Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Examination of Asian and Pacific Islander LGBT Populations Across The United States: Intersections of Race and Sexuality 1st Edition Juan Battle
An Examination of Asian and Pacific Islander LGBT Populations Across The United States: Intersections of Race and Sexuality 1st Edition Juan Battle
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-examination-of-black-lgbt-
populations-across-the-united-states-intersections-of-race-and-
sexuality-1st-edition-juan-battle/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-examination-of-latinx-lgbt-
populations-across-the-united-states-intersections-of-race-and-
sexuality-1st-edition-antonio-jay-pastrana/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cultural-considerations-in-
asian-and-pacific-islander-american-mental-health-1st-edition-
harvette-grey/
https://textbookfull.com/product/blacksound-making-race-and-
popular-music-in-the-united-states-1st-edition-morrison/
Waking the Asian Pacific Co-operative Potential: How
Co-operative Firms Started, Overcame Challenges, and
Addressed Poverty Across the Asia Pacific 1st Edition
Morris Altman
https://textbookfull.com/product/waking-the-asian-pacific-co-
operative-potential-how-co-operative-firms-started-overcame-
challenges-and-addressed-poverty-across-the-asia-pacific-1st-
edition-morris-altman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/intersections-across-
disciplines-interdisciplinarity-and-learning-brad-hokanson/
https://textbookfull.com/product/critical-race-theory-black-
athletic-sporting-experiences-in-the-united-states-1st-edition-
billy-j-hawkins/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-american-language-the-
history-of-spanish-in-the-united-states-first-edition-rosina-
lozano/
https://textbookfull.com/product/national-geographic-guide-to-
national-parks-of-the-united-states-national-geographic-guide-to-
the-national-parks-of-the-united-states-8th-edition-society/
An Examination of Asian and Pacific
Islander LGBT Populations Across
the United States
Juan Battle • Antonio (Jay) Pastrana, Jr. • Angelique Harris
An Examination
of Asian and Pacific
Islander LGBT
Populations Across
the United States
Intersections of Race and Sexuality
Juan Battle Antonio (Jay) Pastrana, Jr.
Graduate Center John Jay College of Criminal Justice
City University of New York City University of New York
New York, USA New York, USA
Angelique Harris
Marquette University
Milwaukee, USA
1 Introduction 1
Naming and Labels 4
LGBT Communities 5
API LGBT Communities 6
API LGBTs Coming Out 6
API LGBT Family Life 7
The Significance of API LGBT Sexuality 8
Organization of the Book 9
References 10
2 Current Trends 15
Current Trends 16
Trans* Issues 16
Immigration 17
Marriage 17
Economics 18
Health 19
References 19
v
vi CONTENTS
Religion 30
Notes 31
References 31
5 Family Life 43
API Families in the United States 44
Support Within Families 45
Relationships and Children 51
References 53
Index 63
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
vii
viii ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Introduction
Abstract This chapter provides a context for the entire volume. First, issues
around language and labeling are presented. Next a general discussion is
provided concerning larger lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans* LGBT com-
munities. Then, more specific information is provided for Asian and Pacific
Islander (API) LGBT communities, with a particular focus on issues of
coming out, family life, and spirituality. This is followed by a discussion of
the significance of API LGBT sexuality. Finally, the chapter ends with a
presentation of how the rest of the book is organized.
I am sure they call it a “happy ending” because the story itself usually has
some seriously unhappy parts in the middle. And that’s definitely the
situation when it comes to my coming out “story.”
I grew up as an only child, living with my mother in Queens, New
York. She and my father grew up in a rural village in southern China and
immigrated together to the United States. Within two years of their
arrival, they had moved several times, across multiple cities and states,
and then I was born. When I was in second grade, my father left the
She went on to proclaim that she wanted me to be happy, and she knew
how hard that would be if I were “different.” In essence, she didn’t want
her daughter picked on.
