You are on page 1of 62

JP ELEKTROPRIVREDA HRVATSKE ZAJEDNICE HERCEG BOSNA d.d.

Mostar
...............

NEW SOURCES OF ENERGY

sekraz.ephzhb@tel.net.ba

Sarajevo, February 2009.


COMPANY INFORMATIONS
Company JP "Elektroprivreda HZ HB" d.d. Mostar
name*
First name* MATO-MATAN

Last name* ZARIC

Position* General manager

Telephone* ++38736335701

Email* ephzhb @ephzhb.ba

Fax ++38736335789

Street address Dr. Mile Budaka 106a

City* Mostar

Post code* 88000

Country* Bosnia and Herzegvina

Web site www.ephzhb.ba


JP Elektroprivreda HZHB d.d. Mostar is Public Utility established on August
26,1992. and since April 28,2004 it has been a joint stock company.
Its activities are power generation, distribution and supplay of electric
power to buyers.
Electricity generation in the region covered by EPHZHB is currently obtained
entirely from six hydro plants, with a total installed capacity of 792 MW.
We supply 181.853 customers.
Annual generation in 2007. was 1124,10 GWh.
Annual consumption in 2007. was 2856,51 GWh. To meet the electricity
demand, this company imports electricity from the international market.
Electricity accepted by customers at distribution level was 33% of whole
year consumption and other 67% accepted by big customers.
From total consumption of gross consumers in BH 91% are gross consumers
that are supplied by EP HZ HB.
To meet the electricity demand of big customers , this company imports 2/3
of electricity from international market.
Expected average growth of total consumption and peak power load in the
period of 2005 2020 is approximately 3.8%, that means that the
consumption will double in twenty years.
GENERATION_DEMAND BALANCE

The Energy demand growth


Projections by the 2020
Public Utility Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d. Mostar
Generating demand balance

Public Utility Elektroprivreda HZ HB Mostar Public Utility Elektroprivreda HZ HB


Basic data on the power system 1992_2006 generating electricity- demnad balance
4000
3500 1000
3000 500
peak load MW
energy GWh

2500
0

energy GWh
2000
-500
1500
-1000
1000
500
-1500

0 -2000
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007

-2500
year 93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
peak load demand generating electricity year
7000 900

800
6000

700

5000
600

Optereenje [MW]
Potronja [GWh]

4000
500

400
3000

300
2000

200

1000
100

0 0
2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020
potronja - ostvarenje potronja - prognoza maksimalno optereenje - ostvarenje maksimalno optereenje - prognoza

Slika 4: Potronja i maksimalno optereenje EP HZ H-B, ostvarenje + prognoza


Suitable answers to challenges such as:
Safety & security power supply
Sustainable development
Balance between generation & consumption
will be offered in this presentation!!
In line with these challenges, we keep on working on
development projects such as:
Use of Wind Energy,
Use of Hydro Energy,
Kongora Lignite Mine and Thermal Power Plant
shown in next slide.

In addition, preparations for the project of use of solar


energy are being made and we have to consider the
place and role of EP HZ HB in the projects of gasification
in this area.
Our target: Demand & production balancing, and produce over
1.600.000 MWh/year of green energy (electricity from wind energy
and small hydro) by year 2020, and hereby contribute reducing
emissions of a carbon dioxide (1.278.004 tCO2/year) and the other
greenhouse gases; thus, join to the EU in fulfilling commitment
under the Kyoto Protocol
Map of existing, under construction and planned power plants
HPP Ugar Usce
HPP Vrletna kosa
HPP Ivik

HPP HAN SKELA

WF GLAMO

WF DEBELO BRDO
PSPP KABLI SHPP STRANJ
SHPP MOKRONOGE
WF BOROVA GLAVA WF MOKRONOGE
PSPP VRILO WF SRANI
TPP Kongora WF POKLEANI
WF MESIHOVINA WF PLONO

