Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Fundamentals of Hazardous Waste Site Remediation First Edition Sellers Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Fundamentals of Hazardous Waste Site Remediation First Edition Sellers Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/fundamentals-of-site-
remediation-for-metal-and-hydrocarbon-cotaminated-soils-third-
edition-edition-john-pichtel/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hazardous-waste-management-an-
introduction-vanguilder/
https://textbookfull.com/product/asphaltene-deposition-
fundamentals-prediction-prevention-and-remediation-first-edition-
tavakkoli/
https://textbookfull.com/product/solid-and-hazardous-waste-
management-science-and-engineering-m-n-rao/
Bioremediation Technology: Hazardous Waste Management
1st Edition M H Fulekar (Editor)
https://textbookfull.com/product/bioremediation-technology-
hazardous-waste-management-1st-edition-m-h-fulekar-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hazardous-waste-and-pollution-
detecting-and-preventing-green-crimes-1st-edition-tanya-wyatt-
eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/creating-a-web-site-design-and-
build-your-first-site-1st-edition-greg-rickaby/
https://textbookfull.com/product/assessment-and-remediation-of-
petroleum-contaminated-sites-first-edition-g-mattney-cole/
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-consulting-
fundamentals-investigation-remediation-and-brownfields-
redevelopment-2-new-edition-edition-benjamin-alter/
FUNDAMENTAIS
___ OF____
HAZARDOUS
WASTE SITE
REMEDIATION
Kathleen Sellers
CRC Press
Taylor &. Francis Group
Boca Raton London New York
Sellers, Kathleen.
Fundamentals of hazardous waste site remediation I Kathleen
Sellers.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-56670-281-X (alk. paper)
I. Hazardous waste site remediation. I. Title.
TD !030.S45 1998
628.5--dc21 98-4419
CIP
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted
material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed.
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the
publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the consequences of their use.
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information
storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
The consent of CRC Press LLC does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion,
for creating new works, or for resale. Specific permission must be obtained in writing from CRC Press
LLC for such copying.
Direct all inquiries to CRC Press LLC, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W., Boca Raton, Aorida 33431.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and
are used only for identification and explanation, without intent to infringe.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those
they have been unable to contact.
The Author
During over twelve years o f experience, Ms. Sellers has focused on developing
and designing solutions to hazardous waste problems. Ms. Sellers received a B.S.
in Chemistry from Indiana University and a M .S. in Environmental Engineering
from the University o f Massachusetts. She began her career with the U.S. Environ
mental Protection A gency and currently works for Ogden Environmental and Energy
Services in Westford, MA.
Ms. Sellers has worked on a variety o f sites, including former chemical manu
facturing facilities, coal-gasification waste sites, and landfills. Her work, under both
state and federal regulatory programs, has included development o f site investigation
plans, management o f focused field investigations, feasibility studies, remedial
design, negotiations with regulatory agencies, and public involvement programs.
Ms. Sellers has also helped clients with their industrial wastewater treatment plant
operations. She is a registered professional engineer in Massachusetts and Vermont.
Acknowledgments
This book is based on the syllabus and handouts that I prepared for a course that
I taught at Tufts University in 1992. Kim M. Henry helped m e to prepare the original
profile o f the hypothetical A ce Solvent Recovery Facility, discussed in Chapter 1,
for that class. It is used herein with her permission. Doug Fannon drafted the figures
in Chapter 1 based on Ms. Henry’s original drawings.
I am grateful to the engineers and scientists who reviewed portions o f this book
in draft and provided helpful comments: Paul Anderson, Ph.D.; Ralph Baker, Ph.D.;
Kristine Carbonneau, P.E.; Jay Clausen, P.G.; Diane Heineman; Kim M. Henry, LSP;
David R. Palmer; Steven M. Pause, P.E., LSP; Kaela Sotnik; Douglas Simmons; and
A llison Nightingale. The editorial team at CRC Press provided m e encouragement
and advice throughout this project. M ost o f all, thanks to m y husband Dave, for his
support.
Finally, I dedicate this book to my mothers and my daughters, and m y other
teachers.
