Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PSY4011 - Week 3 Seminar - Practical 1 Introduction and Method
PSY4011 - Week 3 Seminar - Practical 1 Introduction and Method
B. Practical 1 - Introduction
C. Practical 1 - Method
PSY4011
General Information
PSY4011
Assessments
PSY4011
(100%)
Portfolio of Practical
Workbook (40%)
reports (60%)
Practical 1
WB1 (30%)
(45%)
Tuesday 3rd November, 3pm Wednesday 28th October, 9am
Submissions – Practical Report Submissions – Workbook Assessments
PSY4011
Practical 1 Report
• Word Count: 1500 words
• Recommended minimum number of sources (e.g. journal articles): 10
• Deadline: Tuesday 3rd November 2020, 3pm
If you are experiencing any difficulties with uploads near submission deadline, please
email all documents to Marcelle BEFORE 3pm (the deadline). Anything after 3pm will be a
fail!
PSY4011
Timeline for Practical 1
Work consistently week-by-week. Due in 3 weeks!
PSY4011
Read… and check your work…
(Section 7. Moodle - Writing Guides & Sample Reports)
PSY4011
PRACTICAL 1 – DATA COLLECTION
IMPORTANT:
Do not discuss with or show your
estimates to other participants
https://stmarys.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/psy4011-202021
IQ scores
• M=100
• SD=15
• 68% between 85-115
• 95.6 % between 70-130
PSY4011
Practical Report 1
• TOPIC: Sex differences in self-estimates of general I.Q.
Data collected:
Estimates of your own IQ
◦ RQ: Will self-estimates of overall I.Q. be different for males and females?
PSY4011
Practical 1:
Introduction
HARRIS (2008) CHAPTERS 1 & 2
FIELD & HOLE (2003) – CHAPTER 11
PSY4011
Empirical Report Structure
1. Title 4. Results
2. Abstract 5. Discussion
3. Introduction 6. References
4. Method 7. Appendices
◦ Participants
◦ Design
◦ Materials
◦ Procedure
PSY4011
Title
• APA Level 1 Heading – Bold, Centred, Title case (capitalise main words)
• It should be informative
• It should convey some meaning of what the study entailed… the easiest way
to do this is to include IVs/predictors and DVs/outcome variables.
• Good example:
• Sex Differences in Empathetic Detection of Emotions in Facial Photographs
PSY4011
Abstract
• 150-200 words. Easiest to write this LAST (after the whole report is finished)
• Positioned immediately below the title (Do not indent first sentence)
2. Presents the past research – What has been done in the area before?
• Cite pertinent works (NOT works of tangential or general significance)
• Avoid nonessential details - Focus on pertinent findings, relevant methodology,
major conclusions
PSY4011
Introduction: how long?
For a 1500 word report, aim for around 500-600 words
introduction
• Funnel shaped
PSY4011
Introduction: Structure
First paragraph
1. Introduce the problem Start off broad - Introduce/ define intelligence → general
• Purpose and rationale IQ → estimates of IQ
What will be studied and why it is important to study?
Following paragraphs
2. Present past research Start narrowing down - Include evidence
• Review and be selective! Include material that is of sex differences in self-estimates of IQ →
directly relevant to current research question any explanation for pattern of results.
• Organise into paragraphs - Include summary/ Lead onto specific research hypothesis
linking sentences (Make a mini plan)
Final paragraph
Review study aim and
briefly describe general
3. Your approach to solving the procedure used.
problem Clearly state the prediction
(should be supported by
• The introduction should ‘lead’ the reader to the
evidence reviewed)
hypothesis - It should not be a surprise!
PSY4011
Introduction: Hypothesis
Last Paragraph:
• Restate your study aim
• Briefly describe general method
• State hypothesis
Hypothesis
• You need to write a specific hypothesis at the end of your introduction
• Do not put this separately or in italics
• Based on previous evidence, decide on a one- or two-tailed hypothesis
• State it clearly and concisely. E.g. The current study aimed to test the hypothesis
that adult females will demonstrate higher levels of empathy than adult males
PSY4011
Further Reading
• Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father and me. The Psychologist, 5, 309-311.
• Furnham, A. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: culture and gender difference in self
and other estimates of both general (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and
Individual Differences, 31, 1381-1405. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00232-4.
• Furnham, A., Kosari, A. & Swami, V. (2012). Estimates of Self, Parental and Partner Multiple
Intelligences in Iran: A replication and extension. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 7(2), 66-73.
• Hogan, W. (1978). IQ self-estimates of males and females. Journal of Social Psychology,
106, 137-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924160
• Petrides, K.V. & Furnham, A. (2004). Parental estimates of five types of intelligence.
Australian Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 10-17. DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.144.2.149-162
• von Stumm, S., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Decomposing self-estimates
of intelligence: Structure and sex differences across 12 nations. British Journal of
Psychology, 100, 429-442. doi:10.1348/000712608X357876
PSY4011
Practical 1: Method
HARRIS (2008) CHAPTER 3
FIELD & HOLE (2003) – CHAPTER 12
PSY4011
Method: The ‘How?’
1. Design
2. Participants
3. Materials
4. Procedure
PSY4011
Method: Design
1. Design
• The type of study and design (e.g. independent, dependent design)
• The predictor/independent variable(s) (IV) including the conditions you
selected to represent different levels of the IV. E.g., sex (male and
female)
• The outcome/dependent variable(s) (DV) including details of the units of
measurement. E.g., milliseconds.
PSY4011
Method: Participants
2. Participants
• State total number of participants with descriptive statistics (e.g. sex, age
range, M, SD, etc.), who they were, how they were selected and any other
important characteristics (e.g. inclusion / exclusion criteria)
PSY4011
Method: Materials
3. Materials
• Include hardware, scales (items, rating scales, score calculation, min &
max, meaning of values, example), software, type of stimuli, number of
stimuli, font, etc.
Have you stated what was needed to run the study and record the
data?
Have you described these in sufficient detail to allow replication?
Have you described the stimuli, questionnaires etc. and given
examples in an Appendix?
Have you described any technical apparatus?
PSY4011
Method: Procedure
4. Procedure
• Describe individual testing chronologically, experimenter, instructions,
tasks, responses, etc.
Have you explained in sequence exactly what the researcher did and
what each participant experienced?
Have you reported in full any important instructions given to
participants? (with copies in the Appendix if applicable)
Have you given a clear impression of the layout and arrangement of
events?
Have you stated whether ethical protocol was adhered to?
PSY4011
Before next week…
Practical 1 – ‘To-Do’ list for this week
PSY4011
Next week: Seminar
Practical 1:
Results and Discussion
PSY4011