most countries.
Water sample should thus be analysed for free chlorine incontinently on slice and not
stored for after testing. The system recommended for the analysis of chlorine residual in
drinking water employs N, N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine, more generally appertained to as
DPD. Styles in which o-toluidine is employed were formerly recommended, but this substance
is a honoured carcinogen, and the system is inaccurate and should not be used. Analysis using
starch-potassium iodide is not specific for free chloride, but measures directly the aggregate of
4
free and concreted chlorine; the system is not recommended except in countries where it is
insolvable to attained prepare DPD.
pH
It is important to measure pH at the same time as chlorine residual since the efficacity of
disinfection with chlorine is largely pH- dependent: where they proceed 8.0, disinfection is less
effective. To check that the optimal range for disinfection with chlorine (lower than 8.0), simple
tests may be conducted in the field using comparators similar as that for chlorine residual. With
some chlorine comparators, it is possible to measure pH and chlorine residual simultaneously.
Alternately, movable pH electrodes and measures are s available. If these are used in
the laboratory, they must be calibrated against fresh pH standards at least daily; for field use,
they should be calibrated incontinently before each test. Results may be inaccurate if the water
has a low buffering capacity.
Turbidity
Turbidity is important because it affects both the adequacy of water to consumers, and
the selection and effectiveness of treatment processes, particularly the effectiveness of
disinfection with chlorine since it exerts a chlorine demand and protects microorganisms and
may also stimulate the growth of bacteria. In all processes in which disinfection is used, the
turbidity must always below rather below 1 NTU or JTU (these units are exchangeable in
practice).
5
Colour
Colour is drinking – water may be due to the presence of coloured organic matter, e.g.,
sticky substances, essence similar as iron and manganese, or largely coloured artificial wastes.
Drinking –water should be colourless. For the purposes of surveillance of community water
inventories, it is useful simply to note the presence or absence of observable colour at the time
of slice. Changes in the colour of water and the appearance of new colours serve as pointers
that further disquistion is demanded.
Odours in water are caused mainly by the presence of organic substances. Some
odours are indicative of increased biological activity; others may result from industrial
pollution. Sanitary inspections should always include the investigation of possible or existing
sources of odour, and attempts should always be made to correct an odour problem (which are
sometimes grouped with odour problems) usually account for the largest single category of
consumer complaints. Generally, the taste buds in the oral cavity detect the inorganic
compounds of metals such as magnesium, calcium, sodium, copper, iron, and zinc. As water
should be free of objectionable taste and odour, it should not be offensive to the majority of the
consumers. If the sampling officer has reason to suspect the presence of harmful contaminants
in the supply and swallowing of the water, it is advisable to avoid direct tasting. Under these
circumstances, a sample should be taken for investigation to a central laboratory.
Hardness of water
Hard waters are undesirable because they may lead to lesser cleaner consumption,
scaling of boilers, causing erosion and incrustation of pipes, making food tasteless etc.
Temporary Hardness:
If bicarbonates and carbonates of calcium and magnesium are present in water, the
water is render hard temporarily as this hardness can be removed to some extent by simple
boiling or to full extent by adding lime to water. Such a hardness is known as temporary
hardness or carbonate hardness.
6
Permanent Hardness:
If sulphates, chlorides and nitrates of calcium or magnesium are present in water, they
cannot be removed at al by simple boiling and therefore, such water requires special treatment
for softening. Such a hardness is known as permanent hardness or non-carbonate hardness. It
is caused by sulphates, chlorides, nitrates of Ca and Mg.
Carbonate hardness is equal to the total hardness or alkalinity whichever is less non-
carbonate hardness is the total hardness in excess of the alkalinity. If the alkalinity is equal to
or greater than the total hardness, there is no non-carbonate hardness.
• Water with hardness up to 75 ppm are considered soft and above 200 ppm are
considered hard and in between is considered as moderately hard.