WF VLAJNA
WF PLANINICA
SHPP MODRO OKO
SHPP KLOKUN
SHPP KOUAHPP MOSTARSKO BLATO
SHPP KRAVICE
SHPP STUBICA

WF CRKVINA
WF VELJA MEA

WF BELENII

WF IVANJICA
TABLE of energy power plants under construction and planned
Number Annual
of units Capacity
No. Name production Year
power (MW)
(MWh)
(MW)
1. HPP Mostarsko Blato 2x30 62 169000 2010
2. SHPP Koua 2x2,4 4,78 18304 2010
3. SHPP Klokun 2x1,75 3,50 12592 2010
4. SHPP Dubrava 2x2,5 5,00 12524 2010
5. SHPP Luke 2x1 2,00 5149 2010
6. SHPP Kravica 2x2,5 5,00 21805 2011
7. SHPP Stubica 2x1,5 3,00 12750 2012
8. SHPP Modo Oko 2x1,85 3,75 12224 2012
9. SHPP Stranj 2x3,65 7,30 20800 2012
10. SHPP Mokronoge 2x1,65 3,30 6607 2013
11. V F Velika Vlajna 16x2 32 89356 2010
12. V F Mesihovina 22x2 44 128527 2010
13. V F Livno (Borova Glava) 26x2 52 149617 2010
14. V F Mokronoge 35x2 70 197400 2012
15. V F Srdani 15x2 30 76512 2012
16 V F Poklecani 20x2 40 115632 2012
17. V F Planinica 14x2 28 64940 2012
18. V F Crkvine 12x2 24 64210 2015
19. V F Velja Mea 9x2 18 35630 2015
20. PSPP Vrilo 1x52 52 92591 2014
21. PSPP Kablic 1x52 52 73442 2015
22. HPPHan Skela 2x5,5 11 54000 2015
23. HPP Ugar Ue 1x15 15 60000 2015
24. HPP Vrletna Kosa 2x12,5 25 65000 2015
25. TPP Kongora 2x275 550 3000000 2015
26. NEW RENEWABLE 592,622 1558611,1
2010-
27. NEW CAPACITY SUM 1143 4558611 2015
Existing HPP New HPP WindFarm TPP Consumption EP

Diagram source: Integral development Study of JP Elektroprivreda HZHB Inc. Mostar for
the period of 2006 2010 with projection to Year 2020; Energy institute Inc. April 2007.
EP HZHB activities on new RES Projects
Level of projecting of the future hydro generating capacities by river basins
Name Level of projecting Project house Year of realisation
Project
documentation
R. BASIN T-M-T
SHPP MODRO OKO Prefeasibility study PU EPHZHB - Research and
development department
2008
SHPP KLOKUN* Feasibility study PORY ENERGY GmbH Wien,
Austria 2007
SHPP KOUA* Feasibility study PORY ENERGY GmbH Wien,
Austria 2007
SHPP KRAVICA* Feasibility study PORY ENERGY GmbH
Salzburg, Austria 2th q of 2009
SHPP STUBICA* Feasibility study PORY ENERGY GmbH
Salzburg, Austria 2th q of 2009
R.BASIN LITICA
SHPP DUBRAVA* Feasibility study PORY ENERGY GmbH Wien,
Austria 2th q of 2009
SHPP LUKE I FRIARS* Feasibility study PORY ENERGY GmbH Wien,
Austria 2th q of 2009
R. BASIN UPPER CETINA
SHPP STRANJ Prefeasibility study PU EPHZHB - Research and
development department
3th q of 2009
SHPP MOKRONOGE Prefeasibility study PU EPHZHB - Research and
development department
4th q of 2008
PSPP VRILO* Feasibility study Elektroprojekt d.d. Zagreb,
Croatia 4th q of 2009
PSPP KABLI Prefeasibility study PU EPHZHB - Research and
development department
3th q of 2009
R.BASIN VRBAS
HPP HAN SKELA Prefeasibility study Elektroprojekt d.d. Zagreb,
Croatia 2007
HPP on river Ugar Prefeasibility study Elektroprojekt d.d. Zagreb,
Croatia 2008
Notes:
Arranged by Contract from our own budget
* Prefeasibility study designed by PU EPHZHB - Research and development department
Level of projecting of the future wind generating capacities: FEASIBILITY STUDY

