Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Caption Solar Option Comparion

    Uploaded by

    Gajraj Dogra
    7 views2 pages
    The document compares three options - Capex, Opex, and PPA - for adding solar power generation capacity at an existing 11,000 KVA plant. Capex requires the largest upfront investment of $5 million but provides the highest maximum savings of $1.3 million annually. Opex has no upfront costs but moderate annual savings of $0.53 million. PPA requires the smallest investment of $0.384 million but also the lowest net savings of $0.30 million annually due to billing the existing solar generation.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    caption solar option comparion

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares three options - Capex, Opex, and PPA - for adding solar power generation capacity at an existing 11,000 KVA plant. Capex requires the largest upfront investment of $5 million but provides the highest maximum savings of $1.3 million annually. Opex has no upfront costs but moderate annual savings of $0.53 million. PPA requires the smallest investment of $0.384 million but also the lowest net savings of $0.30 million annually due to billing the existing solar generation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Caption Solar Option Comparion

    Uploaded by

    Gajraj Dogra
    The document compares three options - Capex, Opex, and PPA - for adding solar power generation capacity at an existing 11,000 KVA plant. Capex requires the largest upfront investment of $5 million but provides the highest maximum savings of $1.3 million annually. Opex has no upfront costs but moderate annual savings of $0.53 million. PPA requires the smallest investment of $0.384 million but also the lowest net savings of $0.30 million annually due to billing the existing solar generation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Solar power | Options Available KEY PLANT PARAMETERS

    Plant MD 11000 KVA


    Existing Solar 1000 KVA
    Available Limit 10000 KVA
    Incoming Feeder 132 KVA
    Terrif Plan HT - 1A

    PROS CONS
    1. Savings are Maximum 1. Need investment ( $5 M)
    2. There will be no impact on existing set-up 2. Need to utilize L-1 Area
    Capex

    1. Moderate Savings 1. Need to utilize L-1 Plot.


    2. No Investment
    Opex 3. No Impact on existing Set-up

    1. Minimum Investment. 1. Need to create a partnership company.


    2. No Land Required. 2. Existing Solar generation will be billed
    PPA 3. Minimum Savings among all options
    Power Tariff Comparison | Capex / Opex / PPA 1$ = 74.46

    Description Capex Opex PPA

    1 Landed Unit Rate ( INR/KVA) 0.27 4.5 5.6


    Average Annual Power Generation
    2 13356215 13356215 13356215
    (KVA) (15 Years)
    3 MSEB Tarriff 7.49 7.49 7.49

    4 Average Annual Savings (M$) 1.3 0.53 0.34

    5 Total Investment (M$) 5.0 00 0.384

    6 Average Annual Savings (M$) 1.3 0.53 0.34

    5 Impact on existing captive plant (M$) No Impact No Impact 0.035

    6 Net Annual Savings (M$) 1.3 0.53 0.30

    You might also like