Contents
Acknowledgments
2 B asic P r in c ip le s.................................................................................................................13
2.1 The Significance o f N um bers.............................................................................. 13
2.2 Chemistry o f Hazardous Materials..................................................................... 14
2.2.1 Term inology................................................................................................ 15
2.2.1.1 U n its............................................................................................15
2.2.1.2 Charge and Polarity................................................................17
2.2.1.3 Solubility....................................................................................18
2.2.1.4 Sorption......................................................................................19
2.2.1.5 Volatility.................................................................................... 20
2.2.1.6 Common Reactions................................................................ 22
2.2.2 Common Contaminants.......................................................................... 23
2.2.2.1 Alkanes.......................................................................................23
2.2.2.2 Aromatic Hydrocarbons........................................................ 23
2.2.2.3 Chlorinated Methanes, Ethanes,and E thenes.................. 24
2.2.2.4 Ketones....................................................................................... 25
2.2.1.5 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (P A H s).................25
2.2.2.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (P C B s).....................................25
2.2.2.7 Metals and Other Inorganics.............................................. 27
2.3 Overview o f H ydrogeology................................................................................. 29
2.3.1 Hydrologic C y cle...................................................................................... 29
2.3.2 Geologic Formations................................................................................ 30
2.3.3 Groundwater F lo w ....................................................................................31
2.3.4 Contaminant Transport............................................................................35
2.3.4.1 Nonaqueous Phase Liquids...................................................35
2.3.4.1.1 LN A PL.................................................................. 37
2.3.4.1.2 D N A P L ................................................................. 37
2.3.4.2 D issolved Contamination......................................................39
2.4 How Clean is C lean?............................................................................................. 41
2.4.1 Detection L im its....................................................................................... 43
2.4.2 Background L e v e ls...................................................................................43
2.4.3 Regulatory Standards, Criteria, andScreening L e v e ls ................... 43
2.4.4Site-Specific Risk A ssessm ent...............................................................45
2.4.4.1 Clean-Up Levels Based on Potential Human
Health R isk s.............................................................................. 45
2.4.4.1.1 Types o f Health R isk s......................................46
2.4.4.1.2 Acceptable R isk ..................................................47
2.4.4.1.3 Exposure A ssu m p tions.....................................48
2.4.4.1.4 Calculation o f Clean-Up L evels.................... 50
2.4.4.2 Clean-Up Goals Based on Potential Risks
to an Ecosystem ....................................................................... 59
2.4.5 Clean-Up Goals Based on Protection o f Groundwater..................61
2.4.6 Clean-Up Levels Based on Mass R em oval....................................... 63
2.5 Reaction Engineering............................................................................................. 64
2.5.1 Types o f R eactors...................................................................................... 64
2.5.2 Mass B alance............................................................................................. 65
2.5.3 Rate o f R eaction........................................................................................68
2.5.4 Treatability T esting...................................................................................69
2.6 Environmental Regulations...................................................................................70
2.6.1 Term inology.................................................................................................70
2.6.2 Waste Site Rem ediation...........................................................................71
2.6.3 Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and D isposal...................... 74
2.6.3.1 Waste C lassification.................................................................74
2.6.3.2 Land Disposal Restrictions................................................... 76
2.6.3.3 Other RCRA R egulations..................................................... 78
2.6.4 Other Pertinent Regulations....................................................................78
2.6.4.1 Clean Water A ct........................................................................78
2.6.4.2 Safe Drinking Water A c t ...................................................... 80
2.6.4.3 Occupational Safety and Health..........................................81
2.6.4.4 Transportation........................................................................... 81
2.7 Cost Estim ation........................................................................................................ 82
2.7.1 Level o f A ccuracy..................................................................................... 82
2.7.2 Basis for E stim ates...................................................................................82
2.7.3 Components o f Cost E stim ates............................................................ 83
2.7.4 Sources o f Information............................................................................86
2.7.5 Shortcuts for Preliminary Estim ates.................................................... 87
2.7.5.1 Updating Capital C osts...........................................................87
2.7.5.2 Scaling Equipment C osts....................................................... 88
2 .1 .5 3 Estimating Costs as a Percentage o f Capital C o sts.....88
2.7.6 Sensitivity A nalysis...................................................................................88
Problems................................................................................................................................90
R eferences............................................................................................................................ 95
Index .319
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Consider the A ce Solvent Recovery (ASR) facility.* Between 1974 and 1990 the
facility accepted waste solvents for reclamation. The facility had interim status under
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), but never received a final
Part B permit. In 1990, the facility lost interim status due to the failure to obtain
required insurance policies or alternative forms o f liability coverage. Shortly there
after, the owner/operator declared bankruptcy and abandoned the facility. The
owner/operator cannot be located.
