You are on page 1of 68

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/335235385

Mechanical Behavior of Cold-Bent Insulating Glass Units

Presentation · November 2016

CITATIONS READS

2 121

1 author:

Franz Nikolaus Pölzl


Staticus Facades
5 PUBLICATIONS 4 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Franz Nikolaus Pölzl on 19 August 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


FRANZ NIKOLAUS PÖLZL

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF COLD-BENT INSULATION GLASS UNITS


MASTER‘S THESIS
FRANZ NIKOLAUS PÖLZL

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF COLD-BENT INSULATION GLASS UNITS


MASTER‘S THESIS
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions

01
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions

01
1 MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVES
-smooth and aesthetic building skin
-no standardization in structural glazing
-mechanical behavior of cold-bent IGU‘s ???
-economical method at the construction site

„My objective is an outcome which is able


to advance the research in this promising
branch of facade engineering“

02
1 MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVES
-smooth and aesthetic building skin
-no standardization in structural glazing
-mechanical behavior of cold-bent IGU‘s ???
-economical method at the construction site

My objective is an outcome which is able


to advance the research in this promising
branch of facade engineering.

02
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions

03
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-cold bending

04
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-well-tried way of bending glass
-reshape flat glass by heat
-reshaping accordingly to the
underlying formwork
-small bending radii are possible
-economical for mass production
-shoddy surface parallelism
-cold bending

04
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-cold bending

05
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-cold bending
-is done after the glass is tempered
-hence, it retains it‘s mechanical
properties of safety glass
-smaller bending radii than hot-bent
glass
-good optical quality
-economical for small quantities

05
2 BENDING OF GLASS
insulating glass unit (IGU)
1 glass pane
2 glass pane
3 metallic spacer bar
4 dessicant
5 primary seal (butyl)
6 secondary seal (silicone)

06
MODELLING OF THE IGU
volume element, 2nd order glass panes: volume element, 2nd order

07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
volume element, 2nd order glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order

07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
shell element, 2nd order glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order

07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
butyl (primary seal) is neglected glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
primary seal: is neglected

07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
butyl (primary seal) is neglected glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
primary seal: is neglected

07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
master primary seal: is neglected
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
master/slave contact tied
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
tied all interactions are described by
static interaction properties either by
slave to the glass panes slave
master to secondary seal master/slave interactions with hard contact
or by tying the parts together
tied
master/slave contact /\/\/\/\/\/\/\ tied
master

08
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions

09
IGU MODELS

10
IGU MODELS

single-curved double-curved
or or
single-bent double-bent

10
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study

reference thickness of the reference support situation thickness of the


model glass pane model 1 glass pane

parameter depth of the support situation


cavity
case study 2
aspect ratio
study

young‘s modulus parameter


outcome support situation
of the secondary
study 3
seal

stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer

aspect ratio

11
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

///////////

x=y=z=0
z
x

12
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

z
x

12
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

///////////

x=y=z=0
z
x

12
SINGLE-BENT IGU

13
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study

reference thickness of the reference support situation thickness of the


model glass pane model 1 glass pane

parameter depth of the support situation


cavity
case study 2
aspect ratio
study

young‘s modulus parameter


outcome support situation
of the secondary
study 3
seal

stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer

aspect ratio

14
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study

reference thickness of the reference support situation thickness of the


model glass pane model 1 glass pane

parameter depth of the support situation


cavity
case study 2
aspect ratio
study

young‘s modulus parameter


outcome support situation
of the secondary
study 3
seal

stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer

aspect ratio

14
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

Glass pane 2
Secondary
IGU Spacer
Seal Glass pane 1

Glass pane 1 IGU


///////////
x=y=z=0

/////////////////////////////
x=y=z=0

15
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

10 mm

8 mm
6 mm

16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes

10 mm

8 mm
6 mm

16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
glass pane 2, 6mm
10 mm

8 mm
6 mm glass pane 1, 6 mm

glass pane 2, 10 mm
the „other“ glass pane thickness (glass pane 2)
does not have a significant influence on the stress
in the considered glass pane (glass pane 1)

glass pane 1, 6 mm

16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars

glass pane 2
axis 5-5
axis 6-6
glass pane 1

axis 5-5
axis 6-6
subconstruction

17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars

axis 5-5
axis 6-6
Stainless steel

Aluminum

17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars

yielding of stainless steel at 230 N/mm²

axis 5-5
axis 6-6
Stainless steel

Aluminum

17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars

Aluminum spacer bar


reaches ultimate strength

axis 5-5
axis 6-6
Stainless steel

Aluminum

17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

5.6%

25%

18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

5.6% 12.5%

25%

18
DOUBLE-BENT IGU

x z

19
DOUBLE-BENT IGU

x z

19
DOUBLE-BENT IGU

x z

19
DOUBLE-BENT IGU

20
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study

reference thickness of the reference support situation thickness of the


model glass pane model 1 glass pane

parameter depth of the support situation


cavity
case study 2
aspect ratio
study

young‘s modulus parameter


outcome support situation
of the secondary
study 3
seal

stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer

aspect ratio

21
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

22
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

membrane
stresses

no membrane
stresses

23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU

deformation
plateau

anticlastic
shape

23
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions

24
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress

25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility

25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
-Spacer bars have to be made out of a ductile material
-Stainless steel as a material for spacer bars is suitable

25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
-Spacer bars have to be made out of a ductile material
-Stainless steel as a material for spacer bars is suitable
-The shear deformation, hence the strain in the edge zone is high
-High performance structural silicone for long-term applications

25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
-Spacer bars have to be made out of a ductile material
-Stainless steel as a material for spacer bars is suitable
-The shear deformation, hence the strain in the edge zone is high
-High performance structural silicone for long-term applications
-Membrane stresses in the glass panes occur for small aspect ratios and thin glass
pane thicknesses for the double-bent IGU
→ Prevent a perfectly anticlastic shape
→ Can be an issue regarding the optical quality

25
FRANZ NIKOLAUS PÖLZL

Thank you for your attention


SINGLE-BENT IGU
depth of the cavity
SINGLE-BENT IGU
young‘s modulus of the secondary seal
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
DOUBLE-BENT CASE STUDIES
support situations

1 2

3
MESH SIZE

Part Seeding method Mesh size


Glass pane By size, double 0.01 to 0.1 m
Secondary seal, By size, double 0.005 to 0.05 m
circumferential
Secondary seal along its By number, 4/3 0.005/0.003 m
height/width
Spacer along its length By size, double 0.005 to 0.05 m
Spacer along its By number, 4/3 0.005/0.003 m
height/width
Subconstruction By size, double 0.02 to 0.2 m
MODELLING OF THE IGU

04
View publication stats

You might also like