7
AIM AND SCOPE
To determine the bore water quality from the different water sources. The sample of
bore water were collected in different seasons like rainstorm and spring from different places
and checked how the characters differ from place to place and analysed how to change the
water quality in different seasons. Using the same compared with standard specification.
Environment pollutes the ground water due to so multitudinouss reasons. So, use
analogous weakened water, it causes multitudinous health problems and therefore people must
be calculated to remove impurities from water and the problem arising due to water pollution.
Hence the present work “Physico chemical assessment of bore water in Thiruthuraipoondi
Taluk” with the help of the following different characteristics water,
4. Colour 4. Alkalinity
5. Total Hardness.
6. Calcium Hardness
7. Magnesium Hardness
8. Chloride
9. Sulphate
10. Dissolved Carbon dioxide
To study the ground water several water samples were collected and also analysed and
results are compared with standard specifications.
8
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
Sample of bore well water collected in high grade plastic bottles of one liter capacity
irrigated with distilled water and before collection of samples they were irrigated thrice with
the sample water.
ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Samples were brought to the laboratory and the parameter PH electrical conductivity and
total dissolved solids were analyzed within 36 hours standard methods were adopted for the
analysis of water sample.
PHYSICAL TESTING
Common physical tests of water include temperature, solids attentions. (e.g) total
suspended solids (TSS) and turbidity.
CHEMICAL TESTING
Water sample may be examined using the principle of logical chemistry. Numerous
published test methods are available for both organic and inorganic composites. Frequency
used methods include PH. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand
(COD), nutrients (nitrate and phosphorus compounds), metals (including copper, zinc
cadmium, lead and mercury), oil and grease, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and
pesticides.
BIOLOGICAL TESTING
Biological testing involves the use of plant, animal, and microbial indicators to
9
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Conductivity
Principle
Procedure
Wash the cell with sample, after marshland with evaporated water also samples
temperature is maintained at 250 C.
Apparatus
Conductivity meter, it contains two parts namely conductivity cell and the measuring
instrument.
Significance
The test system is used fors detecting and measuring the contaminations in high purity water
such a measurement of impurities in not important to the diligence series factory outages
caused by the scale of erosion performing from condenser leakage.
pH
pH = - log [H+]
Principle
10
Apparatus
pH Meter
Procedure
The glass electrode and coloured electrode should be well completely and prepared for
use. Then it is formalized under condition of temperature on attention as close of sample using
pH 4 and 9 buffer result.
The electrode should be washed free of buffer result by distilled water and with sample.
The electrode should be left in the sample for several quantities to gain a stable reading.
Significance
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTIC
TOTAL SOLIDS
Procedure
Total solids were determined as the residue left after evaporation of the unfiltered
sample. Total solids include both the dissolved and suspended solids. A weighted evaporation
disc of suitable size was taken and 20 ml of unfiltered sample was taken in the evaporating disc
and carefully dried in a hot air oven. The final weight was taken and total solids was calculated
as shown below,
𝑊 −𝑊
TS (ppm) = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
Where,
W1 - Empty disc weight
Salt like carbonate, chloride, sulphate, phosphate and nitrates of Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe
and Mn etc., are dissolved in natural waters. The high content of dissolved solids increased the
density of water and influence osmoregulation of fresh water organism. They reduce solubility
of gases and utility of water for drinking, irrigational and industrial purpose.
Procedure
Total dissolved solids were determined as the residue left after evaporation of the
unfiltered sample. Total solids include both the dissolved and suspended solids. A weighted
evaporation disc of suitable size was taken and 20 ml of unfiltered sample was taken in the
evaporating disc and carefully dried in a hot air oven. The final weight was taken and the TDS
𝑊 −𝑊
2 1
TDS (ppm) = 𝑚𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 ∗ 106
𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
Where,
The undissolved matter present in water is usually referred to as suspended solids and
it’s was obtained as difference between TS and TDS. The results were tabulated.
ALKALINITY
However, in large quantities alkalinity imparts bitter taste to water. Hence from total
alkalinity points to view the water is fit for drinking.