DURATION
WIND FARM Months Year of realisation PROJECT HOUSE

LIVNO 12 2006 NIP, S.A. Madrid, Spain

MESIHOVINA 12 2006 NIP, S.A. Madrid, Spain

VELIKA VLAJNA 12 2006 NIP, S.A. Madrid, Spain

MOKRONOGE 12 2007

SRANI 12 2007

PLANINICA 12 2007

POKLEANI 12 2008

PLONO 12 2008

CRKVINA 12 2008

VELJA MEA 12 2008

IVANJICA 12 2008

Notes:

Donation from La Agencia Espaola de Cooperacin Internacional

50m mast installation financed from our own budget

Pre-feasibility study prepared by PU EPHZHB - Research and development department, Year 2005-2007
Level of projecting of the future wind generating capacities : FINAL DESIGN
Name Level of projecting Project house Year of realisation
Project documentation
Wind energy Project
110kV Substation for wind
farms Tomislavgrad, Livno and Final design Energocontrol d.d. Zagreb 2th q of 2009
Velika Vlajna*

Notes:
Arranged by Contract from own budget

PRESENT ACTIVITIES
In cooperation with our company (technical and administrative
support) the KfW bank carry out activities:
updating of a feasibility study to take into account the latest
wind measurements at the site. This assessment was prepared
by Consultant Anemos Jacob and finished in October 2008.

completion of an environmental impact assessment:


Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Wind Park
Project. This environmental impact assessment study should
be finished untill February of year 2009.
HYDRO ENERGY PROJECT
Tihaljina-Mlade-Trebiat (T-M-T) River
Basin
System of hydrology stations on T-M-T river basin
JP ELEKTOPRIVREDA HZ HB d.d. Mostar developed system of hydrology stations which include 33 hydrology stations. 30 of
total hydrology stations are automated for remote managing and data transmission and has dual communication with
centre office
31 stations has daily measurement of water level
27 stations has daily measurement of water flow
17 stations has daily measurement of water quality parameters (temperature, redox, turbidity, nitrate, total dissolved gasses
etc.,)
DAILY MEANS VALUES OF WATER

DAILY MEANS VALUES OF pH


Map of SHPP in T-M-T river basin
Design parameters of SHPP on river basin T-M-T

CAPACIT
RENEVABL NETGHG
NAME Y INITIAL COST
E ENERGY REDUCTION
FACTOR
CAPACITY
MW MWh % tCO2/year
SHPP MODRO OKO 3,746 12.224 37% 9.772 7.443.012,365
SHPP KLOKUN 3,451 12.592 42% 9.847 8.528.811,586
SHPP KOUA 4,782 18.304 44% 14504 9.952.427,749
SHPP KRAVICE 4,996 21.805 50% 17.431 10.061.108,14
SHPP STUBICA 2,946 12.750 49% 10.192 7.603.341,455
R. BASIN T-M-T 19,921 77.674 61.746,7 43.588.701,3
LITICA RIVER BASIN
Hidrology stations, springs and defined sinkholes area
Map of SHPP in Litica river basin
SHPP Dubrava & Luke - 3D model
Design parameters of SHPP on Litica river basin

CAPACIT
RENEVABL NETGHG
NAME Y INITIAL COST
E ENERGY REDUCTION
FACTOR
CAPACITY
MW MWh % tCO2/year
SHPP DUBRAVA 5,203 12,524 27% 10.012 11.962.797,00
SHPP LUKE 1,998 5,149 29% 3.293 5.708.125,671
R. BASIN LITICA 7,201 17,673 13.304,596 17.670.922,67
UPPER CETINA RIVER BASIN
BORDER OF UPPER CETINA RIVER BASIN
Hidrology stations
Map of SHPP & PSPP in Upper Cetina river basin
Design parameters of SHPP & PSPP on river basin Upper Cetina

CAPACIT
RENEVABL NETGHG
NAME Y INITIAL COST
E ENERGY REDUCTION
FACTOR

CAPACITY

MW MWh % tCO2/year

SHPP STRANJ 7,375 20.800 32% 16.625 13.968.484,22

SHPP MOKRONOGE 3,268 6.607 23% 5.262 4.376.056,866

PSPP VRILO 51,234 95.417 21% 72.961 60.760.097,28

PSPP KABLI 51,773 73.126 16% 55.916 58.417.379,75

R. BASIN CETINA 113,65 195.949 150.763 137.522.018


VRBAS RIVER BASIN
Map of HPP on rivers Vrbas and Ugar
JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d. Mostar - Hidrology stations
Design parameters of SHPP & PSPP on river basin Vrbas

