Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cold Bent Insulating Glass Units During The Cold Bending Process Final Presentation TU Graz
Cold Bent Insulating Glass Units During The Cold Bending Process Final Presentation TU Graz
net/publication/335235385
CITATIONS READS
2 121
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Franz Nikolaus Pölzl on 19 August 2019.
01
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions
01
1 MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVES
-smooth and aesthetic building skin
-no standardization in structural glazing
-mechanical behavior of cold-bent IGU‘s ???
-economical method at the construction site
02
1 MOTIVATION AND OBJECTIVES
-smooth and aesthetic building skin
-no standardization in structural glazing
-mechanical behavior of cold-bent IGU‘s ???
-economical method at the construction site
02
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions
03
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-cold bending
04
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-well-tried way of bending glass
-reshape flat glass by heat
-reshaping accordingly to the
underlying formwork
-small bending radii are possible
-economical for mass production
-shoddy surface parallelism
-cold bending
04
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-cold bending
05
2 BENDING OF GLASS
methods
-hot-bending
-cold bending
-is done after the glass is tempered
-hence, it retains it‘s mechanical
properties of safety glass
-smaller bending radii than hot-bent
glass
-good optical quality
-economical for small quantities
05
2 BENDING OF GLASS
insulating glass unit (IGU)
1 glass pane
2 glass pane
3 metallic spacer bar
4 dessicant
5 primary seal (butyl)
6 secondary seal (silicone)
06
MODELLING OF THE IGU
volume element, 2nd order glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
volume element, 2nd order glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
shell element, 2nd order glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
butyl (primary seal) is neglected glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
primary seal: is neglected
07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
butyl (primary seal) is neglected glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
primary seal: is neglected
07
MODELLING OF THE IGU
glass panes: volume element, 2nd order
secondary seal: volume element, 2nd order
spacer bar: shell element, 2nd order
master primary seal: is neglected
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
master/slave contact tied
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
tied all interactions are described by
static interaction properties either by
slave to the glass panes slave
master to secondary seal master/slave interactions with hard contact
or by tying the parts together
tied
master/slave contact /\/\/\/\/\/\/\ tied
master
08
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions
09
IGU MODELS
10
IGU MODELS
single-curved double-curved
or or
single-bent double-bent
10
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study
stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer
aspect ratio
11
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
///////////
x=y=z=0
z
x
12
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
z
x
12
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
///////////
x=y=z=0
z
x
12
SINGLE-BENT IGU
13
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study
stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer
aspect ratio
14
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study
stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer
aspect ratio
14
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
Glass pane 2
Secondary
IGU Spacer
Seal Glass pane 1
/////////////////////////////
x=y=z=0
15
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
10 mm
8 mm
6 mm
16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
10 mm
8 mm
6 mm
16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
thickness of the glass panes
glass pane 2, 6mm
10 mm
8 mm
6 mm glass pane 1, 6 mm
glass pane 2, 10 mm
the „other“ glass pane thickness (glass pane 2)
does not have a significant influence on the stress
in the considered glass pane (glass pane 1)
glass pane 1, 6 mm
16
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars
glass pane 2
axis 5-5
axis 6-6
glass pane 1
axis 5-5
axis 6-6
subconstruction
17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars
axis 5-5
axis 6-6
Stainless steel
Aluminum
17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars
axis 5-5
axis 6-6
Stainless steel
Aluminum
17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
stainless steel vs. aluminum spacer bars
axis 5-5
axis 6-6
Stainless steel
Aluminum
17
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
5.6%
25%
18
SINGLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
5.6% 12.5%
25%
18
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
x z
19
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
x z
19
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
x z
19
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
20
single-bent double- parameter
parameter study case study
IGU bent IGU study
stainless steel
spacer and outcome
aluminum spacer
aspect ratio
21
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
22
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
membrane
stresses
no membrane
stresses
23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
23
DOUBLE-BENT IGU
aspect ratio / length of the IGU
deformation
plateau
anticlastic
shape
23
CONTENTS
1 motivation and objectives
2 bending of glass
3 parameter study
4 conclusions
24
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
-Spacer bars have to be made out of a ductile material
-Stainless steel as a material for spacer bars is suitable
25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
-Spacer bars have to be made out of a ductile material
-Stainless steel as a material for spacer bars is suitable
-The shear deformation, hence the strain in the edge zone is high
-High performance structural silicone for long-term applications
25
4 CONCLUSIONS
-Glass pane thickness in the thicker of both glass panes determines the maximum
principal stress
-Aluminum as a material for spacer bars is not suitable due to it‘s low ductility
-Spacer bars have to be made out of a ductile material
-Stainless steel as a material for spacer bars is suitable
-The shear deformation, hence the strain in the edge zone is high
-High performance structural silicone for long-term applications
-Membrane stresses in the glass panes occur for small aspect ratios and thin glass
pane thicknesses for the double-bent IGU
→ Prevent a perfectly anticlastic shape
→ Can be an issue regarding the optical quality
25
FRANZ NIKOLAUS PÖLZL
1 2
3
MESH SIZE
04
View publication stats