Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R OL L NO :- M B A /2 0 1 8/ 3 73 1
IDENTIFY A COMPANY
OF YOUR CHOICE AND
LIST OUT THE CODE OF
ETHICS FOR THE SAME?
COMPANY
CODE OF ETHICS
Standard of condut
We conduct our operations with honesty, integrity and openness, and with respect for the human
rights and interests of our employees. We shall similarly respect the legitimate interests of those
with whom we have relationships.
SHAREHOLDER
Unilever will conduct its operations in accordance with internationally accepted principles of good
corporate governance.
We will provide timely, regular and reliable information on our activities, structure, financial
situation and performance to all shareholders.
BUSINESS PARTNER
Unilever is committed to establishing mutually beneficial relations with our suppliers, customers and
business partners.
In our business dealings we expect our partners to adhere to business principles consistent with our
own
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Unilever strives to be a trusted corporate citizen and, as an integral part of society, to fulfil our
responsibilities to the societies and communities in which we operate
PUBLIC ACTIVITES
Unilever companies are encouraged to promote and defend their legitimate business interests.
Unilever will co-operate with governments and other organisations, both directly and through bodies
such as trade associations, in the development of proposed legislation and other regulations which may
affect legitimate business interests.
Unilever neither supports political parties nor contributes to the funds of groups whose activities are
calculated to promote party interests.
THE ENVIRONMENT
Unilever is committed to making continuous improvements in the management of our environmental
impact and to the longer-term goal of developing a sustainable business.
Unilever will work in partnership with others to promote environmental care, increase understanding of
environmental issues and disseminate good practice.
INNOVATION
In our scientific innovation to meet consumer needs we will respect the concerns of our consumers and of
society. We will work on the basis of sound science, applying rigorous standards of product safety.
COMPETITION
Unilever believes in vigorous yet fair competition and supports the development of appropriate
competition laws. Unilever companies and employees will conduct their operations in accordance with
the principles of fair competition and all applicable regulations.
BUSINESS INTEGRITY
Unilever does not give or receive, whether directly or indirectly, bribes or other improper advantages for
business or financial gain. No employee may offer, give or receive any gift or payment which is, or may
be construed as being, a bribe. Any demand for, or offer of, a bribe must be rejected immediately and
reported to management.
Unilever accounting records and supporting documents must accurately describe and reflect the nature of
the underlying transactions. No undisclosed or unrecorded account, fund or asset will be established or
maintained.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
All Unilever employees are expected to avoid personal activities and financial interests which could conflict
with their responsibilities to the company.
Unilever employees must not seek gain for themselves or others through misuse of their positions
• 1. Frauds in the financial sector Legal authorities define fraud as a crime that “involves the use
of dishonest or deceitful conduct in order to obtain some unjust advantage over someone else”.
Frauds include:
• • Financial services sector, i.e., credit card fraud, cheque fraud and other types of identify-
related fraud;
• • Insurance fraud
• • Telecommunication-related fraud
• • Securities-related fraud
• • Computer-related fraud.
ETHICAL ISSUES IN IT
1. Privacy
• Most people have their personal data spread throughout the digital world. Even things thought
to be secure, such as email or private accounts, can be accessed by unintended sources. Most
employers actively check their employees’ computer habits. Privacy has evolving legal
implications, but there are also ethical considerations. Do people know how their accounts are
monitored? To what extent is such monitoring occurring? As Computer World points out in
this article, privacy concerns can easily become a slippery slope, slowly eroding an individual’s
right to privacy completely.
2. Digital Ownership
• Digital mediums have allowed information to flow more freely than before. This exchange of ideas
comes with a legal and ethical backlash. How can ownership be established in the digital realm?
Things can be easily copied and pasted online, which makes intellectual property hard to control.
Legal notions such as copyright have struggled to keep up with the digital era. Companies in the
music and entertainment industries have pushed for greater legal protections for intellectual
properties while other activists have sought to provide greater freedoms for the exchange of ideas in
the digital realm.
3. Access Costs
• Net neutrality has become a trendy issue thanks to legislative efforts in the last few years. The issue
of net neutrality is essentially a question of access. Proponents want the Internet to remain open to
everyone while some businesses want to create tiered access for those who are willing to pay. The
issue even extends to private Internet usage since the cost of service in some areas may be cost
prohibitive. The larger ethical question is whether or not digital exchange is now a universal right.
The cost of access can impede business growth, entrepreneurial spirit and individual expression.
• These issues are essential for everyone, but they carry extra weight for those who work with
information technology. It is important to remember that working with technology is not separated
from ethical contexts but can actually help define a legal and ethical code for generations to come.
4. Data Gathering
• On some level, everyone knows that their online lives are monitored. The United States has
even passed legislation allowing the government to actively monitor private citizens in the
name of national security. These measures have revived a debate about what information can
be gathered and why. This debate applies on a smaller scale as well because companies need to
consider what information to collect from their employees. This issue invokes a question of
consent. Do people know what information is being monitored? Do they have a right to know
how their data is being used?