Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Handout JPK Gasal 2019-2020
Handout JPK Gasal 2019-2020
• Effect on Market
– Market Share
– Competitive Position
Fundamentals of Statistical Concepts
and Techniques in Quality Control and
Improvement
Cp = (BSA-BSB)/6 = R-bar / d2
NOTE !!!
Indeks kapabilitas proses baru layak untuk dihitung apabila proses berada
dalam pengendalian statistikal
Contoh Study Kasus
• Peta kontrol R
GT = R-bar
BKA = D4R-bar = (2,114)(0,06) = 0,12
BKB = D3R-bar = (0)(0,06) = 0
Peta control 3 sigma rata-rata ketebalan Data keluar dari batas kontrol
produk kayu lapis
2.46
2.44
2.42 rata-rata
2.40 CL
2.38 UCL
2.36 LCL Data keluar dari batas kontrol
2.34
2.32
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
0.14
0.12
0.1 range
0.08 CL
0.06 UCL
0.04 LCL
0.02
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Dilakukan tindakkan perbaikan dan pengambilan data kembali.
perhitungan yang perlu
contoh pengukuran pada unit contoh (n=5)
sampel X1 (mm) X2 (mm) X3 (mm) X4 (mm) X5 (mm) jumlah Rata2 Range ®
X-bar
1 2.38 2.40 2.4 2.38 2.41 11.97 2.39 0.03
2 2.39 2.4 2.41 2.39 2.4 11.99 2.40 0.02
3 2.4 2.38 2.39 2.37 2.40 11.94 2.39 0.03
4 2.39 2.39 2.37 2.41 2.38 11.94 2.39 0.04
5 2.38 2.42 2.39 2.38 2.41 11.98 2.39 0.04
6 2.41 2.38 2.40 2.37 2.39 11.95 2.40 0.04
7 2.36 2.39 2.37 2.38 2.40 11.92 2.39 0.03
8 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.41 2.38 11.96 2.38 0.03
9 2.39 2.38 2.37 2.37 2.39 11.90 2.39 0.02
10 2.42 2.39 2.38 2.42 2.39 12.00 2.38 0.04
11 2.39 2.39 2.41 2.39 2.38 11.96 2.40 0.03
12 2.38 2.38 2.41 2.37 2.39 11.93 2.39 0.04
13 2.42 2.38 2.4 2.41 2.41 12.02 2.40 0.04
14 2.40 2.38 2.38 2.39 2.37 11.92 2.38 0.03
15 2.39 2.40 2.41 2.41 2.37 11.98 2.40 0.04
16 2.38 2.42 2.42 2.41 2.39 12.02 2.40 0.04
17 2.38 2.40 2.37 2.39 2.38 11.92 2.38 0.03
18 2.4 2.37 2.39 2.39 2.38 11.93 2.39 0.03
19 2.39 2.41 2.40 2.38 2.37 11.95 2.39 0.04
20 2.37 2.41 2.40 2.41 2.37 11.96 2.39 0.04
jumlah 47.82 0.68
rata-rata 2.391 0.034
x-double bar
• Peta kontrol X-bar 2.42
CL = 2,391 2.41
2.40
UCL = 2,41 range
2.39 CL
LCL = 2,37
2.38 UCL
LCL
2.37
2.36
2.35
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
0.07
0.05
Cl = 0,03 R
0.04 CL
UCL = 0,06 0.03 UCL
LCL
LCL = 0 0.02
0.01
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Cp = (BSA – BSB)/6 = R-bar / d2 ,
= 0,034/2,326 = 0,01462
Cp = 1,14
Cpk = min (CPL, CPU,)
Dimana
CPL = (GT – BSB) / 3 = 0,91
CPU = (BSA – GT) / 3 = 1,37
Cpk = min (CPL,CPU)
min (0,91 : 1,37)
= 0,91
Cp pembuatan kayu lapis = 1,14 proses memiliki kapabilitas
baik untuk memenuhi spesifikasi ketebalan kayu lapis yang
diinginkan pelanggan yaitu 2,40 mm 0,05 mm. (nilai
target = 2,4 mm ; BSA = 2,45. BSB = 2,35)
Cpk = 0,91 = CPL. Hal ini berarti bahwa nilai rata2 ketebalan
kayu lapis dari proses produksi yg skrg yaitu setebal 2,39
mm adalah lebih dekat dengan batas spesifikasi bawah
BSB , sekaligus menunjukkan bahwa proses tidak mampu
memenuhi batas spesifikasi bawah (BSB = 2,35 mm). Karena
nilai CPL berada dlm kreteria CPL < 1,00 (tidak mampu
memenuhi batas spesifikasi bawah BSB). Sebaliknya CPU
1,37 menunjukkan proses sangat mampu memenuhi batas
spesifikasi atas (BSA = 2,45mm) karena nilai CPU = 1,37
berada dlm kreteria CPU > 1,33 (sangat mempu memenuhi
spesifikasi atas (BSA))
ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING
c3 c
101
c 4.04
25
4.04 3 4.04 4.04 6.03 1.99;10.07 0;10.07
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
Administrative Operations
Data/sampel no 9 ternyata berada diatas UCL,
sehingga perlu dibuang dan di bentuk UCL dan
LCL revisi
c3 c
90
c 3.75
24
3.75 3 3.75 2.059;9.559 0;9.559
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
Banking
A bank has a new vendor that does the printing of its
MICR checks. In order to certify the vendor, the bank
is undergoing incoming inspection of the checks for a
trial period. Checks are produced in batches of
32,000. The acceptance quality level (AQL) that has
been negotiated between the bank and the vendor is
0.25 %. Determine the sampling plan using
ANSI/ASQC Z1.4 if general inspection level I is
selected. Assume normal inspection is in effect.
