Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applications of Time-of-Flight and Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry in Environmental, Food, Doping, and Forensic Analysis Sandra Pérez
Applications of Time-of-Flight and Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry in Environmental, Food, Doping, and Forensic Analysis Sandra Pérez
https://textbookfull.com/product/applications-of-time-of-flight-
and-orbitrap-mass-spectrometry-in-environmental-food-doping-and-
forensic-analysis-1st-edition-sandra-perez/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/applications-in-high-resolution-
mass-spectrometry-food-safety-and-pesticide-residue-analysis-1st-
edition-romero-gonz-lez/
https://textbookfull.com/product/direct-analysis-in-real-time-
mass-spectrometry-principles-and-practices-of-dart-ms-1st-
edition-yiyang-dong/
Time Series Analysis Methods and Applications for
Flight Data Zhang
https://textbookfull.com/product/time-series-analysis-methods-
and-applications-for-flight-data-zhang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/tandem-mass-spectrometry-of-
lipids-molecular-analysis-of-complex-lipids-robert-c-murphy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/chromatographic-analysis-of-the-
environment-mass-spectrometry-based-approaches-4th-edition-
lambropoulou/
https://textbookfull.com/product/time-series-analysis-methods-
and-applications-for-flight-data-1st-edition-jianye-zhang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advancements-of-mass-
spectrometry-in-biomedical-research-alisa-g-woods/
Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry
Volume 71
Joseph A. Caruso
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Hendrik Emons
Joint Research Centre, Geel, Belgium
Gary Hieftje
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Kiyokatsu Jinno
Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Japan
Uwe Karst
University of Münster, Münster, Germany
Gyrögy Marko-Varga
AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden
Janusz Pawliszyn
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada
Susan Richardson
US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, USA
Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry
Volume 71
Applications of Time-of-
Flight and Orbitrap Mass
Spectrometry in
Environmental, Food,
Doping, and Forensic
Analysis
Edited by
Sandra Pérez
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research e Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Peter Eichhorn
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research e Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Damià Barceló
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research e Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under
copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research
and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional
practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge
in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments
described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of
their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a
professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or
editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a
matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of
any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-444-63572-3
ISSN: 0166-526X
xiii
xiv Contributors to Volume 71
xvii
Preface
There is little doubt, if any, that the commercial availability of powerful and
cost-efficient instrumentation in conjunction with the development of user-
friendly data acquisition and processing tools have been decisive factors in the
successful implementation of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) in
highly diverse fields of application. Although the use of HR-MS techniques in
small-molecule analysis has been around for quite some time, with prominent
examples being magnetic sector instruments in academic settings at an early
stage and later on time-of-flight (ToF) MS platforms used in the pharmaceu-
tical industry for drug metabolite identification, many routine laboratories
have nowadays recognised the potential, and are actually taking advantage of
the power of HR-MS not only for qualitative analysis, but also increasingly for
quantitative measurement of organic trace components with its high demands
on instrumental sensitivity, selectivity and robustness. In fact, all of the major
manufacturers with a solid history in developing and producing low-resolution
MS instrumentation based on quadrupole or ion-trap technology for ion
analysis and detection now offer a comprehensive portfolio of (hybrid) HR-
MS instruments to provide solutions to their customers for even the most
complex of analytical tasks. And with the introduction of the first commercial
Orbitrap mass analyser in 2005 and its subsequent triumphal procession,
manufacturers of ToF-based HR-MS instruments took up the challenge of
coming up with innovative solutions to defend, and ideally expand their
market share.
