You are on page 1of 49

CPRHE

Concept of Diversity

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Concept of Diversity

Meaning of Diversity

 Etymology - Diversitas (Latin) and


Diversite - (French)
 Meaning - difference, variety, variation,
not alike
 Pre-supposes two or more entities
 No rank order
 Diversity as an antithesis to hierarchy
Concept of Diversity

Concept of Diversity

 Socio-political concept of modern and democratic era


 Concept of diversity is integral to democracy and development
 Democracy - associative living -mutual respect
 It demands respect for heterogeneity in people characteristics and
their practices
 Development as freedom and choice or capabilities
 Capability -Freedom of people to do and be what they value
 Diversity is a value of inclusion which is imperative in
envisioning an inclusive society
Concept of Diversity

Diversity in Education

 Dimensions of Diversity in education


 Diversity of institutional types, source of financing, type of
programmes, modes of delivery, teacher, student body etc
 Student “Diversity”
 Student Diversity refers to heterogeneity in student identities,
characteristics and attributes
 Social-economic, linguistic, political affiliation, faith, gender &
sexual orientation, schooling’s etc
Concept of Diversity

Why Diversity Matters in Education

 Education attainment is key to mobility of individuals


and growth of economy - Knowledge economy
 But human capacities are diverse
 Diversity of knowledge and experience positively
contribute to production of knowledge and
innovations
 Educational opportunities are unevenly distributed
 Equalising educational opportunities leads to
extending access to diverse population
Concept of Diversity

Summary

 Diversity is a value of inclusion in education

 Student Diversity contributes to Inclusive


development and democratic society

 Valuing student diversity contributes to creation of


knowledge and innovations which are socially and
economically rewarding
CPRHE

Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

The Context
 Diversity is a socio-political concept and value of
inclusion
 Concept of diversity began to receive wider attention
since 1960-70s in North America and Europe
 Diversity as a global debate since the beginning of 21st
century
 Role of International/transnational agencies: UN,
UNESCO
 India: National freedom movement and constitution of
India recognised value of diversity at least a century
back
Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

UNESCO World Declaration 1998


 Right based approach to education
 UNESCO world conference on higher education in 1998 adopted World
declaration on higher education for the twenty first century: vision and
action.
 Convinced that education is a fundamental pillar of human rights,
democracy, sustainable development and peace, and shall therefore
become accessible to all throughout life
 Article 3 - Equity of access -No discrimination but ensure access to
special target groups
 HE as a public service- “The funding of higher education requires both
public and private resources. The role of the state remains essential in
this regard”.
Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

UNESCO Declaration on Cultural Diversity -2001

 Cultural diversity as an extension to human


rights: civil and political rights and economic
social and cultural rights
 As a source of exchange, innovation and
creativity, cultural diversity is as necessary for
humankind as biodiversity is for nature
 Cultural diversity as a factor in development
 Role of market, state and civil society partnership
Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

UNDP HDR 2004

 Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in


Today’s Diverse World
 Cultural liberty as key to development
 Cultural liberty is a vital part of human development
because being able to choose one’s identity—who one is
—without losing the respect of others or being excluded
from other choices is important in leading a full life.
 Need for managing diversity and respond new political
claims of countries, communities and individual
Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

Constitution of India

 Unity in diversity is a political imagination and central


principle for the development of India as a nation state
 It is not merely a politico-administrative document
 Unification of people and culture with varying rank order
requires new values
 Constitutional morality over social morality
 Secularism – respect for all religion
 States formation based on languages but no national
language (14 to 22 languages in 8 schedule)
 Diversity as a value in constitution provides resources for
achieving political, social and economic
Valuing Diversity: Global and National Contexts

Summary

 Post 60s – diversity concerns emerged in EU and NA

 This scenario was linked to socio-demographic and economic changes that were
happening at that time

 Late 20th century and early 21st century – global recognition for valuing diversity

 Current debate on diversity is linked to changing nature of economic production

 Cultural diversity is increasingly seen as catalyst for development

 Indian freedom movements in early 20th century and Constitution of India


recognised value of diversity
CPRHE

Response to Student Diversity

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Response to Student Diversity

Diversity Discourse in Western Societies

 Advancement in technology and infrastructure


facilities and changes in production process
promoted cross-border mobility of people
(migration)
 Internationalisation and growth of student
mobility
 Society and its class rooms (all levels) became
diverse
 Diversity in ethnic background of students
 Diversity in language, culture etc
Response to Student Diversity

