ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

PERSONALITY AND VALUES

Syed Muhammad Taha Mehdi

Zulkarnain Rahu
Numa nooruddin
Mohsin Siddiqui
 WHAT IS PERSONALITY

• Personality is a combination of person’s physical and mental proclivity

traits. This includes guise, pensive, endeavor and foreboding.
• Simply it’s the way in which person interacts with others
UNDERSTANDING THIS WITH SAMPLE ,
ALL THESE THINGS ARE PART OF THEIR
PERSONALITY

Inspiring Impulsive

Extravert Ruthless
 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
FACTORS

• Asians have neutral weather high intelligence and creativity but lack in
spirit that’s why In slavery.

• Europeans have extreme weather less intelligence and creativity but

have high spirit that’s why excel in everything
 CULTURAL FACTORS

• Personality is an individual aspect of culture but culture is an collective

aspect of personality. For example positive traits (Sindhi culture)
• Utmost respect for quest
• Negative traits , some people ( wannabe Waders) planning away from
hard work.
• Pathan culture (hard workers and emotionally unstable )
 BIOLOGICAL FACTORS

• Heredity ( you must have heard phrases like father like son)
• For example even when twins get a parted from each other far away
still they share same proclivity like smoking ciggerate of same brand
and having a car of same model.
 PHYSICAL FACTORS

• Person physical proclivity are a great game changer in determining

personality.
• Height
• Skin tone
• Weight
• Hair color
• Beauty
 SITUATIONAL FACTORS

• Although these situational factors don’t most of the time shape and
formulate your personality but it could alter it 360 degree in
demonizing situations.
• For example
 PESSIMISTIC APPROACH

 Tending to see the worst aspect of things or have believe that worst will
happen.
 According to the case study Metha the very well known personality have
adopted “cynical” approach.
 WHAT IS MBTI IN TERMS OF CASE
AND GENERALLY

 The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is an introspective self-report

questionnaire indicating differing psychological preferences in how
people perceive the world and make decisions.
 Mehta had the qualities of MBTI as he had a good sense of humour ,
want people to recognize him as a successor.
 MBTI TYPES

INTROVERT

FEELERS SENSORS

EXTROVERT

THINKERS INTIUITIVES

PERCIVERS JUDGERS
 METHA PERSONAITY
DEMOSTRATION

 Dominating
 Manifestation needs to be maintain so that people around him can be
aware of a such intellectual person
 He wants to be a mover and shaker that will help him to do great in
solving case studies.
 Autocratic approached been adopted
 Being over confident having a mind set that he is a best scrutinizer.
 Doesn’t support diversity culture
 Remains on his own view point no matter what adverse or positive
effect it has
 CASE STUDY OVERVIEW ON METHA

• Extraversion+sensing+thinking+judging mind set was been developed

• Wants to be a active organizer
• Failed on logical basis
• Assertive personality put metha into a embarrassing situation
• Lacked behind in decisive decision making , practical results due to poor
research , poor in scrutinizer and in the final project with out having
communicated with the group members taking charge and failing
miserably
 KUMAR PERSONALITY
DEMOSTRATION

• Proficiency
• Indulgent
• Support team working
• No headstrong attitude
• Takes time in decision making
• Virtuous human and working skills
• Optimistic
 CONCLUSION

• Kumar labeled metha as a destitute leader

• Lack of communication skills
• Unable to perform as a leader and a team member
• Promote working with multi diverse people
• Always go into the details of facts & figures