CORRELATION BETWEEN TENSES

MASTERY AND SPEAKING ABILITY

IN STRADA BUDI LUHUR

43131.51015.0017
DHIA HANA KHAIRUNNISA M.
Chapter I

1 Background of the Research

2 Question and Scope of the Research

3 Research Hypothesis

4 Method of the Research

 Chapter I
Background of the Research

Question and Method of the

Research
Scopes of the Research
Hypothesis
Research

Question and Scopes

Research Hypothesis
• “Is there any significant correlation
01 between tenses mastery and
speaking ability in Strada Budi
Luhur Vocational School?”
02 A. Ho = No significant correlation
B. Ha = There is significant
correlation
• Simple past tense, simple present
tense, and simple future tense.

03
Method of the Research
Test → Collect the data → Analyze
 Chapter II
Theoretical Description

1. Definition of Tenses 1. Definition of Speaking

• Fulcher (2003)
• Rahman (2011)
• Louma (2004)
• Widarso (1994)
• Tarigan (2015)

2. Various Kinds of Tenses

2. Basic types of Speaking
• Widarso (1994)
• Brown (2003)
• Rahman (2011)

3. Elements of Tenses
3. Co-construction of Speaking
• Yule (2010)
• Fulcher (2003)
 Chapter III
Methodology of the Research 1. Time and Place of the Research

2. Population and Sample

• The population is X grade accounting program
students in Strada Vocational School are population,
which is 69 students.
• The sample is 30 respondent from X grade accounting
program students

3. Technique of Data Analysis

Validity and Reliability Hypothesis Test

Frequency Distribution • If 𝑟𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡 > 𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 , it To approve the
means valid and hypothesis between two
8 steps reliable. variables.
 Chapter IV
Research Findings and Discussion
Tenses Mastery Speaking Ability

Value Total Students Frequency (%) Value Total Students Frequency (%)

55 – 60 6 20 60 - 63 2 6.67

61 – 66 7 23.33 64 – 67 5 16.67

67 – 72 9 30 68 – 71 8 26.67

73 – 78 4 13.33 72 – 75 7 23.33

79 – 84 1 3.33 76 – 79 1 3.33

85 – 90 3 10 80 – 83 7 23.33

Total 30 100% Total 30 100%

 Chapter IV
Research Findings and Discussion

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

X Y
N 30 30
Mean 69.00 72.07
Normal Parametersa,b
Std. Deviation 8.030 6.170
Absolute .184 .165
Most Extreme Differences Positive .184 .165
Reliability Statistics
Negative -.116 -.134
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.007 .901 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .263 .391

a. Test distribution is Normal.
.951 2
b. Calculated from data.

A. Testing Normality
B. Testing Reliability
 Chapter IV
Research Findings and Discussion

• If 𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑 ≥ 𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 , the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected, and the alternative hypothes
is (Ha) is accepted. It means that there is a significant correlation between tenses m
astery and speaking ability.

• If 𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑 ≤ 𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 , the null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted, and the alternative hypothe
sis (Ha) is rejected. It means that there is no significant correlation between tenses
mastery and speaking ability.
Correlations

C. Testing Hypothesis X Y
Pearson Correlati 1 .938**
on
X
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 30 30
Pearson Correlati .938** 1
on
Y
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 30 30
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Chapter V
Conclusion and Suggestion

Conclusion Suggestion
• The correlation? • For the students
• The result? • For the school
• The calculation • For the next
coefficient of researcher
determination?
Thank you