0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views58 pages

Marlee Chong Gps Slide Deck

Marlee Chong Gps Slide Deck

Uploaded by

andrian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views58 pages

Marlee Chong Gps Slide Deck

Marlee Chong Gps Slide Deck

Uploaded by

andrian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Technological Principles and

Policy Challenges of the


Global Positioning System
Marlee Chong
May 6, 2013
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Where am I?
Where am I going?
 Landmarks
 Dead reckoning
 Coordinate system
Latitude
Longitude
Challenges
 Size of the Earth
 Describing celestial and planetary
motion
 Timekeeping
 Measurement in motion
 Reducing error
Radionavigation

Transit

Long Range Aid to Timation


Navigation
(LORAN) System 621B
Opportunity
 Limitations
 Accurate radionavigation required remaining
within the line of sight
 Transit required a latitude to fix position and 10-
15 minutes of processing time: too slow for
aircraft
 Transit (APL, 1960): satellite navigation using orbits
 Timation (US Navy, 1964): stable timing of space-
based satellite clocks
 System 621B (US Air Force, 1963): digital signals and
global coverage
Developing GPS
 Defense Navigation System (NAVSTAR) Global
Positioning System
 Designed for civil and military use to “drop five
bombs in the same hole” for less than $10,000
 Department of Defense combined elements from
Transit, Timation, and System 621B
 Spearheaded by US Air Force
Draper Prize
 Awarded in 2003 “for their technological
achievements in the development of the
Global Positioning System (GPS)”

Bradford Parkinson and Ivan Getting


Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Technology
 System Elements
 Signal
 Ranging
 Vulnerabilities
System Elements
Space Segment
 24-31 satellites identified by space
vehicle number (SVN) and PRN code
 20,200 km altitude
 12 hour cycle
 6 planes of
4 satellites
 Solar powered with
backup batteries
 Rocket fuel limits lifespan
Constellation considerations
 Global coverage
 4 satellite minimum, 6 practical standard in
case of anomalies
 Good geometrically distribution
 Robust if a satellite fails
 Inexpensive repositioning
 Minimal maneuvering to remain in orbit
 Reduce tradeoffs of power requirements by
distance
Control Segment
 2nd Space Operations Squadron of the United States
Air Force tracks satellites, monitors transmissions
and sends commands and information
 Master Control Station
 Monitor Stations
 6 USAF
 10 National Geospatial-Intellignece Agency sites added in
2008
 Ground Antennas
 4 ground antennas located with monitor stations
 8 tracking stations in Air Force Satellite Control Network
Control Segment Map

[Link]
GPS receivers
 Single- or dual- frequency
receivers access L1 or L1
and L2 carrier frequencies QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

 Tracking channels (9-12)


track specific satellites
Signals
 Unique Psuedo-random noise (PRN) Codes
 Coarse Acquisition
(C/A code) L1
 Precision Code
(P code) L1 and L2
 Microwave signals
 L2 = 120 ƒ

 L1 = 154 ƒo
 Clock carrier frequency
 ƒo=10.23 Hz
Security Designs
 Anti-Spoofing (AS)
 P-code encrypted as Y-code; L2 unavailable
 Selective Availability (SA)
 March 25, 1990-May 1, 2000
 Provided civilians with Standard Positioning Service,
compared to military standard Precise Positioning Service
 Decreased performance by factor of 7
 Delta error: dither (add random noise to) all satellite clocks
 Epsilon error: slowly varying orbital errors almost identical for
users with short separation distances
Pseudoranging
 Inherently indeterminable due to bias
in system and user time measurements
Geometric range time ∆t
Satellite Signal
clock reaches
reads receiver ∂tD tu
∂t time w/o error time
Ts Signal Ts +∂t T’u Signal T’u +∂t
leaves reaches Receiver
satellite receiver clock
reads
Pseudorange time time
Psuedorange errors
p=c[(Tu’ + tu)-(Ts+∂t)=∆t+c(tu-∂t+∂tD)
 tu = receiver clock error
 ∂t= satellite clock error
 ∂t= clock bias + clock drift * (t-tclock reference time) + frequency
drift* (t-tclock reference time)^2+relativistic correction
 Relativistic correction: ~ 4.5*10^-10
 SR ~ -8*10^-11; GR ~ 5*10^-10
 Adjust satellite clock frequency by correction
 ∂tD=∂tatmosphere +∂tnoise+∂tmultipath+ ∂thardware
and
interference
Atmospheric errors
Ionospheric
divergence
 Signal info delayed
 np=1-c2/f2-c3/f3-… QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

 vp=c/np
 Carrier phase early
 ng=1+c2/f2+c3/f3+…
 vg=c/ng
Atmospheric errors
Troposphere
 Nondispersive
 Refractivity of
hydrostatic and
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

nonhydrostatic
components
Geometric Dilution of
Precision
 Effect of satellite geometry in
estimating range error propagation

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Vulnerabilities
 Signal
 Infrastructure
 Incidental
Signal
 Commercially available parts and
publicly available directions
Jamming Spoofing
Intentional Valid signal
interference with time
Detectable and delay
illegal QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

