You are on page 1of 6

92 ANESTHESXA . . . Current Researches VOL.51, No. I, JAN.-FEB.

,1972
AXD ANALGESIA

WILLIAM EVERS, M.D., M.Sc.


GABOR B. RACZ, M.B., Ch.B.
ASHLEY A. LEVY, Ph.D.
Syracuse, N e w 'fork"

MATERIAL
T HE introduction of disposable plastic
syringes poses a problem in the area of
blood-gas analysis, for which glass syringes
One hundred paired sets of blood samples
were analyzed, using 500 each of the fol-
have previously been used. Presently, glass lowing syringes:
is being phased out in many institutions for
reasons of economy and convenience. The 1. Monoject 512, 10 ml., polypropylene
uncertainty about how a new syringe mate- (Sherwood Medical Industries) .
rial may idhence the gas exchange between 2. Interchange 4N, 10 ml., glass (Eisele
blood samples and room air is a cause for Company). All syringes had standard Luer
concern. tips (not Luer locks).
This study was undertaken to determine METHOD
whether plastic (polypropylene) syringes To simplify and to speed up sampling,
are suitable and convenient for blood-gas as well as to insure maximal uniformity of
analyses. Assessing the permeability of the compared samples, the following method
plastic syringe to oxygen and carbon diox- was used: 50 ml. of venous blood was drawn
ide was the most important aspect. The into a 100 ml. heparinized syringe and ex-
question of availability was also investi- posed to a 9O:lO mixture of 0xygen:carbon
gated. Also, the tightness of fit between dioxide. The syringe was gently rotated for
plungers and barrels becomes a considera- a period of 5 minutes, after which the blood
tion in arterial flow-back. was transferred via a sealed multiconnedor

*Department of Anesthesiology, State University Hospital, State University of New York, Upstate Medi-
cal Center, Syracuse, New York 13210.
Syringes for Blood-Gas Analysis . . . Evers, et a1 93

FIG.1. Technique of distribution of blood samples.

to five glass and five plastic sample syringes The mean, standard deviation and stan-
(fig. 1).The 10 sample syringes were then dard error of the mean were calculated for
divided into five groups, each consisting of each group of measurements. The difference
a glass syringe and a plastic syringe. PO,, in Po, was calculated between the glass and
Pco,, and p H were determined on an In- plastic syringe of each group. This differ-
strumentation Laboratories p H gas anal- ence is shown by the symbol A.
yzer, Model No. 113, using a Severinghaus-
type carbon dioxide electrode and the Clark For statistical analysis, the following as-
polarographic oxygen electrode. Precision sumptions were made:
gas mixtures were used for calibration.
Readings were made according to the fol- 1. Since plastic syringes are the "new-
lowing schedule: comers" to this work, the values obtained
Group 1: Immediately after sampling. from the glass syringes were taken as base-
lines, and it was assumed that differences
Groups 2 through 5: Syringes were stored between the glass and plastic values could
in a constant-temperature refrigerator (4 to be ascribed to the greater permeability of
4.4" C.) and read a t 1/2, 1, 2, and 4 hours, the plastic syringes, as well as to random
respectively. error.

II
I
* WILLIAM EVERS,M.D., Professor of Anesthesiology a t
the State University of New York, Upstate Medical Cen-
ter, Syracuse, New York, received his medical degree from
the Federal Institute of Medicine in Samarcand, U.S.S.R.
I
He was a Resident in Anesthesiology a t the University
: of Minnesota Graduate School of Medicine, Minneapolis,
I where he earned the degree of M.S. in Anesthesiology.
94 ..
AND ANALGESIA Current Researches VOL.51, No. 1,JAN.-FEB.,
ANESTHESIA 1972

2. Atmospheric Po, was taken as 150 zero at Po, = 150 torr, and should become
torr. For values of Po, in the glass syringes progressively greater as PO, values diverge
greater than 150 torr, diffusion from the cor- from 150 torr in either direction. Thus, plot-
responding plastic syringes would be out- ting A values against Po, values of the
ward. Conversely, for Po, values below 150 glass syringe should give a straight line, the
torr, diffusion would be inward. Conse- slope of which will be dependent on the
quently, Po, A values were treated as relative permeability of the plastic syringe.
“glass minus plastic” above Po., values of This is an obvious corollary of the rate of
150 torr, and “plastic minus glass” below diffusion being proportional to the concen-
150 torr. tration gradient, other factors being con-
stant.
3. For syringes in group 1, differences
between glass and plastic should have a 5. Furthermore, the quantity of gas dif-
mean of zero, if the only effect is random fusing in or out will be proportional to the
error. duration of storage, as long as the change
in partial pressure is small enough not to
4. If plastic syringes are, in fact, more alter the concentration gradient significant-
permeable than glass, A values should be ly. Thus, the slope of the plot of the a

