WIRELESS

WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

Presented By:
Parth Rathod(17BEE054)
Bhautik Patel(17BEE055)
Kevin Patel(17BEE060)
Vraj Patel(17BEE064)
 1.
1. INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION

• Now a days electricity is more important in very efficient way and for that we
developed many things to make it efficient and continuous.
• But as per we know electricity is transmitting through conductors and as per our
comfort for the efficient transmitting electricity we need high efficient conductors
and also the system is become very complex with many conductors so it is not
good for any people and also very dangerous for us with deal with many
conductors so now a days wireless technology is coming.
• So we all know about wireless charger and there are many things that are coming
on based on wireless technology in industrial application also.
 2. BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
2.

• As per we know Nikola tesla invented alternating current in 1856-1943 and he

tried also wireless power transmission experiment at wardenclyffe but he fails.
• 1964 William C. Brown demonstrated a rectenna which could convert microwave
power to electricity.
• 1968’s idea for Solar Power Satellites proposed by Peter Glaser Would use
microwaves to transmit power to Earth from Solar Powered Satellites.
Microwave
3. DIFFERENCEvs.
3. DIFFERENCE Laser
BETWEEN
BETWEEN Transmission
MICROWAVE
MICROWAVE &
& LASER
LASER

Microwave Laser

• More developed • Recently developed solid state

• High efficiency up to 85%
• Beams is far below the lethal
levels of concentration even for a
prolonged exposure
• Cause interference with satellite
communication industry
lasers allow efficient transfer of
power
• Range of 10% to 20% efficiency
within a few years
• Conform to limits on eye and skin
damage
 4.
4. THEORY
THEORY OF
OF WIRELESS
WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

• Electromagnetic Radiation
• Antenna basics
• Phased-array antenna
• Diffraction analogy
• Energy distribution
• Rectenna
• Physical limitations & relationships
 4. THEORY OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION
Physics of Wireless PowerTRANSMISSION
4. THEORY OF WIRELESS POWER Transmission
I)I)PHYSICS
PHYSICSOF
OFWIRELESS
WIRELESSPOWER
POWERTRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

• Forms of Electromagnetic radiation

• Travel at same speed
• F = frequency
• C = velocity of light
• L =wavelength
 4.
4. THEORY
THEORY OF
OF WIRELESS
WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

II)
II)DIPOLE
DIPOLEANTENNA
ANTENNA

• Transmission of power is simpler than TV &

Radio
• Transmitter: wire half a wavelength
• Pushes electrons back and forth
• Receiver: wire half a wavelength
 4.
4. THEORY
THEORY OF
OF WIRELESS
WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

III)ANTENNA
III)ANTENNARADIATION
RADIATIONPATTERN
PATTERN
 4.
4. THEORY
THEORY OF
OF WIRELESS
WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

IV)
IV)PHASED-ARRAY
PHASED-ARRAYANTENNA
ANTENNA

• The λs for microwaves are small 

dipoles small
• Beam focusing: phased-array antenna
• Electronically steered by varying the
timing or phase
• Waves will merge together
4.
4. THEORY
THEORY OF
OF WIRELESS
WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

V)
V)DIFFRACTION
DIFFRACTIONANALOGY
ANALOGY

• Light same properties

• Laser beam shinning trough a narrow
opening & spreads out or diffracts
• Bright spot in the center w/fainter spots
on the side
Diffraction
4.
4. THEORY & WIRELESS
THEORY OF
OF Microwaves
WIRELESS POWER
POWER TRANSMISSION
TRANSMISSION

VI)
VI)DIFFRACTION
DIFFRACTION&&MICROWAVES
MICROWAVES

• Waves reinforce at some points and

they cancel out at other points (bright
and fainter points)
• In microwaves: is a scaled up version of
diffraction
 5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

I)I)EFFICIENCY
EFFICIENCY&&COSTS
COSTS

• Space Solar Power (Wireless Power Transmission)

• Ground Based Solar Power
• Nuclear Energy
• Fossil Fuel
5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

II)
II)ADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGESOVER
OVEREARTH-BASED
EARTH-BASEDSOLAR
SOLARPOWER
POWER

• More intense sunlight

• In geosynchronous orbit, 36,000 km (22,369 miles) an SPS would be illuminated over 99% of
the time
• No need for costly storage devices for when the sun is not in view
• Waste heat is radiated back into space
• Power can be beamed to the location where it is needed, don’t have to invest in as large a
grid
• No air or water pollution is created during generation
• Ground based solar only works during clear days, and must have storage for night. Thus it is
More reliable than ground based solar power
Early and simple schematic of how a space solar power satellite would beam
energy to electrical power grid on Earth.
Initial conceptual looks at a mega-engineering project as shown in this Boeing design.
New technologies point to more efficient, less expensive space solar power systems.
5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

