Police Suicide Is Police Culture Killing

Our Officers 1st Edition Ronald A. Rufo

Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/police-suicide-is-police-culture-killing-our-officers-1st-
edition-ronald-a-rufo/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Measuring Police Subcultural Perceptions A Study of

Frontline Police Officers in China 1st Edition Zheng
Chen (Auth.)

https://textbookfull.com/product/measuring-police-subcultural-
perceptions-a-study-of-frontline-police-officers-in-china-1st-
edition-zheng-chen-auth/

Police misconduct : a global perspective Roberson

https://textbookfull.com/product/police-misconduct-a-global-
perspective-roberson/

Police Leadership : Changing Landscapes Pauline Ramshaw

https://textbookfull.com/product/police-leadership-changing-
landscapes-pauline-ramshaw/

Delivering police services effectively First Edition

Heyer

https://textbookfull.com/product/delivering-police-services-
effectively-first-edition-heyer/
Police and Society 7th edition Kenneth Novak

https://textbookfull.com/product/police-and-society-7th-edition-
kenneth-novak/

Police and Society in Brazil 1st Edition Vicente Riccio

https://textbookfull.com/product/police-and-society-in-
brazil-1st-edition-vicente-riccio/

The Clandestine History of the Kovno Jewish Ghetto

Police First Edition Anonymous Members Of The Kovno
Jewish Ghetto Police

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-clandestine-history-of-the-
kovno-jewish-ghetto-police-first-edition-anonymous-members-of-
the-kovno-jewish-ghetto-police/

Barron s Police Officer Exam Tenth Edition Lombardo

https://textbookfull.com/product/barron-s-police-officer-exam-
tenth-edition-lombardo/

Effective Police Supervision Study Guide Larry S.

Miller

https://textbookfull.com/product/effective-police-supervision-
study-guide-larry-s-miller/
 Police
Suicide
Is Police Culture Killing
Our Officers?
 Police
Suicide
Is Police Culture Killing
Our Officers?
Edited by
Ronald A. Rufo, EdD

Boca Raton London New York

CRC Press is an imprint of the

Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

No claim to original U.S. Government works

Version Date: 20150622

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4822-3500-5 (eBook - PDF)

This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot
assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication
and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any
copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.

Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or
hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information stor-
age or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.

For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copy-
right.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that pro-
vides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photo-
copy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.

Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com
 I would like to dedicate this book to my granddaughter Alinah, who
makes me very happy and is very special in so many ways. I love being
her Papa. Even at a very young age, she is thoughtful and considerate.
To my three wonderful daughters Rita, Laura, and Cara, who touch
my heart, each in a different way, and who I love with all of my heart.
To my Dad, who influenced me in so many ways and who passed
away at a young age, I know he would have been proud of me.
To my beautiful wife Debbie, who has always been supportive
and patient in my effort to complete my book and to get my
crusade about the importance of being emotionally stable to
all police officers on and off the job. Debbie has always been
my inspiration to reach for the stars and never look back.
Contents

Foreword ix
Acknowledgments xiii
Editor xix
Introduction xxi

1 Welcome to the Police Academy 1

RON RUFO

2 Police and the Three Arenas of Social Interaction 21

KENT WILLIAMS

3 Tell Me That I Am Wrong: Who We Are versus

Who We Ought to Be 27
THOMAS CLINE

4 Police Stress and Burnout 55

RON RUFO

5 Trauma, Critical Incidents, Risk Factors, Acute

Stress, and PTSD 87
RON RUFO

6 Nine Personal Issues That Can Be Detrimental

to an Officer 123
RON RUFO

7 Emotional Health and Concerns: A Cry for Help

Is the First Indication That There Is a Problem 141
RON RUFO

8 Suicide Is Never a Dry Run 167

BOBBY SMITH

vii
viii Contents

9 Police Suicide 187

RON RUFO

10 Law Enforcement Suicide Prevention 215

JOHN MARX

11 Conclusion 239
RON RUFO

Index 243
Foreword

By Robert E. Douglas, Jr.

When Dr. Ron Rufo (Chicago police officer) asked me to write this foreword
for his book, I was extremely humbled by his request. As executive director
and founder for the National Police Suicide Foundation since it was founded
in 1997, I have traveled worldwide speaking about mental health suicide pre-
vention for our law enforcement officers along with our military personnel.
What I have seen should be alarming to law enforcement leadership in our
country. We have been seeing over the past 25 years an ever-increasing con-
cern for line officers dealing with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as
well as officer-related suicides to every in-line-of-duty death according to the
2014 report put out by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, on
June 6, 2014 (IACP National Symposium on Law Enforcement Officer Suicide
and Mental Health: Breaking the Silence on Law Enforcement Suicides).
With these pressing issues facing the 18,000 law enforcement agencies
in our country, it is extremely important that we focus on preventive mea-
sures by our administrative and supervisory training programs to address
them within our ranks. Dr. Rufo has aggressively addressed all these issues
and much more in his book, Police Suicide: Is Police Culture Killing Our
Officers?
It is my professional opinion that the greater enemy that our officers
struggle with each day is not the suspect on the street but instead the enemy
that lives with officers attempting to effectively address their emotional
trauma that impacts their daily lives! Dr. Rufo provides the psychological
and departmental roadmap in helping leadership as well as the officers to
navigate through this maze of emotional and physical issues they will face
each day while on the street as well as at home. I strongly believe that Dr. Rufo
is a true “difference maker” (as John Maxwell, author of numerous books
on leadership, would say), as he addresses our leadership issue in charting
the course for law enforcement agencies to make great decisions on helping
and assisting their personnel strive to serve their communities throughout
this country. Never forget that change is unavoidable! The only thing certain
about our tomorrow is the decision we make today.
Dr. Rufo’s book illustrates that such positive and creative change must
happen first within us before it can happen around us!