With the ever-growing popularity of HR-MS techniques and the continuous
technological development in mind, in this book we set out to provide a
snapshot on the current state-of-the-art in HR-MS analysis of small organic
molecules, to describe workflows in analytical laboratories dealing with the
detection and characterisation of environmental pollutants, food contaminants
and doping agents in biological samples, and to identify the strengths and
limitations of hardware and software solutions available to the HR-MS user
community. To this end, we invited experts from academic institutions, public
research organisations, and industry as well as instrument manufacturers to
share their experience and views on their specific area of expertise. We feel
confident that the selection of contributions in this book e ranging from broad
overviews on technical developments or the various MS acquisition modes
suitable for quantitative analysis down to the assignment of fragment ions for
xix
xx Preface
Chapter Outline
1. Introduction 3 4. Working Modes in
2. Evolutionary Route of the Quantitative Analysis 12
Orbitrap Technology 4 5. Conclusion 16
3. Ion Source Capabilities References 16
Associated with Orbitrap
Technology 9
1. INTRODUCTION
While mass spectrometry is rightfully considered as one of the most (if not the
most) powerful methods of analysis in environmental, food, antidoping and
forensic laboratories, its further expansion depends on its ability to keep up
with analytical challenges, such as the growing variety of analytes and the
increasing stringency on limits of detection and quantitation. Over the recent
decade this ability was enabled by increasing speed of liquid and gas sepa-
rations that in its turn has driven requirements on throughput and quality of
analysis provided by mass spectrometry instrumentation.
Developments addressing analytical challenges and increased perfor-
mance have focused not only on ion sources, especially those employing an
atmospheric-to-vacuum interface such as electrospray (ESI) and atmospheric
pressure chemical ionisation (APCI), but also on the transition to the use of
high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The latter trend started with
time-of-flight (TOF) instruments and has continued with the newest of mass
spectrometric techniques: Orbitrap mass spectrometry.
The combination of targeted and nontargeted analysis, increased selec-
tivity with less sample preparation and compound optimisation, and retro-
spective analysis are crucial factors contributing to the increase interest in the
use of HRMS coupled to liquid chromatography (LC). Ever since the intro-
duction of commercial orthogonal acceleration-time-of-flight (oa-TOF) in-
struments in the mid-1990s, significant improvements have been made in
order to produce a high-performance instrument with modest power re-
quirements, size and most importantly, able to operate at reduced costs.
Magnetic sector, TOF, Orbitrap, and Fourier transform ion cyclotron (FTICR)
are viable options, but TOF and Orbitrap mass analysers are probably the most
commonly used with LC or UHPLC systems. In general, TOF instruments
show a mass resolving power of approximately 10,000e60,000 FWHM (full
width at half maximum) with a mass measurement accuracy of 1e5 parts per
million (ppm), while the mass resolving power of the latest Orbitrap instru-
ment can reach up to 450,000 FWHM at m/z 200 with <3 ppm mass accuracy
with external calibration.
The increased selectivity provided by HRMS is particularly important
when studying complex mixtures, such as biological, environmental and food
samples. Accurate detection and quantitation relies on the differentiation
between the compound of interest from background ions and isobaric in-
terferences. Furthermore, the simplification of workflows and the addition of
flexible scan functions make LC-HRMS, particularly Orbitrap MS, suitable for
environmental, food, antidoping and forensic analysis.
LT, linear trap; CID, collision-induced dissociation; HCD, higher energy collision-induced dissociation; ETD, electron-transfer dissociation; fETD, front-end electron-transfer
dissociation; QMF, quadrupole mass filter; eFT, enhanced Fourier transform; HCCT, high-capacity transfer tube; EMR, enhanced mass range; Bold denotes first appearance of a
feature, references belong to the first publications devoted to the corresponding instrument.
7
8 SECTION j I Instrumentation
Velos (2009), while a dual ion trap ramped up the speed of MS/MS [12]. In the
Orbitrap Elite instrument (2011) [13], a compact, high-field analyser and an
enhanced Fourier transform (eFT) algorithm [14] enabled increase of resolving
power of the analyser by a factor of four.
