“Strong

“Strong and
and Credible
Credible Navy
Navy for
for a
a Progressive
Progressive Maritime
Maritime Philippines”
Philippines”
  References
 Highlights of EO80 & AO25
 Mechanics of the Interim AFP Rating and
Ranking System
 Deliverables
 Rating Procedures for PN Personnel
 Proposed PN Units Forced Ranking
 Updates of PN Personnel Forced Rating

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Letter of DBM Secretary FLORENCIO B ABAD
(Chairman, AO25 Inter-Agency Task Force) to Hon
VOLTAIRE T GAZMIN, Secretary, DND re Conditional
Approval of PBB Granting
 EO80 (PB Incentive System), AO25 & AO25 Inter-
Agency Task Force Memorandum Circular No 2012-02
dated 16 Oct 2012
 AFP Manual 11-2 re Inspector General Services & AFP
RG 161-291 dated 21 Jan 1954 re Inspector General’s
Service
 DND Memo dated 26 Mar 2012 re 2012 Program
Performance Review Guidance, Program 1-4
“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”
 DND Circular No 4, GHQ-AFP dated 05 May 2003 re
AFP Officer Appraisal System
 Memorandum Circular No 2012-03, IATF dated 12
November 2012 re Guidelines on Determining
Eligibility and Ranking Bureaus, Delivery Units, and
Individuals Based on Performance in Line with the
Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) in
FY2012
 AFP Circular No 16 dated 13 Sept 93 re EP Evaluation
Marks
 AFP SOP No 6 dated 19 Jun 95 re AFP Performance
Evaluation Mark for Civilian Employees
“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”
 Rationalize the current incentive system in government
generally characterized by across-the-board bonuses
 Strengthen performance monitoring and appraisal systems
like the Organizational Performance Indicator Framework
(OPIF) to measure agency performance
 Link personnel incentives to delivery unit’s performance
and recognizing & rewarding exemplary performance
 Establish and implement a Performance-Based Incentive
(PBI) System that will motivate higher performance and
greater accountability.

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Rationalize, harmonize, streamline, simplify, integrate and
unify the efforts of government agencies relative to the
National Leadership’s Agenda, the Phil Development Plan,
commitments and targets
 Establish a unified and integrated Results-Based
Performance Management System (RBPMS)
 Incorporate a common set performance scorecard, and
organizational performance information system
 Provide a basis for determining entitlement to performance-
based allowances, incentives, or compensation of
government personnel.

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

Productivity Enhancement Incentive (PEI) –
across-the-board bonus of P5,000.00 per
employee (from the original P10,000.00)

Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) – top-up

bonus based on individual’s contribution to
accomplishment of Department/Agency targets

Note: The PEI and PBB top-up bonus shall be sourced from the
Miscellaneous Personnel Benefits Fund (MPBF)

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Achieved at least 90% of MFO (Major Final Output), STO
(Support to Operations), GASS targets (General
Administration and Support Services.
 Achieved at least 90% of Priority Program targets
 Meet 100% of good governance conditions under the
performance drivers of the RBPMS, set by the AO 25 Task
Force for FY 2012
 System of Forced ranking of Delivery Units and the
personnel within them
 Good Governance Conditions (all 4 of them)

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Group Individual Performance Category
Performance
Best Better Good
Category
Performer Performer Performer
Best Bureau
35,000 20,000 10,000
(delivery unit)
Better Bureau
25,000 13,500 7,000
(delivery unit)
Good Bureau
15,000 10,000 5,000
(delivery unit)

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 The AFP and the different Major Services
(PA, PAF, PN & GHQ Proper & TAS –
Programs 1-4) shall adopt a standardized
System of Rating and Ranking the
Performance of AFP Delivery Units and

Personnel/Soldiers.