ix
x Foreword

By John Mayer, PhD

The suicide and attempted suicide of police officers is a mental health concern
that has been neglected for too many years. The stigma of discussing mental
health is slowly, but steadily, being lifted in many segments of our society
and in many occupations, but in those occupations that carry with them the
duties of protecting others, the idea of attending to one’s own mental health
remains heavily stigmatized. There are many reasons given for the denial of
mental health care in these professions, and some of them have been the peer
culture within the occupation, the role models available to the workers, inef-
fective coping mechanisms, and poor preventive measures within the occu-
pation. In the culture of the police officer, one of the most prevailing reasons
for the inattention to emotional or personal self-care is the mind-set among
their fellow police peers that such concerns identify them as weak and not fit
to handle the rigors of the job. Appearing weak in front of their fellow officers
makes them vulnerable, and being vulnerable will get them ridiculed and
shunned by the other officers.
In police work, in addition to these prevailing forces keeping police
officers away from mental health prevention, Rufo, in this book, delves into
specific forces in the lives of police officers that create a peer culture that
puts low priority on mental health prevention and the officer’s emotional life.
Sadly, in the 25 weeks of training in the police academy, there is no attention
paid to the coping mechanisms needed to handle the large amount of stress
and negativity that the police officer faces on the job each day. This formal
personal preparation should be an integral part of the police officers’ tool-
kits as they approach their jobs each day. The lack of formal preparation not
only perpetuates the stigma against mental health services but it also leaves
the officer no other opportunity to learn personal coping mechanisms other
than through peer observation, informal mentoring, on-the-job training, or
fending for one’s self through some other means such as investing in a book
like this to augment training. And, of course, it also opens up the great pos-
sibility that the police officer will cope with strenuous work through negative
behaviors and emotions.
This is where Rufo’s book becomes invaluable as a tool for police officers
because it supplements what prevention they are getting elsewhere. For that
reason, this book is a must read for every officer, every administrator, every
chief everywhere to cope with the complexities of modern police work.
Let me talk about this book for it is not only a book for police officers
but also a book for police administrators, municipal officials, police family
members, and everyone who wants to understand the pressures and cop-
ing mechanisms of a municipal police officer. The book is well researched,
thorough, well presented, and well organized. It covers all one would need
to know to understand the problem of police suicide. Police Suicide: Is Police
Foreword xi

Culture Killing Our Officers? takes us from what the cadet experiences in the
police academy through the daily job stress and even to the aftermath of a
police suicide. No other book is as comprehensive as this. Rufo gives us a look
into the police academy and the training that cadets receive. Here we get our
first glimpse of the fact that the personal life of police officers is not addressed
nor are there coping mechanisms or emotional preparedness for this job that
put so much strain on the psyche of officers.
Some time ago, I wrote a book on the lives of Catholic priests titled Grace
under Pressure. As a result of an extensive research project where I inter-
viewed priests from across the United States, I learned a great deal about
what it takes to be a successful Catholic priest. What I learned in that research
reminds me of the preparation and lifestyle of police officers. At that time,
I discovered that priests were not receiving training in the emotional tools
necessary to cope with their roles as leaders of often multimillion-dollar
corporations so soon after their ordination. With the shortage of priests in
the Catholic Church, a priest is quickly thrust early in his career into the
highly stressful position of being a pastor of an organization that can have a
budget upward of millions of dollars, a building or buildings that often need
constant repair and care, or a congregation teeming with spiritual needs, and
he is often alone in doing this as the diocese (name for the district adminis-
tration) doesn’t have the manpower to assign an assistant priest to help out.
In fact, I often found one priest heading multiple parishes alone, so multiply
this stress by three or four. The most glaring aspect of this research, again at
that time, was that the priest received no training on business administra-
tion or finance. And, as I pointed out, they were not given preparation on
how to cope with all this stress. Even more remarkable is that within the
seminary and ordination process, the priests’ natural coping resources, their
families, were purposely and directly discouraged from being a part of the
priests’ lives. To badly paraphrase a statement made at the ordination cer-
emony, “You give your sons now to the work of the Lord and they are no
longer yours but ours. So, alone and coping with tremendous pressures, they
are not trained to handle and stripped of the logical coping mechanism that
groomed one to follow this calling (the family). It is no wonder many priests
cannot cope with such pressures. In fact, it is remarkable that so many of
these men do make this all work for them.”
Why this comparison? I outline this here as a strong example of exactly
what we face in the profession of being a police officer. The same elements
setting up the police officer to fail, to crack under this pressure, are in the
training process, the peer culture of police, and the on-the-job experiences
of police officers. We need to do a better job of preparing police for this stress
and a better job caring for our officers throughout their careers. If we do so,
we will have better police officers and we will be better served as a society.
This book is a primer in that direction.
xii Foreword

I have known Ron Rufo for many years. Our paths have crossed in
our work and often in our personal life. In every encounter, I have always
observed Ron to rise to the occasion. If it was on duty, Ron was the consum-
mate professional police officer. If it was personal, Ron was affable, engaging,
and positive. What this tells me about this man is that he copes with life well.
He has a wide bandwidth of personal interests, a rich and full family life, and
a passionate professional life. Ron and I have always been kindred spirits in
all those ways. I understand Ron and his approach to his job and to life itself.
I can’t think of a better authority to author such an important book than
Dr. Ronald Rufo Chicago Police Department. He has been on the streets as
a Chicago police officer for years, he studied and obtained a doctorate, he is
a passionate family man, and he is a well-balanced, emotionally stable indi-
vidual. All of these are the credibility that Ron brings to this book.
Acknowledgments

To Julie Diaz, who is not only an exceptional proofreader but also a dear
friend who has been committed and steadfast in her effort to make this book a
success. She has proven to be an invaluable teammate in preparing this man-
uscript for publication. Julie has worked extremely hard in correcting and
organizing the many pages of script that I have sent her, without ever com-
plaining. Her suggestions were clearly remarkable and well thought out. She
has assisted me in putting my message on police suicide and police culture in
a clear and organized perspective. She must have gone through a few red pens
on my manuscript, and I could not begin to thank her for her dedication to
my book. Thanks again, Julie. You truly are the best!
To the following four contributors of this book, who agreed to write their
own chapters:

• Kent Williams is an insightful and dynamic personality in law

enforcement who takes a proactive approach to the problems police
officers face on a daily basis. Thank you for writing Chapter 2.
• Tom Cline, a dear friend of mine with a gentle and kind disposi-
tion, has a tremendous outlook on life. He has taught many recruits
about the importance of emotional wellness. Thank you for writing
Chapter 3.
• Dr. Bobby Smith, truly an inspirational person and speaker who I
have had the pleasure to meet. He is in every sense of the word a
policeman’s policeman. He is renowned for his dedication and cour-
age after facing a devastating injury in the line of duty as a Louisiana
State Trooper. Chapter 8 is a chapter taken from Dr. Bobby Smith’s
book The Will to Survive.
• John Marx, a well-known authority in the field of suicide prevention.
Thank you for writing Chapter 10.

