Professional Documents
Culture Documents
???????
• Pricing strategy 2
????????
Two basically different principles
• 1. Cost of raw materials/production +
desired profit = sales price
Co
costs than chains. costs connected to the sale
d n-
of a product.
st
se itio
-B
Ba p et
as
ed
m
Co
sed
-B a
d
man
De
What the market will bear
PROBLEMS:
• Lack of knowledge
Comparison:
Comparison …the
Comparison
Comparison: …the client
client cannot
cannot easily
easily compare
compare
with
with the
the competition.
competition.
Expense:
Expense
Expense:
Expense …the
…the price
price represents
represents only
only aa very
very
small
small part
part of
of customers
customers income.
income.
Basic methods
• Synchro-pricing
– Coca-Cola Company has tested a machine
that is capable of adjusting its prices based on
exterior temperatures.
TACTICS
• Decoy pricing
– A high priced item is placed on the menu as a
reference point. The customer determines that
it is too expensive but in comparison to the
« decoy » item, other prices seem
« reasonable », even if they are still relatively
high. We are not really hoping to sell the
« decoy » item but instead we break the price
resistance for the rest of the menu.
– see Shoemaker and Stowe (1990), Decoy Menu Items Can
Enhance Margins, Restaurant & Institutions
TACTICS
• Complementary pricing
– Separate prices.
– Dim Sum
– A la carte
– Tapas
THE OMNES PRINCIPLE
• Price spread (lowest to
highest)
– Shouldn’t be more than 2.5 (90% of
main courses)
– Appetizers should be approx. At 35% of
average main course.
– Desserts should be approx. at 25% of
the average main course.
THE OMNES PRINCIPLE
• Spred of dishes across price
range
(main courses)
– The number of dishes in the medium range
should be about equal to the number in the
two extremes of the range.
THE OMNES PRINCIPLE
www.tic-et-tac.com/salle/bacpro/1bacpro/
technologie/principesommnesgreg.htm
« Backyard Burger »
Question 1
• Fast food industry frequently uses odd-
even psychological pricing (0.99, 1.29)
• Taco Bell price lining (.59, .79, .99, all
products fall into these categories)
• Baackyard Burger prices againts
competitor’s premium plus value items)
• Risk of « Gourmet » product could be too
expensice in comparison
Question 2 (price competitivity)
• Backyard Burgers has an advantage over
competitors in fixed costs (uses only 2/3 of
land, franchise fees are lower than Burger
King)
• Variable costs are higher (« Gourmet »
burgers, 1/3 pound vs. ¼ pound)
Question 3 (Demand)
• Fast food industry has a history of using
price as key competitive factor.
• If competiton offers similar « Gourmet »
products at lower prices, Backyard Burger
could decline.
• However, if BB are trul perceived as a
better product, demand could increase,
reflecting an inelastice price demand
curve.