I was able to explain that I’ve felt “different” on many levels, some of
them having nothing to do with my sexual orientation. I told her that I was
OK with being different. I told her I could handle being picked on by people
in the street; however, it hurt most when I was picked on at home.
Over the next few years, we worked on listening to each other, respect-
ing each other, and not picking on each other. I don’t want to sound like a
cliché, but it did get better. Now, I’m a 23-year-old graduate student in
anthropology, living in Philadelphia, and my mother considers my partner
of three years as “another daughter.”
Only time will tell if the ultimate ending of this story is a happy one, but
I have to admit it’s pretty good right now.
According to data from the Social Justice Sexuality (SJS) Project,
Mei’s story is not uncommon. The patterns of Asian and Pacific
Islander (API) LGBT life defy common stereotypes. Of the over 5,000
participants surveyed for the SJS Project, API LGBT respondents, con-
trary to some expectations, are less religious than other LGBT commu-
nities of color; feel as connected to the broader LGBT community as
other LGBT people of color; are no more likely to feel homophobia is a
problem in their neighborhood or community; and are more likely to feel
their racial or ethnic status is an important part of their identity. And
about 90% are out to at least some of their friends and family.
The SJS Project began as a research agenda that sought to document
and celebrate the stories of API LGBT people: their racial and sexual
identities, spirituality and religion, mental and physical health, family
formations and dynamics, and civic and community engagement. Since
2008, one of the overarching goals of the project has been to better
understand identity and life experiences through a knowledge-based
lens—one that does not necessarily ask about issues of discrimination,
stigma, HIV and AIDS, and pathology but rather seeks to gather base-
line data that have not been systematically collected. This purposeful
line of inquiry not only has its roots in feminist scholarship (e.g.,
Crenshaw 1989; Matsuda 1991; Sandoval 1991), but it is also part of
a tradition of social scientific and legal scholarship on race that seeks to
build counter-narratives. These stories are often in conflict with peo-
ple’s everyday (and stereotypical) understandings of the role of race,
4 AN EXAMINATION OF ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER LGBT POPULATIONS . . .
sexuality, and gender in the lives of people of color. For more about the
theoretical perspectives and research methodologies employed by the
SJS Project, please refer to Chapter 6.
Using both qualitative and quantitative data from the SJS Project as a
guide, this book uncovers more common and uncommon stories of API
LGBT people. Using respondents’ own words, distinctions are made
between myths and lived realities. Some of the information presented
in these pages is common sense, while other information is new and
counterintuitive. Ultimately, our goal is to educate all and empower a
collection of communities of people who, all too often, don’t get to tell
their own stories but are forced to spend their lives responding to
narratives that are told about them.
use racial terms assigned to them. Instead, most API people around the
world refer to themselves based on whichever country or indigenous
population they belong to (e.g., Japanese, Chinese, Malaysian). As a social
construct—something that changes over time and within different con-
texts—identity labels are neither static nor universal.
LGBT COMMUNITIES
Though there is more to be done, scholars have investigated lesbian and
gay experiences from a historical perspective (Chauncey 1994; D‘Emilio
2002; Epstein 1999; Gamson and Moon 2004; Sedgwick 1990; Seidman
2006; Vaid 1995). Further, others have highlighted the importance of
race (Ferguson 2007; Guzmán 2006; Nagel 2000; Sommerville 2000;
Vidal-Ortiz 2008) and racism (McBride 2005; Young and Meyer 2005)
on that history.
By creating separate groups of people based on heterosexual and
homosexual identity, many have argued that the medical field was instru-
mental in stigmatizing sexual minorities (Weeks 1996). In addition, the
most powerful institution informing the “racial morphology” within the
United States has been the law (Haney Lopez 1996). Therefore, in
resistance to that unique oppression, researchers have linked experiences
of sexual minorities of color with issues of social justice (Cohen 1997;
Teunis et al. 2006). The immigration of people of color further compli-
cates conversations of race in the US (Choo 2012; Puri 2004;
Purkayastha 2012).