CAPACIT
RENEVABL NETGHG
NAME Y INITIAL COST
E ENERGY REDUCTION
FACTOR

CAPACITY

MW MWh % tCO2/year

HPP HAN SKELA 11,644 53.708 53% 42.929 24.500.000

HPP UGAR USCE 12 33.000 31% 26.400 13.146.800

HPP IVIK 11,20 22.000 22% 17.600 7.296.900

HPP VRLETNA KOSA 11,20 22.000 22% 17.600 7.296.900

R. BASIN VRBAS 46,04 130.708 104.529 52.240.600


WIND ENERGY PROJECT
In 2001 - Elektroprivreda HZ HB - Mostar (EP HZHB) started with
research and development of wind energy project (Project),
April 2004 ten micro sites were selected for the installation of 10
m meteorological stations
The hardware and software for measuring, data transmission,
supervising and data processing was acquired (e.g. NRG and
Wilmers equipment; WAsP and WindFarmer software, etc.) and a
measurement program has started
A wind data analysis was conducted after one year and three best
sites were selected for further development. The installation of 50 m
masts was conducted on three selected sites and the measurement
program was carried out
April 2006 - A final analysis was conducted with data collected both
from 10 and 50 m masts. It includes following aspects:
o Network connection and electrical systems analysis
o Geotechnical studies
o Economic analysis
o Technical issues
o Legal conditions
o Wind farm design
May 2006 - Analysis for the Use of Wind Power for Electricity
Generation in Bosnia and Herzegovina was done and it was presented
to the public
July 2006 - Review of the Study of the Feasibility of Wind Power in
B&H was performed.
A three new 50-meter measurement masts has been installed
Next steps in the realization of the Project were undertaken: making
new proposals of rules and directives, reserving the land, obtaining
necessary permissions and similar

The most of studies and analysis were performed by "NIP, SA", Madrid
in cooperation with EP HZ HB. The review of these studies was
conducted by "GARRAD HASSAN" Zaragoza
WIND ENERGY PROJECT

EXPLORED & NEW SITES


EXPLORED SITES: Annual energy production expected. (AEP)

VELIKA VLAJNA
VLAJNA
Total gross annual Total net annual energy Total net annual energy
Full load equivalent Capacity Proportional
energy production production (GWh) production (GWh) considering
hours/year factor wake loss (%)
(GWh) considering wake losses other sources of losses

101,615 95,875 89,356 2792 32% 5,65

MESIHOVINA
MESIHOVINA
Total gross annual Total net annual energy Total net annual energy
Full load equivalent Capacity Proportional
energy production production (GWh) production (GWh) considering
hours/year factor wake loss (%)
(GWh) considering wake losses other sources of losses

145,28 137,904 128,527 2921 33% 5,08

LIVNO
LIVNO
Total gross annual Total net annual energy Total net annual energy
Full load equivalent Capacity Proportional
energy production production (GWh) production (GWh) considering
hours/year factor wake loss (%)
(GWh) considering wake losses other sources of losses

166,142 160,533 149,617 2877 33% 3,38


Expected energy production based on results of measurement
program so far

Total Gross Total Net


Nominal Installed Proportional Capacity
Units Energy Energy
Power Power Wake Loss Factor
Production Production

WINDFARM No. MW/Units MW/ windfarm GWh % GWh %

MOKRONOGE 35 2 70 151.00 2.88 129.61 42


SRANI 15 2 30 53.46 0.69 48.89 29
PLANINICA 14 2 28 40.84 0.77 36.55 27
TOTAL 64 2 128 245.30 215.05
EXPLORED SITES: Investments
Items MESIHOVINA LIVNO VELIKA VLAJNA
% Euro Euro Euro
TOTAL COSTS OF TURBINES 75,00% 49.500.000,00 58.500.000,00 36.000.000,00
CIVIL WORKS 7,50% 4.950.000,00 5.850.000,00 3.600.000,00
ELECTRIC INSTALLATION 6,60% 4.356.000,00 5.148.000,00 3.168.000,00
STUDIES AND ENGINEERING 0,10% 66.000,00 78.000,00 48.000,00
SUBSTATION 3% 1.980.000,00 2.340.000,00 1.440.000,00
TRANSMISSION LINE 3% 1.980.000,00 2.340.000,00 1.440.000,00
OTHERS 0,40% 264.000,00 312.000,00 192.000,00
DEVELOPMENT COSTS 4,40% 2.904.000,00 3.432.000,00 2.112.000,00
TOTAL INVESTMENT 66.000.000,00 78.000.000,00 48.000.000,00

