Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Pancreatic Cancer With Special Focus On Topical Issues and Surgical Techniques 1St Edition Sun Whe Kim Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Pancreatic Cancer With Special Focus On Topical Issues and Surgical Techniques 1St Edition Sun Whe Kim Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/pancreatic-cancer-with-special-
focus-on-topical-issues-and-surgical-techniques-kim/
https://textbookfull.com/product/gastric-cancer-with-special-
focus-on-studies-from-japan-akiko-shiotani/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cancer-genetics-and-
therapeutics-focus-on-phytochemicals-madhumita-roy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/claims-for-secession-and-
federalism-a-comparative-study-with-a-special-focus-on-spain-
alberto-lopez-basaguren/
Multimodality Management of Borderline Resectable
Pancreatic Cancer 1st Edition Matthew H.G. Katz
https://textbookfull.com/product/multimodality-management-of-
borderline-resectable-pancreatic-cancer-1st-edition-matthew-h-g-
katz/
https://textbookfull.com/product/atlas-of-head-and-neck-
endocrine-disorders-special-focus-on-imaging-and-imaging-guided-
procedures-1st-edition-luca-giovanella/
https://textbookfull.com/product/proceedings-of-topical-issues-
in-international-political-geography-radomir-bolgov/
https://textbookfull.com/product/minimally-invasive-surgical-
techniques-for-cancers-of-the-gastrointestinal-tract-a-step-by-
step-approach-joseph-kim/
Sun-Whe Kim
Hiroki Yamaue
Editors
Pancreatic Cancer
123
Pancreatic Cancer
Sun-Whe Kim • Hiroki Yamaue
Editors
Pancreatic Cancer
With Special Focus on Topical
Issues and Surgical Techniques
Editors
Sun-Whe Kim Hiroki Yamaue
Department of Surgery Department of Surgery
Seoul National University Wakayama Medical University
College of Medicine Wakayama
Seoul Japan
Republic of Korea
v
Contents
1 Epidemiology������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 3
Young-Joo Won
2 Molecular Alterations in Pancreatic Cancer ������������������������������� 11
Toru Furukawa
3 Pathological Classification�������������������������������������������������������������� 25
Yue Xue, Michelle D. Reid, and Nazmi Volkan Adsay
4 Controversial Issues in Pathological Diagnosis ���������������������������� 53
Akio Yanagisawa
5 Operative Specimen Handling and Evaluation
of Resection Margins ���������������������������������������������������������������������� 67
Caroline Sophie Verbeke
6 Tumor Markers�������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 89
Ji Kon Ryu
vii
viii Contents
Index�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 469
List of Editors
Editors
Associate Editors
Assistant Editor
xi
Contributors
xiii
xiv Contributors
Y.-J. Won
Department of Cancer Registration and Statistics,
National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
e-mail: astra67@ncc.re.kr
Incidence ASR
a Male
Pancreatic cancer
7.7+
4.7-7.7
2.5-4.7
1.5-2.5
<1.5
No Data
Incidence ASR
b
Female
Pancreatic cancer
5.2+
3.5–5.2
2.2–3.5
0.91–2.2
<0.91
No Data
Fig. 1.1 (a) Incidence of pancreatic cancer in men. (b) Incidence of pancreatic cancer in women
1 Epidemiology 5
World
Pancreas
Year Estimated number of new cancers (all ages) Male Female Both sexes
2012 178161 159711 337872
ages < 65 74063 49149 123212
ages > = 65 104098 110562 214660
World
Pancreas
Number of new cancers in 2025 (all ages)
Male 254874
Female 224562
World
Pancreas
Number of cancers in 2025 (all ages) - Both sexes
479436
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 550000
Fig. 1.2 Incidence prediction of pancreatic cancer in revision. The numbers were computed using age-specific
2025 (Population forecasts were extracted from the rates and corresponding populations for 10 age-groups)
United Nations, World Population prospects, the 2012
6 Y.-J. Won
Mortality ASR
a Male
Pancreatic cancer
7.4+
4.5–7.4
2.5–4.5
1.4–2.5
<1.4
No Data
Mortality ASR
b
Female
Pancreatic cancer
5.1+
3.5–5.1
2.2–3.5
0.88–2.2
<0.88
No Data
Fig. 1.3 (a) Mortality of pancreatic cancer in men. (b) Mortality of pancreatic cancer in women
1 Epidemiology 7
World
Pancreas
Year Estimated number of cancer deaths (all ages) Male Female Both sexes
2012 173827 156564 330391
ages < 65 66117 42108 108225
ages > = 65 107710 114456 222166
World
Pancreas
Number of cancer deaths in 2025 (all ages)
Male 249979
Female 220815
World
Pancreas
Number of cancer deaths in 2025 (all ages) - Both sexes
470794
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 550000
Population forecasts were extracted from the United Nations, World Population prospects, the 2012 revision.
