Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vibration 04
Vibration 04
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Response Under a General Periodic Force
4.3 Response Under a Periodic Force of Irregular Form
4.4 Response Under a Nonperiodic Force
4.5 Convolution Integral
4.6 Response Spectrum
4.7 Laplace Transforms
4.8 Numerical Methods
4.9 Response to Irregular Forcing Conditions Using Numerical
Methods
a0
mx cx kx F (t ) a j cos jt b j sin jt (4.8)
2 j 1 j 1
a0 (a j / k )
x p (t ) cos( jt j )
2k j 1 (1 j r ) (2jr )
2 2 2 2
(b j / k )
sin( jt j )
j 1 (1 j r ) (2jr )
2 2 2 2
Example 4.5
Total Response Under Harmonic Base Excitation
Example 4.5
Total Response Under Harmonic Base Excitation
Solution
1 a1 b1
x p (t ) cos( t 1 ) sin(t )
1 (E.2)
(1 r 2 ) 2 (2r ) 2 k k
Example 4.5
Total Response Under Harmonic Base Excitation
Solution
k 4000
We have, Y 0.05 m, 5 rad/s, n 20 rad/s,
m 10
5 c c 20
r 0.25, 0.05,
n 20 cc 2 km 2 (4000)(10)
d 1 2 n 19.975 rad/s
a1 cY (20)(5)(0.05) 5, b1 kY (4000)(0.05) 200,
2(0.05)(0.25)
1 tan 1 0.02666 rad
1 (0.25)
2
Example 4.5
Total Response Under Harmonic Base Excitation
Solution
Example 4.5
Total Response Under Harmonic Base Excitation
Solution
Example 4.5
Total Response Under Harmonic Base Excitation
Solution
2 N
a0 Fi (4.9)
N i 1
2 N 2 jti
a j Fi cos , j 1,2,... (4.10)
N i 1
2 N 2 jti
b j Fi sin , j 1,2,... (4.11)
N i 1
• Once the Fourier coefficients a0, aj, and bj are known, the steady-
state response of the system can be found using Eq.(4.13) with
2
r
n
17 © 2011 Mechanical Vibrations Fifth Edition in SI Units
4.3 Response Under a Periodic Force of Irregular
Form
Example 4.6
Steady-State Vibration of a Hydraulic Valve
Find the steady-state response of the valve in the figure below if the
pressure fluctuations in the chamber are found to be periodic. The
valves of pressure measured at 0.01 second intervals in one cycle are
given below.
Example 4.6
Steady-State Vibration of a Hydraulic Valve
Solution
Since the pressure fluctuations on the valve are periodic, the Fourier
analysis of the given data of pressures in a cycle gives:
p(t ) 34083.3 26996.0 cos 52.36t 8307.7 sin 52.36t
1416.7 cos104.72t 3608.3 sin 104.72t
5833.3 cos157.08t 2333.3 sin 157.08t ... N/m 2 (E.1)
Example 4.6
Steady-State Vibration of a Hydraulic Valve
Solution
We have also
0.2
A 0.000625 m 2
2r 1 2 0.2 0.5236
1 tan 1 tan 16.1
1 r 1 0.5236
2 2
Example 4.6
Steady-State Vibration of a Hydraulic Valve
Solution
The steady-state response of the valve can be expressed as
(1416.7 A / k ) (3608.3 A / k )
cos(104.72t 2 ) sin(104.72t 2 )
(1 4r ) (4r )
2 2 2
(1 4r ) (4r )
2 2 2
(5833.3 A / k ) (2333.3 A / k )
cos(157.08t 3 ) sin(157.08t 3 )
(1 9r ) (6r )
2 2 2
(1 9r ) (6r )
2 2 2
• When the exciting force F(t) is nonperiodic, such as that due to the
blast from an explosion, a different method of calculating the
response is required.
• Various methods can be used to find the response of the system to
an arbitrary excitation.
• Some of these methods are as follows:
1. Representing the excitation by a Fourier integral
2. Using the method of convolution integral
3. Using the method of Laplace transforms
4. First approximating F(t) by a suitable interpolation model and
then using a numerical procedure
5. Numerically integrating the equation of motion
• We have
Impulse Ft mx 2 mx 1 (4.12)
t t
f lim t Fdt Fdt 1 (4.14)
t 0
• Response to an impulse
• Response to an impulse
• Response to an impulse
x(t 0) x0 0 (4.23)
1
x (t 0) x 0 (4.24)
m
Hence, Eq.(4.18) reduces to
e nt
x(t ) g (t ) sin d t (4.25)
md
28 © 2011 Mechanical Vibrations Fifth Edition in SI Units
4.5 Convolution Integral
• Response to an impulse
Fe nt
x(t ) sin d t Fg (t ) (4.26)
md
x(t ) Fg (t ) (4.27)
• Response to an impulse
Impulse Response
Example 4.7
Response of a Structure Under Impact
Example 4.7
Response of a Structure Under Impact
Solution
From the known data,
k 2000 c c 10
n 20 rad/s, 0.05,
m 5 cc 2 km 2 2000(5)
d 1 2 n 19.975 rad/s
1 t n ( t )
z (t ) 0 y
( ) e sin d (t )d (4.34)
d
where the variable z replacing x
Example 4.12
Compacting Machine Under Linear Force
Example 4.12
Compacting Machine Under Linear Force
Solution
Figure (b) is known as the ramp function.
