Professional Documents
Culture Documents
University of Waterloo
Department of Mechanical Engineering
ME 610: Analytical Vibration
Fall 2005
Ayhan Ince
Adrian Wong
Purpose
ME 610 Presentation.
Presentation Outline
Background
Introduction
Modeling Approach
Modeling and Analysis
Results
Conclusion
Recommendations
Questions
ME 610 Presentation.
Background
Suspension System
– Improve Ride Quality
– Good Road Handling
Depending on
– Vertical Motion (Heave) of Vehicle Body
– Angular Motions (Pitch and Roll) of
Vehicle Body
ME 610 Presentation.
Introduction
Most of vehicle suspension models
are 1 DOF to 4 DOF (half vehicle)
– Easier to model and implement
– Large volume of technical research on topic
available
However
– They ignore the roll motion of the vehicle
– Thus, incapable of determining torsional
rigidity of the vehicle
ME 610 Presentation.
Introduction
To capture the dynamic phenomenon
of heave, pitch, and roll requires a full
vehicle suspension model.
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling Approach
Generalized full vehicle suspension model
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling Approach
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling Approach
Assumptions are:
– Suspension and tires are described by
constant damping and spring stiffness
– Vehicle Body represented by
concentrated mass at CoG and rotation
inertia about CoG
– Wheel hubs represented by
concentrated mass at CoG
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
To create simulation model of full
vehicle suspension system:
– Determine the equations of motion for 7
DOF (2nd order)
– Decouple the equations of motion into
14 first ordinary equations
– Use numerical methods to provide
solutions from decoupled equations
– Animate model using the solutions
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
SIMULATION
SYSTEM FULL VEHICLE GENERATED
EQUATIONS MODEL RESULTS
DISPLACEMENT
MATLAB &
MAPLE VELOCITY
Simulink / VR
ANIMATION
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
The 7 equations of motion are:
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
The 7 equations of motion are (cont):
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
Mass Matrix
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
Damping Matrix
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
Stiffness Matrix
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
Eigenvalues and Natural Frequencies
Heave
Roll
Pitch
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
Eqigenvectors and Mode Shapes
ME 610 Presentation.
Modeling and Analysis
The 14 1st order equations are:
ME 610 Presentation.
Results
Parameters for results generated are:
– Road input is sinusoidal with frequency = 5 rad/s
– Base Amplitude = 0.15 m
– a = 1.5m
– b = 1.5m
– w1,2 = 1m
– Velocity = 20 m/s
– Delay between front and rear = (a+b)/vel
– Delay between left and right = π/2
ME 610 Presentation.
Results
Results generated from full vehicle
suspension model using prescribed
parameters
ME 610 Presentation.
Results
Magnitude plot for sprung mass motion
Heave Magnitude versus Frequency
0.5
Amplitude (m)
0.4
heave
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Frequency (radian/s)
ME 610 Presentation.
Results
Magnitude plot for sprung mass motion
Pitch and Roll Magnitude versus Frequency
0.25
Peak at approx.
0.2 pitch
11 radian/s
0.15 roll
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Frequency (radian/s)
ME 610 Presentation.
Results
Animation of Model
ME 610 Presentation.
Conclusion
Full vehicle suspension model is generic
The generalized parameters of the full
vehicle suspension model allows for:
– Optimization of ride quality
– Optimization of handling capabilities
Current model is utilized as a vehicle
shaker table.
ME 610 Presentation.
Recommendations
Increase full vehicle suspension
model capabilities by:
– Including tire lift-off and suspension
travel limits
– Develop a complete road handling
capable vehicle model
– Introduce control logic capabilities for
possible active and semi-active
suspension
ME 610 Presentation.
Questions
Thank you for attending
ME 610 Presentation.