The numbers were computed using age-specific rates and corresponding populations for 10 age-groups.
Fig. 1.4 Mortality prediction of pancreatic cancer in revision. The numbers were computed using age-specific
2025 (Population forecasts were extracted from the rates and corresponding populations for 10 age-groups)
United Nations, World Population prospects, the 2012
8 Y.-J. Won
1.1.3 Survival is about 12%. For stage IIA pancreatic cancer, the
5-year survival rate is about 7%. For stage IIB
It is difficult to perform comparisons of pancreatic cancer, the 5-year survival rate is about 5%. The
cancer survival between countries due to differ- 5-year survival rate for stage III pancreatic can-
ences in methodologies and criteria for including cer is about 3%. Patients with stage IV pancreatic
patients in analyses. Nevertheless, survival rates cancer have a 5-year survival rate of about 1%.
following surgical resection for pancreatic cancer Among men with pancreatic cancer, 22% sur-
range from 11 to 20 months. The 5-year survival vive for at least 1 year, and a previous study on the
ranges from 7% to 25% [3]. Patients with unre- age-standardized net survival for patients diag-
sectable locally advanced disease (stage III) have nosed with pancreatic cancer during 2010–2011 in
a median survival of 6–11 months [4]. Patients England and Wales predicted that this value may
who have metastatic disease have a median sur- decrease to 4% for patients surviving for 5 years or
vival of only 2–6 months [5]. more [7]. Survival rates for women are similar,
In the USA, there has been a steady increase in with 20% surviving for 1 year or more and 3%
the survival rate for most cancers, whereas very predicted to survive for at least 5 years. Survival
slow advances have been observed for pancreatic rates of pancreatic cancer patients continue to
cancer, for which the 5-year relative survival is cur- decline gradually beyond 5 years after diagnosis.
rently 7%. These low rates ensue in part because Just 1% of both men and women are predicted to
more than one-half of cases are diagnosed at a dis- survive their disease for 10 years or more, as
tant stage for which the 5-year survival is 2%. The shown by age-standardized net survival for
distribution of pancreatic cancer by stage is local- patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during
ized, 9%; regional, 28%; and distant, 53% [6]. 2010–2011 in England and Wales [7].
In general, patients who can be treated with
surgery tend to live longer than those not treated
with surgery. Information from the National 1.1.4 Risk Factors
Cancer Database based on individuals diagnosed
with exocrine pancreatic cancer between 1992 An individual’s risk of developing pancreatic
and 1998 shows that the 5-year survival rate for cancer depends on many factors, including age,
those with stage IA pancreatic cancer is about genetics, and exposure to risk factors (including
14%. For stage IB cancer, the 5-year survival rate some potentially avoidable lifestyle factors).
1 Epidemiology 9
analysis of 456 PDAs in 2016 [5]. There also are pathway including CTNNB1; those functioning
some independent studies published elsewhere in transforming growth factor beta (TGFb) path-
including one by Wang et al. regarding exome way including SMAD3, TGFBR1, TFGBR2,
analyses of 15 PDA cell lines in 2012 [6] and the ACVR1B, and ACVR2A; and those functioning in
other by Witkiewicz et al. regarding exome anal- phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway
ysis of 109 PDAs in 2015 [7]. including PIK3CA and PTEN [4, 5].