Evolution of research-grade instruments was taken to a new level of
performance and usability with the introduction in 2013 of Orbitrap Fusion
Tribrid instrument that justified its name by combining for the first time three
top-tier analysers (high-field Orbitrap, dual-pressure linear trap and quadru-
pole mass filter) in one mass spectrometer. In addition, it featured for the first
time an easier to use ETD option with a front-end source of anions. This
source could be also used for internal calibration both in positive and negative
modes. In its further version Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (2015), a new level of
source brightness was enabled by utilising high-capacity transfer tube with
about threefold increased gas throughput and corresponding decrease of ion
fill times.
Starting from 2008, some of these capabilities were transferred to a
growing family of benchtop instruments designed specifically for routine high-
throughput analysis. A stand-alone Orbitrap mass spectrometer, Exactive, has
led the way, with the ion source linked to the C-trap via an octapole [16]. Later
this instrument became the basis for drastic expansion of the m/z limit of
Orbitrap analysis to accommodate needs of native mass spectrometry of intact
proteins and protein complexes [17].
In 2011, the combination of Orbitrap analyser with a quadrupole mass
filter was launched under the name of Q Exactive and became increasingly
popular for proteomics and high-throughput screening applications [18].
Later it became the basis for a streamlined version Q Exactive Focus that was
configured specifically for small molecule routine applications. Increased
performance of Q Exactive family was realised later in Q Exactive Plus and
HF [19]. In both instruments, inject flatapole was used to prefilter ion beam
in MS/MS mode to reduce drastically contamination of the downstream
optics, while segmented pre- and postfilter on hyperbolic-rod quadrupole
mass filter improved the quality of mass isolation and transmission of pre-
cursor ions.
This development has led to a new page in the history of Orbitrap mass
spectrometry, when in 2015 it entered for the first time the field of GC/MS.
The latest instruments based on Q Exactive family provide more than suffi-
cient numbers of spectra across narrow peaks so typical for GC/MS at suffi-
ciently high resolution to enable analysis of complex mixtures even in full
spectrum mode.
As a result, the Orbitrap-based mass spectrometers have built a compelling
foundation for their wide application not only for research type applications but
also for screening, trace and targeted analysis in LC/MS and GC/MS, applicable
in the field of environmental, food, doping and forensic analysis.
Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry: Evolution and Applicability Chapter j 1 9
However, [MH]þ ions have been observed with certain compounds, such as
analytes containing triple bonds and under certain APPI conditions. The APPI
response frequently differs substantially, indicating a certain dependence on
the functional group present in the molecule [28]. Addition of a dopant to the
mobile phase of an LC-MS is sometimes necessary to increase sensitivity in
APPI. As an LC-MS interface, APPI has been applied widely in pharmaceu-
tical, biological, and environmental analysis. Although APPI was originally
developed for LC-MS, there are also an increasing number of reports using it
as an interface for GC-MS [29]. Although APPI is widely used with petro-
leomic samples, it has also found utility for tracing fullerenes from industrial
use in natural waters [22].
The first direct ionisation methods were DESI [30] and DART [31].
Another characteristic of direct analysis technologies is that they do not
Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry: Evolution and Applicability Chapter j 1 11
require addition of a matrix for their operation as in MALDI. The ion sources
are easy to couple to a mass spectrometer, thus increasing the versatility of the
MS, and solvent consumption is very low, making them in fact environmen-
tally sound techniques. They vary by the ionisation method, the types of
molecules that can be ionised and the mass range they can accommodate. In
general, those techniques that ionise by electrospray (DESI, flowprobe, LESA
and PaperSpray) can produce multiply charged ions and are therefore able to
analyse larger molecules. Techniques such as DART and LDTD are limited to
a mass range of about m/z 1000 and produce only singly charged ions.