I want to personally acknowledge every person in this book who has contrib-
uted to making this book a success. To the many experts in the health-care

xiii
xiv Acknowledgments

profession, the clergy, and the law enforcement who I personally interviewed
and who were gracious enough to share their thoughts, opinions, and insight
for my book on the effect of police culture as it relates to police suicide. Again,
my sincere thanks to everyone.

Health-Care Professionals

• Denis Adams, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, is a clinical thera-

pist for the professional Counseling Service Employee Assistance
Program (EAP) of the Chicago Police Department.
• Dr. Carl Alaimo, Sr., retired after 26½ years of service as the director
and chief psychologist of the Mental Health Services Department of
Cermak Health Services of Cook County, Illinois. Dr. Alaimo has
worked closely with the State of Illinois Division of Mental Health,
the Circuit Court of Cook County–Criminal Justice Division, and the
Chicago Police Department Crisis Intervention Team. He currently
is teaching at the Cook County Training Institute.
• Dr. Alexis Artwohl is a well-respected expert in the field of police
suicide. She is an internationally recognized behavioral science con-
sultant working with law enforcement as a trainer, researcher, and
author. She has written a book entitled Deadly Force Encounters:
What Cops Need to Know to Mentally and Physically Prepare for and
Survive a Gunfight.
• Dr. Frank Campbell is compassionate and concerned about the
many survivors of police suicide. He works with the survivors and
victims of attempted suicide, and he is the former executive direc-
tor of the Baton Rouge Crisis Intervention Center and the Crisis
Center Foundation in Louisiana. He is currently senior consultant
for Campbell and Associates Consulting where he consults with
communities on forensic suicidology cases. He introduced his Active
Postvention Model, most commonly known as the Local Outreach
to Suicide Survivors (LOSS) Team.
• Dr. Jack Digliani is a well-known authority on police culture and
the problems and issues that officers experience. He is a licensed
psychologist and a former law enforcement officer. Dr. Digliani
has a wealth of knowledge and experience and is an expert in
the field of police psychology and police peer support. He is the
author of Reflections of a Police Psychologist and has written the
Police and Sheriff Peer Support Team Manual, the Law Enforcement
Critical Incident Handbook, and the Law Enforcement Marriage and
Relationship Guidebook.
Acknowledgments xv

• Dr. Marla Friedman has a vision to incorporate emotional wellness

to the many police chiefs throughout the nation. It is an honor and
pleasure to have her thoughts in this book. She is a licensed clinical
psychologist and has written an article about the complex subject of
police suicide for Command Magazine, a publication of the Illinois
Association of Chiefs of Police.
• Bruce Handler, MD, has been involved in Crisis Intervention Team
(CIT) training of more than 6000 law enforcement and correctional
officers in Illinois.
• Dr. John Mayer is a very good friend. I appreciate his time and effort
in making my book a success. He is a prolific author of 20 books
about mental health issues and a well-known psychologist with more
than 30 years of experience in the Chicagoland area. He is a consul-
tant to many law enforcement agencies throughout the country. John
also cowrote the foreword of this book.
• Victoria Poklop, MS, is a dedicated and compassionate licensed
professional counselor at the Des Plaines Police Department,
Des Plaines, Illinois.
• Dr. Ellen Scrivner is a highly respected police psychologist. She has
worked extensively with the FBI, other federal agencies, and many
police departments across the country, developing programs in risk
assessment, police wellness, psychological training, community
policing, and law enforcement coordination.
• Dr. Bryan Vila is extremely knowledgeable on the subject of sleep
deprivation and the detrimental effects it has on police officers. He is
well known in law enforcement and has been involved in numerous
sleep-related studies throughout his career.
• Dr. John Violanti has written 15 books on the subject of police sui-
cide. He was a New York State Trooper for 23 years and a crimi-
nal investigator and coordinator of the Psychological Assistance
Program for the New York State Police. Dr. Violanti has been
involved in the design, implementation, and analysis of police stress
and health studies throughout his career.
• Lisa Wimberger is well known in police circles for her relaxation
techniques and coping mechanisms that enhance a person’s emo-
tional well-being. Wimberger founded the Neurosculpting® Institute
that is used by many law enforcement agencies throughout the coun-
try, especially for an officer’s emotional survival.
• Dr. Nancy Zarse is a distinguished clinical psychologist and profes-
sor of the Forensic Department at the Chicago School of Professional
Psychology. Dr. Zarse is well known for her clinical work and critical
incidence training with law enforcement personnel throughout the
United States.
xvi Acknowledgments

Clergy

• Father Dan Brandt is amazingly easygoing and has a great sense of

humor. As police chaplain, he is dedicated to the men and women of
the Chicago Police Department.
• Father Tony Pizzo is a dear and personal friend who is kindhearted
and compassionate to everyone. He is a Jesuit priest from St. Rita’s
Parish and has counseled many police officers throughout his career.
• Father Charles Rubey is well known around the world for his work
and dedication to those who have lost a loved one to suicide, espe-
cially through the support group The Compassionate Friends.

Law Enforcement

• Dr. Dean Angelo Sr. has been in law enforcement for 34 years and
is currently the president of the Chicago Fraternal Order of Police
Lodge 7.
• Pam Church is the chief of police of the Western Springs Police
Department, Western Springs, Illinois.
• Phil Cline is the former police superintendent of the Chicago Police
Department.
• Robert Douglas, Jr., is a sincere and dedicated professional who
works tirelessly to prevent suicide among law enforcement officers.
He is the executive director of the National Suicide Foundation, Inc.
and a former police officer. Bob was also gracious enough to cowrite
the foreword of this book.
• John Barney Flanagan spoke candidly and openly about the loss
of his son to suicide. Thank you for sharing your feelings. Barney
is a retired assistant deputy superintendent and spent 35 years as a
Chicago police officer. He retired as a first deputy superintendent,
Chicago Police Department.
• Douglas Fuchs is the police chief of the Redding Police Department,
Redding, Connecticut.
• Hiram Grau retired as a deputy superintendent after 28 years in the
Chicago Police Department, and in 2011, he became the director of
the prestigious Illinois State Police.
• Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman is an internationally recognized scholar,
author, soldier, and speaker who is one of the world’s foremost experts
in the field of human aggression and the roots of violence and violent
crime. Lt. Col. Grossman specializes in the study of the psychology
of killing, and he has written the books On Killing and On Combat,
Acknowledgments xvii

