Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NTPC
Rakesh Jain
Addl. Dy CAG
1
Presentation Outline
• Indian Power Scenario and GOI Initiatives
• XII Plan – Projection
• Areas of Concern- Power Sector
• About NTPC
• SWOT Analysis – NTPC
– Strength
– Week Ness
– Opportunities
– Threats
• Way Forward
2
Indian Power Scenario
Type Installed Capacity
(MW) Capacity Break up
Thermal 151530
Hydro 39491
Thermal
Hydro
Nuclear 4780 Nuclear
Renewable
Renewable 27542
Total 223344
As on Source: CEA
31.03.2013 3
Per Capita Consumption Notwithstanding sustained
demand, India continues
(kWh/Year) to be among the lowest
per capita consumers
of electricity globally,
lagging Brazil and China by
~3:1
Per capita consumption
29% of the world average
4
Strengths Weakness
• Huge Demand for Power • Limited Coal availability
• Hydro Potential • Poor Financial Health of
• Educated Manpower Discoms
• Coal Reserves • Environmental Issues
• Huge Renewable Energy Potential
Indian
Power
Scenario
Opportunity Threats
• Increase in Power Equipment Mfg • Competition for energy Assets
Base in the International Market
• Development of Coal Mines • Cheap Imports from China
• Power Trading • Wide Fluctuation in imported
• Regulatory Setup fuel price
• Development of Green Energy • Change in International Laws
• Energy Efficiency and
Conservation
POLICY & REFORM INITIATIVES
9
12th Plan: Requirements of Funds
11
NTPC Ltd
(A Maharatna Company)
12
India’s Largest Power Generator
13
NTPC Ltd
14
Market Price of NTPC Share
262
212
162
112
62
3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5
g-1 n-1 r-1 n-1 v-1 g-1 n-1 r-1 n-1 v-1 g-1 n-1 r-1 n-1 v-1 g-1 n-1 r-1 n-1 v-0 g-0 n-0 r-0 n-0 ct-0 g-0 y-0 r-0 n-0 ct-0 g-0 y-0 r-0 n-0 ct-0 g-0 y-0 r-0 n-0 ct-0 g-0 y-0 r-0 n-0
u u p a o u u a a o u u a a o u u p a o u u a a u a a a u a a a u a a a u a a a
3 -A 2-J 1-A 7-J 5-N 3-A 2-J 0-M 8-J 8-N 3-A 3-J 0-M 7-J 4-N 5-A 6-J 6-A 0-J 6-N 1-A 2-J 6-M 9-J 3-O 8-A 0-M 3-M 2-J 2-O 9-A 1-M 6-M 2-J 9-O 8-A 1-M 7-M 2-J 0-O 8-A 0-M 7-M 4-J
2 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 3 1 2 3 1
15
No. of Plants Capacity (MW)1 % Share
NTPC Owned
Coal 16 31,855 77.36%
Gas/Liquid Fuel 7 3,955 9.60%
Solar * 10 0.02%
Sub-total 23 35,820 86.98%
Owned by JVs and Subs
Coal 6 3,424 8.31%
Gas 1 1,940 4.71%
Sub-total 7 5,364 13.02%
Total 30 41,184 100.00%
Player 41184
o wer
t P
epe n d en 35000+
g I n d
e a din R : 1 9% 30000+
sa L CA G
e d a 0 1 3
s Evolv 9 8 2–2 25000+
ha MW 1
NTPllCed Capacity
in
20000+
Insta
15000+
10000+
5000+
200+
1981-82 1987-88 1990-91 1994-95 2002-03 2006-07 2008-09 2011-12 2012-13
16
Capacity Expansion Plans (MW)
55535 54964
16071 14068
9641
17
NTPC Ltd
18
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
19
NTPC Ltd
20
NTPC Ltd
21
NTPC Ltd- Cost Structure
22
NTPC Ltd
SWOT Analysis
23
NTPC Ltd