12
Principle
Alkalinity is found by titration with suitable strong acid using phenolphthalein and
methyl orange indicator. Above PH of 8.3 phenolphthalein gives a pink colour. When the PH
drops the indicator becomes colourless. The methyl orange indicator gives yellow colour,
when PH is above 4.3. At PH about 4.3 the indicator changes from pink to yellow colour due
to all the 3 types of alkalinities.
Procedure
0.02N sulphuric acid was standardized using standard sodium carbonate solution
using methyl orange indicator. Then 100 ml of sample was taken in a conical flask and about
2 drops of phenolphthalein indicator was added and titrated against standardized sulphuric
acid (0.02N). The solution remains colourless, after the addition of phenolphthalein indicator.
The phenolphthalein alkalinity was zero.
2 or 3 drops of methyl orange was added to the same sample and the titration was continued
until the yellow colour changes to pink at the end point. This was the total alkalinity.
TOTAL HARDNESS
Principle
To estimate the total hardness of water. The sum of Ca2+and Mg2+ ions present
must be known by titrating a standard EDTA solution against measured quantity of hard
water using EBT, the total hardness of water can be measured.
13
Procedure
The 40 ml of the sample is taken with few drops of ammonium buffer and 2
drops of EBT are added. It is titrated against EDTA solution. The end point is the changes of
colour from wine red to blue.
Calculation
𝑚𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝐷𝑇𝐴 ∗ 1000
Total Hardness = 𝑚𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
CALCIUM HARDNESS
Principle
These titrations are carried out for metal ions don’t react (or unsatisfactorily) with a
metal indicator (or) for metal ions which form EDTA complex that are more stable than those
of other metals.
For example, Ca2+ ions form a less stable complex than Mg2+ with EBT and a more
stable complex with EDTA. But Ca can be determined indirectly as follows. An excess of a
solution containing 1:1 Mg- EDTA complex may be added to the Ca2+ sample. The Ca2+
forms a lighter EDTA complex and displaces an equivalent amount of Mg which is then
titrated against standard EDTA.
Procedure
Calculation
14
MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
Procedure
Calculation
CHLORIDE
Chloride is invariably present in small amount in almost all-natural water and its content
goes up appreciably with increasing salinity.
Principle
Procedure
Calculation
Where,
V3 = Normality of AgNO3
Chloride is one of the major inorganic anions in water. It potable water the chloride
will give salty taste with combination of NaCl. The salty chloride content is harm to human
being and plants.
SULPHATE
Sulphate dissolved in water from certain minerals, especially gypsum (or) appears from the
oxidation of sulphides mineral.
Principle
Sulphate ion can be precipitated by the addition of BaCl2 in acid medium. The formed
precipitate can be weighted,
Procedure
50ml of water sample taken in a 100ml beaker. It is acidified with concentrated HCl. That
solution is boiled for 10 to 15 minutes, 5ml of 10% BaCl2 solution is added drop by drop in hot
condition while adding, stirrer is constantly. The heating is continued till all the sulphates in
water are precipitated as BaSO4.Now the heating is stopped and the precipitate is allowed to
settle down. The precipitate is filtered through Whatman 40 filter paper. The precipitate is
washed well so that it is free from chloride. The precipitate is concentrated in a furnace. Now
the precipitate is cooled in a desiccator. From the weight of the precipitate amount of sulphate
is calculated.
Calculation
DISSOLVED CO2
16
contribute to the corrosion. The dissolved carbon-di-oxide is often the sole contributor to the
acidity of portable natural water sample.
Procedure
Wash the apparatus with distilled water. Rinse the burette with standard sodium
carbonate solution and then fill it in burette. Note down the initial burette reading. Rinse the
pipette with water sample. Pipette out 25ml of water sample, transfer it to conical flask. Add 2
to 3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator. Titrate the water sample in a conical flask by adding
sodium carbonate solution from burette. The appearance of pink colour indicates endpoints.
