Shs Research Manuscript

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
SHS-Research-Manuscript
Computer Science (Northwestern Visayan Colleges )
Scan to open on Studocu
Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|41524226
Format:
1. Paper Size : Short (8.5” X11”)
2. Margin : Left: 1.5”, Right : 1”
Top : 1”, Bottom: 1”
3. Font Style : Courier New
3. Font Size : 12
3. Line Spacing : Double
3. Alignment : Justify
Legend:
<Content> Input contents of students in paragraph form or in
statement form.
Color green text – comments or suggestions only (must be hidden
on the actual write-ups.
Color black text – included on the actual write-ups and it is the
absolute value.

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
Research Title
A Research Presented to
the faculty of the Senior High School Department
Information and Communication Technology
NORTHWESTERN VISAYAN COLLEGES
Kalibo, Aklan
In Partial Fulfilment
of the Requirements for the Subject
Research in Daily Life 2
<STUDENT’S NAME>
<STUDENT’S NAME>
<STUDENT’S NAME>
December 2022

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
<Mention the person who helped to make the study

possible and expressing your heartfelt gratitude to them.>
You may mention them in the Mofollowing order:
<God>
<Parents>
<Research Adviser>
<Instructors>
<English critic>
<System Consultant>
<Friends>
Student’s initials:
<R.R.T>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
ABSTRACT
Determination study Significance Relationship Findings
An abstract summarizes, usually in one paragraph of 300 words or

less, the major aspects of the entire paper in a prescribed
sequence that includes:
1) the overall purpose of the study and the research problem(s)

you investigated;
2) the basic design of the study;
3) major findings or trends found as a result of your analysis;

and,
4) a brief summary of your interpretations and conclusions.
The abstract allows you to elaborate upon each major aspect of the
paper and helps readers decide whether they want to read the rest of
the paper. Therefore, enough key information [e.g., summary results,
observations, trends, etc.] must be included to make the abstract
useful to someone who may want to examine your work.

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
APPROVAL SHEET
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i-ii
ABSTRACT iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv-vi
LIST OF TABLE vii
LIST OF FIGURE viii-ix
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION <page no.>
Background of Study <page no.>
Objectives of the Study <page no.>
Conceptual Framework <page no.>
Scope and Limitation of the Study <page no.>
Definition of terms <page no.>
Significance of the Study <page no.>
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE <page no.>
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY <page no.>
Software Development Life Cycle Model <page no.>
Requirements <page no.>
Data Analysis <page no.>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
Design <page no.>
Coding <page no.>
Testing <page no.>
Acceptability <page no.>
User’s Manual <page no.>
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA<page no.>
System Overview <page no.>
Security, functionality and Acceptability
of the System <page no.>
Interface of the main menu <page no.>
Physical Environment <page no.>
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION <page no.>
Summary <page no.>
Conclusion <page no.>
Recommendation <page no.>
REFERENCES <page no.>
APPENDICES <page no.>
APPENDIX A. Work Breakdown Structure <page no.>
APPENDIX B. Questionnaire Evaluation Form <page no.>
APPENDIX C. Concept Paper Supporting Documents <page no.>
APPENDIX D. Request Letter to Conduct a Study <page no.>
APPENDIX E. Memorandum of Understanding <page no.>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
APPENDIX F. Request Letter to Conduct Evaluation of the
System(Ongoing/completed Status of the Study) <page no.>
APPENDIX G. Invitation Letter for the end-user
(Ongoing) <page no.>
APPENDIX H. Request Letter to Conduct Evaluation of the System
(Completed Status of the Study) <page no.>
APPENDIX I. Invitation Letter for the end-user
(Completed) <page no.>
APPENDIX J. Source Code <page no.>
APPENDIX K. User’s Manual <page no.>
APPENDIX L. Curriculum Vitae <page no.>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
LIST OF TABLES
Table1. Level of Acceptability <page no.>
Table2. Level of Functionality <page no.>
Table3. The Acceptability of the System <page no.>
Table4. The Acceptability of the System <page no.>
Table5. Hardware Minimum Requirements <page no.>
Table6. Software Minimum Requirements <page no.>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This provides the background and rationale of the problem and

justification in conducting a study.
Background of the study
This section presents the prevailing circumstances concerning the

research problem. It also discusses the other similar studies and
projects conducted by others to address the same.
It is important to cite here that despite several researches done in

past, there are still problems or gaps in the technology, practice or
information. This is where the statement of the problem is embedded;
hence, conduct of the study is justified.
Recommended contents are as follows:
<Presentation of the Problems>
<The existence of the unsatisfactory condition>
<Rationale of the study>
<Historical background of the study/problem>
<A desire to have a deeper and better understanding of a

situation circumstances or phenomenon>
<A desire of doing a better way something or improving the
product>
<A desire to discover something>
<Geographical condition of the study>
<A link between an introduction/background of the study and

statement of the problem>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
Objectives of the study
Generally the objective of the study aims to develop
<Title of the Study>

