Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODU OTION
25
B
151S7
tis ■ . . §l
INTRODUCTION,
^6
; . v , ■■ (S 1 .
INTEODUCTION.
27
/Wi—
!>x ' ' ■ ' _■
\ ^ \ \ vj- ■
:' lls iiiP liis ilii A
HINDU IOONOGRAP|Y.
28
INTBODCOTION. ^
■ V II.
The , foregoing remarks lead us naturally to
look at the probable causes of the
Decadence of decadence of the iconoplastie art in
Indian Art and . _ ' , . ., . . .
its caufso®. India. There is no doubt that the
arts of sculpture and painting
attained an amount of perfection in ancient India,
which could stand comparison with what was
attained in other civilised countries. The Indian
artist was not wanting in originality and vigour in
the handling of his subjects; he was also true to
nature, and in his representations of animals and
birds he is often unsurpassed, In the early period
of the history of Indian art, the imagination of the
artist was nob tied down by mechanical rules, which
became the bane of art in later times. The early
sculptor was guided by his own observation and
imagination, and dealt with his subjects with a
freedom, which made him able to produce very
29
ill ■ ,, ■( 3,o1>'11.V- ‘ ,i
<SL
1 ; * | 1. ,
INTEODIJ CTIO'N,
SO
y
^ 'f P * ' $ :'W^'?■'■'":;■■:■■?:; ''^ ^t-;'';.;.| ■
JL_A
INTRODUCTION
$
■,, ■uiL
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY,,
32
SaradadevI ; Bronze ; Kaiadi. S ankaraebarya : Bronze : K aladi.
/n
(ST
k^/JL_JL
!. ' ■ 'v ■
INTEODUOTION.
VIII.
I! one studies the sculpture of India from the
historic point of view, he cannot
feature*°ofrl'Sie W to notice that there have been
viSouaJertoda^ different stages in the evolution
of the art here as elsewhere. To
he able to assign a given piece of sculpture to the
particular stage of its evolution, it is necessary to
know with some amount, of accuracy the various
peculiarities of the earlier and later sculptures.
All the earlier specimens of sculpture are in general
free from the cramping influence of artificial rules,
and are notably realistic ; a desire on the part of
the artist to copy nature as faithfully as possible,
is plainly visible in his work. In his human
studies, the bust, though fully formed, is not stiff
and severe in its contours as in the later speci
mens. As in later workmanship, the chest does
not end abruptly, and the abdomen begins making
sharp angles with the former. There is a gentle
merging in of the one into the other without any
marked line of demarcation between th em ; the
outline of the whole of the body is like two gently
curved brackets placed at a little distance from
each other with their concave opening side turned
outwards and resembles more or less the outline
of the face of a cow. Whereas, in later sculptures,
33
ic
III
.^ y
<SL
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
34
xjS6■g°5x
N
*s*2$fe.•stf&s' y 1 ,111 ' ' 1■.-. \
%L
INTRODUCTION,
35
m
HINDU ICONOGB A.PHY.
36
/ K (y v
**L ’*’%
~„’
J^\ *v**4&V'’’ % 4 .itl'-v
-■ '. , » s ' i s
. t A,
/ "-' •»’3
■£' ‘'
% __ ^ - ^ f e j n P ' i a ^ jagppN£>
' ~’59„
| ' j £> ^
3? -%|li§S
■ “ - — — ~ " -.
C> Q
INTRODUCTION.
37
fg i ' , <SL
HINDU IOONOGBAPHY.
XX. " .
It is an interesting phenomenon to note that
there are vicissitudes in what may
vicissitudes m be called the fortune of images as
god*.hl*tor3r ° objects of worship. As time passes
on certain images somehow cease
to be popular and their worship is eventually
discarded. Similarly, the contrary process also
takes place and images unknown to religious fame
become quite famous. New images are often set
up, and in time they too become popular and
famous. The three important goddess-images of
earlier times (from the 5th to the 9th Century
A.D.) are seen to be those of §rt, Durga and
Jyeshtha. Of these the two first are still popular;
but the last one is almost completely forgotten
as an object of worship. That Jyeshtha was
once an important goddess is evidenced by the
fact that in the Bodhayana-grikya-sutras a whole
chapter is devoted to the description of the worship
of this goddess, and th at the Srlvaishnava Saint,
Tondar-adippodi, complains in one of his Tamil
hymns that people were in his days wasting their
veneration upon dyeshthadevl, ignoring the
Supreme God Vishnu, the greatest giver of all good
gifts. The Jyeshfcha.devi group of three figures—
a large female figure in the middle with a
88
|J)I §L
INTRODUCTION.