In 1990, the state environmental agency removed drums and tanks o f waste solvents
from the site. The removal action also included decontamination o f the building and
removal o f trash and debris from the site. The agency began a site investigation in the
late 1990s. The results o f that investigation are summarized below.
* Note: The Ace Solvent Recovery facility is a hypothetical site, created to illustrate many of the common
problems found at hazardous waste sites. It was created with the help of Kim M. Henry, LSP, and is used
with her permission.
1
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE REMEDIATION
PALMER ROAD
100 200
SCALE IN FEET
A s shown on Figure 1.2, 35 borings were installed on the site, 7 o f which were
com pleted as monitoring wells. Two additional wells were installed off-site.
Soil samples were collected from the unsaturated zone and analyzed for volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), metals, and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Soil samples were also tested using the Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).
Groundwater samples collected from the monitoring w ells were analyzed for
VOCs, SVOCs, metals, and PCBs. Samples were also analyzed for conventional
wastewater parameters used to evaluate and design groundwater treatment systems.
Pumping tests were performed in selected wells.
INTRODUCTION
PALMER ROAD
Figure 1.2 Locations of borings and monitoring wells. Ace Solvent Recovery facility.
Boring logs were used to develop cross sections showing the site stratigraphy, as
shown on Figures 1.3 and 1.4. The surface o f the site is covered with a thin layer
o f fill. A layer o f till, com posed o f fine sand and silt, underlies the fill in the northern
portion o f the site in a layer approximately 20 feet thick; in the southern portion of
the site, the fill is underlain by glacial outwash com posed o f sand and gravel.
Fractured bedrock is present beneath the site and slopes to the south. The bedrock
is highly fractured to a depth approximately 20 feet below the top o f rock. Investi
gations to a greater depth have not been conducted at this site.
Screening tests o f the soil samples collected from the till indicate that approxi
mately 15% of the soil volume exceeded 0.5 in. in size. The material used as backfill
in the former lagoon contained som e debris. An estimated 20% o f the fill in the
lagoon exceeded 0.5 in. in size.
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE REMEDIATION
The soil near the location o f the former tanks and stills is contaminated with PCE
and TCE, as is the soil in the former disposal lagoon. Concentrations o f total VOCs
ranged up to 730 mg/kg. Tables 1.1 and 1.2 sununarize the pertinent data. As
indicated in Table 1.2, several o f the samples failed the TCLP test for VOCs. The
soil near the former transformer operation is contaminated with PCBs at concentra
tions o f up to 158 m g/kg. These data are also provided in Table 1.1.
Water levels were measured in all monitoring w ells during May and August to
evaluate the seasonal fluctuation. Table 1.3 indicates the water table elevations in
the shallow unconsolidated aquifer during the August monitoring period, and
Figure 1.5 shows the groundwater contours. Groundwater elevations were approxi
mately 1 foot higher throughout the site during May. Although groundwater eleva
tions are not provided for the deeper bedrock aquifer, groundwater flow in the
bedrock occurs in the same direction as the unconsolidated aquifer, to the south.
INTRODUCTION
LfGEND
HLL
FRACTURED BEDROCK
The glacial till layer in the northern portion o f the site has a hydraulic conductivity
o f 1 X 10^ cm /sec and an effective porosity o f 10%. Pumping test data indicate that
a w ell fully screened in this material has a radius o f influence o f approximately 25
feet and can yield a maximum flow o f approximately 0.2 gallons per minute (gpm).
The glacial outwash (sand and gravel layer) in the southern portion o f the site
has a hydraulic conductivity o f 1 x 1(T‘ cm /sec and an effective porosity o f 25%.
Pumping test data indicate that a w ell fully screened in this material has a radius o f
influence o f approximately 500 feet and can yield a maximum flow o f approximately
200 gpm.