Specifically to:
1. Develop a module of:
a) <name of module>;
b) <name of module>;
c) <name of module>;
d) <name of module>;
2. Determine the functionality, security and acceptability of
the system.
3.
Scope and Limitation of the Study
This section explains the scope of the investigation defines

where and when the study conducted and who the subjects were. The
scope sets the delimitations and establishes the boundaries of
the study.
<Defines when, where and who the subject (end users)>
<A brief statement of the general purpose of the study>
<The subject matter and topics studied. The study focused on title>
<The locale of the study; where the data are gathered or entity to
which the data belong>
<The respondents>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
<The period of the study>
Significance of the study
This portion discusses the benefits derived by the target

group from the result of the study.
Hence, this study will be beneficial to the following:
<Community/School>
<Computer Science Department>
<End User>
<Future Researchers>
Definition of Terms
This includes the operational definition of variables

(parameters) and other important terms used in the study that may
have different meanings and interpretations in other fields.
Conceptual Definition. based on the dictionary (proper

citation) Ex. <(Author, year)>
<Term. Meaning> (Alphabetical Order)
Operational Definition. based on your study

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Related literature is composed of discussion of facts and

principles to which the present study is related. These materials
are usually printed and found in books, encyclopaedias,
professional journals, magazines, newspapers and other
publications. (Calderon, 1993)
Foreign
<Contents>
Local
<Contents>
1. What is the problem is all about and how to solved it

2. Provides information about past researches. (findings
justified)
3. Gives you a feeling of confidence since it will serve as
your basis in supporting your findings.
4. Provides information about research methods.
5. Provides findings and conclusion of the past research you
may relate it to your study.
-Findings, ideas
-Generalization (Ex. that plant needs sunlight explain

justify)

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
-Principles
-Conclusion related to the study
-Acknowledge (cite the author) to establish the validity of

evidences.
-Quotations with prescribe format (optional).
-Use the term according to.

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
In this chapter the Software Development Life Cycle Model

will be illustrated and explained its phases based on the study.
Also technical background and specification of the system
revealed.
<Figure/Illustration of Software Development Life Cycle Model>
Phase 1. <Phase Name and Explanation based on your study>
Phase 6 & so on. <Phase Name & Explanation based on your study>
Note: The number of phases may vary based on your Software

Development Life Cycle Model.
System Flow Diagram
In this section the researcher will show and explain the
system flow diagram of the study concisely.

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
<System Flow Diagram Illustration>
<Explanation of System Flow Diagram>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
In this chapter, the researchers will discuss their analysis,

presentation, and interpretation of their data.
Technical Background
In this section the research will reveal the platform,

programming languages, database, and features of the system.
Interface and menus
In this section the researcher will explain the meaning of
color and design of the interface of the system and also explains
the function of all menus of the system.
<Explain the meaning of color and design of the interface>
<Enumerate and explain the functions of all menus in your system>
User Manual
<Step-by-step procedure on how to operate the system by answering

the criteria of evaluation such as; functionality, security, and
acceptability of the system>
Functionality, Security, and Acceptability of the System

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
In this section, the researchers will interpret the data followed

by the table of data accordingly.
Respondent of the study
Respondents are those persons who have been invited to

participate in a particular study and have actually taken part
in the study.
Sampling Technique
Purpose of sampling was used in conducting the survey to

evaluate the acceptability and functionality of the application
Data Gathering Instrument
The questioner prepared contains tree statements for level
of acceptability and rated it as follows:
2 – Acceptability
1 – Not Acceptability
For level of functionality, the respondents were asked to
rate the statement as follows:
2 – Functionality
1 – Not Functionality
For level of security, respondents were asked to rate the
statements using the following scale:
2 – Secure
1 – Not secure

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
Data Analysis. The data gathered were analyzed using the

descriptive statistics such as frequency count, mean and weighted
mean.
Frequency count. For the final testing, the responses of the

respondents were counted based on the questions that formulate in
the evaluation form with the scale of Acceptable and Not
Acceptable as a response to determine the level of acceptability
of the system; While rating scales from Functionality and not
Functionality to evaluate the functionality of the application.
Weighted Mean. The weighted mean was used to determine the

acceptability and functionality of the system based on the rating
scale from 1 to 2.
Mean. This was used to determine the overall results of the

rating based on the weighted means of indicators in determining
the acceptability and functionality of the system.
Functionality of the System
<Content>
Criteria for Level of Functionality
the Functional Not Weighted Interpretation

Functional mean
Functionality (2) (1)
of the
System
1.<Functions of
the System> 30 0 2.00 Functional
2. <Functions
of the System> 30 0 2.00 Functional

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
3. .<Functions
of the System> 0 30 1.00 Not Functional
4. .<Functions
of the System> 0 30 1.00 Not Functional
Mean 1.50 Functional
Legend: Scale Description
1.00 – 1.50 Not Functional
1.51 – 2.00 Functional
Acceptability of the System
<Content>
Criteria for Level of Acceptability
the Acceptable Not