III)
III)ADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGESOVER
OVERNUCLEAR
NUCLEARPOWER
POWER

• Possible power generation of 5 to 10 gig watts

• If the largest conceivable space power station were built and operated 24
hours a day all year round, it could produce the equivalent output of ten 1
million kilowatt-class nuclear power stations.
• Nuclear power doesn't pollute the atmosphere like fossil fuels. But it does
produce waste. This stays radioactive for thousands of years and is very
dangerous. At the moment most stations bury their waste deep underground,
at sea or send it to other countries. (Britain, for example, accepts and buries
nuclear waste from several countries.)
5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

DISADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGESOVER
OVERNUCLEAR
NUCLEARPOWER
POWER

• One of the disadvantage of Nuclear

• On April 26, 1986 the worst catastrophe in nuclear history occurred in the station at
Chernobyl, Ukraine.
• Due to the failure of one of reactor, two people died immediately from the explosion
and 29 from radiation. About 200 others became seriously ill from the radiation; some
of them later died. It was estimated that eight years after the  accident 8,000 people
had died from diseases due to radiation (about 7,000 of them from the Chernobyl
cleanup crew). Doctors think that about 10,000 others will die from cancer. The
most frightening fact is that children who were not born when the catastrophe
occurred inherited diseases from their parents.
 5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

IV)
IV)ADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGESOVER
OVERFOSSIL
FOSSILFUEL
FUEL

• Fossil fuels won't last forever (next 50yrs)

• It is not renewable
• The ability to match supply to demand may already have run out, especially for oil
• Fossil Fuel fired electric power plants in the US emits about 2 billion tons of
greenhouse gas CO2 in to air every year. This courses climate change in the future via
greenhouse effect.
• Cost—prototype would have cost $74 billion
• “According to Kyle Data the Oil Factor,” which predicts that oil could hit $100
a barrel by 2010.
5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

DISADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGESOVER
OVERFOSSIL
FOSSILFUEL
FUEL
• If microwave beams carrying power could be beamed uniformly over the earth. They
could power Mobile Devices E.g. cell phones
• Microwave transmission
• Interference with other electronic devices
• Health and environmental effects
• Possible health hazards
• Effects of long term exposure
• Exposure is equal to the amount that people receive from cell phones and Microwaves
• Location
• The size of construction for the rectennas is massive and also Implementation
Complexity
5.
5. COMPARISONS
COMPARISONS AMONG
AMONG OTHER
OTHER POWER
POWER SOURCES
SOURCES

V)
V)SUSTAINABLE
SUSTAINABLEENERGY
ENERGY

• To meet the final goal of providing sustainable energy for future growth and
protection of the environment, the design and technology for space solar power
should be evaluated by the criteria of availability of resources, energy economy
(payback time) and waste production such as carbon-dioxide through all the
processes required for production of SPS . Power from space should be
competitive with other energy sources in this respect. We also need a space
solar future if our children are to live in an intact environment. They will be
grateful to us
 6.
6. CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION

• This idea worth to invest in since this technology brings in virtually unlimited
power from the sun.
• This also benefits the intercontinental power providers.
• Absolutely environmentally friendly since it is emission-free.
 7.
7. REFERENCE
REFERENCE

1) “A Few Things you occasionally wanted to know about wireless power transmission.” Potter, Seth.
http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/a_few_things_you_occasionally_wanted_to_know_about_wireless_power_trans
mission.shtml

2) “Solar Power Satellites and Microwave Power Transmission”

http://www.kentlaw.edu/classes/fbosselm/Spring2004/PowerPoints/Wireless%20Power%20Transmission%20-%20Soube
l.ppt

3) www.on-orbit-servicing.com/pdf/OOS2004_presentations_pdf/OOSIssuesOverview_Oda.pdf

4) www.kentlaw.edu/classes/fbosselm/Spring2004/ PowerPoints/Wireless%20Power%20Transmission%20-%20Soubel.ppt

5) www.spacefuture.com/.../a_fresh_look_at_space_ solar_power_new_architectures_concepts_and_technologies.shtml

6) Lin, James C., “Space solar power stations, wireless power transmissions, and biological implications”, IEEE microwave
magazine, March, 2002
THANK
THANK YOU…
YOU…