which are required reading at the FBI academy and numerous other
academies and colleges.
• Terry Hillard is extremely well respected in the law enforcement
community. He is the former superintendent of police for the
city of Chicago and has spent more than three decades in law
enforcement.
• Bill Hogewood is a renowned and trusted authority as a peer sup-
port innovator and instructor in law enforcement. He began his
career as a Prince George’s County police officer and proudly served
the citizens of Maryland for 28 years. He became training program
manager for crisis negotiation and peer support in the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). He has trained
and consulted in the United States and internationally in hostage
negotiations, peer support, suicide recognition and intervention,
and stress management.
• Michael Holub is the police chief of the La Grange Police Department,
La Grange, Illinois.
• Garry McCarthy is the current superintendent of police for the
Chicago Police Department.
• Jeff Murphy worked as a police officer for more than 40 years, retir-
ing as a lieutenant in the Chicago Police Department. He was instru-
mental in developing the Critical Incident Training (CIT) Program
for the Chicago Police Department and surrounding law enforce-
ment departments.
• Sean Riley is an inspirational, open, and caring fellow police officer
who was honest about the issues he experienced on the job as a police
officer and what he has done to change his life. He is the founder and
executive director of Safecallnow.org. Riley is also a former police
officer of the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department and Kirkland
Police Department and past union president.
• Steve Stelter is the chief of police for Brookfield, Illinois, and has
35 years of experience in law enforcement.
• Barry Thomas is the captain of the Story County Sheriff’s Department,
the second vice president of the FBI National Academy Associates,
and the chair of the executive board for Safe Call Now.
• Brad Woods is recognized for his leadership and dedication to
helping police officers in emotional crisis within the Chicago
Police Department. He retired as a commander of the Personnel
Division. While in charge of the Personal Concerns and the
Behavioral Intervention Unit, he developed an early warning sys-
tem that would get help to an officer before the officer’s situation
became worse.
xviii Acknowledgments

Special thanks to

• Beverly Anderson, PhD, Police Suicide: Understanding Grief and

Loss, Metropolitan Police EAP (www.giftfrom within.org).
• Scott Affholter, a retired lieutenant, Wyandotte Michigan Police
Department.
• Augie Battaglia, retired police officer, Chicago Police Department.
• Cheryl Brown, Suicide Finding Hope, a website that deals with the
survivors and coping with loss from suicide.
• Dr. Kevin Gilmartin.
• Dee Hatos, thank you for writing about police and the media in the
Introduction.
• Phil Hasket, retired police officer, Chicago Police Department.
• Tim J. Freesmeyer, founder and president of Etico Solutions.
• Dr. Olivia Johnson, founder of the Blue Wall Institute and Illinois
State representative for the National Police Suicide Foundation. She
is the author of Brass Versus Officers: Distrust Gets Us Nowhere.
• Dr. Robin Kroll, a clinical psychologist and the director of inter-
ventions, specializes in police psychology. Dr. Kroll’s concentration
includes working with police officers in individual, group, and family
therapy for issues related to addiction, mood disorders, work-related
matters, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
• Kevin McNulty, police officer, Chicago Police Department.
• Brian O’Neil, writer for the Tacoma News Tribune.
• Jay Padar, sergeant with the Chicago Police Department. Jay coau-
thored the book On Being a Cop with his father, Jim Padar.
• Jim Padar worked as a Chicago police officer for more than 29 years,
retiring as a lieutenant.
• Justin Roa, an extremely talented young man who did an excellent
job on the book cover. Your artwork was an inspiration for the title
of the book.
• Donald Simmons, police officer, Chicago Police Department.
• Lt. Matt Walsh, Cook County Sheriff’s police.
Editor

Dr. Ron Rufo is a highly decorated Chicago police officer with over 20 years’
service, which includes a Life Saving Award, Department Accommodation,
and Unit Meritorious Award. He has 23 honorable mentions and over 100
letters of appreciation as a Chicago police officer. Ron began his career in the
9th District, was assigned to the prestigious Ambassador program, and was
eventually assigned to the Preventive Programs Unit, where he has served
as a crime prevention speaker for over 13 years. For most of his career, Ron
has been actively involved as a peer support team leader for the Employee
Assistance Program (EAP) section of the Chicago Police Department. He has
had specialized training in suicide prevention and is a member of the Critical
Incident Team. Ron has been on numerous calls responding to police officers
in crisis and has been involved in the aftermath of police suicides. He is cur-
rently assigned to the 18th Police District.
Ron received his bachelor of arts degree in criminal social justice from
Lewis University in 2000, graduating with highest honors and as a scholar of
the university. He earned his master of arts degree in organizational leadership
from Lewis University in 2002. He received his doctorate degree in organiza-
tional leadership from Argosy University in 2007. His dissertation was “An
Investigation of On-Line Sexual Predation of Convicted Male Offenders”. His
first book, Sexual Predators Amongst Us, was released in December 2011. He
coauthored a second book, Police and Profiling in the United States: Applying
Theory to Criminal Investigation, with Dr. Lauren Barrow in July 2013.
Ron has contributed a chapter on sexual predator investigations to a
book geared toward police detectives and crime scenes. He has also contrib-
uted a chapter on building safety for a property manager’s guide to a book on
terrorism and property management. Ron has taught criminal social justice
in the master’s program at Kaplan University since 2008.

xix
Introduction

If I commit suicide, it will not be to destroy myself but to put myself back
together again. Suicide will be for me only one means to put myself back
together again. Suicide will be for me only one means of violently reconquer-
ing myself, of brutality invading my being, of anticipating the unpredictable
approaches of God. By suicide, I reintroduce my design in nature; I shall for
the first time give things the shape of my will.
Antonin Artaud, French poet