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE REMEDIATION
PAU4ER ROAD
L£GCNO
Q U0NITCR1NG WELL
SCALE IN FEET
Analytical data from shallow monitoring w ells screened at the bottom o f the
unconsolidated aquifer (indicated with an “S” in the w ell identification number) and
from w ells screened approximately 20 feet below the top o f the bedrock aquifer
(indicated with an “R” in the w ell identification number) are provided in Tables 1.4
and 1.5. Based on these data, chlorinated organic compounds have migrated off-site
in the bedrock aquifer, but are still confined to the site property in the shallow aquifer.
D oes the A SR site need to be cleaned up? How?
Every site presents a unique challenge. Nonetheless, every site can be analyzed
in terms o f a limited set o f fundamental features, and a cost-effective solution based
INTRODUCTION
on those features. Remedial solutions for hazardous waste sites depend on four broad
considerations:
Chapter 2 o f this book provides a framework for the reader to begin this funda
mental analysis. C hapters describes groundwater remediation technologies, and
Chapter 4, soil remediation technologies. The objective o f this book is to help the
reader to develop a multidisciplinary approach to solving hazardous waste problems.
Rules o f thumb are presented throughout this book. Rules o f thumb should always
be applied with a strong dose o f common sense; they are guidelines, based on
practical experience, and not absolute rules.
INTRODUCTION 11
Problems
1.1 Reread the description of the ASR site. Write down all of the technical terms that
you do not understand.
1.2 This exercise is intended to help you to explore and define your personal views on
environmental protection, as personal opinions almost invariably affect the selection
and design of remediation options for hazardous waste sites. Consider a hypothetical
site contaminated with tetrachlorogoop (TCG), a potential human carcinogen which
has caused cancer in laboratory animals at relatively low doses. TCG is leaching
from the soil into the groundwater, which is migrating toward a wetland. Four
remediation options are under consideration for the soil:
• Option 1: Cap the contaminated soil, to prevent people from contacting the soil
and to minimize the leaching of TCG to groundwater. Fence the site. Maintain the
cap and fence indefinitely. Estimated cost: $120,000.
• Option 2: Excavate contaminated soil, including some soil beneath the groundwa
ter table, so that residual contamination is at a level which should not pose a human
health threat or leach to groundwater above trace levels. Dispose of the soil in a
hazardous waste landfill in another state. Backfill the excavation. Estimated cost:
$800,000.
• Option 3: This option is similar to option 2, but the contaminated soil would be
incinerated at an off-site facility to destroy the TCG. Estimated cost: $3.5 million.
• Option 4: This option is similar to option 3, except that the site would be restored
to background conditions rather than to risk-based clean-up levels. (Since TCG is
not a naturally occurring compound, “background conditions” means that no TCG
could be detected in soil that would remain at the site.) Estimated cost: $25 million.
What should be done to clean up the site? Consider two alternative site settings;
determine what should be done in each case, and present your rationale.
[a] The site is on the grounds of a large chemical-manufacturing facility. TCG was
accidentally spilled from a storage tank. The multinational corporation which
owns the facility made marginal profits in the last year.
[b] The site is located behind an elementary school. Contamination resulted from
activities in the maintenance shed. Because of a large influx of new students,
the school department is low on funds and may need to lay off art and music
teachers, close the computer lab, and limit after-school sports. Funding for the
school comes from property taxes in this affluent town; the townspeople have
voted down property tax increases for ten years in a row.
[c] Did your answers for (a) and (b) differ? If so, why?
CHAPTER 2
Basic Principles
The TCG-contaminated site may not need to be cleaned up, and neither option 1 nor
option 2 may be more cost effective based on the estimates presented. The answers
depend upon the accuracy o f the estimates and the number o f significant figures.
Accuracy is a sim ple concept: the more accurate an estimate, the closer it is to
the true value. Increasing accuracy generally requires increasing cost, whether for
collecting more data, running more sophisticated chemical analyses, or spending
more labor hours working on the project.