F t n (t )
x(t ) 0 e sin d (t )d
md
F t n ( t )
0 (t ) e sin d (t )(d )
md
F t t n ( t )
0 e sin d (t )(d )
md
Example 4.12
Compacting Machine Under Linear Force
Solution
These integrals can be evaluated and the response expressed as
follows:
F 2 2 2
2 2
x(t ) t e n t
cos d t d n
sin d t (E.1)
n n n d
2
k
For an undamped system, Eq.(E.1) reduces to
F
x(t ) nt sin nt (E.2)
n k
Fig. 4.13(c) shows the response given by Eq.(E.2)
Example 4.11
Response Spectrum of a Sinusoidal Pulse
Find the undamped response spectrum for the sinusoidal pulse force
shown in the figure using the initial conditions
Example 4.14
Response Spectrum of a Sinusoidal Pulse
Solution
F0 sin t , 0 t t0
mx kx F (t ) (E.1)
0, t t0
where (E.2)
t0
Example 4.14
Response Spectrum of a Sinusoidal Pulse
Solution
2 k
where n (E.5)
n m
Example 4.14
Response Spectrum of a Sinusoidal Pulse
Solution
Example 4.14
Response Spectrum of a Sinusoidal Pulse
Solution
n 2t0
x(t t0 ) sin A cos nt0 B sin nt0 (E.11)
2t0 n
2t0
x (t t0 ) cos n A sin n t n B cos nt (E.12)
t0 t0 n
Example 4.14
Response Spectrum of a Sinusoidal Pulse
Solution
Where st
2 (E.13)
1 n
2t0
Hence,
A sin nt0 , B 1 cos nt0 (E.14)
nt0 n t0
x(t ) ( n / t0 ) t0 t t
Therefore, sin 2 sin 2 ,
2
st 21 ( n / 2t0 ) n n n
t t0 (E.15)
46 © 2011 Mechanical Vibrations Fifth Edition in SI Units
4.6 Response Spectrum
e nt
S v z (t ) max P2 Q2 (4.44)
1 2
max
Example 4.17
Derailment of Trolley of a Crane During Earthquake
Example 4.17
Derailment of Trolley of a Crane During Earthquake
Example 4.17
Derailment of Trolley of a Crane During Earthquake
Solution
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Solution
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Solution
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Solution
Assuming d = 10 mm,
135 0.01 2
st (1.0286 10 10 ) 3
3. 446 10 4
m
We have
0.01
st 3.466 104
n 2 2 0.03726 s
Hence, g 9.8
t0 0.1
2.6841
n 0.03726
60 © 2011 Mechanical Vibrations Fifth Edition in SI Units
4.6 Response Spectrum
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Solution
The maximum bending stress at the root of the cantilever bracket can
be computed as:
0.01
(368.5 0.3)
M c 2 442.2 MPa
max b
I 1.25 109
61 © 2011 Mechanical Vibrations Fifth Edition in SI Units
4.6 Response Spectrum
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Solution
Since this stress exceeds the permissible value, we assume the next
trial value of d as 20 mm. This yields:
135 0.02 2
st (1.0286 10 10 ) 3
6.0430 10 5
m
0.02
st 6.0430 10 5
n 2 2 0.01560 (s)
g 9.8
t0 0.1
6.4
n 0.01560
62 © 2011 Mechanical Vibrations Fifth Edition in SI Units
4.6 Response Spectrum
Example 4.18
Design of a Bracket for Shock Loads
Solution
x t 0 lim sX s (4.46)
s
x0 n t x 0 nt
x(t ) e sin(d t 1 ) e sin d t
(1 )
2 1/ 2
d
1 t ( t )
0 F ( )e n sin d (t )d
md
1 j 1
x j Fi 1 e
k i 1
n ( t j t i )
cos d (t j ti )
n
d
sin d (t j ti )
Example 4.31
Damped Response Using Numerical Methods
Example 4.31
Damped Response Using Numerical Methods
Solution
Example 4.31
Damped Response Using Numerical Methods
Solution
Example 4.31
Damped Response Using Numerical Methods
Solution
Example 4.31
Damped Response Using Numerical Methods
Solution