Because so much research focuses on disease and illness instead of
health and wellbeing, a strong bias exists in social science research
(Boehmer 2002; Keyes and Grzywacz 2005). As a result, there have
been explicit calls for more research highlighting a resilience over a deficit
model (Akerlund and Cheung 2000; Masten 1994; Shih 2004). Adrienne
Rich has encouraged more dynamic thinking when it comes to sexuality.
For example, she describes a lesbian continuum to convey that sexuality is
more fluid than fixed (1981). Social identity (whether racial or sexual
orientation) tends to develop via “stages” (Erikson 1956). Further, people
of color and sexual minorities are more likely to suffer from minority stress
(Meyer 1995), which occurs from navigating value structures that are in
conflict between minority and majority groups (Cross 1978; Phinney
1992). There is a long history of researchers documenting negative phy-
sical and mental health outcomes for LGBT people of color due to
6 AN EXAMINATION OF ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER LGBT POPULATIONS . . .
minority stress (Balsam and Szymanski 2005; Mays and Cochran 2001;
Mays, Cochran, and Rhue 1993; Mays et al. 2002).
Because of the stresses related to multiple minority statuses, activists
have worked diligently to create “safe spaces” (Davis 2002). Others,
however, have argued that dominant ideologies are always present and
internalized, and by implication no “space” is safe (Foucault 1990).
The stresses related to multiple minority statuses have produced several
responses. One response has been that dominant ideologies are always
present and internalized (Foucault 1990); another response has been to
create safe spaces (Davis 2002). The reality of multiple statuses has
prompted theorists to view sexuality through intersectionality, a theo-
retical framework and methodological lens to understand racial mino-
rities, sexual minorities, and their intersections (Collins 2000, 2015;
Crenshaw 1989; Lorde 2001; Weber 2010).
Another reason for the lack of research on LGBT . . . black families is the
belief by many mainstream . . . scholars and researchers that it is not their
job to address the African American LGBT population if they themselves
are not part of that population. “What” they might ask, “gives us the right
8 AN EXAMINATION OF ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER LGBT POPULATIONS . . .
communities and beyond), and the intersection of the two. More speci-
fically, all too often, while their larger heterosexual Asian communities
fight for racial justice and the larger White LGBT communities fight for
sexual justice, the unique experiences of API LGBTs go unvoiced.
It has been argued that people are destroyed from a lack of knowledge.
Through sound research and reasoned thinking, this book addresses
erroneous information and myths with the expectation that if ignorance
kills, then knowledge will empower.
REFERENCES
Akerlund, M., and M. Cheung. 2000. Teaching Beyond the Deficit Model: Gay
and Lesbian Issues among African Americans, Latinos, and Gay Asian
Americans. Journal of Social Work Education 36: 279–293.
Balsam, K.F., and D.M. Szymanski. 2005. Relationship Quality and Domestic
Violence in Women’s Same-Sex Relationships: The Role of Minority Stress.
Psychology of Women Quarterly 19: 158–169.
Bennett, M., and J. Battle. 2001. “We can See Them, but We Can’t Hear Them”:
LGBT Members of African American Families. In Mary Bernstein and Renate
Reimann (Eds.), Queer Families, Queer Politics: Challenging Culture and the
State, 53–67. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bernstein, M., and R. Reimann. 2001. Queer Families, Queer Politics. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Boehmer, U. 2002. Twenty Years of Public Health Research: Inclusion of Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Populations. American Journal of Public
Health, 92(7): 1125–1130.
Chandra, A., W.D. Mosher, and C. Copen. 2011. Sexual Behavior, Sexual
Attraction, and Sexual Identity in the United States: Data from the 2006–2008
National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Report, 3(36),
1–36.
Chauncey, G. 1994. Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Makings
of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.