No easy
detection or
solutions yet
Infrastructure
 Damage to control center, satellite
network, and cyber attacks
Alternate master control center
Extra satellites in orbit
Incidental
 Target: ubiquitous and well-known
 Spectrum interference
 Solar flares: thickens ionosphere
 Magnetic storm:
solar wind interacts
with magnetic field
 uV increases,
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

ionizing and heating


thermosphere
Mitigation
 Receivers and users detecting
anomalies
 Firewalls and cyber security
 Alternative technologies and
redundancy systems for must
vulnerable and critical
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Applications
 Original mission:
military navigation
technology for
positioning and
navigation
 Designed with dual QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

use in mind
Assessment Scheme
 Highly Critical: application able to perform some
functions with alternative technologies and/or
systems after severe disruption and consequences
 Moderately Critical: application able to perform
most functions with existing alternative
technologies and/or systems with compromised
accuracy and precision
 Not Critical: application able to perform all
functions and can utilize alternative technologies
and/or systems with minimal disruption
Positioning
 Smart Bombs: ex. Joint Direct Attack Munition
 JDAM receiver finds
position of bomb
 Aircraft receiver finds
position of target QuickTime™ and a
 Guidance kit monitors decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

bomb position as
control computer
adjust tail fins
 40 feet accuracy
Highly Critical Positioning
 Inertial guidance system
as an alternative
 Loss of accuracy and
precision leads to
collateral damage QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Nuclear Test Detection
 US Atomic Energy Detection System
Global network of sensors to detect
nuclear events operated by US Air Force
Sensors aboard the GPS
satellites monitor space
and the atmosphere QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Moderately Nuclear Test
Critical Detection
 GPS system failure likely leaves
satellites and sensors in orbit
 Other satellites could
host future sensors

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Positioning
 US Geological Survey measures the
relative position of stations relative
near active faults
Calculate strain, slip and ground
deformation
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Not Critical Positioning
 USGS could easily substitute other
methods to conduct surveys, such as
LORAN-C, because the time resolution
is large

QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Navigation
 Mobile phones with built-in receivers
Assisted GPS uses carrier network
 Mobile apps
can access
GPS data QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Moderately Navigation
Critical
 Triangulation from cell towers
 Vibrant community to code patches
or other apps
 Spoofing
apps change QuickTime™ and a

coordinates
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.

read by other
apps
Timing
 NYSE and
Nasdaq data
centers execute
and timestamp
trades
 Network Time
Protocol
synchronizes
servers every
second with
GPS
Highly Critical Timing
 Without GPS
 Trades not
synchronized
 Trading houses
cannot obtain time
from cellular
networks from GPS
 Without local
receiver
 Internet NTP has
2s offset
 Resolution disrupts
high frequency
trades
Weather Forecasting
 Radio Occultation
 Measure atmospheric density
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor

from the refraction of signal


passing through atmosphere to a
low-Earth orbit satellite
 Can compensate for lack of
meteorological observation
stations for oceans and the
poles
Moderately Weather
Critical Forecasting
 Less complete models
 Accuracy issues regardless
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor

 Less precise instrument


calibration
 Alternatives such as satellite
imaging
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Overview
 History
 Technology
 Applications
 Policy
Policy
 Mandate
 Governance
 Funding
 Interoperability
 Privacy
 Spectrum protection
 Replacement?
Mandate
 Presidential policy (2010 National Space
Policy)
 “The United States must maintain its leadership
in the service, provision, and use of global
navigation satellite systems”
 Law (Title 10 of the U.S. Code, Section 2281)
 Created in National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1998
 Responsibility of Secretary of Defense
Governance
National Executive Committee for Space-Based
Positioning, Navigation, and Timing
 National Coordination Office runs policy with
working groups
 NASA advisory board
 Defense (co-chair), Transportation (co-chair),
State, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Homeland
Security, Joint Chiefs of Staff, NASA
Funding: $1.5 billion
Dept of Defense Dept of Transportation
 Develop  Civilian GPS beyond
 Acquire gen III
 Operate  Joint funding
 Sustain
Brownouts
 Replacements delayed
Relaxed, insufficient oversight
 Options
Use retired satellites
Speed up production
Power management of secondary missions
Interoperability
 UN’s International Committee on Global Navigation
Satellite Systems (ICG)
 Compatibility and interoperability
 Cooperation: coordinate and share information and save
costs
 Position, navigation and timing information helps society’s
security and environment
 Working groups and individual agreements
Privacy
 United States vs Jones (Jan 2012)
 Supreme Court: warrant needed to secretly
install a tracker
 United States vs Katzin
 Challenging decision regarding tracking, which was not
considered a search
 Geolocation Privacy and Surveillance Act
[Sen. Wyden D-Ore, Rep. Chaffetz (R-Utah),
and Sen. Kirk (R-Ill)]
 Introduced to Senate in 2011, House in May 2012
 Proposes a standard for government access
Spectrum protection
 Commercial products: FCC and NTIA
Lightsquared barred from using
neighboring spectrum
Importing, marketing, selling, and
operating jammers is illegal (up to
$100,000 fine)
Replacement?
 DARPA’s All Source Positioning and
Navigation (ASPN)
Phase 2 June 2012 to design algorithms
“low cost, robust, and seamless navigation
solutions for military users…with or
without GPS”
Acknowledgements
 Thank you all for coming
 Special thanks to Prof. Venky
Narayanamurti and Dr. Tolu Odumosu
for their mentorship and assistance

You might also like