INNO58h

Peer review & course evaluation

May 2012

Name: _________________________

Team: ______________________________

A) Self-evaluation Grade your own effort and learning during the course on a scale 1-5. 5 = always 4 = often 3 = sometimes 2 = seldom 1 = not at all

Evaluate the following I contributed with useful ideas in our team I asked my team members for opinions and information I contributed to keeping the team on track (concerning the course and project) I helped the group stay together I encouraged other group members to work, to give their ideas and thoughts I took other group members into consideration when working I made sure everybody in the group understood the project and related tasks I made summaries based on other group members thoughts and ideas I invested time and effort in posting comments in our blog I read relevant books for this projects. I shared thoughts and ideas from the books I read with my team members I participated actively in the workshops. I participated actively in developing the teams ideas and thoughts in Kunstenniemi. My grade (average)

Grade

Comment

INNO58h

Peer review & course evaluation

Team: ______________________________

May 2012

Name: _________________________

B) Peer review Evaluate the people you have worked with during this course. Write the name of your group members in the columns below. Review each person (fill in the table), and mark as following 5 = always 4 = often 3 = sometimes 2 = seldom 1 = not at all Name of group member Contributed useful ideas Asked for information from other group members and also asked for opinions Helped the group members Helped keep the group focused on the task Helped the group stay together Encouraged other group members to work, to share their ideas and thoughts Made the task more enjoyable Made my own learning more effective Took other group members into consideration when working Made sure everybody in the group understood the project and related tasks Made summaries based on other group members thoughts and ideas Shared information and thougts from reading books, blogs and related sources Posted blog comments Participated in the workshops Contributed to developing thoughts and ideas when working in Kunstenniemi Quality of work done Quantity of work done Grade (average) 5 = excellent 4 = good 3 = average 2 = weak 1 = lousy

INNO58h

Peer review & course evaluation

Team: ______________________________

May 2012

Name: _________________________ C) Course evaluation

Give a grade (1-3) for each of the learning methods during the course. Mark as X in the columns below. Grade 3 means it supported your learning, grade 1 means it disrupted your learning.

1 Working in teams Workshop 1 @ TuAMK Workshop 2 @ Novia Workshop 3 @ Hanken Discussions in mixed groups during the workshops Writing the team blog Reading freely chosen literature Support by teachers/coaches The Kunstenniemi-session 2-4.5

Open questions Is there something particular in the process that you did not like?

Is there something particular in the process that you liked?

What went well?

What did not go so well?

What did you learn from working with a client?

What did you get out of the process?

INNO58h

Peer review & course evaluation

May 2012

What has been difficult?

Comment on the workshops

Comment on working in teams/groups

Comment on your time-usage during the course

Comment on the team blog

Comment on the main blog (innostutaan.blogspot.com)

Comment of freedom of choosing literature

What supported my learning most?

What disrupted my learning most?

The course is 135 hours (if 5 study points), which means approximately 17 hours of work per week. How does this workload relate to my own work? (We need information concerning this for planning the course next year)