Chavez, A. F., and F. Guido-DiBrito. 1999. Racial and Ethnic Identity and
Development. New Directions For Adult and Continuing Education 84: 39–47.
Choo, H.Y. 2012. The Transnational Journey of Intersectionality. Gender &
Society 26(1): 40–45.
Chung, Y. B., and A. A. Singh. 2009. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Asian Americans. In Nita Tewari and Alvin N. Alvarez (Eds.), Asian American
Psychology: Current Perspectives, 233–247. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Cohen, C.J. 1997. Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential
of Queer Politics? GLQ: A Journal Of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3: 437–465.
Collins, P.H. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the
Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Collins, P.H. 2004. Black Sexual Politics. New York: Routledge.
1 INTRODUCTION 11
McBride, D. 2005. Why I Hate Abercrombie & Fitch: Essays on Race and Sexuality.
New York: New York University Press.
Meyer, I.H. 1995. Minority Stress and Mental Health in Gay Men. Journal of
Health and Social Behavior 36: 38–56.
Nagel, J. 2000. Ethnicity and Sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 107–133.
Nakamura, N., J. R. Flojo, and M. Dittrich. 2009. Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual
Asian Americans: Coming Out In Context. In Jean Lau Chin (Ed.), Diversity in
Mind and in Action, 33–35. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Phinney, J. 1992. The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A New Scale for use
with Adolescents and Young Adults from Diverse Groups. Journal of Adolescent
Research 7: 156–176.
Portes, A. & Rumbaut, R.G. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Prashad, V. 2003. The Karma of Brown Folk. Twin Cities, MN: University of
Minnesota Press.
Prasso, S. 2006. The Asian Mystique: Dragon Ladies, Geisha Girls & Our Fantasies
of the Exotic Orient. Cambridge, MA: Public Affairs Books.
Puri, J. 2004. Checking (Homo) Sexualities at the Nation’s Door: Nationalisms
and Sexualities, In Jyoti Puri (Ed.), Encountering Nationalism, 42–69. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Purkayastha, B. 2012. Intersectionality in a Transnational World: Symposium on
Patricia Hill Collins. Onality in a Transnational World 26: 55–66.
Rich, A. 1981. Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs, 5, 631–
660.
Rodriquez, H., R. Saenz, and C. Menjivar. 2007. Latinas/os in the United States:
Changing the Face of America. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Press.
Sandoval, C. 1991. U.S. Third World Feminism: The Theory and Method
of Oppositional Consciousness in the Postmodern World. Genders 10:
1–24.
Sarkisian, N., and N. Gerstel. 2012. Nuclear Family Values, Extended Family Lives:
The Importance of Gender, Race, and Class. New York: Routldege.
Savin-Williams, R. 1990. Gay and Lesbian Adolescents. Marriage and Family
Review 14: 197–216.
Sedgwick, E. K. 1990. The Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
Seidman, S. 2006. Theoretical Perspectives. In Steven Seidman, Nancy Fischer,
and Chet Meeks (Eds.), Introducing the New Sexuality Studies: Original Essays
and Interviews, 3–13. New York: Routledge.
Shih, M. 2004. Positive Stigma: Examining Resilience and Empowerment
in Overcoming Stigma. The Annals of the American Academy of Political
& Social Science 591(1): 175–185.
14 AN EXAMINATION OF ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER LGBT POPULATIONS . . .
Singh, A.A., Y.B. Chung, and J.K. Dean. 2006. Acculturation Level and
Internalized Homophobia of Asian American Lesbian and Bisexual Women:
An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling 1(2): 3–19.
Sklar, K.K., and B.W. Palmer. 2009. The Selected Letters of Florence Kelley:
1869–1931. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
SMART (Sexual Minority Assessment Research Team). 2009. Best Practices for
Asking Sexual Orientation on Surveys. Williams Institute, UCLA School of
Law. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/706057d5.