13
14 THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE REMEDIATION
The concept o f significant figures is less intuitive. Calculated values are often
reported simply as they appear on a calculator or spreadsheet which has been set to
show an arbitrary number o f figures after the decimal point. Those figures may not
all be m eaningful (i.e., significant figures). Depending on the assumptions used in
the calculation, the clean-up level described above could be 6 mg/kg, 6.2 mg/kg, or
6.2389 mg/kg. Thus, the number o f significant figures in that calculation and in the
estimate o f the average concentration on site may determine whether or not the site
must be remediated.
How are significant figures determined? The number o f significant figures is at
least the number o f nonzero digits. Zeros may be significant figures, unless they are
used only to locate the decimal point.' For example, the follow ing numbers all have
three significant figures: 6.24, 0.000233, 1.00 x 10^, and 12,700.
The number o f significant figures in a calculated value — such as the clean-up
level or cost estimates in the examples above — depends on the uncertainty in the
numbers used to calculate that value. Two types o f uncertainty are considered:
absolute uncertainty and relative uncertainty. The absolute uncertainty in a number
is a single unit o f measurement. The relative uncertainty is the ratio o f the absolute
uncertainty to the total quantity.' For example, a pump priced at $1499 may be a
line item in a cost estimate. The absolute uncertainty in that cost is $1, and the
relative uncertainty is 1/1499.
When numbers are added or subtracted, the absolute uncertainty in the result
equals the largest absolute uncertainty among the components.' In less exact terms,
the answer should contain digits only as far as the first column containing significant
figures.^’^ For example, consider the sum o f 1200 + 1399.4 + 0.43. Without consid
ering significant figures, the answer is 2599.83. However, only two figures are
significant and thus the answer is 2600.
When numbers are multiplied or divided, the relative uncertainty in the result
equals the largest relative uncertainty among the components.' Less precisely, the
number o f significant figures in the answer should be the same as the number of
significant figures in the least exact factor.^-^ U sing this guideline, the product of
0.4375, 1.0, and 6 is 3, not 2.625.
When a series o f calculations are performed, the final result should he rounded
o ff to the proper number o f significant figures, and not the intermediate results.
Exact numbers, such as the number o f tanks in a groundwater treatment system or
the number o f soil samples used to calculate an average concentration, are not
considered in determining the number o f significant figures.^-^
Exam ples 2.1 and 2.2 later in this chapter illustrate the use o f significant figures.
2.2.1 Terminology
2.2.1.1 Units
Example 2.1: An analytical laboratory has reported that a groundwater sample con
tains 273 pg/L benzene (chemical formula C^Hj). Convert the units to mg/L, ppm, ppb,
%, M, and x,.
Convert to mg/L:
1000 pg = 1 mg
(273 pg/L) • (1 mg/1000 pg) = 0.273 mg/L
Convert to ppm:
, /, . , V 1 mg contaminant „
1 ppm (by weight) = -----^ ------------------= 0.0001 percent by weight (2.1)
10 mg water
16 THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE REMEDIATION
Convert to ppb:
1 |xg/L = 1 ppb, analogous to the derivation above for ppm
so 273 pg/L = 274 ppb
Conversion to percentage:
From Equation 2.1, 1 ppm = 0.0001%
(0.274 ppm) ■(0.0001%/! ppm) = 0.0000274%
Conversion to M:
The chemical formula of benzene is .
The atomic weight of carbon is 12.011; the atomic weight of hydrogen is 1.0079.
The molecular weight of benzene is 6 • (12.011 + 1.0079) = 78.1134 g/mole.
(0.273 mg/L) • (1 g/1000 mg)/(78.1134 g/mole) = 3.494913926 x 10-® M.
Since the least number of significant figures in the numbers used in this calculation is
3, the molarity should be rounded off to 3.49 x 10-® M.
Conversion to X/t
Assume that the groundwater contains primarily water, which has a chemical formula
of HjO and a molecular weight of (2 • 1.0079) + 15.9994 = 18.0152 g/mole. Using the
density o f water and the molarity of the solution (see above), (3.494913926 x 10-®
moles benzene/L water) • (1 L/998 g water) • (18.0152 g/mole water) = 6.3087748 x
l(h*, or, considering the number of significant figures, 6.31 x l(h*. (Note that the mole
fraction is unitless.)
Example 2.2: An air sample at 25°C and 1 atm contains 210 milligrams of benzene
per cubic meter (mg/m^). Convert this concentration to ppmv, y,-, and p,.
