Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FM Activity Po
FM Activity Po
FM Activity Po
4-20 DSO and accounts receivable Harrelson Inc. currently has $205,000 in accounts receivable,
and its days sales outstanding (DSO) is 71 days. It wants to reduce its DSO to 20 days by pressuring
more of its customers to pay their bills on time. If this policy is adopted the company’s average sales
will fall by 15 percent. What will be the level of accounts receivable following the change? Assume a
365-day year.
GIVEN INFORMATION:
= 1,053,873.24 × 0.85
= 895, 792.25
20 = Receivables/ (895,792.25/365)
= 49,084. 51
4-21 P/E and stock price
Year 1
= 8,000,000/ 540,000
= 14.81
= 21/14.81
= 1.42
Year 2
= 13,200,000/ (540,00+81,000)
= 13,200,000/ 621,000
= 21.26
= 30.19
4-22 Balance sheet analysis
= 1.5 × 300,000
= 450,000
= 450,000/ (365×36.5)
= 45,000
= 337,500/3.75
= 90,000
= 450,000/3.0
= 150,000
= 15,000
= (15,000+45,000+90,000)/2.0
= 75,000
Common stock = Total liabilities and Equity – (Current liability + Retained earnings)
= 67,500
Cost of Goods sold = Sales – (Sales× 25%)
= 450,000-(450,000×25%)
= 337,500
= 655,000/330,000
= 1.98
= 655,000-241,000/330,000
= 1.25
= 336,000/ (1,607,500/365)
= 76.29 or 76 days
= 1, 351,000/241,500
= 5.59
= 1,607,500/947,500
= 1.70
= 36,750/1,607,500
= 2.29%
= 36,750/947,500
= 3.88%
ROE = Net Income/Common Equity
= 36,750/361,000
= 10.18%
= 70,000(1-0.25)/701,000
= 7.48%
= 70,000/21,000
= 3.33
= (84,000+256,500)/ (84,000+256,500+361,000)
= 48.54%
= 12/10
= 1.2
= 361,000/ 36100
=10
= 12/1.02
= 11.76
= 36,750/36100
= 1.02
EV/EBITDA ratio = Enterprise value/ EBITDA
=696,200/ 70,000+41,500
=696,200/ 111,000
= 6.24
= 696,200
b. Construct the extended Du Pont equation for both Barry and the industry
Barry
ROE= Profit Margin x Total Asset Turnover x Equity Multiplier
= (Net Income/Sales) x (Sales/Total Asset) x (Total Asset/Common Equity)
= (36,750/1,607,500) x (1,607,500/947,500) x (947,500/361,000)
= 2.286% x 1.697 x 2.625
= 10.18%
Industry Average
ROE= Profit Margin x Total Assets Turnover × Equity Multiplier
= 12.1%
d. Suppose Barry had doubled its sales as well as its inventories, accounts receivable, and
common equity during 2005. How would that information affect the validity of your ratio
analysis? (Hint: Think about averages and the effects of rapid growth on ratios if averages
are not used. No calculations are needed
If Barry doubled its sales, inventories, accounts receivable, and common equity during 2005
without using averages in the ratio analysis, the rapid growth would likely distort the ratios.
This sudden increase in values could skew the ratios significantly, making it challenging to
accurately assess the financial performance and stability of the company. Averages are
essential in such cases to provide a more balanced and reliable representation of the
financial health of the business amidst rapid growth.
a. Calculate those ratios that you think would be useful in this analysis.
= 303,000,000/ 85,000,000
= 3.56
= (1.200507 × 100%)
= 20.05%
= 49,500,000/ 4,500,000
=11
EBITDA average = EBITDA/ INT charges
=61,500,000/4,500,00
= 13.67
= 660,000,000/ 159,000,000
= 4.15
=66,000,000/ (795,000,000/365)
= 30 DAYS
= 795,000,000/147,000,000
= 5.41
=795,000,000/450,000,000
=1.77
= 33,750,000/ 795,000,000
= 0.42452×100%
= 4.25%
= 33,750,000/450,000,000
=0.075×100%
= 7.5%
ROE= Net income/ Common equity
= 33,750,000/315,000,000
= 0.107142×100%
= 10.71%
= 0. 094225 × 100%
= 9.42%
b. Construct an extended Du Pont equation, and compare the company’s ratios to the
industry average ratios.
COMPANY
ROE = Profit Margin × Total assets turnover × (Total assets/ total common equity)
= 10.75%
INDUSTRY
= 3.75% × 3 × (16.1%/11.25%)
= 16.1%
c. Do the balance sheet account or the income statement figures seem to be primarily
responsible for the low profits?
According to the DUPONT equation, the primary factor contributing to low profit is the asset
turnover, with sales and total assets being the key determinants. Total assets are derived
from the balance sheet, while sales are sourced from the income statement, making both
financial statements accountable. However, the balance sheet figure appears to have a
greater impact on low profit compared to the income statement figure.
d. Which specific accounts seem to be most out of line relative to other firms in the industry?
Upon examination of the ratios, it is evident that the return on assets, return on equity, and
total asset turnover are significantly deviating from industry norms when compared to other
firms.
e. If the firm had a pronounced seasonal sales pattern, or if it grew rapidly during the year,
how might that affect the validity of your ratio analysis? How might you correct for such
potential problems?
Ratios are prone to distortion in cases where a firm exhibits distinct seasonal sales patterns
or experiences rapid growth within a year. This issue can be rectified by utilizing average
financial statements and benchmarking the calculated ratios against those of other firms.