“Problem” of Heterogeneity

 Hostile ethnic groups


 Discriminatory practices
 Lack of social cohesion and harmony in
campus and society
 Negative impact on economic
development
 Heterogeneous ethnic population as a
problem
Response to Student Diversity

State Response to Diversity

Three major approaches

 Assimilationism
 Differentialism
 Multi-culturalism
Response to Student Diversity

Assimilationism

 Socio-cultural value system of majority remains as


dominant and legitimate
 Minority who came late is “other”
 Minority culture is undervalued
 Minority should assimilate or disappear in to
mainstream
 Minority must disconnect from past communities
 Also known as Melting Pot approach
Response to Student Diversity

Differentialism

 Differentialism contrasts with assimilation

 It promotes separation to avoid inter-mingling

 Reducing opportunity for intermingling as a strategy to reduce conflicts

 Each group is given separate spaces

 Promotes parallel systems

 Criticism: It is new version of apartheid


Response to Student Diversity

Multi-culturalism

 Acknowledge mono-culture is against humanity

 Human civilisation is multi-cultural

 Problems lies in the world view and perspective through which others
are looked at

 Multi-culturalism promotes co-existence of diverse cultures and diverse


people

 Toleration, accommodation and respect

 Right to be what they value without losing respect from others


Response to Student Diversity

Summary

 Lack of social cohesion and harmony as a threat to


social and economic development of countries

 Assimilationism is insensitive to minorities

 Differentialism is new avatar of apartheid

 Multi-culturalism -recognition and positive


accommodation of diverse other culture and people
CPRHE

Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Promoting Diversity

 Constitutional mechanism of reservation

 Diversity oriented admission policies

 Incentive schemes

 Student support programme in campuses


Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Reservation Policies

 Reservation is a constitutional provision

 Article 341 and 342 reservation for SCs and STs

 93rd constitutional amendment- reservation for OBCs

 124th constitutional amendment reservation for


economically backward general category

 Vertical and horizontal reservation


Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Diversity-oriented Admission Policies

 Institutions make interventions to attract and


recruit students from targeted groups

 Deprivation Points of JNU –Backward disctrict

 Gender Diversity Factor (extra marks in


interview) –IIMs

 Reservation for Transgender


Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Incentives Schemes

 Post-matric scholarships

 Post-matric hostels

 Monthly stipend

 Tuition fee waiver

 Travel concession
Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Student Support Programme

 Ensuring retention
 Remedial or/and academic enrichment programme
 Equal opportunity office
 Anti-discrimination officer
 Book bank
 Language labs/cells
 Earn while learn schemes
Policies for Promoting Diversity in India

Summary
 Affirmative action for promoting diversity - to provide
access to and success in higher education

 Constitutional provisions, diversity oriented admission


policy, incentive schemes and student support programme

 Improve access

 Ensure retention

 Support to succeed
CPRHE

Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Assessing Diversity
 Assessing Diversity requires understanding about
characteristics of population being considered and category
which exists at given period of time

 Diversity is temporal and contextual

 New categories are added

 Different Levels:
 Nation, state and institution
 Stream, faculty, discipline
 UG, PG and PhD
 Government, aided and unaided institutions
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Assessing Diversity
 Caste

 Religion

 Regional background

 Income group

 Gender and sexuality

 Parental education background


Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Nature of Student Diversity


 Massification altered characteristics of clientele
 Increasing number of non-traditional learner’s access
higher education
 Non-traditional learner’s includes students from
 Disadvantaged social groups such as Scheduled Castes,
Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Minorities like
Muslims
 Uneducated parents - first generation learner
 Under-developed region
 Schools located in remo
 Poor families
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Caste
Caste wise Distribution (Share)

General OBC SC ST
All India 43.26% 36.34% 14.88% 5.52%
Source: AISHE 2019

Caste wise Distribution (GER)


All category SC ST
All India 26.3% 23% 17.2%
Source: AISHE 2019
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Location

Location Share %

Rural 43.8

Urban 56.2
Source : CPRHE 2017
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Gender

Share %

Female 48.6

Male 51.4
Source : AISHE 2019
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

