Professional Documents
Culture Documents
512
Structure II
Propane,
iso-butane…
51264
Structure H
Methane + neohexane,
Methane +
435663
51268 cycloheptane
Base Permafrost
Depth
Depth
GHSZ
GHOZ
GHSZ
BGHZ BGHZ
Temperatur Temperatur
e e
GHSZ: Gas Hydrate Stability Zone
GHOZ: Gas Hydrate Occurrence Zone
BGHZ: Base Gas Hydrate Zone
1000
Most confident estimate
100
10
USA energy consumption over
1000 years at current rate
1
0,1
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Yea Sloan and Koh (2008)
r
6 Classification: Internal 2012-08-23
Reservoir quality 1 Hydrate in sands
• Gas hydrate resources housed in sand
reservoirs
• Shallow “conventional” reservoirs
Gas-hydrate-bearing sands Canada Japan ◄◄ Coarse-grained continental sand
seem the most feasible ◄
• Pressure depletion
• Heating
• Direct exchange with more stable hydrate former (e.g. CO2)
Depth/Pressure
dissociation
seafloor
• Disadvantage
− Dissociation is endothermic and will
cool down the system
− Vast amounts of water produced
with
the gas
− Removing hydrate from consolidated
sediments may compromise structural
integrity
Depth/Pressure
• Disadvantage
seafloor
− Need to add large amounts of energy
to the system
− Vast amounts of water produced with
the gas
− Removing hydrate from consolidated
sediments may compromise structural
integrity
Temperature
• Advantage
− No dissociation of hydrate. Keeping
structural integrity
Depth/Pressure
− Carbon neutral production process
seafloor
− Long term storage of CO2
• Disadvantage
− Needs permeability/connectivity to
access the entire reservoir with CO2-
injection
− The exchange process is based on
liquid-solid diffusion and is inherently
slow (there are ways to speed this up)
Mallik: Three
2004
Japan: MH21
research wells phase 1. 32
1969 2001 drilled. 470 Sm3 2003 wells drilled
of gas produced offshore to map
Messoyakha Japan: MH21 by Alaska: the Nankai
1971 1998 Japan: Drilled
starts was created. depressurization Dedicated Trough
first offshore
production Imperial oil First hydrate Ultimate goal to hydrate
hydrate
discovers research research well make offshore research Korea: BSR
hydrates in well at Mallik production from well drilled indicating
Northern site Korea: KIGAM hydrates viable hydrate in the
Canada. initiate by 2018 Ulleung
Mallik site hydrate basin
program
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
2007 2014 -
Alaska: BP 2014
drills hydrate Korea:
2006 research well 2008 2010 2012 Offshore
production test
India: NGHP China: First Mallik: Second Korea: Drilled Alaska:
expedition. hydrate production 10 sites. 10 ConocoPhillips
2015
Four separate expedition. test finished 2009 LWD and 2 CO2 injection 2013 Japan: Long
legs of Three sites (initiated in wireline logging test (Ignik
Japan: MH21 term offshore
drilling. One show hydrates 2006). 13 000 and vertical Sikumi). Japan:
starts Phase 2 production test
site showed Sm3 of gas was seismic Offshore flow
128m hydrate Korea: First produced over with goal of two profiling. Japan: Drilled test
offshore Alaska: BP
hydrate a six day period first offshore
production planning for
expedition. production well
tests production test
Three sites (date uncertain)
show hydrates
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Jarle Husebø
Senior Researcher Reservoir Technology
jahuse@statoil.com
Tel: +47 900 19 805
www.statoil.com