Sommerville, S. 2000. Queering the Color Line; Race and the Invention of
Homosexuality in American Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Takagi, D. 1994. Maiden Voyage: Excursion into Sexuality and Identity Politics in
Asian America. Amerasia Journal, 20: 1–17.
Takaki, R. 1998. Strangers from a Different Shore. Boston, MA: Back Bay.
Teunis, N., G. H. Herdt, and R. Parker. 2006. Sexual Inequalities and Social
Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Tran, D.K. 1998. Transgender / Transsexual Roundtable. In David Eng and Alice
Hom (Eds.), Q & A: Queer in Asian America, 227–243. Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University Press.
Vaid, U. 1995. Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian
Liberation. New York: Anchor Books.
Vidal-Ortiz, S. 2008. The Puerto Rican Way is More Tolerant: Constructions and
Uses of “Homophobia” among Santería Practitioners Across Ethno-Racial and
National Identification. Sexualities 11: 476–495.
Weber, L. 2010. Understanding Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality: A Conceptual
Framework. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Weeks, J. 1996. The Construction of Homosexuality. In Steven Seidman (Ed.),
Queer Theory Sociology, 41–63, Oxford: Blackwell.
Weston, K. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Young, R.M., and I.H. Meyer. 2005. The Trouble with “MSM” and “WSW”:
Erasure of the Sexual-Minority Person in Public Health Discourse. American
Journal of Public Health 95: 1144–1149.
CHAPTER 2
Current Trends
Abstract This chapter presents current trends for Asian and Pacific Islander
LGBT communities. More specifically, five unique areas are explored: trans*
issues, immigration, marriage, economics, and health.
MYTH: All sexual and racial minorities use the same terms to identify
themselves.
REALITY: Within groups, there is diversity in the labels people like to
use to refer to themselves, and throughout history, the cate-
gories for race, ethnicity, and sexuality have changed.
MYTH: All trans* people are White.
REALITY: There is significant racial diversity within the trans*
community.
MYTH: Immigration is not an issue for LGBT communities.
REALITY: There are thousands of same sex couples throughout the
United States where one or neither partner is a US citizen.
Further, immigration is often a means through which LGBT
individuals—regardless of relationship status—seek shelter
from legal and social stigmas in their countries of origin.
MYTH: All LGBT people identify marriage as a top issue.
CURRENT TRENDS
According to analysis of the 2011 American Community Survey, API
Americans comprise about 5% of all US adults; and of those who identify
as LGBT, 4.3% are Asian. Arguably, the biggest current trend affecting
API LGBT people crystalized on Friday, June 26, 2015. On that day, the
United States’ Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution guarantees a
right to same-sex marriage. Though that event was monumental it was by
no means all-encompassing. In short, API sexual minorities have aspects
of, and issues in, their lives that may be related to, but also go beyond,
same-sex marriage. Among them, we provide specific attention to issues
related to trans* people, immigration issues, marriage, economic issues,
and health.
TRANS* ISSUES
According to a report jointly published by the National Queer Asian Pacific
Islander Alliance, the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), and
the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) “the combination of anti-
transgender bias with structural and interpersonal racism [means] that trans-
gender and gender non-conforming people of color, including those who are
[API], experience particularly devastating levels of discrimination” (NCTE
2010). With 18% reporting a household income of less than $10,000/year,
API trans* and gender non-conforming people often live in extreme poverty.
This number is six times the general API population rate (3%), and over four
times the general US population rate (4%) (Grant et al. 2011).
Even in the presence of devastating levels of discrimination, however,
there are powerful glimmers of hope. For example, 44% of API trans* and
2 CURRENT TRENDS 17
IMMIGRATION
According to the NGLTF (NGLTF 2014), almost 80 countries have laws
that discriminate against LGBT people; and in seven countries, there is
capital punishment for having sex with someone of the same sex. In the
United States, thousands of LGBT people apply for asylum, but only
about 1000 are admitted annually; and the United States has over
267,000 LGBT adults who are undocumented immigrants. Almost
three-quarters (72%) of people in the United States, however, feel that
undocumented immigrants should be able to remain in the United States
legally (Pew 2015a).
