Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
MIT 3371 - February 10, 2014
Agenda
The debate What is art?
Games as art
Mid-semester evaluation
The debate:
Ebert Games are not art in principle
Competitive, goal-oriented, and can be won Focus should be on experience, not winning Should improve or alter nature through the artist s soul Taste we know
What is art?
Art is the process of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.
Wikipedia (via Kellee Santiago)
The use of skill and imagination in the creation of aesthetic objects, environments, or experiences that can be shared with others.
Encyclopedia Britannica
Oxford Dictionary
Art
Common ways to consider games as art
Relies on traditional artistic forms New lively art
Traditional art
Smuts According to most major theories of art, many video games should be considered art
First concreative mass art
Elegance in competition
Sports are evaluated on aesthetics
Competition doesnt preclude elegance
Literature
Games rely on:
Literary / narrative conventions Literary storylines
Literature
Narrative
A story that follows a sequence of events
Dantes Inferno
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUOZRRU_Dy g
Music
Games can:
Use existing music Create new music Generate music
Music
Eternal Sonata
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owrBn3S1_3o
Rez
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4EFNWe4m Cc
Visual art
Artists create game worlds Art developed through design process Borrow artistic and aesthetic styles
World of Warcraft
Halo 3
Half-Life 2
Bioshock
Traditional art
Gravity Bone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdt-lboxt7Q
Okami
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuz0IF1MAk&feature=related
Do you think video games can be considered art given their relationship to different art forms? Is this enough to allow them to be considered art in their own right?
Lively Arts:
Focus on popular aesthetics Give shape and form to immediate experiences and impressions Embedded in everyday life
Art
Games still need to evolve to be art
Technical challenges and industry pressure arent excuses
Games need:
Memorable moments and emotional intensity More experimentation and innovation Ongoing criticism
Flower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJam5Auwj1E
Do games have the potential to be great art, or are they more likely to be lively art?
Are video games art (or could they be in the future)? Ebert questions, Why are gamers so intensely concerned, anyway, that games be defined as art? Why do you think it might be important for games to be considered art?
Take away
Games may be considered art because of their:
Use of traditional art forms Status as a new lively art Use as inspiration and a tool for art