NEW SITES: Investments


Items MOKRONOGE SRDJANI POKLECANI PLANINICA
% Euro Euro Euro Euro
TOTAL COSTS OF TURBINES 75,00% 78.750.000,00 33.750.000,00 45.000.000,00 31.500.000,00
CIVIL WORKS 7,50% 7.875.000,00 3.375.000,00 4.500.000,00 3.150.000,00
ELECTRIC INSTALLATION 6,60% 6.930.000,00 2.970.000,00 3.960.000,00 2.772.000,00
STUDIES AND ENGINEERING 0,10% 105.000,00 45.000,00 60.000,00 42.000,00
SUBSTATION 3% 3.150.000,00 1.350.000,00 1.800.000,00 1.260.000,00
TRANSMISSION LINE 3% 3.150.000,00 1.350.000,00 1.800.000,00 1.260.000,00
OTHERS 0,40% 420.000,00 180.000,00 240.000,00 168.000,00
DEVELOPMENT COSTS 4,40% 4.620.000,00 1.980.000,00 2.640.000,00 1.848.000,00
TOTAL INVESTMENT 105.000.000,00 45.000.000,00 60.000.000,00 42.000.000,00
OBSTACLES AND FACTORS THAT SLOW
DOWN A PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

Limitations of legal framework in B&H

Absence of spatial master plans and urban planning

Slow and complicated administrative procedures and obtaining


of required documents and licenses

Overlapping of competency and conflict of power between state,


entity and municipal level

Absence of support schemes for wind energy (renewable


energy sources)
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY COMMUNITY,
UNDER IMPLEMENTATION, OR WITH FINANCING IDENTIFIED
Draft proposal Priority projects in the Contracting Parties Explored locations
Code Title Type Capacity Location Project Status/potential Financing Reference
(MW) (Contracti value start-end date by sources
ng parties) estimate (Euro)
in Euro
Electricity WF Borova Green field 52 B&H 78 Mio. Under appraisal, Credit European
generation glava investment EP HZHB Feasibility study Investment Bank
01 completed, (EIB) with letter
Environmental show strong
impact interest to finance
assessment study this Project in
(EIA) should be 75% amounts.
finished untill
summer of year
2008.
Electricity WF Green field 44 B&H 76 Mio. Implementation (90% by In the framework
generation Mesihovina investment EP HZHB phase, EIA study KfW and of bilateral
02 should be 10% by EP financial
finished untill HZHB) cooperation
summer of year between
2008. Germany and
B&H, KfW, is to
2008/2012 finance the first
major wind
power park to be
developed in
B&H
Electricity WF Velika Green field 32 B&H 48 Mio. Feasibility study Credit EIB with letter
generation Vlajna investment EP HZHB completed, EIA show strong
03 study should be interest to finance
finished untill this Project in
summer of year 75% amounts.
2008.
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE ENERGY
COMMUNITY, UNDER IMPLEMENTATION, OR WITH
FINANCING IDENTIFIED

Draft proposal Priority projects in the Contracting Parties New


sites
Code Title Type Capacity Location Project Status/potential Financin Reference
(MW) (Contracti value start-end date g by
ng estimate sources
parties) in Euro (Euro)
Electricity WF Green 70 B&H 105 Mio. Pre-feasibility PPP/Cre We are
generation Mokronog field EP HZHB study completed, dit looking for
04 e investm 2010/2012 Investor.
ent
Electricity WF Green 30 B&H 45 Mio. Pre-feasibility PPP/Cre We are
generation Srdjani field EP HZHB study completed, dit looking for
05 investm 2010/2012 Investor.
ent

