Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section C
International Business
Provided By : Mr.Md.Mahmudul Hasan
Fourth Edition
Fouji
Jagannath University
CHAPTER 4
International Trade Theory
1992
GNP/per capita
$450
GNP Growth/year
1.5%
4-6
Korea
1970
GNP/per capita
$260
1992
GNP/per capita
$6790
GNP Growth/year
9%
4-7
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-7
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-7
4-7
Free Trade occurs when a government does not attempt to influence, through
quotas or duties, what its citizens can buy from another country or what they can
produce and sell to another country.
The Benefits of Trade allow a country to specialize in the manufacture and export
of products that can be produced most efficiently in that country.
The Pattern of International Trade displays patterns that are easy to understand
(Saudi Arabia/oil or China/crawfish). Others are not so easy to understand (Japan
and cars).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-8
through
4-8
through
and
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-10
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-10
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-10
10
A
Figure 4.1
Cocoa
15
20
B
K
G
0
10
Rice
15
20
Ghana
S. Korea
Cocoa
10
40
Rice
20
10
Ghana
10.0
S. Korea
2.5
Total production 12.5
5.0
10.0
15.0
Ghana
S. Korea
Total production
20
0
20
0
20
20
Ghana
S. Korea
14.0
6.0
6.0
14.0
Ghana
S. Korea
4.0
3.5
1.0
4.0
Table 4.1
4-13
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Theory of Comparative
Advantage
Assume Ghana is more efficient in production of both cocoa and
rice.
Scenario 1:
In Ghana it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13 1/3
resources to produce 1 ton of rice.
Thus with 200 resources Ghana can produce 20 tons (200/10)of
cocoa and no rice. Or 15 tons of rice(200/13.33) and no cocoa or any
combination of the two.
In South Korea it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and
20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice.
Thus , with 200 resources Korea can produce 5(200/40) tons of
cocoa and no rice or 10 tons of rice and no cocoa or any combination
of the two on its PPF.
Cocoa
15
10
A
Figure 4.2
K
B
2.5
0 3.75
5 7.5
K
10
Rice
15
20
Theory of Comparative
Advantage
Scenario 2:
If both the countries use half of the resources to produce cocoa
and half of the resources to produce rice:
Thus with 100 resources for each of the products, Ghana can
produce 10 tons (100/10)of cocoa and 7.5 tons(100/13.33) of rice.
In the same way with 100 resources Korea would produce 2.5
tons(100/40) of cocoa and 5 tons(100/20) of rice.
So without trade the total production would be 12.5(10+2.5) tons
of cocoa and 12.5(7.5+5) tons of rice.
Cocoa
15
20
10
2.5
0 3.75
5 7.5
10
Rice
15
20
Theory of Comparative
Advantage
Scenario 3: International Trade takes Place:
Cocoa to Rice Ratio in Ghana: 10: 7.5 or 4:3 or 1: 0.75
Cocoa to Rice ratio in Korea: 2.5:5 or 1:2
Cocoa is cheaper in Ghana. So Ghana can sell 1 unit of cocoa to
Korea and get 2 units of Rice whereas she can only get 0.75 units
of rice in exchange of giving up 1 unit of cocoa production in her
own country.
So, Ghana would export cocoa and import rice.
Theory of Comparative
Advantage
On the other hand,
Rice to cocoa Ratio in korea:5:2.5 or 1:0.5
Rice to cocoa Ratio in Ghana:7.5:10 or 1: 1.33
Rice is cheaper in Korea because Korea can sell 1 unit of Rice to
Ghana and get 1.33 units of cocoa whereas she can only get 0.5
units of cocoa by sacrificing the same amount of rice in her own
country.
SO Comparative Advantage comes into effect
Ghana
S. Korea
Cocoa
10
40
Rice
13.33
20
Ghana
10.0
S. Korea
2.5
Total production 12.5
7.5
5.0
12.5
Ghana
S. Korea
Total production
15
0.0
15
3.75
10.0
13.75
Ghana
S. Korea
11
4
7.75
6
Ghana
S. Korea
1.0
1.5
0.25
1.0
Table 4.2
Cocoa
15
10
A
Figure 4.2
K
B
2.5
0 3.75
5 7.5
K
10
Rice
15
20
4-16
Diminishing returns:
More a country produces, at some point, will require
more resources (diminishing returns to specialization).
Different goods use resources in different proportions.
However:
Free trade might increase a countrys stock of
resources (as labor and capital arrives from abroad),
and
Increase the efficiency of resource utilization.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cocoa
Figure 4.3
G
0
Rice
Cocoa
PPF1
Figure 4.4
Rice
4-20
4-20
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-20
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-20
4-20
4-21
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-23
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-24
production
United States
Exports
Imports
consumption
Exports
Imports
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Developing Countries
Exports
Imports
New Product
Maturing Product
Standardized Product
Figure 4.5
4-25
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-26
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-27
First-Mover Advantage
Economies of scale may preclude new entrants.
Role of the government.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-28
Porters Diamond
(Harvard Business School, 1990)
The Competitive Advantage of Nations.
Looked at 100 industries in 10 nations.
Thought existing theories didnt go far enough.
Question: Why does a nation achieve
international success in a particular industry?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Determinants of National
Competitive Advantage
Factor endowments:nations position in factors
of production such as skilled labor or
infrastructure necessary to compete in a given
industry.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Determinants of National
Competitive Advantage
Factor endowments:nations position in factors
of production such as skilled labor or
infrastructure necessary to compete in a given
industry.
Demand conditions:the nature of home
demand for the industrys product or service.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Determinants of National
Competitive Advantage
Factor endowments:nations position in factors of
production such as skilled labor or infrastructure
necessary to compete in a given industry.
Demand conditions:the nature of home demand for
the industrys product or service.
Related and supporting industries:the presence or
absence in a nation of supplier industries or related
industries that are nationally competitive.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Porters Diamond
4-30
Figure 4.6
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Demand Conditions
Related and
Supporting
Industries
2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights
4-31
The Diamond
Success occurs where these attributes exist.
More/greater the attribute, the higher chance of
success.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Determinants of
National Competitive Advantage
Chance
Two external
factors that
influence the
four
determinants.
Company Strategy,
Structure,
and Rivalry
Factor
Conditions
Government
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-32
Demand
Conditions
Related
and Supporting
Industries
Factor Endowments
4-33
4-34
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-35
Relationship of Basic to
Advanced Factors
Basic can provide an initial advantage.
Must be supported by advanced factors to
maintain success.
No basics, then must invest in advanced factors.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-36
Demand Conditions
Demand creates the capabilities.
Look for sophisticated and
demanding consumers.
impacts quality and innovation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-37
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-38
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
4-39
McGraw-Hill/Irwin