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
Banking (solution)
The ANSI/ASQC Z1.4 standardized sampling plans for
attributes is used. From Table 9-11 for a lot size of
32,000 and general inspection level I the sample size
code letter of K and an AQL of 0.25%, the code letter
change to L with the acceptance number being 1 and
the rejection number 2. The sample size is 200. The
sampling plan calls for randomly choosing 200 checks
from the lot of 32,000. If 2 or more checks have
characters that are not recognizable by the recorder,
the lot is deemed unacceptable
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
Health Care Services
The quality of service in a hospital is kept track of by
determining the proportion of medication errors;
this is done by dividing the number of medication
errors by 1000 patient-days for each observation.
The results of 25 such observation are shown in
table, showing the percentage of medication errors.
Construct an appropriate control chart, and
comment on the quality level. Is a goal of error free
performance reasonable to expect from this system?
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
Health Care Services
Observation Percentage of Observation Percentage of
number medication number medication
1 2.6 14 2.0
2 1.9 15 4.2
3 2.8 16 2.2
4 2.9 17 1.8
5 2.4 18 2.4
6 1.8 19 2.3
7 2.3 20 1.6
8 2.1 21 1.9
9 1.4 22 2.0
10 1.7 23 2.2
11 2.2 24 2.1
12 2.0 25 2.3
13 1.2
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
54.3
p 2.17
25
p(1 p) 0.02171 0.0217
p3 0.0217 3 0.0079;0.0355
n 1000
revisi
50.1
p 2.0875 0.0209
24
p (1 p ) 0.02091 0.0209
p3 0.0209 3 0.0073;0.0345
n 1000
Applications To Various Service Functions
And Industries
Quality characteristics in health care services Method of control
-Waiting time for service Mean bar ( x ) and R
- Time to obtain an appointment chart
- Effectiveness of medicines as indicated by measures such
as temperature or blood pressure
- Time for an ambulance
- Time to be admitted in emergency room service
-Number of errors in blood or urine test per 200 samples C chart
- Number of billing errors per 100 accounts
- Number of adverse comments per week on nurses’
performance or quality of food
-Number of errors per week in deliveries to patients
-Proportion of medication cases in error P- chart
- Proportion of money payments in medication cases in
error
- Proportion of test performed incorrectly
Evaluasi Kualitas Jasa
• Tujuan evaluasi kualitas jasa adalah agar jasa yang diberikan
dapat didesain, dikendalikan dan dikelola sebagaimana halnya
dengan kualitas barang
1 3 8 3
2 1 9 1
3 4 10 0
4 2 11 1
5 3 12 2
6 0 13 1
7 2 14 2
Latihan soal
• Sebuah penerbangan melakukan upaya
mengendalikan layanan dengan mencatat rata-rata
waktu delay (satuan menit) dengan ukuran sampel 4
kali penerbangan, kemudian diperoleh data sbb:
(control chart X bar dan R)
Observation Average delay Range
number
1 6.5 2.1
2 11.1 3.8
3 18.8 4.6
4 10.2 4.2
5 5.6 4.0
6 10.4 3.6
7 9.8 4.1
QUALITY INFORMATION
SYSTEMS AND DECISIONS
Information
Data Sources Design of Needs
Data Processing
Recording
Monitoring Analysis Reporting
MANAGING THE QUALITY INFORMATION
SYSTEM
1. Structuring the Information System
Much of information is well structured and
routinized with regard to content, format,
distribution, and data base.
QUALITY DATA PROCESSING
1. Sources of Data
2. Data Collection
Kind of defect, cause for defect, location of defects
detection, weight and relative significance of defect,
evaluation of defect, cost of defect
3. Essentials of Data Monitoring and Compilation
4. Advent of Computers
COMPUTERS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Organizational Principles
• What are the needs for structure or function and specific purpose and
objective of the tasks in both the long-term and short-term
perspective?
• What are its relationships to other functions, vertically and laterally in
the hierarchical structure?
• What are the responsibilities, of the function, task, or job? How should
the job description be documented, formulated, and made acceptable
within set rules and directives?
• What are the required qualifications for the person involved in the
organizational change?
• What methods are to be employed to evaluate performance?
Designing For Quality Assurance Organization
Functional Structures
• Permanence
• Organizational units
• Scope of business
• Evolutionary stage of quality assurance
• Functional emphasis
• Organizational for maintaining control
• Degree of centralization
Designing For Quality Assurance Organization
• Organizational schemes
• Matrix Management
Quality Programs And Projects