STRENGTHS
• Leadership Position in Indian Power
Sector
• Experience of more than 30 years in
operation of Power plant
• Healthy Balance Sheet
• Ability of Turnaround Underperforming
Power Stations
• Prudent Off Take Policy
• High Operational Efficiency
• Strong Credit Ratings by Credit
Agencies
• Pan India Presence
• Competent and Dedicated Work Force 24
NTPC Ltd
WEAKNESSES
25
NTPC Ltd
26
Comparison with IPPs on “Hard Cost” basis
(Rs. crore per
MW)
Project hard
Configuratio
Project Type Year of Year of BTG BoP cost Total (As
Descriptio Location
n and G/B) cost COD BTG + Others
Capacity (in Cos
n BoP (C)
MW) (A) t (B) (A+B+C)
(A+B)
Jharkhand 2x500 G 2007 2012 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 3.69
Maharashtra 3x660 G 2007 2013 2.34 1.63 3.97 0.03 4.00
Uttar Pradesh 2x600 G 2007 2012 2.69 2.69 0.23 2.92
Odisha 4x600 G 2007 N.A. 3.10 3.10 0.02 3.12
Gujarat 5x800 G 2008 2013 N.A. N.A. N.A. 3.53
IPPs
Odisha 2x600 G 2008 N.A. 2.31 1.61 3.92 0.08 4.00
Madhya Pradesh 2x660 G 2009 N.A. 4.87 4.87 0.12 4.99
Madhya 6x660 G 2009 N.A. 3.33 3.33 0.16 3.49
Pradesh
Karnataka 2x600 G 2009 2012 3.64 3.64 0.26 3.90
Chhattisgarh 2x600 G 2009 N.A. 2.26 1.56 3.82 0.73 4.55
Andhra Pradesh 2x500 B 2007 N.A. 2.20 1.72 3.92 0.88 4.80
Maharashtra 2x500 G 2007 N.A. 2.25 2.08 4.33 0.56 4.89
Haryana 3x500 G 2007 N.A. 2.30 1.82 4.12 0.61 4.73
NTPC
Tamil Nadu G N. . 2. 2. 1 4. 0. 0 5.
Uttar Pradesh 2x500 B 2008 N.A. 2.50 2.14 4.64 0.71 5.35
Madhya 2x500 B 2008 N.A. 2.50 1.98 4.48 0.56 5.04
Pradesh
z Data Set I: 2007 to 2009
Comparison with IPPs on “Hard Cost” basis…2
(Rs. crore per
MW)
Project hard
Configuratio
Project Type Year of Year of BTG BoP cost Total (As
Descriptio n and BTG + Others
Location (G/B)cost COD Cos Cos Financed)
n Capacity
(in MW) (A+B)
BoP (C)
estimatio t(A) t(B) (A+B+C)
Uttar Pradesh 3x660 G n 2010 N.A. 2.76 1.46 4.22 0.10 4.31
Maharashtra 2x660 G 2010 N.A. 2.97 1.20 4.17 0.02 4.19
IPPs Punjab 3x660 G 2010 N.A. 3.52 3.52 0.37 3.89
OPPORTUNITIES
• Huge Power Deficit in the
country
• Consultancy assignments in
India and Abroad
29
NTPC
SWOT Ltd - THREAT
ANALYSIS
THREATS
• Entry of Foreign/Private
Players in the Power Sector !
• Flow of human capital from
the company to other power
sector companies
• Pressure on Fuel resources
• Scarcity of vendors for
•
Power Equipment
Competitive Bidding Route
!
• Power Off Take risk
• Poor Financial Health of
Discoms
30
Focus on Strengths
Through Organic and Inorganic Growth,
Maintain Market Leadership
Overcome
Weakness
Identifying Strengths Through,
Opportunities
Brain
External Storming,
Environment
Monitoring, SWOT Strategic Think
Tank, Cost
Strong Oppurtunity Weakness
Management Analysis Control ,R&D,
Adoption of
Information Advanced
System, Technologies,
Opportunities Training of
Abroad Development
Threats
of Employees,
34