Electricity WF Green 40 B&H 60 Mio. Pre-feasibility PPP/Cre We are


generation Poklecani field EP HZHB study completed, dit looking for
06 investm 2011/2012 Investor.
ent

Electricity WF Green 28 B&H 42 Mio. Pre-feasibility PPP/Cre We are


generation Planinica field EP HZHB study completed, dit looking for
07 investm 2010/2012 Investor.
ent

Note: Pre-feasibility study prepared by PU EPHZHB - Research and development department


Coal mine & TPP Kongora

AREA OF
COAL DEPOSIT
KONGORA LIGNITE MINE AND THERMAL POWER PlANT YEAR 2007

In the area of Kongora in the Duvno Plain, there are large amounts of coal
with a low calorific value. The first research was done in 1956 and 1957,
then in the period 1975 1978 when most of the research work was carried out and
appropriate analyses and studies were prepared.Taking into consideration the results
of the research and environmental protection principles, in 1997, Elektroprivreda
Hrvatske zajednice Herceg Bosne gave Rheinbraun Engineering und Wasser GmbH
Cologne, Germany the charge of preparing the pre-feasibility study Integrated Lignite
Mining and Power Project Kongora. The study was prepared in June,1998 and proved
that it is possible to extract energy coal in the Kongora coal deposit. The coal would
be used as a fuel for a thermal power plant with the capacity of over 550 MW in the
period of 40 years.
JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB provided the necessary funds to keep on the detailed
research in this site with the objective of establishing the coal quantity and quality.
Other research was also done for the needs of the Kongora lignite mine and thermal
power plant. The work was carried out according to the Study on Detailed Additional
Geological Research of Kongora Lignite Deposit near Tomislavgrad (the Faculty of
Mining Engineering-Geology-Civil Engineering of Tuzla University, 2006) on the basis
of the approval given by the Ministry of Economic Affairs of HB Canton.

The work includes:


o research drilling with coring and excavation;
o laboratory coal testing and preparation of a study on coal quality;
o laboratory testing of physical-mechanical features of coal and accompanyng
seams with preparation of a geomechanical study;
o preparation of a study on the deposit classification and categorization;
o hydrological, meteorological and hydrological research.
HISTORY OF GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AND EXPLORATION WORK
Year Activity Constructor

1871 Investigation began at 1871th year

1956 6 boreholes (K-1, K-2, K-3, K-16, K-17 i K-18), total 1518,83 m. Geoinenjering Sarajevo- Institut for geology Sarajevo ,
B&H
1975 14 boreholes (K-21 - K-34), total 1512,70 m Geoinenjering Sarajevo- Institut for geology Sarajevo ,
B&H
1976 6 boreholes (K-35 - K-40) total 864,75 m Geoinenjering Sarajevo- Institut for geology Sarajevo ,
B&H
1977 5 boreholes (K-41 - K-45) total od 683 m, Geoinenjering Sarajevo- Institut for geology Sarajevo ,
B&H
2007 Exploration drilling with coring and extracting of prospecting PU Geo-Mari d.o.o. - Geotehnika 94 d.o.o. Mostar, B&H
trench, 49 boreholes total 6039,50m

TOTAL 80 boreholes with total depth of 10 618,78m

PROJECT DOCUMENTATIONS
Year Project documentations Project house

1978 Elaborate on the classification, categorisation and calculation on the lignite Geoinenjering Sarajevo- Institut for geology
reserves in the Kongora deposits Sarajevo
1998 Pre - Feasibility Study Integrated lignite mining and power project Kongora Rheinbraun Enginering und Wasser GmbH
/ Zalede, June 1998 Koln Njemaka

2006 Project Detailed geological investigation of lignite deposit Kongora near Faculty of Mining, Geology and Civil
Tomislavgrad, Engineering, Tuzla, B&H, year

2007 - 2008 Laboratory testing of coal and completion of Elaboration on coal quality Inspekt RGH, Sarajevo, B&H, year 2007-2008.
(total nr. of analysys 972 were conducted)