The generation of ions in DESI occurs when high-velocity charged drop-
lets, produced from a pneumatically-assisted electrospray, impinge onto a
surface to be analysed (liquid, dry sample or tissue sample) at atmospheric
conditions. Ions of chemical species present on the surface are produced
through the interaction of the charged droplets and the sample. The resulting
mass spectra are similar to electrospray mass spectra. Unique attributes of the
technology are rapid quantitation (w6 s per sample), MS imaging without
laser absorbing matrix under atmospheric conditions (tunable lateral spatial
resolution from 50 mm to 2 mm) and analysis of conductive and nonconductive
surfaces. Strittmatter et al. have reported the direct combination of thin-film
microextraction and DESI-MS (Orbitrap mass analyser) for the screening and
detection of various different pharmaceuticals and personal care products in
wastewater treatment plants. This approach enables considerably shorter
analysis time compared to the traditional LC-MS run [32].
DART is a rapid ionisation technique for noncontact surface sampling of
compounds from samples in any state of matter: gases, liquids and/or solids.
Operating at ambient pressure with the sample at ground potential, the tech-
nique enables near instantaneous determination of sample composition by mass
spectrometry. Although first introduced in 2003, DART has been commercially
available since 2005 [31]. The ionisation mechanism in DART is Penning
ionisation [33]. The basic DART experiment utilises a strip with various metal
mesh spots where samples are deposited. The strip moves in front of hot helium
gas that flows through the sample/mesh. Hot, excited-state helium atoms pro-
duce reactive species which ionise the sample by an APCI-like mechanism
[31]. In the analysis of solid surfaces (food packaging, for example) the DART
probe is aimed at an angle towards the surface. Powder, pellets or pills can be
analysed directly with no sample preparation in the analysis of bulk substances
in forensic applications or drug fraud investigations. DART has been exten-
sively coupled to Orbitrap mass spectrometers and there is a long list of
references utilising the technology in the environmental, drug authenticity or
adulteration, food safety and forensic applications among many others (selected
examples: [34e41]).
Although paper spray ionisation has been used in custom research set-ups
since 2010 [42], the first commercial source was only recently introduced to
the market. It is an automated sample handling and ionisation source for mass
12 SECTION j I Instrumentation
Working
Area Matrix Topic Workflow Mode References
Food safety Tomato, pepper, Pesticide analysis Screening and FS/ddMS2 [43]
orange and green tea quantitation
Food safety Fruits and vegetables Pesticide analysis Screening and FS/ddMS2 [44]
quantitation
Food safety Urine Synthetic steroid hormones Quantitation t-SIM/ddMS2 [45]
Food safety Dairy products Mycotoxins Quantitation FS/ddMS2 [46]
Food safety Leek, wheat and tea Multiclass contaminants Screening and FS/ddMS2 [47]
quantitation
Food safety Baby food Multiclass contaminants Screening and FS/ddMS2 [48]
quantitation
Food safety Bivalves Marine toxins Quantitation PRM [49]
15
16 SECTION j I Instrumentation
5. CONCLUSION
The use of LC-HRMS in the analysis of small molecules is expected to in-
crease within the coming years. This technique is clearly making a transition
from research to routine analysis due to the development of simplified hard-
ware. The improvement of crucial parameters such as sensitivity and full
compliance with regulatory guidelines make this technology as competitive
and appealing as a triple quadrupole mass analyserebased workflow.
Furthermore, the possibility to combine target, suspect and nontarget analysis
in the same run has facilitated the transition to HRMS.
Despite the recent advances, the identification of unknowns remains
challenging. In general, the process leading to the identification of an
elemental composition and/or structure not present on a database is still very
manual and, therefore, time-consuming. Developments targeting more
streamlined workflows for the identification of unknowns are expected for the
full exploitation of LC-HRMS capabilities.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Makarov, Anal. Chem. 72 (2000) 1156e1162.
[2] A. Makarov, E. Denisov, A. Kholomeev, W. Balschun, O. Lange, K. Strupat, S. Horning,
Anal. Chem. 78 (2006) 2113e2120.
[3] K.H. Kingdon, Phys. Rev. 21 (1923) 408e418.
[4] A. Makarov, Anal. Sci. 10 (2013) 26e33.
