Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DETERMINATION OF THE
MINIMUM DISTANCE
BETWEEN ADJACENT ROWS
OF SOLAR PANELS TO
AVOID SHADING EFFECT
Presented By:
Sofeea Mohammad1
Md. Shahin Azad2
1,2
MS student, Institute of Energy, University of Dhaka
Thesis Supervisor
Shade
The first is shading of a Photo Voltaic Panel, window, or other receiver by nearby trees,
buildings, or other obstructions. The geometries may be irregular, and systematic
calculations of shading of the receiver in question may be difficult.
The second type includes shading of Photo Voltaic Panels in other than the first row of
multi-row arrays by the Photo Voltaic Panels on the adjoining row.
The third includes shading of windows by overhangs and wing-walls. Where the
geometries are regular, shading is amenable to calculation, and the results can be
presented in general form.
Shading calculations are needed when two adjacent PV panels are arranged
in rows. Normally, the first row is unobstructed, but the second row may be
partially shaded by the first, the third by the second, and so on. This
arrangement of PV panels is shown in cross section:
Figure-3: Shadow effect on one series string of an array (Adopted from i15.p.lodz.pl
based on Patel, Mukund R. 2006)
A study has revealed that the output of a 1400W string - which was fitted
with bypass diodes - dropped by 10% when only 4 cells were shaded.
When 12 cells were shaded, the power output dropped by more than
50%! (R. E. Hanitsch et al., 2001).
There are a lot experiments has done around the world to fix the
distance between two adjacent rows of solar panels/modules.
So, If we can’t use the solar cells by its maximum capacity, we’ll be looser
in so many ways; Shading on PV panels/modules may causes:
H Height of the
inclined solar panel
To get the value of R (OM = LN) of a tilted surface with an angle of β (L'LN =
O'OB) we have taken help from J. Appelbaum et al. 1979.
The Solar hour angle, is defined in Duffie, John A. et al. (2013)
..............(2)
where: is the latitude angle of the location
is the declination angle of sun
Shadow component toward Y axis is
...............(3)
Fy is the shadow component to the Y axis for a vertically placed pole or Solar
PV module; Adopting from J. Appelbaum et al. 1979 the Y axis shadow
component Fy is ................(4)
.............(5)
where: s Solar Azimuth angle
z Zenith Angle
Since Solar Altitude Angle (S) is the compliment of the zenith angle, we can
rewrite the above equation
.................(6)
From figure -4, its very clear that for a maximum output from a solar PV module
the term must be zero; i.e. module surface will be out of shadow. So the above
equation becomes
....................(9)
Based on the above equations we have tried to develop a simple tool (basically
excel based) to determine minimum distance between two adjacent solar
panels/modules to avoid shading effect:
According to the simple tool, developed using office excel, the minimum distance
between two adjacent PV panels rows is not less than 1.25 times of the length of
the PV modules throughout the whole year for a northern hemispheric zone. This
tool is available at the following link for verification and general use.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BynUPMzwCv
EiclVFY3NxcWFadm8/edit?usp=sharing
1. The experiment has done by using a vertical pole with a simplest set up; that
has some percentage of error. To get a precise data a well prepared scaled
set up can be developed to measure the shadow and the length of diffracted
shadow length.
2. For avoiding lot of raw data the experiment confined with a fixed surface
azimuth angle of the tilted surface in our simple. The effect of variation of
surface azimuth angle on PV performance also can be studied.
3. Gathering shadow length of inclined PV modules with few tilt angles for the
whole year, an empirical relation between shadow and PV module lengths
can be achieved with a simplified way for the northern hemispheric
geographical areas focusing different regions in Bangladesh.