39
|ft ' ' .- .-; , \ ' ! ■/ ' ;. .'"■' ,k ;' ." ■„" V './',. / ■ 1 '■ ' .' ,'V' ’ 1 , ' ’
<SL
1 \ ‘
M.... 4
j
HI N.DTJ ICONOGRAPHY,
40
111 ■. \ . (SL
t STBODUOTION.
X.
New deities and their images are also seen to
come into existence from time to
. Creation of now t jffie This is due generally to two
or three causes. One of these is
the apotheosis of saints and acharyas. In S. India
we find in various temples many images represent
ing Saiva and Vaishnava saints who are known to
history as having been great centres of light and
leading in their respective faiths. For instance,
&iruttandar was a contemporary of the Pallava
king Narasimhavarman, having in fact been one of
his generals. Tirujnanasambandha and VagiSa
41
1 F
_
n
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
42
/'Jj* ■g°5x ...........
C l| <SL
PLATE D
■
l e y . '- < ’ ■ ■
INTRODUCTION.
43
/
xS'®‘G
|W\ ■ . 1 1 11 . ■, . ■1..
n ■
| P
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
id
^ ;:-Vv;7;;;V. j
^ -B^gLJZ'-^'
■ - ; >■'■.
-' - 1.V'*'*-'
■ ■
'^-' / " ‘1^* ^V> - 1' „ . ' 5 \ •'
. . • ■ ■ . . ■ ■ ■ - ■
=
Trimurti with Siva as the central figure : Stone : Tiruvottiyur. Trimurti with Vishnu as the central figure : Stone ;
N a g a ’ a D u r a m . ______________________________________
1 1 1 ' &
INTRODUCTION.
40
VV', . .■ ' f : ' ' '.;' ; ' <SL
.
.HINDU ICONOGRAPHY,
XL
It may be seen th a t the Trivikram avatara
of Vishnu is sculptured, with the
■Universality of same details, and the same group*
the rules of Tan- ,
tras andAgamas, mg of the members constituting
the theme, whether the image
happens to be found in Madras in the South, in
Bombay in the West or in Bengal in the North-
E ast. The only difference observable in the
images belonging to the various parts of the
country is in the outline of the features and the
details of ornamentation. The B rihai Samhitd-
of Varahamihira says :— dexcimir lipa bh us han a -
veshdlahkdra-murtihhih kdryd pratima lakshana»
yuMa sannihitd vriddhida bhavati This means
th a t the ornamentation and clothing and beautifi
cation of th e images should be worked out in
accordance with the usage in the country in which
the images are made. Images made according to
' the rules laid down in the Sastras, when set up in
46
III ' . % L
INTBODU GTTON,
X ,...
the neighbourhood, bestow prosperity and progress.
I t is thus required that the outline of the faces and
features and the details of clothing and ornamenta
tion should be made to vary from place to place
according to local usage. In other respects no varia
tion was allowed or encouraged. I t cannot be seen
th at there has been in any part of India any new
canon of art other than the rules prescribed in the
Agamas and the Tmitras. From the uniformity
observable everywhere throughout India in the
arrangement, say, of the individual figures belong
ing to a subject, it is clear that the rules laid down
in the Agamas and Tantras have had a very
general application. The same rules having been
obeyed everywhere in the matter of making images,
it is no wonder that the same results have been
produced by artists belonging to all parts of the
country in so far as the art is apt to be bound
down by rules.
X II.
In going through the descriptions of the
various images, as given in this
cea^in1sciupture volume, the reader will come upon
uSde^tanding of a few instances, in which the
texts.deeCriptlve sculptures of two different parts of
the country differ in some import-
47
ft| <SL
H IN D U ICONOGRAPHY.
48
<SL
INTRODUCTION.
49
G
111 ' VSL
HINDU ICONOGBAPHY.
60
I> ■■■ 1 ; ■■ ■ ■■ ■
m . .■: .V ■ , . -
INTRODUCTION.
51
..... f :f;yf ^
■% I t f l l l l <SL
HINDU ICONOGBAPHY.
52
Vv ■ ' ■, • ' ■/ \
jg M p lli
. •.1 1 ,
1 1 1 ;;' ■■■. .
INTRODUCTION
XVI.