From Example 2.1, the molecular weight of benzene is 78.1134 g/mole. Air is approx
imately 78.1% nitrogen (N2, molecular weight 28.0134 g/mole) by volume and 20.9%
BASIC PRINCIPLES 17
oxygen (O2, molecular weight 31.9988 g/mole). Therefore, the molecular weight of air
is approximately (0.781 • 28.0134) + (0.209 ■31.9988) = 28.566215 g/mole.
Convert to ppmv:
At 25°C and 1 atm, 1 gram mole of an ideal gas has a volume of 22.41 liters. In general.
1 volume o f contaminant
1 ppm v =
10“ volumes air, including contaminant (2 .2)
Then,
volumes benzene
= 60.24702549
volumes air
Convert to y¡:
mol benzene
= 0.0000602
mol air
Convert to p-,:
In general.
P i ~ Pioial y i (2.3)
Charge and polarity are similar properties which help to determine the solubility
o f a compound and its ability to adsorb to solids.
An ion is a charged atom or fragment o f a molecule. M ost inorganic chem icals
dissolved in groundwater are ions. Certain organic compounds can also be ions under
certain conditions. A cation is positively charged because it lacks one or more
electrons from its structure. Examples include Ca^^, Cr+^, and Cri“. An anion is
negatively charged because it carries excess electrons. Examples include Cl” and
18 THE FUNDAMENTALS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE REMEDIATION
Cr203^. The valence state o f an ion describes the degree o f charge (e.g., +2, +3). It
changes in redox reactions. (See the discussion o f redox reactions in Section 2.2.1.6.)
N onionic species can be characterized as polar or nonpolar. In a polar m olecule,
electrons are not shared equally between atoms. A s a result, different parts o f the
m olecule have slight positive and slight negative electronic charges. Certain atoms
are more electronegative than other atoms; such atoms tend to attract electrons and
thus carry a slight negative charge. Electronegativity increases as follows:^
F>0>C1, N>Br>C, H
Polar compounds are more soluble in water than similar nonpolar compounds.
2.2.1.3 Solubility
(2.4)
Pages.
(Exposition) 1
Ire Situation : Implorer 20
IIe Situation : Le Sauveur 23
IIIe Situation : La Vengeance poursuivant le crime 26
IVe Situation : Venger proche sur proche 32
Ve Situation : Traqué 36
VIe Situation : Désastre 40
VIIe Situation : En proie 43
VIIIe Situation : Révolte 45
IXe Situation : Audacieuse tentative 50
Xe Situation : Enlèvement 53
XIe Situation : l’Énigme 56
XIIe Situation : Obtenir 59
XIIIe Situation : Haine de proches 61
XIVe Situation : Rivalité de proches 68
XVe Situation : Adultère meurtrier 72
XVIe Situation : Folie 76
XVIIe Situation : Imprudence fatale 81
XVIIIe Situation : Involontaire crime d’amour 87
XIXe Situation : Tuer un des siens inconnu 92
XXe Situation : Se sacrifier à l’Idéal 98
XXIe Situation : Se sacrifier aux proches 102
XXIIe Situation : Tout sacrifier à la Passion 104
XXIIIe Situation : Devoir sacrifier les siens 106
XXIVe Situation : Rivalité d’inégaux 111
XXVe Situation : Adultère 118
XXVIe Situation : Crimes d’amour 126
XXVIIe Situation : Apprendre le déshonneur d’un être
aimé 133
XXVIIIe Situation : Amours empêchées 138
XXIXe Situation : Aimer ennemi 145
XXXe Situation : L’Ambition 149
XXXIe Situation : Lutte contre Dieu 152
XXXIIe Situation : Jalouse erronée 156
XXXIIIe Situation : Erreur judiciaire 160
XXXIVe Situation : Remords 166
XXXVe Situation : Retrouver 169
XXXVIe Situation : Perdre les siens 171
(Conséquences) 173
ACHEVÉ D’IMPRIMER
Le 10 Novembre 1894
POUR LE
MER CVRE D E F RANC E
PAR
C. RENAUDIE
56, RUE DE SEINE, 56
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LES TRENTE-
SIX SITUATIONS DRAMATIQUES ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.