Introduction: Life’s Journey

This book will provide a realistic insight into the life of a police officer through
a police officer’s eyes. I have been a Chicago police officer for over 20 years
and will give graphic details of what an officer goes through to survive on the
streets, but what he or she gives up in return.
Early in childhood many people will ask, “What do you want to become
when you grow up?” I am not completely sure when I thought about becom-
ing a police officer. I never said to anyone that I would like to be a police offi-
cer until my late twenties. It was always in the back of my mind, but I never
acted on it until my early thirties. I am not sure what exactly persuaded me
to take the necessary steps to become a police officer; it may have been my
demeanor to help others. No one in my family was in law enforcement. My
encounters with police officers were rare and infrequent.

xxi
xxii Introduction

I truly believe a person finds a career path he or she is destined for. I

use the word “destined” because I believe a higher power puts us where he
wants us to be. I had a few different professions before I actually focused
on becoming a policeman. I was divorced with three children when I trav-
eled to Las Vegas, Nevada, in hopes of becoming a law enforcement offi-
cer. I arrived early and took in the spectacular light display of the famed
Las Vegas Strip. The next day, I arrived at the Las Vegas Convention Center
to take the written part of the exam. I was amazed how many people wanted
a job in law enforcement. True to the area, I tried to figure what my odds
were of being a metro police officer. The crowd was enormous and growing.
For the Las Vegas exam, you must pass each part of the exam to continue
on. I passed the written section with flying colors, and I was scheduled to
run a mile and a half the next day. I got up early and proceeded to the indoor
track where they gave me a nylon yellow pullover with #6 on the front and
back. The instructions were clear, and the entire run was videotaped so
there would be no mistake to its accuracy. Each candidate must run six laps
around the oval track in 12 minutes and 30 seconds or before. If a candidate
runs the course in 12 minutes and 31 seconds, they will not go on any far-
ther in the exam process. I soon found out after the first lap that I was not
in the best shape to run, especially in the thin air of Las Vegas. There was
no excuse on my part; I did not pass the exam. The moderator yelled out “#6
you can stop after five laps.” I knew by 12:45 on the clock that it was over.
I did not pass, but I did not quit. I ran the full six laps just to prove to myself
that I can do it. The next year, I took the Reno exam and made it all the way
to the oral boards. My lack of law enforcement procedures was apparent;
I failed miserably. My hopes of becoming a police officer were diminishing.
Both exams taught me something: if you want the job as a police officer, you
better become more prepared. When I returned home from Nevada, I had
a goal and was focused on taking the upcoming police exam and becoming
one of Chicago’s finest.
I was 35 years old when I took the Chicago police exam. I joined a health
club with a buddy of mine, and we ran every morning. At 35 years old (this
was considered old by police standards, but there was no age or educational
restrictions back then), I was still pursuing a dream. I remember walking
into Curie High School on the south side of Chicago where there were thou-
sands of applicants waiting to get in, very similar to the scene at the Las Vegas
Convention Center when I took the Las Vegas police exam. There were six
sites offering the police exam that day. The news reported that over 36,000
individuals were vying for only 2000 openings. The odds were a 1–18 chance
of being a cop.
After the written test, there were a few hurdles in the process. There was a
hiring freeze for a year, and then a discrimination lawsuit was filed by a num-
ber of applicants. I thought I would never become an officer. At 39 years old,
Introduction xxiii

I finally was called in for the next segments of the exam. Going through the
testing process was long, with the anticipation and waiting for the next step
in the process. The agility test was my last obstacle, and I ran the mile and a
half in less than 12 minutes on an unusually blistering hot June day. There I
was sitting in a room with the other candidates who passed the run, the last
segment to starting the academy. We were told to quit our previous jobs and
move into the city and that we would be starting the Police Academy on July
5, 1994. We were told to report to the Police Academy at 8 a.m. sharp in a suit
and tie.
The night of July 4 was filled with anticipation and the sounds of errant
firecrackers exploding what seemed like yards away from my bedroom win-
dow. I tossed and turned and could not sleep. I was worried that if I did fall
asleep, I might not hear the alarm clock. At 4 o’clock, I got up, took a shower,
and proceeded to get dressed. Better that I am early than late. I arrived at the
Police Academy at 5 a.m., 3 hours earlier than I was supposed to arrive.
The shocked police officer on duty at the front desk asked me bluntly, “What
the hell do you want, who are you?” I explained that I was in the next acad-
emy class and could not sleep. Shaking his head, the officer directed me to the
vending machines in the cafeteria and said, “Welcome to the Chicago Police
Department.” The rest is history.

Always a Cop

I am amazed when one of my family members or acquaintances introduces

me. To this day, most of my friends and family introduce me as Ron, he is a
Chicago cop. Rarely do they say hello to Dr. Rufo or even acknowledge my
degree. I do not resent being introduced that way; in fact I am very proud of
being an officer, but there is more to me than just being a cop. I am a hus-
band, father, professor, and author. I find most medical doctors and attorneys
are introduced in the same way; this is Joe, and he is a heart surgeon or Bob
is an attorney.
The badge defines who we are. Once the badge goes on, it never comes
off, whether anyone else sees it or not. It fuses with the soul, through adver-
sity, fear, and adrenaline. It is a symbol of pride, integrity, and guts. Many of
you will never know that feeling of being a cop, a crusader of justice. Even
after a good cop leaves the job for a well-deserved retirement, he will know
a lifetime of camaraderie that few experience. In law enforcement, there is
a lasting partnership or brotherhood even after the uniform has remained
isolated in the back of the closet. Police officers will share with other officers
their war stories, accomplishments, and burdens of the job. They will share
with each other a lifetime of experiences that no citizen could ever dream of.
Police friends are for life!
xxiv Introduction

Public Perception of the Police

The public looks to the police for answers and solutions to problems and to
be problem solvers. Rarely does the public realize that the police are humans
and that we have issues of our own. Most people like the police; a few indi-
viduals loathe the police. A majority of people do not enjoy their encounters
with the police. The police are called for service when something bad or cata-
strophic has occurred, for example, a car accident, burglary, or theft report,
and the list goes on. Often when the police are involved, there is some form
of negative connotation attached to the situation.