TABLE 1
Storage Data
Po? linear regression equation* Pcoz linear regression equation”
Duration of Slope t 95 percent Constant Slope f 95 percent Constant
storage, minuter confidence interval confidence interval
~

0 0.0157 r+ 0.0199 -0.003 0.0412 k 0.0516 -1.322


30 0.0282 t 0.0179 -1.288 -0.0273 +- 0.0545 0.127
60 0.0338 t 0.0158 -3.691 -0.0309 f 0.0532 -0.048
120 0.0397 2 0.0142 -2.559 0.0024 20.0549 -1.352
240 0.0345 t 0.0203 -1.702 -0.0201 k 0.0542 -0.552
:%near regression equation has the form A = slopex p (gas) + constant.

0.04
I
r
e,“f

0.01

I d 30 €30 120 240


Duration of Storage, minutes

FIG.2. PO,slopes and 95% confidence intervals.


Syringes for Blood-Gas Analysis . . . Evers, et a1 95

0.12

0.08

0.04
0"

To -0.0

-0.0

0 30 60 120 240
Duration of Storage, minutes

FIG.3. pC09 slopes and 95% confidence intervals.

against Po, should increase almost linearly slopes of the A Pco2 graphs for any of the
with duration of storage. five groups (fig. 3 ) . The improvement in
performance of the plastic syringes when
6. The above assumptions hold equally dealing with Pco, over Po, measurements
for the Pco, measurements, except that at- may be ascribed to the far smaller range of
mospheric Pco, has been taken as zero. Pco, values dealt with. Slopes of the A
These effects were measured statistically, Po, graphs obtained were statistically in-
and the results are given in table 1. For the distinguishable from zero, reinforcing the
Po, measurements, there is a definite non- conclusion that over such relatively limited
zero slope, statistically distinguishable from ranges, A values do not change significant-
zero for all periods of storage, except for ly, whether for Po, or for Pco?.
group 1, which is statistically not distin-
guishable from zero. Figure 2 shows the RESULTS
slopes with their 95 percent confidence in- Diffusion of Gases.-Values shown in
tervals as a function of storage time. It can table 2 are interpreted as follows:
be inferred that after 4 hours of refrigera-
tion, the slope of the A Po, graph will be 1. pH: The blood in both the glass and
0.04. This means, to take a rather extreme plastic syringes showed a regular but slight
example, that if a blood sample with a Po, drop in pH, with the drop somewhat more
of 750 torr were to be stored in a plastic rapid in the plastic syringes. However, the
syringe for 4 hours under refrigeration, A magnitude of the drop (0.009 for glass,
would have a value of 0.04 x (750-150) = 0.014 for plastic, both over 4 hours) is com-
24 torr, a reading 3.2 percent lower than parable with the standard error (typically
would be obtained in a glass syringe. 0.009) and statistically not significant.
The Pco, measurements negate the con- 2. Pco2: This value in both types of
sequences of assumptions 4 and 5. There- syringe showed a similar pattern: a fall in
fore, it is concluded that measurements in the first 30 minutes, followed by a steady
glass and plastic syringes cannot be dis- rise. However, differences between glass
tinguished statistically, in view of the fail- and plastic syringes were too small to be
ure to demonstrate statistically significant significant.
96 . . . Current Researches VOL.51, No. 1, JAN.-FEB.,
ANESTHESIAAND ANALGESIA 1972

TABLE 2
Diffusion of Gases
Glass Syringes
A 30 min. 1 hr. 2 hr. 4 hr.

PH 7.352 7.352 7.351 7.348 7.343


0.096 0.141 0.097 0.103 0.098
0.009 0.013 0.009 0.010 0.009
PCOJ 41.48 39.52 39.64 40.55 42.06
12.08 11.54 11.76 11.63 12.02
1.13 1.08 1.10 1.09 1.13
Po, loo%* 94.87 93.13 95.34 95.20
0 18.42 22.04 25.56 35.92
0 1.72 2.05 2.37 3.34
Plastic Syringes
PH 7.351 7.349 7.346 7.343 7.337
0.097 0.097 0.098 0.095 0.096
0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.009
Pco. 41.04 40.49 41.20 41.81 43.43
11.99 11.72 11.82 11.72 12.28
1.12 1.10 1.11 1.10 1.15
Po, 100%” 97.07 95.35 96.00 96.91
0 18.00 17.91 19.31 24.66
0 1.67 1.67 1.79 2.29
*See text for interpretation of results.
Values tabulated: mean, standard deviation, and standard error of mean.