[5] A. Makarov, Theory and practice of the Orbitrap mass analyzer, in: R.E. March, J.F.J. Todd
(Eds.), Practical Aspects of Trapped Ion Mass Spectrometry, Volume IV: Theory and
Instrumentation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010, pp. 251e272.
Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry: Evolution and Applicability Chapter j 1 17
[6] M. Scigelova, A. Makarov, Fundamentals and advances of Orbitrap mass spectrometry, in:
R.A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley, Chichester, 2013.
[7] R.A. Zubarev, A. Makarov, Anal. Chem. 85 (11) (2013) 5288e5296.
[8] S. Eliuk, A. Makarov, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 8 (2015) 61e80.
[9] J.V. Olsen, B. Macek, O. Lange, A. Makarov, S. Horning, M. Mann, Nat. Methods 4 (9)
(2007) 709e712.
[10] G. McAlister, W. Berggren, J. Griep-Raming, S. Horning, A. Makarov, D. Phanstiel, G.
Stafford, D. Swaney, J. Syka, V. Zabrouskov, J.J. Coon, Proteome Res. 7 (2008) 3127.
[11] K. Strupat, V. Kovtoun, H. Bui, R. Viner, G. Stafford, S.J. Horning, Am. Soc. Mass
Spectrom. 20 (2009) 1451.
[12] J.V. Olsen, J.C. Schwartz, J. Griep-Raming, M.L. Nielsen, E. Damoc, E. Denisov, O. Lange,
P. Remes, D. Taylor, M. Splendore, E.R. Wouters, M. Senko, A. Makarov, M. Mann, S.
Horning, Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8 (2009) 2759.
[13] A. Michalski, E. Damoc, O. Lange, E. Denisov, D. Nolting, M. Mueller, R. Viner, J.
Schwartz, P. Remes, M. Belford, J.J. Dunyach, J. Cox, S. Horning, M. Mann, A. Makarov,
Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11 (2012).
[14] O. Lange, E. Damoc, A. Wieghaus, A. Makarov, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 369 (2014) 16e22.
[15] M. Senko, P. Remes, J. Canterbury, R. Mathur, Q. Song, S. Eliuk, C. Mullen, L. Earley, M.
Hardman, J. Blethrow, H. Bui, A. Specht, O. Lange, E. Denisov, A. Makarov, S. Horning, V.
Zabrouskov, Anal. Chem. 85 (24) (2013) 11710e11714.
[16] K.P. Bateman, M. Kellmann, H. Muenster, R. Papp, L. Taylor, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.
20 (2009) 1441.
[17] R. Rose, E. Damoc, E. Denisov, A. Makarov, A. Heck, Nat. Methods 9 (2012) 1084e1086.
[18] A. Michalski, E. Damoc, J.P. Hauschild, O. Lange, A. Wieghaus, A. Makarov, N. Nagaraj,
J. Cox, M. Mann, S. Horning, Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10 (9) (2011). M111.011015.
[19] R.A. Scheltema, J.P. Hauschild, O. Lange, D. Hornburg, E. Denisov, E. Damoc, A. Kuehn,
A. Makarov, M. Mann, Mol. Cell Proteomics 13 (2014) 3698e3708.
[20] P. Silcock, C. Cojocariu, D. Roberts, S. Quarmby, B. Guckenberger, J. Cole, J. Voss, A.
Peterson, J.P. Hauschild, O. Lange, N. Kwiecien, M. Westphall, J. Coon, A. Makarov, A
fully integrated GC orbitrap system opens a new chapter in GC-MS, in: Proceedings of 63rd
American Society for Mass Spectrometry, May 31eJune 4, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri, 2015.
[21] O. Núñez, H. Gallart-Ayala, P. Lucci, C.P.B. Martins (Eds.), Fast Liquid Chromatography-
Mass Spectrometry Methods in Food and Environmental Analysis, World Scientific Pub-
lishing Company, London, 2015.