Media Perception of the Police

The media, both newsprint and television, will often sensationalize a story
that involves the police, more often emphasizing police misconduct over
something good that the police have done. News coverage regarding the
inappropriate behavior of an officer is often highlighted in the headlines of
the daily paper and in the local newscasts. Police should not be above the law
or the citizens they are sworn to protect, and that is often the focus of the
officer who has abused his or her power in an effort to circumvent the law.
People are curious about how the officer got caught up in the miscon-
duct or situation that they are accused of being involved in. The consensus
is the officer abused his power and should be severely punished; there are
enough criminals on our streets and the police officer should not be one of
them. The Constitution of the United States maintains that anyone accused
of any criminal or illegal behavior is innocent until proven guilty. It is the
general consensus that police officers who are accused of a crime, police
misconduct, or inappropriate behavior are most likely guilty (or assumed
guilty anyway).
Police officers will get their day in court. Even if the officer is found not
guilty in a court of law, the general public will assume the court was influ-
enced by his profession. In the minds of citizens, police officers will pro-
tect their own if it means writing favorable reports or looking the other way
when it comes down to police misconduct or inappropriate accusations. In
the mind-set of the public, police officers truly are above the law, in their
belief that everyone involved in the criminal justice system will ultimately
protect the police officer in some way. The officer accused of misconduct will
always carry that stigma of wrongdoing even though he has been exoner-
ated in a court of law. To his friends and colleagues in law enforcement, the
stigma of misconduct will overshadow any awards or accolades the officer
may have received.
Introduction xxv

Media Perception by Diane Hatos

Mark Twain once said that a lie can circle the world before the truth can finish
tying its shoes.

Let’s face it; these days the media is every officer’s nemesis. In this fairly new
phenomenon, the media uses its influence to directly shape our view of the
police world. Police personnel face endless challenges of self-destruction
and humiliation now that nearly everyone carries cell phones equipped with
video cameras that can and do record at the touch of a button. These vid-
eos, which expose situational chaos, largely illustrate unfortunate, out-of-
context, citizen encounters featuring police brutality that ultimately gives
law enforcement a “black eye.”
In all fairness, yes, there are times when force is needed to restore the
peace—there are a lot of bad guys out there. This point quickly escapes the
public when tweets go out and Facebook news feeds are inundated with video
clips featuring the “dark side” of police work. For reasons unknown to me,
these isolated, unflattering images take America and the world by storm,
receiving hundreds of thousands of “hits” in a relatively short amount of
time, while the true, “feel good” stories about the “good guys” in law enforce-
ment fail to grab our attention. Why?
The majority of police officers act courteously and professionally most of
the time. There is no shortage of videos showing police officers using exces-
sive force, much less any real discrimination that in many cases portrays law
enforcement in a downright false light. At the very least, these exposés are
questionable. It takes a keen and willing eye to look for the truth. While suc-
cessful at capturing an audience, there is no denying that the prevalence of
these videos “posted” on social media fails drastically at capturing the posi-
tive side of law enforcement. And it’s not fair. This phenomenon has become
a runaway train with no brakes. Every recorded detail, no matter how false
or contrived, one-sided or slanted, is easily believed; there is absolutely no
room for disclaimers.
In the early days of television and radio as many of you may remember,
everything was subject to a censorship process, fairly strict in comparison to
today’s standards. Currently, censorship is very limited—there are no filters
in social media. Videos taken by individuals do go viral, literally, in a matter
of hours. As a result, we have become victims of this “in your face” style of
media propaganda.
Sadly, this litany of audio and video recordings exhibiting “cops behav-
ing badly” has had a profound effect, not only on those in law enforcement
but also on how the general public views the police. The media has an unde-
niably powerful influence on how people form their opinions on the police,
xxvi Introduction

and they know it. Additionally, this type of pessimistic journalism has a
powerful and detrimental effect on police morale.
On any given day in every city in America, the newspapers are alive with
local, national, and world news articles featuring police stories. These articles
largely accentuate the negative aspects of law enforcement, which, in all hon-
esty, only truly happen in a very minute segment of the entire police profes-
sion. This blatant distortion of factual reporting has infiltrated social media
creating a real concern for law enforcement agencies.
The community-oriented policing (COP) initiative is a growing trend
in the majority of departments across the country: it focuses on building
strong ties with a wide array of community members. These mutually benefi-
cial relationships rely on trustworthy interactions and are not always easily
forged. The public can become quickly outraged and begin to believe that all
cops are abusive when negative news stories or videos surface. They seriously
undermine COP efforts.
The folks in Seattle, Washington, are a prime example of media influ-
ence and negative public perception. Recently, the Seattle Police Department
underwent a complete transformation after public allegations of racial
profiling and police brutality caused the Department of Justice (DOJ) to
launch a thorough investigation in 2011. This media-fueled inquiry uncov-
ered a pattern of constitutional violations in the department’s use-of-force
policies. In efforts to avoid a federal lawsuit, the Seattle Police Department
agreed to adhere to a federally drawn plan that included a new training and
reporting program, as well as an improved oversight strategy for the entire
department.
During the past three years, Seattle PD has endured intense pub-
lic scrutiny. The department has not only gone through four chiefs but
also recently appointed a fifth chief, Kathleen O’Toole, on June 23, 2014.
O’Toole, a former chief in Boston, became the first female to hold this posi-
tion in Seattle.
Chief O’Toole is facing a daunting endeavor; more than 120 Seattle offi-
cers have filed a lawsuit challenging the department’s new, federally man-
dated use-of-force policies that were put into place under the terms of the
reform program. She has publicly announced not only a firm commitment
to restore civic trust but also a willingness to reestablish an acceptable level
of pride in the officers of the organization. Chief O’Toole is motivated to
win back her officers through an intensive, hands-on approach, sans litiga-
tion. This will not be an easy task. The actions of a few coupled with bad
publicity have greatly contributed to overall poor citizen perception of this
department.
Naturally everyone antes in on the topic when a department suffers
such intense media exposure. Restaurants and taverns are filled with people
discussing the latest news reports. Heated discussions commonly include
Introduction xxvii