2007- 2008 Laboratory testing of physical mechanical characteristics of coal and Mining institute, Tuzla, B&H, year
accompanying sediments and completion of Geo-mechanical Elaborate
(total nr. of analysys 699 were conducted),
2009 Elaborate on classification and categorisation of lignite deposit Kongora Faculty of Mining, Geology and Civil
Engineering (FMGCE), Tuzla; JP PHZHB
COAL DEMAND
PRELIMINARY LOAD SCHEDULE AND UNIT NET GENERATION ( 275 MW )

FALLOW:

Annual Net Generation: 1 498 000 000 kWh ( ~1 500 GWh )

Total annual heat consumption = 13 524 440 GJ by block per year


or for both blocks total 27 048 880 GJ per year

With caloric value of coal from proximately 7 420 KJ/kg, coal


demand per year is about 3 657 000 tons. (1.22 kg of coal for 1 kWh
net energy)

With mentioned coal demand per year, time limitation of surface pit
is 169 071 885 tons: 3 657 000 = 46,23 years ~ 46 years
COST EVALUATION FOR ENTIRE PERIOD OF USE
The cah flow analysis has been carried out for main and power plant
together.
Item Total expenditure (million )

Lignit mine Power plant Total Project


1. Investment, replacement 380,14 1.078,22 1.458,36
2. Operating expenses 813,77 1.339,02 2.152,79
3. Insurances 23,69 459,03 482,72
4. Royalties - 126,22 126,22
5. Central overhead 32,55 - 32,55
Total 1.250,15 3.002,49 4.252,64

Estimated total cost with investment for entire period of 46 years is: 4 252 638
075
Evaluation of exploration costs
In average, during the working period of the mine costs of coal production
are:
- 11,31 EUR/tons that is
- 1,532 EUR/GJ
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE EBNERGY
COMMUNITY, UNDER IMPLEMENTATION, OR WITH
FINANCING IDENTIFIED

Draft proposal Priority projects in the Contracting Parties


Code Title Type Capacit Location Project Status/potenti Financing Reference
y (MW) (Contractin value al start-end by
g parties) estimate in date sources
Euro (Euro)

Electricity CM & 2x275 1 Bosnia 1.100,00 Pre-feasibility Strategic Looking for


generation TPP and Mio. study partner/P Investor/Strate
01 Kongora Herzegovi completed, PP gic partner
n, Investigations
Federation completed
of B&H
EP HZHB

1 Power size and number of Units could be changed


Integration of RES capacities into Electricity Grids

SYSTEM PLANNING AND NETWORK


DEVELOPMENTS
110 kV network topology Area N-W 2007-2015

VE GLAMO

VE
DEBELO BRDO

VE
BOROVA GLAVA VE MOKRONOGE

VE SRANI

VE MESIHOVINA

VE POKLEANI

VE PLONO
110 kV network topology Area South 2007-2015
VE POKLEANI VE PLONO

VE
VELIKA VLAJNA

VE PLANINICA

VE MERDAN
GLAVA

VE KAMENA
110 kV network topology Area S-I 2007-2015

VE CRKVINA

VE
VELJA MEA

VE BELENII

VE IVANJICA
Integration of Wind
Power into Electricity Grids
SYSTEM PLANNING AND NETWORK DEVELOPMENTS

Need for additional/new grid infrastructure is layout


in area:

North-West 189 km new overhead lines and 8 TS


110/20 kV.
South 24,7 km new overhead lines and 4 TS 110/20
kV.
South-East 129 km new overhead lines and 4 TS
110/20 kV.
CONCLUSIONS
Joined cooperation in:
o Planning and realisation of projects with common interest
o Promoting renewable energy sources, adjusting, governing and
monitoring completion of maps, feasibility study elaborates, project and
bidding documentation,
oAdjusting, governing and monitoring completion of maps, feasibility study
elaborates, project and bidding documentation and if acceptable, joined
construction of the thermal power plant Kongora
o Wind energy utilisation in electrical energy generation and during the
research completion of studies, technical documentation, consortium for
constructing and managing wind farms
o Exploring the possibility of solar energy utilisation
o Preparing the electrical energy system study and connecting to EES
within existing and future configuration of transmission system
o Professional qualification of human resources on different projects of
common interest, in preparing system studies, project designing, during
the construction
Lets work together on
sustainable future

You might also like