The Sanskrit authorities relied upon in this
work are mainly the Agamas, the
a J h o r S S U P ra n a s, and the early Vedic and
upon m this Upamshadic writings. The Aga
mas and the Tantras do not appear
to have received much attention from modern
scholars. Many of them are probably not older
than the fifth or sixth century A, D., and some
may be even later than that. The Kamikagama,
among the Saivagamas, is perhaps the oldest. In
the Uttara-Karaniigama, we find it laid down that,
on the seventh day of the mahotsava of Siva, the
impalement of the Jainas, said to have been carried
55
n rid
ft t
HINDU ICONOGIlrVFHY.
SUS
ll| ^ - 'I ■ C; <sl
INTRODUCTION.
57
H
III ■ ' <§l
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
58
‘■V'riV'i Y.' ri_'; ... ' .'Y'Y. ' YY ' . _ '. ' • ' YV.vY ; '
INTRODUCTION,
| ■ llllf:
:
,c^ i j^b * --?v s ^V^-5 :* y’^ r J ;V-1.-?,. *>.iv :• i i .', -; ■J,1-.: ", ;;'v ' .'.'• '.' |’4 | )i-<\;i(i .•; •■ >;, •’’■:/ .. ■ .' '.!> ' . 'V .V f.--:. • j O ■•£:*;•• ' ' ’;’ :' V;
K :‘-■,'-:.'7, V: ^'‘? v ' ’-:'s*•=:- o - V ’>j'” :b ; ':! f : ::^i:-:/). o' ;V '.^V v!V ';;v ^ .”:‘ i ‘ '" ■’■' ■’■V ^ :' ' ■'/: ■■11’ V: : V , v . ' - . ' ■ ■"'''", ■ V y - ' : '' .' ■'■■■"’■:' ■ ;■ ' ^
pSilllKiSilift.®
■ ■
r ' .: ri; I ; .£ / :
I ,, . • ;v ,;: v . v . , , o
' '. . « : ■ •
C ' ‘V ■■". ;r ' ■'■
■
}. ■,'■•
f
m <sl
1
' Goi X -v. . ' ■ : 'i1 •■V 1 V :l
111 (SL
HINDU I00N0GRA3PHY.
2
iS :
< . , ' V
<SL
DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF TERMS.
8 ’
jg s a fj^ 1 , ■ . A ilii©
?(!)) ; .. . ..;■ ,\ : ■ . yy y c - G ; v •■ f ? ' , : ; './ ' .'
<SL
,v r ; Vv-
AA' .: ','■■■■ ■' V'' ■' vA'l :'''■ A'AAAAy L ,;L\'A\v -r l AAA A' AAA A' ' ‘ •:: A,' A' ■:>'<,' A. A '$■ "
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY,
4
' c°5x : ‘■ ....... ... - «j- .. 1 •. ..—....... ..‘
i r S P S f '- ' c*
V!r m )■) PLA TE l. ,
Fig. 11
Tig. 12
||^ ;;■•
j L I f Fig- 8. * v
• m s
Fig. 9 Fig. 10
To faco page 4.
' ........ .... ’.......1.... .. ...... ....."........’......." ’ ’ ...... .. •
r\
CP <SL
DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF TERMS.
S
\ A ' ' ,
111 <SL
' V . 1- I' ' ,' v ; ;i ’ll, ■•V ' l . ' ; ' • vV ■| , I' '■■■"■, ^^
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
6
■g“5x
VA S / m PLATE 11 n 1 j
^ Fig. 8 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | ^ ^
To face page 6.
/m ^ % , n
<SL
DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF TERMS.
7
.. . ■ ^
U p %
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
8
(f( t PLATE III. NT
k J i^ J
£ j] ^ |j Fig. 18 Fig. 17 I
T
Fig. 10 Fig. 11 I I*
To face page 8.
(«): ■
■'
<sl
DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF TERMS.
9
ill
‘ NsX ^ ft? .■stf?^/// V . ' ' . ' ' '•■' , 1 1 _ l
ii.
•'. . ■ ‘
H IN D U ICONOGRAPHY.
10
■ ■ ri?1 ✓ -n
III . ■ ■ lSl.
DEFINITION AND DESCEIPTION OF TEEMS.
n
'G
oix ■ ”' : 1. ' ‘: ' ■ ■o'! . /"'• ' ' :\ - , ,
/¥/'—s &n y ^\
m §l
HINDU ICONOGRAPHY.
12