Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 April 2005
1
INTRODUCTION
World steel production 965 million metric tonnes (mmt) ((63.3% by BOF) China (1st) 220.1 mmt; Japan 110.5 mmt; USA 90.4 mmt India (8th) 31.8 mmt (48.7% by BOF process) Feb. 2005 Total production for the Asian region was 41.4 mmt, a rise of 10.3% on February 2004. China produced 24.8 mmt of crude steel in February, up 21.2% on the same month in 2004.
Source: http://www.worldsteel.org/media/wsif/wsif2004.pdf
STEEL
Source: http://www.energymanagertraining.com/iron_steel/Iron_Steel_process.htm
PROJECT LOCATION
540 km
http://www.mapsofindia.com/states/index.html
BASELINE METHODOLOGY
Part of waste gas used for internal heating requirements within the steel manufacturing industry, and remaining waste gases would normally have been flared in the absence of the project activity;
Project activity does not induce diversion of waste gases required for internal usage, to project activity; No change in process except changes due to collection, stabilization and transportation of waste gases to electricity generators; No local regulations/ programmes to constrain use of GHG intensive fuels (like coal), nor any regulation making use of waste gases mandatory; and Project activity results in supply of electricity to local grid, excluding grids with surplus power, unless cost of generation and supply is favourable for inter-grid transfers. Though not stated methodology applicable to project that supplies gas to
Existing power plant with no expansion of capacity, or Existing power plant with gas meeting requirement of capacity expansion, or 10 New power plant supplying to grid.
Case II:
Use of waste gas to generate additional power in existing power plant and/ or generate power in new power plant(s). The baseline scenario in this case is electricity would have otherwise been generated by the operation of gridconnected power plants and by addition of new generation sources. Baseline: Combined Margin grid intensity based on ACM0002 methodology.
12
Additionality
Use of Tool for assessment and demonstration of Additionality
Investment analysis
investment comparison analysis using a financial indicator (such as IRR, NPV,cost benefit ratio, levelized cost of electricity generation or Rs./kWh values), and checking whether there is at least one identified alternative which is better for investment than the project activity.
The chosen alternative to the project is flaring of the waste gases, and purchasing power from the grid. The cost of power in the alternative scenario in comparison to the project activity is Rs 1.94/kWh.
13
Project Boundary
This includes points of generation of waste gases in steel mfg operation, stabilisation, cleaning and transportation of these gases to the power plant through a gas handling network, delivery of power to grid, and all associated 14 equipment for such project activity, under the control of the project proponents. Source: Project Document
15
Build Margin
The sample group m consists of either: five power plants that have been built most recently [including plants under construction], or power plants capacity additions in the electricity system that comprise 20% of the system generation (in GWh) and that have been built most recently [including plants under construction].
16
Leakage
Due to use of displaced hydrocarbon fuel by other smaller power generators who currently use renewables.
However, in cases where there could be demand for power, such possibilities are ruled out since this would necessitate replacement and use of alternate power generating technology, which may not be feasible for a smaller generator.
CF: Correction Factor for gas quantity eligible for emission reduction = Minimum[(X-Z), Y, W] / W
Y : minimum quantity of waste gases flared in the steel manufacturing industry (average of sector during the last 3 years) Z: average amount of waste gases used for internal requirements of all waste gas generators (in similar steel manufacturing sector) in the region or country during the last 3 years X: the minimum quantity of waste gases generated in the steel manufacturing industry sector during the last 3 years, and W: waste gas supplied to power plants If the steel industry sector values for X,Y and Z are not available, then 17 CF = 1
Emissions Reductions
In existing power plant where only fuel replacement occurs
ERy(1) = Baseline I * CF PEy
In existing power plant where fuel replacement occurs along with additional power generation
ERy(2) = (Baseline I + Baseline II)* CF PEy
If more than one of the above occurs, then ERy(4) = (Baselinei * CF) - PEy
Note: PEy = 0
18
Local level data: 3 years old or of lesser vintage Regional level data: 5 years vintage
19
Next .
Whether the Methodology has been completely defined Transparency and Conservativeness has been taken into account Is the Methodology correctly applied
20
Thank You