University of San Carlos
School of Business and Economics Department of Business Administration
2nd Semester S.Y. 2024 – 2025
Peer-Assessment Evaluation on Output
(Note: responses will be treated with confidentiality)
After your output is complete, evaluate your group mates using this rubric with the following scales and
interpretations:
1-2 unsatisfactory
3-4 minimal
5-7 effective
8-10 exemplary
Students Complete Name: Senados, Jan Julya S.
Understanding Analysis of the Active Listens and Encourages Total
of the output group output involvement cooperates total Score
Name of Group Members in our output with group participation
mates
(10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (50)
10 10 10 10 10 50
1. Balacuit, Nicole Cyra Gift Y.
2. Billones, Nino Jesse A. 10 10 10 10 10 50
10 10 10 10 10 50
3. Cardenio, Kristine Mae
10 10 10 10 10 50
4. Rallos, Anne Daniela
5. Suarez, Christine Claire 10 10 10 10 10 50
6. Sumalpong, James Nico 10 10 10 10 10 50
7. Tabion, Xyla Kristyl 10 9 7 7 7 40
Reflections: You can use the back page if necessary
What do I think about my group (participation and attainment of goal)?
My groupmates demonstrated a satisfactory level of participation, with most of the members
contributing suggestions and ideas that were innovative and well thought of. This has helped the group to finish
tasks efficiently and smoothly. Additionally, since we made the activity during a busy week, most of the
members were eager to lend a hand for the groupmates who were struggling to juggle different tasks from
different subjects. Working together helped us overcome obstacles more effectively, which led to a productive
workplace. Together with our hard work, collaboration, and dedication, we managed to stay on course and
successfully completed this project.