Just as there is a military industrial complex and a prison industrial
complex, some have argued that the United States has an immigration
detention industrial complex as well (Kalhan 2010). With an annual
budget of over 3.3 billion dollars and with about 33,000 people in
detention on any given day, the US Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) is quite a substantial federal agency. Further, almost
half of those detained by ICE are held by private corporations, who get
millions of dollars from the federal government for their services.
Caught in this web are detained LGBT immigrants who, compared to
the general population, experience increased rates of physical and sexual
abuse in detention facilities. According to data from the United States
Census, there are nearly 11,500 same-sex couples in which neither
partner is a US citizen and 14% of noncitizens in binational same-sex
couples are Asian Pacific Islander; while among citizens in same-sex
binational couples, 7% are Asian/Pacific Islander (Konnoth and Gates
2011).
MARRIAGE
In 2001, about 57% of people in the United States opposed same-sex
marriage; by 2015 the same percentage (57%) favored it (Pew 2015b).
Though there were some racial differences, they were not at all dramatic.
Racial difference and patterns are dramatic, however, when examining
marriage patterns—for both opposite-sex and same-sex couples. Due to
18 AN EXAMINATION OF ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER LGBT POPULATIONS . . .
ECONOMICS
According to API LGBT respondents of the Social Justice Sexuality
Project, economic issues are the second most important issue facing
them (Battle et al. 2013). This is not a surprising finding given experi-
ences with poverty and employment discrimination. For example,
according to the Pew Research Center 2013 LGBT survey and the
Pew Research Center analysis of the 2011 American Community
Survey, LGBT adults are more likely to be poor than their non-LGBT
counterparts. More specifically, while 28% of all adults have an income
of less than $30,000, almost 40% of all LGBT adults do. In addition,
API communities are philanthropically underserved. For example,
according to a report published by the Funders for LGBTQ Issues
(2014), in 2013, API LGBT communities received about 1% of all
domestic funding for LGBT issues.
Further, in one of the first and most comprehensive studies ever
conducted on LGBT poverty, Albeda and colleagues (2009) found,
among other things, that poverty is at least as common in the LGBT
population as among heterosexual people and their families; children in
gay and lesbian couple households have poverty rates twice as high as
2 CURRENT TRENDS 19
HEALTH
Economic inequities serve to both create and sustain health inequities
(Sears and Mallory 2011). Research shows that compared to other racial
and sexual minorities, LGBT API adults are most likely to experience
psychological distress (Krehely 2009).
Not all issues concerning API LGBT people are negative. For example,
a nationwide sample of LGBT people of color (Battle et al. 2013) found
that compared to other LGBT people of color, API LGBT people feel just
as connected to the broader LGBT community, are no more likely to feel
homophobia is a problem in their neighborhood or community (Battle et
al. 2013), and are significantly more likely to feel their racial or ethnic
status is an important part of their identity.
REFERENCES
Albeda, R., M. V. L. Badgett, A. Schneebaum, and G. J. Gates. 2009. Poverty in
the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Community. Williams Institute, UCLA School
of Law. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/
uploads/Albelda-Badgett-Schneebaum-Gates-LGB-Poverty-Report-March-
2009.pdf.
Badgett, M.V.L., B. Sears, H. Lau, and D. Ho. 2009. Bias in the Workplace:
Consistent Evidence of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Discrimination 1998–2008. Chicago Kent Review 2(84): 559–595.
Battle, J., A.J. Pastrana Jr., and J. Daniels. 2013. Social Justice Sexuality
Survey: The Executive Summary for the Asian and Pacific Islander
20 AN EXAMINATION OF ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER LGBT POPULATIONS . . .
END OF VOL. I.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.