[22] O. Núñez, H. Gallart-Ayala, C.P.B. Martins, E. Moyano, M.T. Galceran, Anal. Chem. 84
(12) (2012) 5316e5326.
[23] P.B. Fayad, M. Prevost, S. Sauve, Anal. Chem. 82 (2) (2010) 639e645.
[24] M. Boisvert, P.B. Fayad, S. Sauve, Anal. Chim. Acta 754 (2012) 75e82.
[25] A. Roy-Lachapelle, M. Solliec, M. Sinotte, C. Deblois, S. Sauve, Talanta 132 (2015)
836e844.
[26] J.A. Syage, M.D. Evans, K.A. Hanold, Am. Lab. 32 (2000) 24e29.
[27] L.C. Short, S.S. Cai, J.A. Syage, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 18 (4) (2007) 589e599.
[28] K.O. Zhurov, L. Menin, T. Di Franco, Y. Tsybin, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 26 (7) (2015)
1221e1232.
[29] T.J. Kauppila, H. Kersten, T. Benter, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 26 (6) (2015) 1036e1045.
[30] Z. Takats, J.M. Wiseman, B. Gologan, R.G. Cooks, Science 306 (5695) (2004) 471e473.
[31] R.B. Cody, J.A. Laramée, H.D. Durst, Anal. Chem. 77 (8) (2005) 2297e2302.
[32] N. Strittmatter, R.A. During, Z. Takats, Analyst 137 (17) (2012) 4037e4044.
18 SECTION j I Instrumentation
[33] L. Song, S.C. Gibson, D. Bhandari, K.D. Cook, J.E. Bartmess, Anal. Chem. 81 (24) (2009)
10080e10088.
[34] M.C. Bridoux, A. Schwarzenberg, S. Schramm, J.C. Tabet, R.B. Cole, Direct analysis in real
time/Orbitrap mass spectrometry as a tool for the direct, global characterization and dif-
ferentiation of real explosive samples for forensic application, in: ASMS Sanibel Confer-
ence Proceedings, Clearwater, 2015.
[35] R.L. Self, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 80 (2013) 155e158.
[36] S.E. Edison, L.A. Lin, B.M. Gamble, J. Wong, K. Zhang, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
25 (1) (2011) 127e139.
[37] L. Vaclavik, B. Belkova, Z. Reblova, K. Riddellova, J. Hajslova, Food Chem. 138 (4) (2013)
2312e2320.
[38] M. Farré, Y. Picó, D. Barceló, Anal. Chem. 85 (5) (2013) 2638e2644.
[39] E. Crawford, B. Musselman, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 403 (10) (2012) 2807e2812.
[40] S.E. Edison, L.A. Lin, L. Parrales, Food Addit. Contam. Part A 28 (10) (2011) 1393e1404.
[41] T. Cajka, K. Riddellova, P. Zomer, H. Mol, J. Hajslova, Food Addit. Contam. Part A 28 (10)
(2011) 1372e1382.
[42] H. Wang, J. Liu, R.G. Cooks, Z. Ouyang, Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49 (5) (2010) 877e880.
[43] D. Gómez-Ramos, M.L. Rajski, H. Heinzen, A.R. Fernández-Alba, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.
407 (21) (2015).
[44] J. Wang, W. Chow, D. Leung, J. Chang, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 (49) (2012) 12088e12104.
[45] P. Kumar, A. Rúbies, F. Centrich, M. Granados, N. Cortés-Francisco, J. Caixach, R.
Companyó, Anal. Chim. Acta 780 (2013) 65e73.
[46] W. Jia, X. Chu, Y. Ling, J. Huang, J. Chang, J. Chrom. A 1345 (2014) 107e114.
[47] Z. Dzuman, M. Zachariasova, Z. Veprikova, M. Godula, J. Hajslova, Anal. Chim. Acta 863
(2015) 29e40.
[48] W. Jia, X. Chu, Y. Ling, J. Huang, J. Chang, J. Chrom. A 1347 (2014) 122e128.