exclamations of “they need to just fire the chief!” The effects are real; our
citizens are full of frustration.
A cloud of doubt and mistrust develops when citizens are repeatedly
exposed to the media hammering images into their heads. When the DOJ
comes to town and becomes involved in any department’s affairs, isn’t it only
natural for the general public to question and mistrust the local police? There
may be a few reports that indicate constitutional violations, where the police
have obviously failed to practice professionalism and restraint. The media
targets the heated exchanges between police and loud and angry citizens. At
that point, is it any wonder that people, out of desperation, want to fire the
chief?
Brian O’Neill (2014), a Tacoma police officer and former Tacoma News
Tribune contributor of a column known as the Blue Byline, has noted that
“the legal definition of necessary force does not come complete with a mil-
lion examples; it’s simply one long sentence. That makes it open to interpre-
tation by people with broadly different mindsets. But such is life in a free
country.” O’Neill has a valid point; many times the political rhetoric behind
the scenes spills over the edge of common sense, leaving nothing but a trail
of officer dissatisfaction and civil disobedience in its wake. After all, no one
wants to be on the receiving end of the blame game.
Reporting to work each and every day in a department rife with contro-
versy and political unrest must be extremely difficult. To weather this type
of storm, every officer in the department is required to display a bravado
of strength at all times. And without question, to deflect all of the residual
media blowback on the streets, it is surely an enormous test to perpetually
act like “one of the good guys,” a “good example,” or at the very least field the
barrage of personal questions with patience and class. How tiring!
We are all well aware that the media for their actions would be classi-
fied as sharks. A moment of poor judgment, or one bad decision, and a good
cop can suddenly be demoted or fired for their actions. Regrettably, in the
media today, there is a common theme: police officers caught on tape in a
serious encounter that inevitably makes the officers look bad, and they are
immediately exploited on social media. The media will continuously show
the clip over and over again, showing angry crowds gathering at a scene of
the alleged incident, often making out more of the story than need be. Often
police officers are not given the chance to present their take on the encounter,
nor are they even aware that bystanders are capturing their every movement
on video or audio. But that’s too bad, and once it’s out there, no one can
unring that bell. Once again, the general public has spoon-fed its mind-set to
dislike the cops. What a shame!
In today’s world, it takes a unique individual to enter the field of law
enforcement; in many ways, it is a gamble with fate. Although every profes-
sion has its ups and downs, police work is another story entirely. Things can
xxviii Introduction

easily turn on a dime even if an officer does every single thing to the best of
his ability, every single day of his career. One negative “tweet,” or one out-
of-context video that makes its rounds on social media (which ultimately is
finding its way via “trending” onto the national news), will negatively influ-
ence the way our citizens view a police department and, to some, the entire
law enforcement profession.

Ferguson: It’s Too Early to Demonize

or Canonize by Brian O’Neill

In the conflicting narratives about the shooting of Michael Brown in

Ferguson, Missouri, Officer Darren Wilson is either a rogue who killed an
unarmed man or a heroic survivor. Brown is either a martyr to the vile prac-
tice of racial profiling or else a dangerous felon shot while attacking a cop.
Why the need to demonize or canonize at this point? We have heard that
Brown, a young African-American man, robbed a convenience store minutes
before Officer Wilson stopped him while he and a friend were walking down
the middle of a street. We have also been told that Brown shoved Wilson
back inside his car, injuring him, and then attempted to take the officer’s duty
weapon. It supposedly fired and Brown fled. He was then shot numerous
times, allegedly while surrendering to Wilson.
Nearly every aspect of the confrontation is disputed by witnesses and
police, yet many people have made up their minds about what happened. That
defies logic. The dynamic events leading up to a police shooting are a layer of
subtle microevents that form a coherent picture only when pieced together.
In much the same way, the Big Bang cannot be adequately explained without
breaking it into nanoseconds; every nuance leading up to a shooting must
be dissected before it can be understood. Let’s consider two disputed details:
Was Brown unarmed? If it is shown that he did lay his hands on Wilson’s duty
gun, his lack of a weapon of his own isn’t necessarily a decisive factor. (And if
he let go of the gun and backed away, should a reasonable person assume he
wouldn’t try again?) Did Wilson shoot Brown when his hands were raised? If
so, it’s hard to imagine a justification for the use of deadly force.
As a former police officer, the most frustrating condemnation of police
came from columnist Leonard Pitts, Jr. Pitts invoked the spirit of Atticus
Finch, demanding that we climb into the skin of another person and walk
around in it before rendering judgment. Missing was any admission that
cops have skin, too. Two brief examples from my own career: In the first, my
partner and I were chasing a wanted felon, a 6-foot, 350-pound gang member
known to have carried weapons in the past. I found him first and drew my
gun. This massive young man challenged me, closing the distance between
us in seconds. Though his hands were empty, at his side he was a step away
Introduction xxix

from putting his hands on my weapon. No time to draw a less lethal weapon,
no time to reholster. Do I shoot an unarmed man? Fortunately, my partner
arrived. After a lengthy fight, we arrested him. I still do not know what I
would have done had he not shown up.
The second incident involved a preteen boy who had allegedly used a
knife in a robbery against another kid. When I found the suspect and his
mother at home, I politely attempted to address the issue. She heaped abuse
on me, calling me a “f-ing pig” and “stupid cracker,” among other choice
names. I endured it in silence for 10 straight minutes until my sergeant
arrived, listened briefly, and then told me to walk away. The score: hatred 1,
justice 0. None of this is meant to excuse the police response in Ferguson.
The cops share much of the blame for the subsequent riots. We learned in the
1990s, when Tacoma’s Hilltop was awash in gunfire and gangs, that hand-
cuffs and jail are merely a tourniquet. The real remedy is a strong partner-
ship between the people and their police. But that kind of partnership takes
willingness to step into the skin of another, including the skin in uniform.