MAPK1/ERK translocates into nucleus and acti- plays an important role in determining cells’ fate
vates transcription factors that induce expression whether they survive through DNA repair or die
of effector genes functioning in DNA replication, by apoptosis to avoid accumulation of mutations
RNA maintenance, transcription and translation, caused by DNA damage [19]. Mutations in TP53
cell cycle and mitosis, transporting, and cell pro- are found in 60–75% of PDAs. Mutations in
liferation [11]. Activity of MAPK1/ERK is nega- TP53 are either frameshift mutations or missense
tively regulated by dual specificity phosphatases mutations within a DNA-binding domain of p53.
(DUSPs), most directly by DUSP6 [12]. DUSP6 The missense mutation in p53 abrogates DNA-
forms a negative feedback loop with MAPK1/ binding activity, which results in dysfunction of
ERK, i.e., an activation of MAPK1/ERK induces its transcription-activating activity. These muta-
expression of DUSP6 that inactivates MAPK1/ tions have been thought as loss-of-function muta-
ERK; therefore, MAPK1/ERK activity is tightly tions, which definitely is the case in frameshift
regulated through this negative feedback loop mutations; however, a recent investigation indi-
[13]. However in some PDAs, expression of cates that missense mutations in p53, at least
DUSP6 is downregulated mostly by aberrant some of them, can modulate functions of chro-
methylation; hence, the negative feedback loop matin remodeling proteins and then enhance
between MAPK1/ERK and DUSP6 is abrogated, transcriptions of certain genes that promote
which results in constitutive activation of malignant phenotypes of cancer, which indeed
MAPK1/ERK and expression of genes impli- are gain-of-function mutations [20]. p53 proteins
cated in malignant phenotypes of PDAs [14]. with missense mutations are refractory to
BRAF encodes B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/ MDM2-mediated proteasomal destruction and,
threonine kinase that functions as a MAP3K in therefore, accumulate in the nucleus and appeared
MAPK pathway. BRAF is mutated in some of as overexpressed by immunohistochemistry [21].
PDAs that harbor the wild-type KRAS; therefore,
mutations in BRAF and KRAS are mutually
exclusive in PDAs [15]. Most mutations of 2.5 CDKN2A
BRAF in human cancers including PDAs are
observed as a V600E mutation, which turns the CDKN2A encodes the cyclin-dependent kinase
kinase constitutively active [16]. Vemurafenib is inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A)/p16. CDKN2A/p16
developed to target cancers with the BRAFV600E plays a role in attenuation of cell cycle progres-
mutation [17]. sion from G1 phase to S phase. For progression
of the cell cycle, the cyclin-dependent kinase 4
(CDK4) is activated by binding with cyclin D;
2.4 TP53 subsequently the activated CDK4 phosphorylates
retinoblastoma protein (RB), and then, the phos-
TP53 encodes p53, a transcription factor involved phorylated RB dissociates from the E2F tran-
in DNA damage response [18]. DNA damage scription factor 1 (E2F1), which facilitates
provoked by irradiation and/or reactive oxygen nuclear translocation of E2F1 and expression of
species is sensed by and activates the ataxia tel- target genes necessary for the cell cycle progres-
angiectasia mutated (ATM), a serine/threonine sion [22]. CDKN2A inhibits the activation of
protein kinase, that phosphorylates p53. The CDK4 by hampering its binding to cyclin D and,
phosphorylated p53 dissociates from the mouse therefore, attenuates cell cycle progression.
double minute 2 homologue (MDM2), an CDKN2A is mutated and deleted homozygously
E3-ubiquitin ligase, and binds DNA to induce in 25% and 10% of PDAs, respectively [4].
expression of target genes that have a consensus Moreover, CDKN2A is epigenetically silenced by
binding sequence in their promoters. Most of aberrant hypermethylation in 50–60% of PDAs;
these target genes of p53 encode proteins involved hence, CDKN2A is functionally disrupted in
in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis almost all PDAs, which presumably contributes
including p21, p27, BAX, PUMA, etc., which to uncontrolled cell cycle progression [23].