Weighted Interpretation
Acceptability (2) Acceptable mean
of the (1)
System
1. <Content>
30 0 2.00 Acceptable
2. 2. <Content>
3 3. .<Content>
4. .<Content>

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
Mean 2.00 Acceptable
1.00 – 1.50 Not Acceptable
1.51 – 2.00 Acceptable
Security of the System
<Content>
Criteria for Level of Security
the
Acceptability of
Secured Not
Weighted Interpretation
the (2) Secured mean
System (1)
1. <Content>
2. 2. <Content>
3.3. <Content>
4. <Content>
Mean 2.00 Acceptable

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
1.00 – 1.50 Not Acceptable
1.51 – 2.00 Acceptable

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In this chapter, the researchers discuss the summary, conclusions

and recommendations of the study.
Summary
This section summarizes all portions of the study from the

objectives to subjects to methodology and results and findings.
Conclusions
In this section is where you wrap up your ideas and leave the
reader with a strong final impression.
Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusion of the project study

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
REFERENCES
Under the American Psychological Association (APA) Style,
all entries are arranged alphabetically, with the family name
first of the first author (in case of multi- authored source)
followed by the initials of the first names and middle names of
the co-authors, all in uppercase. List all entries in hanging
indention, single- spaced. See samples below.
APPENDIX A
Work Breakdown Structure
In this section the researcher will show an illustration on how

they formulated and constructed their system successfully
APPENDIX B
I. Questionnaire Evaluation Form

II. Evaluation Criteria
APPENDIX C
Concept Paper Supporting Documents
APPENDIX C.2
Technical Problems
APPENDIX C.1
Prior Art Search Report
APPENDIX C.3
Synthesis
APPENDIX C.4
Proposed Solutions
APPENDIX C.5
Comparison Matrix between Prior Arts and Proposed Research

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
APPENDIX C.6
Methodology
APPENDIX C.7
Work Plan
APPENDIX C.8
Budgetary Outlay
APPENDIX C. 9
Expected Output
APPENDIX D
Request Letter to Conduct a Study
< In this section the researchers showed the photocopy of request

letter to the end-user to conduct a study>
APPENDIX E
Certificate of active participation during Pre-Oral Defense
APPENDIX F
Certificate of active participation during the Final Presentation
APPENDIX G
Source Code
APPENDIX H
User’s Manual
APPENDIX I
Evidence of Evaluation
APPENDIX J
Thesis Adviser’s Certification
APPENDIX K
Pictures

lOMoARcPSD|41524226
APPENDIX L
CURRICULUM VITAE

Shs Research Manuscript

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Shs Research Manuscript

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

lOMoARcPSD|41524226

Computer Science (Northwestern Visayan Colleges )

Scan to open on Studocu

Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)

<Mention the person who helped to make the study

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)

Determination study Significance Relationship Findings

An abstract summarizes, usually in one paragraph of 300 words or

1) the overall purpose of the study and the research problem(s)

2) the basic design of the study;

3) major findings or trends found as a result of your analysis;

4) a brief summary of your interpretations and conclusions.

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)

TABLE OF CONTENTS iv-vi

LIST OF TABLE vii

LIST OF FIGURE viii-ix

INTRODUCTION <page no.>

Background of Study <page no.>

Objectives of the Study <page no.>

Conceptual Framework <page no.>

Scope and Limitation of the Study <page no.>

Definition of terms <page no.>

Significance of the Study <page no.>

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE <page no.>

METHODOLOGY <page no.>

Software Development Life Cycle Model <page no.>

Requirements <page no.>

Data Analysis <page no.>

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)

Design <page no.>

Coding <page no.>

Testing <page no.>

Acceptability <page no.>

User’s Manual <page no.>

ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA<page no.>

System Overview <page no.>

Security, functionality and Acceptability

of the System <page no.>

Interface of the main menu <page no.>

Physical Environment <page no.>

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION <page no.>

Summary <page no.>

Conclusion <page no.>

Recommendation <page no.>

REFERENCES <page no.>

APPENDICES <page no.>

APPENDIX A. Work Breakdown Structure <page no.>

APPENDIX B. Questionnaire Evaluation Form <page no.>

APPENDIX C. Concept Paper Supporting Documents <page no.>

APPENDIX D. Request Letter to Conduct a Study <page no.>

APPENDIX E. Memorandum of Understanding <page no.>

Downloaded by Dhannamee Bentoy (dhannamaeebdao@gmail.com)

APPENDIX F. Request Letter to Conduct Evaluation of the

System(Ongoing/completed Status of the Study) <page no.>

APPENDIX G. Invitation Letter for the end-user

(Ongoing) <page no.>

APPENDIX H. Request Letter to Conduct Evaluation of the System

(Completed Status of the Study) <page no.>

APPENDIX I. Invitation Letter for the end-user

(Completed) <page no.>

APPENDIX J. Source Code <page no.>