Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Info Com 2011 TPC Info Meeting
Info Com 2011 TPC Info Meeting
17 March 2010
Overview
• Multiple-level structure for paper reviewing
– TPC Co-chairs
– Area TPC (ATPC) Chairs
– TPC members (TPC lead and TPC review) and Backup TPC
members
• Highlights
– Increase number of ATPC Chairs
– Enhance the ATPC Chairs paper matching process
– Enhance the TPC paper matching process
Reviewing Process
ATPC Chairs
• In total we will have 39 ATPC Chairs for Infocom 2011
– Detailed information can be found at
http://www.comsoc.org/confs/infocom/2011/
– Each ATPC Chair is responsible for 40-50 papers
– Papers will be assigned to the ATPC Chairs immediately after
the submission deadline
– Should decide on “Early reject” in two cases:
• Paper is not ready for review (missing figures, clearly out of scope, etc.)
• Inconsistency between author names/affiliations on the paper and in
EDAS
– Such inconsistency may result in assigning papers to reviewers with conflict of
interest
ATPC Chairs (2)
• Oversee the discussion phase; intervene if TPC-Lead is
ineffective
• Make sure there is consistency between TPC-Lead summary and
TPC reviews
• Choose/add extra reviewer whenever necessary
– E.g., low quality/biased reviews, controversial reviews, missing reviews
– Can enter own review
– May utilize a subset of TPC members (backup TPC members), who are
assigned to help during this phase
• Provide recommendation to TPC Chairs
– Three outcomes: accept, reject, discuss at TPC meeting
– Try hard not to put the paper into the discussion phase
• Participate in TPC meeting and lead group discussions
Matching Papers to ATPC Chairs
• A list of areas will be provided when authors submit paper
Cognitive radio networks and Cyber-physical systems and networks Data center, Grid and Cloud networks
spectrum management
Delay tolerant networks Energy-efficient networks Future Internet architecture
Middleware and network services Mobile ad hoc networks Multimedia networking
Network QoS, economics and pricing Network communication and switching Network management
technologies
Network monitoring and Network protocols Network security and trustworthiness
measurement
Network theory and optimization Optical and broadband networks Peer-to-peer (P2P) and overlay
networks
Sensor and actuator networks Vehicular networks Web and online social networks
Wireless mesh networks Wireless networks - Cellular, WLAN, Wireless networks - Cross-layer design
RFID
Wireless underwater and underground Miscellaneous topics
networks
• Further adjustments will be made to make sure the load balancing
among all the ATPC Chairs
Matching Papers to TPC Members
• Under each area, there are multiple topics
• Each topic also includes the methodology that is used, e.g.
Theory/Analysis, Simulation, and
Experimentation/Measurements
• A sample topic can be:
• wireless mesh networks: scheduling: experimentation/measurement
• TPC members need to indicate their interest in terms of
topics (before submission deadline)
• TPC members claim papers based on title and abstract (after
submission deadline)
• Fine adjustment will be made to ensure a good match
TPC Members
• Review assigned papers (15-18 papers) by due date
• Each TPC member will also be TPC-Lead for 4-6 papers in
his/her group of papers
– NO delegation of these papers
– TPC Leads to provide summary of online discussions
• Backup TPC will have no more than 6-8 papers
– Quality review is expected within short period of time
• Participate in online discussion
– Try to resolve conflicts
• Attend TPC meeting in Los Angeles, CA
– TPC meeting date has been fixed to Nov. 13, 2010
TPC Lead
• For each paper, one TPC member is designated as
TPC Lead
• TPC Lead
– Must review this paper – NO delegation
– Initiate and lead the online discussion phase
– Summarize discussion results and make recommendations
(accept, reject, discuss, need additional review)
– Summary report is not available to the authors
Paper Delegation
• Only non-TPC-Lead Papers can be delegated to qualified
reviewers
– TPC member is responsible for overseeing the quality
• Delegation is performed via EDAS
• Delegation must be done within 10 days from the date you are
assigned the papers
• TPC member must personally ensure that the delegated
reviews are completed on time
– Request the delegated reviewers to participate in the on-line discussion
phase
– No more than 25% of the non TPC-lead papers may be delegated (~ 3
papers)
On-line Discussion Phase
• This is a critical part of the review process
– Starts after the reviews are due, and will last around 2 weeks
• All reviewers of the paper must participate in the on-line discussion
through EDAS
– During this phase, the reviewers can see the reviews of each other
– The reviewers are required to understand the other reviews and to resolve
inconsistencies
• The discussion is also very important even when there is agreement
about accept/reject
– E.g. if the paper is ranked (4, 5, 6) (We want to identify the best 3-5 papers for
best paper award candidates)
– Or if the paper is ranked (1, 1, 4) (We want to give coherent response)
• It is acceptable to change your review and score after the discussion!
– Please be fair to the authors!!!
On-line Discussion (2)
• Please provide a detailed discussion related to the
technical merits of the paper
– For example, “The authors have not cited relevant prior work.
The paper has significant technical deficiencies. Equation 12 is
incorrect because ...”
• Avoid the impulse to push paper to the discussion category
straightaway! We are time-constrained at the TPC meeting
– (for a 1, 4, 4 paper): “I see we have no consensus. Let’s
recommend that the paper be discussed during the TPC
meeting.”
– “Yes, let’s discuss at the TPC meeting”
Detailed Schedule
TPC members indicate their interest in terms of topics 1-Jun-2010 15-Jun-2010
Notification 21-Nov-2010
• High quality reviews are essential for the success of the conference
Contacts
• Email: info11.chairs@gmail.com
• Individual Emails:
– byrav@cse.unl.edu
– jiewu@temple.edu
– qianzh@cse.ust.hk
– jcliu@cs.sfu.ca
Questions ?