14 T. Furukawa
helps to bring RAD51, a RecA homologue in pancreatic cancer is beta catenin. The gene
eukaryotes, and plays a vital role in strand inva- encoding beta catenin is CTNNB1, which is
sion in the homologous recombination, to damag- mutated in ~10% of PDAs. Beta catenin is a
ing sites in DNA for its proper function [33]. ATM cadherin- associated protein in the adherence
encodes the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) complex that mediates cell-cell junction. Beta
that is a kinase and functions in sensing of a DNA catenin is also a cytoplasmic protein that can
damage. ATM associates with a damaged site and function as a signal mediator, which is tightly
phosphorylates some proteins including the regulated through formation of a complex with
checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and the checkpoint axin and the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)
kinase 2 (CHK2), which eventually results in cell protein. The complex of beta catenin-axin-APC
cycle arrest for DNA repair. PALB2 encodes the associates with glycogen synthase kinases that
partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) that, as phosphorylate and render beta catenin for
this name suggests, is co-expressed with ubiquitin-proteosomal destruction. Wnt signal-
BRCA2 in nuclear foci when cells are irradiated, ing suppresses the complex formation and facil-
which indicates that PALB2 also participats in itates free beta catenin. The free beta catenin
DNA repair [34]. Since most of mutations of these translocates into the nucleus and functions as a
genes are loss-of-function mutations, a proper transcriptional coactivator [37]. Mutations in
repair of DNA cannot be pursued, and, therefore, CTNNB1 cause to generate a protein refractory
secondary mutations accumulate in cells with to the ubiquitin-mediated destruction, which
mutations of these genes. results in facilitation of the transcriptional
coactivator activity of beta catenin [38]. By
immunohistochemistry, a mutated beta catenin
2.9 RNA Processing Genes is often found as an overexpressed protein in the
nucleus.
Genes encoding RNA processing and/or splicing
factors including SF3A1, SF3B1, U2AF1,
U2AF2, RBM6, and RBM10 are mutated in ~16% 2.11 Phosphatidylinositol
of PDAs [5]. SF3A1, SF3B1, U2AF1, and U2AF2 3-Kinase (PI3K) Pathway
encode components of U2AF, a small nuclear Genes
ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) essential for proper
splicing of pre-messenger RNA. Most of muta- Genes encoding molecules implicated in PI3K
tions in these genes are missense mutations in a pathway including PIK3CA and PTEN are
functional domain and are demonstrated to func- mutated in ~5% of PDAs. PI3K pathway
tion as a dominant negative protein that facilitates plays a fundamental role in cell growth.
immature splicing [35]. RBM6 and RBM10 Phosphatidylinositol (PI) is a glycerophospho-
encode RNA-binding molecules implicated in lipid molecule sitting in the cell membrane. PI is
alternative splicing. Mutations of these genes are phosphorylated by kinases on specific hydroxyl
mostly loss-of-function mutations, which is dem- groups, PI-3, PI-4, and PI-5, and functions as a
onstrated to be implicated in dysfunction of alter- signal mediator. PIK3CA encodes the
native splicing of some key molecules for phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase,
oncogenesis like NUMB [36]. catalytic subunit alpha. Mutations in PIK3CA
mostly affect codon 545 or 1047, which causes
upregulation of kinase activity of its protein
2.10 Wnt Pathway Genes product. PTEN encodes the phosphatase and ten-
sin homologue, a phosphatase specific for PI-3.
Wnt pathway is an important signaling pathway in Mutations in PTEN are mostly frameshift or non-
development of multicellular organisms. One of sense mutations that result in loss of function of
important mediators in Wnt pathway implicated in its product.
16 T. Furukawa