The Job Itself

Many officers may feel the stress of the job and are in denial regarding their
feelings. Officers may feel overwhelmed by circumstances or problems that
have occurred in their career, family, or personal life, and they do not want to
speak with anyone about these issues. Officers may be scared to seek any type
of professional assistance. This can be detrimental to a police officer in many
ways. In the officer’s mind, it is a Catch-22 situation. When an officer is psy-
chologically unfit for duty, he may be asked to relinquish their weapon and
ID, and cannot perform the job as a police officer. Requesting psychological
help can leak out to just one person, rumors spread, and there is no telling
the reaction by fellow officers. Just the stigma and being labeled by comrades,
superiors, or police management as possibly unstable or having psychologi-
cal issues may cause other officers to shun or not want to work with the offi-
cer. Other officers may view him or her as a liability on the street. The stigma
is there and it will never go away. Also, the officer may not be able to work
side jobs that are security based, because he cannot carry a weapon, causing
a financial burden as well. It may take the officer a considerable amount of
time to go through the process and attain help for his problems. One prob-
lem now has escalated and has created many additional issues that the officer
must embrace.
Superintendent Terry Hillard said that seeking help due to stress- and
job-related issues is recommended. Asking for emotional help in a time of
crisis is not weakness. It should not be held against an officer if he wishes to
discuss issues that are bothering him. Emotional issues should not be bottled
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
You treated me decent just to get my dandelions away from me! I
been a fool," she sobbed at Horseface, grinding her fists in her eyes.
She dropped her hands and snapped at Goreck, "And it was you
what made me do it! I'll fix you for that! Out of my way, everybody!"
The Martians hiding in "The Martian's Fancy" and peeping from its
windows let out a shriek as she started for the borer. They'd read her
mind. They burst from the place like moths from an opened trunk,
and instantaneously scattered all over the landscape.
"You boys watch Goreck," Trixie ordered the Finchburgers who had
come on foot. "But you with the machines, come on—join the fun!"
The air not only was rent, but hamburgered as she turned on the
borer's blast-ray full-strength and dragged it straight for "The
Martian's Fancy". The mowing-machine chopped up a few street
weeds before it began to cut and bale the houses. The psithium
detectors hopped like kangaroos against the flimsy walls, battering
them down. Goreck's protests were inaudible in the clangor of
smashing dwellings and the crackle of crumbling masonry. His tears
of frustration and fury made tiny mudpies in the dust.
"I guess that'll show you how a lady ought to be treated," Trixie
observed rather enigmatically, but with grim satisfaction, after having
done to his town everything that the old Assyrian conquerors had
bragged about—except perhaps the piling up of human heads. "Now
give him a send-off, boys!"
But their blasts at his feet couldn't possibly keep up with him. Maybe
it was merely dust, but he ran so fast he seemed to smoke from
friction.
"I guess nobody's going to like me no more, after what I went and
done—losing my dandelions," Trixie sighed. They had started
homeward, and she was riding behind Horseface on Elmer. Most of
the pedestrians were riding the borer.
Horseface said, "We love you more than ever, Trix. We had to lose
you before we could see what fools we been."
Horseface went on, "Don't worry about the dandelions. For one
thing, while we was going through that tunnel you and Goreck made,
we found a whopping big vein of psithium—big enough to start
another rush! Now we can all go back to Terra if we want to—or if we
stay, you can build a whole blooming conservatory!"
Trixie stopped sobbing. Elmer rejoiced, because from her hiccoughs
he had felt as if she and Horseface had been dancing on his back.
Horseface said, "And anyway, your dandelions ain't lost. I knew it
when I came chasing after you to the fork in the road. Phorey
Yakkermunn the Martian was driving your jeep. Don't you remember
what we used to call him? 'Ears', that's what—'Ears' Yakkermunn,
'cause being a Martian and coming from a planet with rarefied air like
there is on Mars, his ears had to be extra big so they could catch
sounds."
"What's that got to do with my dandelions?"
"Phorey never could get used to the heavy air we got here on Venus.
It makes sounds too loud and hurts his ears. So he still does like he
used to, he stuffs them with cotton. Goreck told him to take the
dandelions to Saturday, didn't he? But with all that cotton in his ears,
you know where he took 'em? To Satterlee!"
"Are you sure?"
"Positive! After we took the fork in the road, we was following borer-
tracks, not tire-marks!"
She threw her heavy arms around him, planting a kiss full on his lips.
It not only made him squirm, but reminded him of Candy Derain's
suction cup bicycle. Candy probably had traveled a hundred miles or
so by now—straight up and down again—and actually couldn't have
gained more than a hundred feet straightaway.
"You're so resourceful, Horseface," Trixie breathed, with
constellations rather than mere stars in her eyes. "You remind me of
Mike. And I'm going to reward you for all you've done. I'm going to
marry you!"
Horseface didn't dare to groan. While Trixie clamped a loving paw on
his own hand almost squeezing it to pulp, he wished fervently that he
was alone on the far hills—anywhere but here—looking for psithium
nuggets.
But Trixie always had her way, and she wasn't going to stop having it
now.
"You're so masterful!" she wheezed.
And even Elmer, looking back over his shoulder, hung his head and
sighed.

A COMMENT ON ONE TOUCH OF TERRA

I have read Dr. Hannes Bok's ONE TOUCH OF VENUS, which
appears elsewhere in this publication, with understandable interest.
While I may deplore, as a cultural anthropologist, Dr. Bok's obvious
empathy towards these miners with their socially regrettable attitude
towards the original inhabitants, I must say that Dr. Bok paints quite
an effective picture of living conditions in these scattered
communities.
I have been privileged, though, as I have said elsewhere, to visit with
and spend considerable time with the natives who withdrew to the
hills soon after our ships first landed.
I have found these men and women extraordinarily hospitable, warm
and friendly, once they sense that you do not come among them as
a tourist.
They have a very ancient culture, a rich language (with gradations
similar to 20th century Javanese). Their chants are fantastic, long,
mournful wails, whose shadings, whose tremolos, still inspire you
and make you one with them. I hope to translate some of these
chants in the near future, including one dedicated to the sacred
sand-lillies, so erroneously called zips by the miners.
Vithaldas Hattopadhyaya O'Quinn
Lecturer in Venusian Antiquities
 *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ONE TOUCH
OF TERRA ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in
these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it
in the United States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of
this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept
and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and
may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the
terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of
the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research.
Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given
away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with
eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject
to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
 PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free

distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and

Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree
to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be
bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from
the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in
paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be

used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a
few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.
See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with
Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do
not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing,
performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the
work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of
course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™
mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely
sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name
associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of
this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its
attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without
charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other

immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™
work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or
with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is
accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
 This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived

from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the
United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must
comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted

with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project

Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a
part of this work or any other work associated with Project
Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this

electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you
provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work
in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in
the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing

access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
 copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™

electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may
be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except

for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph
1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner
of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF
WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE
TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL,
PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE
NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you

discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must
return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity
that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in
lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may
demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted
by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or
indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur:
(a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b)
alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project
Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.
It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and
donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help,
see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,

Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can
be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the
widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating

charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and
keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in
locations where we have not received written confirmation of
compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of
compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where

we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make

any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed

editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.