Note down the burette reading find out the sodium carbonate consumed. Repeat the titration to
get concordant reading.
Calculation
𝑉 ∗ 22 ∗ 1000
Amount of Dissolved = 50∗25
Where,
17
TABLE - 1
SAMPLE No AREA
SAMPLE – I ALATHAMBADI
SAMPLE – II KORUKKAI
SAMPLE – IV PAMANI
SAMPLE – V THIRUPPATHUR
SAMPLE – VI NACHIKULAM
18
COLLECTION IN MONSOON
SAMPLE -1: (ALATHAMBADI)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
54.3947−54.3917
= 73.8094−54.3917 ∗ 106
= 154 ppm.
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
573.8094−54.3917
= ∗ 106
20
= 150 ppm
Titre Value = 15 ml
15∗1000
= 100
= 150 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
= 220 ppm
19
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 8 ml
8.8∗1000
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 220 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
= 212 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
= 324 ppm
= 35 ppm
20
SAMPLE -2: (KORUKKAI)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
52.8823−52.8732
= 71.6105−52.8732 ∗ 106
= 485 ppm.
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
71.6105−52.8732
= ∗ 106
20
= 455 ppm
Titre Value = 25 ml
25∗1000
= 100
= 250 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
= 337 ppm
21
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 9.6 ml
0.4∗1000∗9.6
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 96 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
= 152 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
= 324 ppm
= 35 ppm
22
SAMPLE -3: (KOKKALADY)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
48.7008−48.6883
= 68.0851−48.6883 ∗ 106
= 644 ppm.
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
68.0851−48.6883
= ∗ 106
100
= 625 ppm
= 192 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
Titre Value = 10 ml
10∗1000
Total hardness as CaCO3 in (mg / litre) = 40
= 250 ppm
23
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 12.3 ml
0.4∗1000∗12.3
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 123 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
Titre Value = 10 ml
Normality of AgNO3 = 0.02
Equivalent weight = 35.46
10∗0.02∗35.46∗1000
Amount of Chloride = 20
= 354 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
= 785 ppm
= 17 ppm
24
SAMPLE -4: (PAMANI)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
53.7222−53.7139
= 73.0872−53.7139 ∗ 106
= 428 ppm.
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
73.0872−53.7139
= ∗ 106
100
= 415 ppm
= 194 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
= 157 ppm
25
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 12.5 ml
0.4∗1000∗12.5
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 125 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
Titre Value = 6 ml
Normality of AgNO3 = 0.02
Equivalent weight = 35.46
6∗0.02∗35.46∗1000
Amount of Chloride = 20
= 212 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
= 753 ppm
= 3 ppm
26
SAMPLE -5: (THIRUPPATHUR)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
32.1489−50.2569
= 49.2478−50.2569 ∗ 106
= 179 ppm.