3. Po,: In view of the large range of though plastics are permeable to gases, the
Po2 covered by the blood samples in the permeability varies from one plastic mate-
study (54 to 490 torr) , each value of Po2 rial to another.1 When disposable plastic
was adjusted to a percentage based on the syringes first appeared on the market, they
value for the zero time blood sample being were mainly of polystyrene. However, since
100 percent. This had the effect of reducing 1965, polypropylene syringes, which are
the standard deviations and standard errors lighter, stronger, more flexible, and more
to values small enough to be meaningful. impact-resistant, have been replacing poly-
styrene.
From both the glass and plastic syringes,
there was a loss of oxygen from the zero Few documented data are available on
time level within the first 30 minutes. Once the gas diffusion between plastic syringes
this loss occurred, there seemed to be no and room air. Fletcher and Jergen,z com-
further marked change in Po,. Further, the paring glass with polystyrene syringes,
plastic syringes seemed to lose slightly less found a threefold greater oxygen loss from
oxygen than the glass, although the differ- the plastic syringes. Laver and Seifen,3 on
ence was not statistically significant. the other hand, stated that plastic syringes
can be used for blood-gas analysis if no de-
Ease of 0b ta ining Samp1es.-Plas tic syr- lay in reading the results is foreseen.
inges: The plunger moved fairly easily in
the syringe barrel once the “suction-cup” The main causes for blood-gas changes,
effect was broken. The latter proved quite once the blood is drawn into a syringe, are:
annoying and required preliminary “crack-
ing,” that is, disengagement of the plunger 1. Diffusion through syringe walls: Dif-
from the closed position.
fusion through standard glass syringe walls
is slower than through plastic. In plastic
DISCUSSION syringes, the diffusion varies with the ma-
The change from reusable glass syringes terial and thickness of syringe walls (table
to disposable plastic has been rapid. Al- 3).
Syringes for Blood-Gas Analysis . . . Evers, et a1 97

TABLE 3
Comparison of Some Chemical and Physical Properties of
Polypropylene and Polystyrene
Polypropylene polystyrene
-
Specific gravity 0.885 to 0.895 1.05 to 1.06
Permeability t o gases m1./100 sq. in./mni. thickness
24 hr./atmosphere at 25” C.
Carbon dioxide 800 900
Oxygen 240 350
W a t e r absorption 24 hr./percent c0.005 0.04 to 0.06
Resistance rating
Strong acids Excellent Good
Strong alkalies Excellent Exeellent

2. Leakage between syringe plunger and SUMMARY


barrel: In plastic syringes fitted with flex- Five hundred paired serial PO?, Pco,,
ible neoprene stoppers on the plungers, and pH determinations on 100 arterialized
leakage along the barrel-plunger interface blood samples were made, using glass and
appears much less than in the “multifit” polypropylene syringes. No statistically sig-
glass type., nificant differences in data were found be-
tween the two types of syringes. The auth-
3. Continuing cellular metabolism, which
contributes to a lowered Po, and pH and ors conclude that polypropylene syringes
can be used in lieu of glass syringes where
increased Pco2: This process slows down
the inconvenience of the “suction-cup” ef-
rapidly as the blood sample is chilled.
fect is not a factor.
CONCLUSIONS
No statistically significant difference was ACKNOWLEDGMENT
seen in blood-gas data obtained with poly- The authors wish to express their grati-
propylene and glass syringes. Diffusion of tude to Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc.,
gases through the syringe wall is not a sta- for a grant-in-aid that made this study pos-
tistically or clinically significant problem. sible, and to Dr. B. L. Valentine, Director
Obtaining arterial blood samples, on the of Biological Safety of Sherwood, for his
other hand, is more difficult, as the “suc- assistance in supplying the technical data.
t i o n - ~ effect
~ ~ ’ in
~ plastic syringes prevents
free back-flow. Therefore, a glass syringe REFERENCES
may still be preferred for the single arterial 1. Modern Plastics Encyclopedia 1969-70. New
blood sample. However, the current trend York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, vol 46, p 988
in continuous patient monitoring, using in-
2. Fletcher G, Jergen LB: Effect of sampling
dwelling arterial cannulae, makes plastic technique on the determination of Pao, during
syringes convenient and acceptable. In these oxygen breathing. J AppI PhysioI 21:463-468, 1966
instances, the traction necessary to initiate
3. Laver MB, Seifen A: Measurement of blood
blood flow will not dislodge the arterial oxygen tension in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology
cannula. 26: 73-101, 1965

The hours t h at make us happy make us wise.


-John Mascfield

You might also like