Cultural Dimensions Malcolm Bradbury, The Social Context of Modern Literature Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972
Every so often, there occur in the arts certain severe
upheavals, which seem to affect all their products and radically change their temper. For some reason, these are often closely associated with centuries: we can sense one such change that belongs to the 18th century, which we call ‘Neo-classicism’; another associated with the nineteenth, ‘Romanticism’; and another associated with our own century for which we have no clear name but which we often regard as the most radical of all. There are, then, certain phases, often taking place over a relatively short period of time, when ‘style’ shifts and the structure of perception among artists significantly alters, and when the environment and prevailing assumptions of art are so radically recreated that it seems no longer to be witnessing to the same kind of world, or employing structure, material or language in the same way as before. D. Fokkema, E. Ibsch, Modernist Conjectures: a mainstream in European literature, 1910-1940 Palgrave Macmillan, 1988
It is also possible that the quick succession and
simultaneous development of different literary currents characteristic of modern literary history will forbid future attempts toward periodization - unless the coexistence of many different currents is considered a distinctive feature of a period. Astradur Eysteinsson, The Concept of Modernism Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1990
Modernism represents the cultural and aesthetic changes
that “took place in a tumultuous era: an era of Western imperialism, enormous advances in science and technology, world war, communist revolutions, crisis in the capitalist economy, the rise of fascism. The turmoil of the era signals in several ways the ‘creation’ of the contemporary world, and no reading of our world can overlook the way it emerged from these historical disruptions. The sweeping breadth of the concept of modernism seems to indicate that changes of enormous proportions are also seen to have occurred in literature and art.” M. H. Abrams, A Glossary of Literary Terms
a prominent feature of modernism is the phenomenon
of an avant-garde…, that is a small, self-conscious group of artists and authors who undertake, in Ezra Pound’s phrase, ‘to make it new.’ By violating accepted conventions and decorums, they undertake to create ever-new artistic forms and styles and to introduce hitherto neglected, and often forbidden, subject matters. Matei Călinescu, Five Faces of Modernity Duke University Press, 1987
In France, Italy, Spain, and other European countries the avant-garde
tends to be regarded as the most extreme form of artistic negativism – art itself being the first victim. As for modernism – it never conveys the sense of universal and hysterical negation so characteristic of the avant-garde. The anti-traditionalism of modernism is often subtly traditional. Impressionism Claude Monet – Impressions Sunrise Cubism Pablo Picasso – Les Demoiselles d’Avignon Expressionism
Edvard Munch – The Scream
Features of Modernism
◦ Break with tradition;
◦ Demise of mimesis; ◦ Autonomy of art and its divorce from truth or morality; ◦ Shift of focus from the outer to the inner world (importance attached to the unconscious); ◦ Meaning dependent on the cretor as much as on the receiver; ◦ Importance attached to form, which is the one creating meaning; ◦ Transgressing of the boundaries between genres and artistic forms.