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
49.2478−50.2569
= ∗ 106
20
= 50 ppm
TSS = 179 - 50
= 129 ppm
= 155 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
= 187 ppm
27
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 27 ml
0.4∗1000∗27
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 270 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
Titre Value = 4 ml
Normality of AgNO3 = 0.02
Equivalent weight = 35.46
4∗0.02∗35.46∗1000
Amount of Chloride = 20
= 141 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
Weight of the precipitate = 44.3268 g
Volume of sample = 50 ml
44.3268∗1000
Amount of sulphate = 50
= 886 ppm
= 52 ppm
28
SAMPLE -6: (NACHIKULAM)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
= 663 ppm
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
70.3471−59.2987
= ∗ 106
20
= 552 ppm
= 212 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
Titre Value = 6 ml
6∗1000
Total hardness as CaCO3 in (mg / litre) = 40
= 150 ppm
29
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 5 ml
0.4∗1000∗5
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 50 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
Titre Value = 5 ml
Normality of AgNO3 = 0.02
Equivalent weight = 35.46
5∗0.02∗35.46∗1000
Amount of Chloride = 20
= 177 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
Weight of the precipitate = 40.7508 g
Volume of sample = 50 ml
40.7508∗1000
Amount of sulphate = 50
= 815 ppm
= 44 ppm
30
SAMPLE -7: (VILAKUDI)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
70.03865−53.1243
= ∗ 106
50.4336−53.1243
= 628 ppm
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
50.4336−53.1240
= ∗ 106
20
= 134 ppm
Titre Value = 15 ml
15∗1000
= 100
= 150 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
= 87 ppm
31
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 9.2 ml
0.4∗1000∗9.2
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 92 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
Magnesium hardness = 92 - 87
= 5 ppm
8) CHLORIDE ION
= 170 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
Weight of the precipitate = 36.4352 g
Volume of sample = 50 ml
36.4352∗1000
Amount of sulphate = 50
= 728 ppm
= 17 ppm
32
SAMPLE -8: (METTUPALAYAM)
1) TOTAL SOLIDS
𝑊 −𝑊
TS = 𝑊3−𝑊1 ∗ 106
2 1
75.1256−61.5896
= 62.1258−61.5896 ∗ 106
= 282 ppm
𝑊3 −𝑊1
TDS = ∗ 106
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛
62.1258−61.5896
= ∗ 106
20
= 268 ppm
= 135 ppm
5) TOTAL HARDNESS
= 152 ppm
33
6) CALCIUM HARDNESS
Titre Value = 5 ml
0.4∗1000∗5
Calcium as CaCO3 in (mg/litre) = 40
= 50 ppm
7) MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
8) CHLORIDE ION
= 195 ppm
9) SULPHATE ION
= 508 ppm
= 7 ppm
34
TABLE 2(A)
PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
Color Colorless -
Odor Odorless -
Taste Tasteless -
Ph 6.0-8.5 6.0-9.0
CHEMICAL PARAMETERS
Calcium 100.0 -
Magnesium 30.0 -
35
TABLE 2(B)
permissible permissible
3. Alkalinity 10 33 _ _
36
TABLE 2(C)
1. Ph 6.0-8.5
2. TS 550 ppm
4. TSS 50 ppm
37
TABLE-3
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
MONSOON
38
TABLE – 4
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
(ppm) (ppm)
39
ABBREVATION
DO - Dissolved Oxygen
TS - Total Solid
40
SUMMARY
❖ For the samples 1,2,4,5,8 TS value are permissible according to the US standard.
❖ For the samples 1,2,4,5,7,8 TDS value are permissible according to the US standard.
All samples are permissible according to WHO and ICMR. TSS values for 1,2,3,4,8
❖ Total Hardness of the samples are 1.3.4,5,6,7,8 are permissible according to the US
❖ Magnesium Hardness values for 4,5,6 samples are permissible according to the US
standard. For the samples 1,3,4,5,6,7 are permissible to WHO and ICMR.
❖ Sulphate values of all samples are higher than US standard, for the samples 1 are
❖ Dissolved CO2 values for 4,8 samples are permissible according to the US standard.
❖ Chloride Value of the samples 2 are to the permissible limit according to US standard,
for the samples are 3,8 permissible limit according to WHO and ICMR.
❖ Alkalinity of all these sample value are higher , according to WHO, ICMR and US
Standard.
CONCLUSION
❖ In this project the water quality in around Thiruthuraipoondi Taluk carried out based
❖ Eight Samples of bore water were collected from Thiruthuraipoondi district, Four
41
❖ Physicochemical activities such as pH, TDS, TSS, TS, Alkalinity, conductivity, Total
hardness, calcium, magnesium, chloride, sulphate, free chlorine and dissolved CO2
❖ The data obtained are compared with standard values for drinking water standard such
❖ Based on the water quality data obtained from this investigation it clear that the 6
samples such as 1,2,4,5,6,7,8 were used for drinking purpose. Two samples such as
42
REFERENCE
2. Gaikwad A.V. and Mirgane S.R.,(2011), Ground water Quality in Beed District of
43