Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Basic Assumptions:
1. A section which is plane before bending remains plane after
bending. This implies strains across section are linearly varying.
2. The reinforcement is subjected to the same variations in the
strain as the adjacent concrete. This implies there is no slip
between steel bars and the adjacent concrete. This is possible if
adequate development length of bars and concrete cover are
provided.
3. Tensile strength of concrete is ignored. The reinforcement
assumed to takes all the tension due to flexure.
August 6, 2020 2
Basic Assumptions:
4. The maximum compressive stain in concrete when a
section complete plastic deformation is taken to be
in bending (simple or compound) in axial
cu 0.0035 cu 0.002
compression
5. The maximum tensile strain in the reinforcement is
taken to 0.01. This limit assumed to limit crack-width
with in tension zone of section to the acceptable limit.
August 6, 2020 4
Design Equations for Singly Reinforced Rectangular Section:
N.A
z d 0.4 x
Ts As . f yd
August 6, 2020 5
Letting.
As
Design Equations for Singly Reinforced…
b.d
Steel ratio of section
Equilibrium of both internal and external forces,
1
F H 0 Cc Ts 0.8 f cd . b . x As . f yd 0.8 f cd . b . x . b . d . f yd
Ultimate moment of . f yd
Resistance of section is:
August 6, 2020
M u . f yd . b . d . 1
2
Eq[2] 6
2 f cd
Relative
Ultimate
Moment
August 6, 2020 8
Design of Singly Reinforced Beam
August 6, 2020 9
Balanced Singly Reinforced Section
That is, the maximum compressive strain in concrete reaches the ultimate
strain, and the strain in tension steel is just yielded: x cu
c cu 0.0035 s yd f yd Es d cu s
August 6, 2020 11
Design of Singly…
August 6, 2020 12
Design of Singly…
August 6, 2020 13
Design of Singly…
% Redistribution of
elastic moments
max max
0% 0.3584 0.294
10% 0.2944 0.251
20% 0.2304 0.204
30% 0.1664 0.152
August 6, 2020 14
Similar approach
August 6, 2020 15
Similar approach
August 6, 2020 16
Similar approach
August 6, 2020 17
Similar approach
August 6, 2020 19
Inelastic Redistribution…
August 6, 2020 20
Inelastic Redistribution…
Let the beam subjected to the load Wp that cause the plastic
hinges at the ends when the maximum moment at supports equal to
the ultimate resistance of beam section. But, with the formation
of plastic hinges, the beam is still able to support additional load
without complete collapse. After formation of plastic hinges at
supports, the beam behaves as if simply supported.
August 6, 2020 21
Inelastic Redistribution…
On further loading, the moment at center of span increases
proportionally with the change of loading. Additional load Δw is
slowly applied until it causes the beam to transform into a collapse
mechanism with the formation of one or more hinges at the
middle.
August 6, 2020 22
Inelastic Redistribution…
At collapse, mid-span moment equal to the ultimate resistance of
beam section,
w p . l 2 w . l 2 w p . l 2
Mu
24 8 12
August 6, 2020 23
Inelastic Redistribution…
August 6, 2020 24
According to EBCS-2/95, elastic moments of
continuous beams and frames are redistributed using
the following reduction coefficient,
August 6, 2020 25
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
NA
= +
August 6, 2020 27
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
August 6, 2020 28
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
August 6, 2020 29
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
August 6, 2020 30
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
August 6, 2020 31
Doubly Reinforced Rectangular Section
August 6, 2020 32
N.A
August 6, 2020
Examples 33