[49] A. Rúbies, E. Muñoz, D. Gibert, N. Cortés-Francisco, M. Granados, J. Caixach, F. Centrich,
J. Chrom. A 1386 (2015) 62e73.
[50] A.D. Ngongang, S. Vo Duy, S. Sauve, Anal. Methods 7 (2015).
[51] G. Fedorova, T. Randak, R.H. Lindberg, R. Grabic, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 27
(15) (2013) 1751e1762.
[52] C. Moschet, A. Piazzoli, H. Singer, J. Hollender, Anal. Chem. 85 (21) (2013) 10312e10320.
[53] B. Zonja, A. Delgado, S. Pérez, D. Barceló, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (6) (2015)
3464e3472.
[54] E. Dahmane, J. Boccard, C. Csajka, S. Rudaz, L. Décosterd, E. Genin, B. Duretz, M. Bromirski,
K. Zaman, B. Testa, B. Rochat, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406 (11) (2014) 2627e2640.
[55] T.M. Li, J. Chen, X. Li, X.J. Ding, Y. Wu, L.F. Zhao, S. Chen, X. Lei, M.Q. Dong, Anal.
Chem. 85 (19) (2013) 9281e9287.
[56] L. Bailly-Chouriberry, F. Cormant, P. Garcia, A. Kind, M.A. Popot, Y. Bonnaire, Anal.
Chem. 85 (10) (2013) 5219e5225.
[57] X. He, M. Kozak, S. Nimkar, Anal. Chem. 84 (18) (2012) 7643e7647.
[58] M. Concheiro, D. Lee, E. Lendoiro, M.A. Huestis, J. Chrom. A 1297 (2013) 123e130.
[59] M. Concheiro, S. Anizan, K. Ellefsen, M.A. Huestis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405 (29) (2013)
9437e9448.
Chapter 2
Advances in Time-of-Flight
Mass Spectrometry
J.C. Fjeldsted
Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States
E-mail: john_fjeldsted@agilent.com
Chapter Outline
1. Introduction 19 2.5 Ion Detection 34
1.1 Basic Concepts of TOF-MS 20 2.6 High-Speed Digitisation 35
1.2 LC/MS Instrumentation 23 3. GC/MS Instrumentation 36
1.3 Application Demands 25 3.1 Via Electron Ionisation 37
2. Current Improvements in TOF 3.1.1 Current
Instrumentation 26 Developments 37
2.1 Ion Production 27 3.2 Via GC-APCI Interface to
2.2 Ion Sampling 28 LC/MS Systems 38
2.3 Resolving Power 30 3.3 The Future of GC-Based
2.3.1 Chromatographic TOF MS 39
Factor 31 4. IM-TOF-MS Adding Additional
2.3.2 Nonchromato- Dimensionality 40
graphic Factors 31 4.1 Historical Background and
2.3.3 Off-Axis Energy Basic Principles 40
Spread 31 5. Conclusion 47
2.3.4 Ion Mirror 32 Acknowledgement 47
2.3.5 Flight Path Length 32 References 48
2.4 Mass Accuracy 33
1. INTRODUCTION
Over the last decade, there has been a significant growth in the use of high-
resolution mass spectrometry (MS) for trace-level detection in environmental,
chemical, biological and life science applications, including applications such
as contaminants, impurities, pollutants, residual pesticides, metabolomics,
Characinidae [Africa]—
Erythrinina 15 „
Curimatina 40 „
Anastomatina 25 „
Tetragonopterina 80 „
Hydrocyonina 30 „
Crenuchina 1 „
Serrasalmonina 35 „
Cyprinodontidæ—
Carnivoræ [Europe, Asia, N. America, India, Africa] 30 „
Limnophagæ 31 „
Osteoglossidæ [Africa, India, Australia] 2 „
Gymnotidæ 20 „
Symbranchidæ [India] 1 „
672 species.