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Overall Lead Responsibility for organizing, conducting & implementing
the proposed (Annual) System of Rating and Ranking shall be the
respective Resource Managers of Program 1-3 (the Major Service
Commanders) and Program 4 (VCSAFP). They shall formally be
represented by the Deputy Inspector General of each Service (PA,
PAF, PN) and in the case of Program 4 – by the Deputy, TIG, AFP:
 Deputy IG’s of Program 1-4 shall be the lead staff in collaboration
with their respective RMO, MFO, 1’s & IT Offices
 They shall be designated as Performance Management Team.
 PMTs for each Service shall have the lead responsibility for
collating, recording, assessing, evaluating and in physically
complying with the documentary requirements relative to the
Rating and Ranking of Delivery Units and Personnel/Soldiers

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 The System of Rating and Ranking the Performance of AFP
Delivery Units and Personnel/Soldiers shall center on the
following:

 Forced ranking of bureaus or Delivery Units (DUs)

according to the extent/decree of their contribution
to the achievement of their respective Agency/Unit
performance targets.

 Forced ranking of officials and employees of bureaus,

offices or delivery units that qualified for the PBB

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Forced ranking of bureaus or Delivery Units (DUs)
according to the extent/decree of their contribution to
the achievement of their respective Agency/Unit
performance targets:

 PMT of each Service (Program 1-4) shall rank their

respective Delivery Units as follows :

Ranking Performance Category

Top 10% Best Delivery Unit (Operational and/or Admin)
Top 25% Better Delivery Unit (Opnl and/or Admin)
Top 65% Good Delivery Unit (Opnl and/or Admin)

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 The parameters for the determination which among
the Delivery Units (DUs) is Best, Better or Good shall be
in accordance with the establish quantitative criteria
they observe in their respective Service.

 In addition, each Service has the option to use other

criteria, both quantitative and qualitative (ex.
Rating/Result of Annual General Inspection and
Program Performance Budget Execution Review -
PPBER) in the implementation of their rating scheme

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Forced ranking of officials and employees of bureaus,
offices or delivery units that qualified for the PBB :

 PMT of each Service (Program 1-4) shall rank their

respective Individual Personnel/Soldier as follows :

Ranking Performance Category

Top 10% Best Performer
Next 25% Better Performer
Next 65% Good Performer

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 The parameters for the determination which among
their Individual Personnel/Soldier is Best, Better or Good
shall be in accordance with the following:

a) DND Cir No 4, re AFP Officer Appraisal System

b) AFP Cir No 16 re EP Evaluation Marks
c) AFP SOP No 6 re AFP Performance Evaluation Mark
for CEs

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 The composition and corresponding basic duties of each member of the
Performance Management Team is as follows: :

Membership Principal Duty

Deputy Inspector General Chairman
Chief, Inspection Division, OTNIG Forced Ranking of Delivery Units
Chief, Admin Branch, O/N1 Forced Ranking of Individual personnel
NRMO Representative Member
NMFO Representative Member
Ensure uploading of required data in the PN
Chief, IT Branch, O/N6
Website
Chief, Program and Budget Branch, O/N1 Member

PNFC Representative Member

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 TASK SPR/OPR/UPR
Determination of Delivery Units PMT/OTNIG
Categorization of Delivery Units PMT/OTNIG
Forced Ranking of Delivery Units PMT/OTNIG
Categorization of Individuals PMT
Forced Ranking of Individuals All PN Units
Communications & Dissemination Plan PMT

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Categorization of Individuals shall be by personnel class:
• Officers
• Enlisted Personnel
• Civilian Employee

 All PN Units shall forced ranked their respective personnel

by personnel class
• Type Commands - PHILFLT/PMC
• Operational Commands - SIX (6) NAVAL FORCES & FMRF
• Support Commands - NSSC/NETC/NCBde/NRC/NBC
• Support Units - NISF/PNFC/NLC/MNH/CNH/BNS
HPN & HSG/CMOG,PN

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Performance
OAR/EPEM/
Nr Rank Last Name First Name MI AFPSN Unit Designation Category
AFPPEMCE Rating
(Best/Better/Good)

Prepared By: Approved By:

____________________________________ _____________________________________
Unit Admin/Personnel Officer Unit Commander

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”

 Deadline of Submission: 291200H November 2012

 All Rating Sheets should be submitted in Hard and

Electronic Copy to HPN (Attn: N1)

 PN Units that will not submit WILL NOT BE INCLUDED in

the Consolidated PN Personnel Rating Sheet that will be
submitted to the Chairman, DND Performance Management
Group (Attn: ASPP/ASPER)

“Strong and Credible Navy for a Progressive Maritime Philippines”