First Generation Learners


%

First Generation Traditional


Background Characteristic
Learner Learner

Male 23.80% 76.20%


Female 23.90% 76.10%
Hindu 22.30% 77.70%
Muslim 32.40% 67.60%
OR 24.90% 75.10%
SC 31.40% 68.60%
ST 44.30% 55.70%
OBC 26.30% 73.70%
Upper Castes (Others) 16.30% 83.70%
Rural 30.90% 69.10%
Urban 18.20% 81.80%
Source CPRHE Study, 2017
Empirical Evidence on Student Diversity in India

Income
Enrolment share of income groups
Quintile 2007 2014

1 52.9 34.1

2 21.3 25.7

3 12.3 18.7

4 8.7 13.6

5 4.8 7.9

Source Thorat and Khan, 2018


Empirical evidence on student diversity in India

Summary
 Higher education expansion in last two decades has
made substantial changes in the clientele of higher
education

 Student are now from diverse socio-economic


backgrounds

 Higher education is no longer a privilege for elite

 However disparity continue to exists


CPRHE

Teaching Learning in a Diverse Class Room

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Teaching Learning in a Diverse Class Room

Diversity in Class Room


 Students in colleges and universities are from diverse
background –socio-economic, region, location,
schooling etc
 Socio-economic and cultural capital stock of the
family varies
 Socio-cultural practices, world view and experience of
students from diverse background vary
 Aspirations of students are diverse
 Learning habits and skills are also different
Teaching learning in a diverse class room

College Readiness

 Academic preparation level of student body varies


-Syllabus, language of instruction, type of school, location of
school
 Foundational knowledge on subjects is unevenly
distributed among student body
 Competency in medium of instruction
 Learning environment at home and learning support is
not uniform
 Learning background of student body is now diverse
 College readiness: Is college ready for diverse student
body or Is student body ready for college
Teaching learning in a diverse class room

Teaching and Learning

 Learning needs of diverse student body conflicts with


contemporary pedagogical tools, methods and processes
 Dominance of lecture mode as major form of teaching
 Opportunities are not adequate to bridge the gap in academic
preparation
 Lack of effective remediation/academic support programmes in
campuses
 Lack of mentoring support to students
 Low teacher –student interactions
 Teachers are not adequately equipped/oriented to address new
class rooms
Teaching learning in a diverse class room

Diversity and Inclusion


 Diversity as a value of inclusion
 Inclusion in access to success requires 3 Cs:
 Inclusive Curriculum
 Respectful accommodation of perspectives and life world of
diverse segment of society in curriculum
 Inclusive Campus
 Socio-cultural milieu, policies and structures of a campus that
welcome and are receptive towards diverse student body.
 Inclusive Class Room
 Recognises academic differences and promotes academic
success of students from all background
CPRHE

Institutional Strategies for Promoting Diversity

Dr. Malish. C M
Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education
National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration (NIEPA), New Delhi
Institutional Strategies for Promoting Diversity

Major elements
 Institutional Vision

 Institutional Plan

 Orientation to faculty and staff

 Institutional mechanism

 Conducive academic infrastructure

 Feedback system

 Monitoring and evaluation

 Institutional Research Model


Institutional Strategies for Promoting Diversity

Institutional Vision
 Developing a vision for valuing diversity

 Institutional Diversity Policy and Diversity Plan

 Principles of valuing diversity

 Areas of interventions

 Integrating diversity vision with structure and processes of institutions

 Collective engagement from all stakeholders

 Diversity as a shared value among all stakeholders


Institutional Strategies for Promoting Diversity

Orientation and Institutional mechanism


 Orientation for faculty and staff for valuing and
promoting diversity
 Pedagogical orientation to teachers
 Orientation to staff such as librarian, administrative staff
and lab assistant
 Strengthen existing institutional mechanism
 Create new structures for addressing concerns of
students
 Ensure coordination between various cells/committees
 A central coordinating body to look after overall activities
Institutional Strategies for Promoting Diversity

Academic infrastructure
 Creating inclusive academic infrastructure

 It requires assessment from students

 Inclusion of audio-video resources in library

 Special learning resources for visually challenged

 Differently abled friendly buildings and class room

 Technology supported learning environment (smart class room)

 Availability of quality learning material in regional languages

 Student feedback on social and academic experience


Institutional strategies for promoting diversity

Monitoring and Evaluation and IRM


 System should be in place to ensure diversity vision is enacted

 Develop indicators to assess

 Monitoring as a regular process

 Annual reports should reflect evaluation

 Need for institutional research model

 Periodic collection and analysis of academic and social experience of


students

 Institutional research for critical self examination and evidence for


developing strategies

You might also like